IGF 2025 Proposed Issues
Number of contributions by:
Stakeholder Group
Government: 58
Intergovernmental Organization: 21
Civil Society: 168
Technical Community: 49
Private Sector: 56
Below are the inputs received in response to the IGF 2025 Call for Thematic Inputs. They will inform the MAG’s discussions and assist them in determining the thematic priorities of the IGF 2025 programme.
Regional Group
African Group: 132
Asia-Pacific Group: 85
Eastern Europe Group: 11
Latin American and Caribbean Group: 38
Western European and Others Group: 67
Intergovernmental Organizations: 19
ID2
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust
Civil Society
ID3
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Civil Society
ID4
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Private Sector
ID5
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development
Do events to raise awareness
A mix of lightning talks, long talks, panels and gamefication
Civil Society
ID6
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Technical and Operational Topics
Technical Community
ID7
Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF annual meeting and inter-sessional work can better contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes by fostering multi-stakeholder dialogue, ensuring inclusivity, collaboration and the alignment of discussions with actionable global digital goals.
Building on my experience in Internet governance, I propose a more inclusive, open and innovative approach to the IGF format. Imagine we are Integrating transverse themes like accessibility, digital inclusion, and virtual sustainability into thematic tracks can as well ensure no stakeholder group is left behind. Sessions could adopt interactive formats such as breakout groups or hands-on workshops, tailored to address regional challenges and amplify underrepresented voices. Incorporating storytelling elements to highlight real-world impacts, especially from marginalized communities, would make the discussions relatable and actionable.
Civil Society
ID8
Digital Cooperation, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
1. Integrating Themes and Priorities
Global Digital Compact Alignment: The IGF can explicitly align its annual themes and sub-themes with the principles and objectives outlined in the GDC, such as digital inclusion, internet governance, data protection, and ethical AI use.
WSIS Outcomes Review: Incorporate dedicated sessions to assess progress on WSIS action lines, emphasizing how IGF discussions contribute to achieving specific goals (e.g., bridging the digital divide or ensuring inclusive digital development).
2. Strengthening Intersessional Work
Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions: Enhance the scope of IGF Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks to tackle key GDC and WSIS areas, such as trust and security, universal connectivity, and capacity-building.
Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Develop BPFs focused on actionable recommendations for achieving the WSIS outcomes and GDC goals. For instance, a BPF on equitable internet access or ethical AI implementation.
3. Engaging with High-Level Stakeholders
Governments and Intergovernmental Organizations: Foster greater participation from governments and UN entities, ensuring their involvement in framing and advancing GDC and WSIS-related discussions.
Private Sector and Civil Society: Actively involve private-sector leaders and civil society groups to bring diverse perspectives and innovative solutions to the table.
4. Facilitating Measurement and Monitoring
Data and Progress Tracking: Use IGF sessions to review and share progress metrics related to WSIS action lines and the GDC’s principles, leveraging input from diverse stakeholders.
Reporting Contributions: Produce an annual IGF outcome document or report explicitly addressing how discussions contribute to WSIS and GDC objectives, linking them to measurable impacts.
5. Promoting Cross-Sectoral Collaboration
Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Use the IGF to launch and support multi-stakeholder partnerships that operationalize GDC and WSIS objectives, such as fostering public-private collaborations for internet infrastructure development.
Regional Engagement: Encourage regional IGF initiatives to align with these global goals, ensuring context-specific contributions to the broader agenda.
6. Preparatory and Follow-Up Activities for 2025
Dedicated Tracks: Organize tracks at the IGF annual meetings in 2024 and 2025 focused on preparing for the high-level meeting on WSIS outcomes and advancing the GDC.
High-Level Dialogue: Engage with UN leadership and WSIS stakeholders during IGF meetings to create actionable roadmaps leading up to the 2025 high-level review.
By tailoring its activities to align with the GDC and WSIS goals, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing digital inclusion, fostering sustainable digital development, and addressing emerging global challenges in internet governance.
Global Digital Compact Alignment: The IGF can explicitly align its annual themes and sub-themes with the principles and objectives outlined in the GDC, such as digital inclusion, internet governance, data protection, and ethical AI use.
WSIS Outcomes Review: Incorporate dedicated sessions to assess progress on WSIS action lines, emphasizing how IGF discussions contribute to achieving specific goals (e.g., bridging the digital divide or ensuring inclusive digital development).
2. Strengthening Intersessional Work
Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions: Enhance the scope of IGF Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks to tackle key GDC and WSIS areas, such as trust and security, universal connectivity, and capacity-building.
Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Develop BPFs focused on actionable recommendations for achieving the WSIS outcomes and GDC goals. For instance, a BPF on equitable internet access or ethical AI implementation.
3. Engaging with High-Level Stakeholders
Governments and Intergovernmental Organizations: Foster greater participation from governments and UN entities, ensuring their involvement in framing and advancing GDC and WSIS-related discussions.
Private Sector and Civil Society: Actively involve private-sector leaders and civil society groups to bring diverse perspectives and innovative solutions to the table.
4. Facilitating Measurement and Monitoring
Data and Progress Tracking: Use IGF sessions to review and share progress metrics related to WSIS action lines and the GDC’s principles, leveraging input from diverse stakeholders.
Reporting Contributions: Produce an annual IGF outcome document or report explicitly addressing how discussions contribute to WSIS and GDC objectives, linking them to measurable impacts.
5. Promoting Cross-Sectoral Collaboration
Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Use the IGF to launch and support multi-stakeholder partnerships that operationalize GDC and WSIS objectives, such as fostering public-private collaborations for internet infrastructure development.
Regional Engagement: Encourage regional IGF initiatives to align with these global goals, ensuring context-specific contributions to the broader agenda.
6. Preparatory and Follow-Up Activities for 2025
Dedicated Tracks: Organize tracks at the IGF annual meetings in 2024 and 2025 focused on preparing for the high-level meeting on WSIS outcomes and advancing the GDC.
High-Level Dialogue: Engage with UN leadership and WSIS stakeholders during IGF meetings to create actionable roadmaps leading up to the 2025 high-level review.
By tailoring its activities to align with the GDC and WSIS goals, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing digital inclusion, fostering sustainable digital development, and addressing emerging global challenges in internet governance.
To enhance the impact and inclusiveness of the UN Internet Governance Forum (IGF), its format and design can be reimagined to better align with its goals of multi-stakeholder collaboration, inclusivity, and actionable outcomes. Below are some ideas for improving its overall structure:
1. Thematic Tracks with Clear, Action-Oriented Focus
Fewer, Focused Tracks: Reduce the number of thematic tracks to 4–5 key global priorities, such as:
Universal Connectivity and Digital Inclusion
Data Governance and Privacy
Cybersecurity and Trust
AI, Ethics, and Emerging Technologies
Digital Economy and Human Rights
Cross-Cutting Themes: Embed cross-cutting issues (e.g., gender equity, environmental sustainability, and youth participation) into every track.
Outcome-Oriented Themes: Each track should culminate in a set of actionable recommendations or a policy framework to guide stakeholders.
2. Multi-Tier Session Design
Plenary Discussions: High-level panels featuring key policymakers, tech leaders, and civil society representatives, focusing on overarching themes and global challenges.
Interactive Workshops: Smaller, practical sessions designed for collaborative problem-solving or skill-building within specific tracks.
Roundtables: Stakeholder-specific discussions (e.g., governments, private sector, youth, civil society) to address unique perspectives and priorities within the thematic framework.
Lightning Talks: Short, TED-style presentations by innovators, youth, or marginalized groups to spotlight novel ideas or local challenges.
3. Pre-IGF Consultations and Post-IGF Engagement
Pre-Forum Dialogue: Organize online consultations or town hall-style meetings months in advance to gather inputs from all regions and stakeholder groups, ensuring the agenda reflects diverse concerns.
Living Agenda: Allow real-time adjustments to the agenda based on new developments or participant contributions during the forum.
Post-Forum Tracks: Maintain engagement through IGF Dynamic Coalitions or Policy Networks to implement outcomes and monitor progress.
4. Inclusion of Regional Perspectives
Regional IGF Alignment: Dedicate sessions for regional IGF initiatives to share insights and best practices, ensuring they are reflected in the global discussions.
Localized Breakout Groups: Organize sessions focused on specific regional challenges (e.g., small island states, landlocked countries, or conflict zones) to build targeted solutions.
5. Innovative Formats for Engagement
Simulated Negotiations: Role-playing sessions where stakeholders simulate treaty or policy negotiations on contentious topics like cross-border data flows or AI ethics.
Hackathons or Labs: Interactive spaces where participants co-create tools, frameworks, or prototypes to address pressing digital issues.
Youth Takeovers: Entire sessions or a thematic day led by young participants, offering fresh perspectives on governance challenges.
1. Thematic Tracks with Clear, Action-Oriented Focus
Fewer, Focused Tracks: Reduce the number of thematic tracks to 4–5 key global priorities, such as:
Universal Connectivity and Digital Inclusion
Data Governance and Privacy
Cybersecurity and Trust
AI, Ethics, and Emerging Technologies
Digital Economy and Human Rights
Cross-Cutting Themes: Embed cross-cutting issues (e.g., gender equity, environmental sustainability, and youth participation) into every track.
Outcome-Oriented Themes: Each track should culminate in a set of actionable recommendations or a policy framework to guide stakeholders.
2. Multi-Tier Session Design
Plenary Discussions: High-level panels featuring key policymakers, tech leaders, and civil society representatives, focusing on overarching themes and global challenges.
Interactive Workshops: Smaller, practical sessions designed for collaborative problem-solving or skill-building within specific tracks.
Roundtables: Stakeholder-specific discussions (e.g., governments, private sector, youth, civil society) to address unique perspectives and priorities within the thematic framework.
Lightning Talks: Short, TED-style presentations by innovators, youth, or marginalized groups to spotlight novel ideas or local challenges.
3. Pre-IGF Consultations and Post-IGF Engagement
Pre-Forum Dialogue: Organize online consultations or town hall-style meetings months in advance to gather inputs from all regions and stakeholder groups, ensuring the agenda reflects diverse concerns.
Living Agenda: Allow real-time adjustments to the agenda based on new developments or participant contributions during the forum.
Post-Forum Tracks: Maintain engagement through IGF Dynamic Coalitions or Policy Networks to implement outcomes and monitor progress.
4. Inclusion of Regional Perspectives
Regional IGF Alignment: Dedicate sessions for regional IGF initiatives to share insights and best practices, ensuring they are reflected in the global discussions.
Localized Breakout Groups: Organize sessions focused on specific regional challenges (e.g., small island states, landlocked countries, or conflict zones) to build targeted solutions.
5. Innovative Formats for Engagement
Simulated Negotiations: Role-playing sessions where stakeholders simulate treaty or policy negotiations on contentious topics like cross-border data flows or AI ethics.
Hackathons or Labs: Interactive spaces where participants co-create tools, frameworks, or prototypes to address pressing digital issues.
Youth Takeovers: Entire sessions or a thematic day led by young participants, offering fresh perspectives on governance challenges.
Civil Society
ID9
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID10
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Child online safety, Hate speech, including against women and vulnerable groups, Trust and accountability measures
Host open forums for peer-to-peer learning on emerging technologies, with a focus on co-developing solutions for digital inclusion, AI ethics, and cybersecurity risks, also another creative way is to host portions of the IGF annual meeting in virtual reality to provide a more immersive and interactive experience. This can facilitate deeper engagement and foster a sense of presence among participants from around the world, breaking down geographical barriers.
Not certain if there is anything more that can be done.
I love the current format, like the IGF 2024, it is very holistic.
Civil Society
ID11
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Resource Allocation: Ensure adequate resources are allocated to support the participation of stakeholders from the Global South and other underrepresented regions1.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in aligning with major global initiatives and agendas. Here are some ways the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes:
1. Integration of Key Themes
Digital Inclusion: Focus on bridging the digital divide by promoting policies and initiatives that ensure equitable access to digital technologies for all, especially marginalized communities1.
Human Rights: Emphasize the protection of human rights in the digital space, ensuring that digital technologies are used to enhance freedoms and privacy2.
Sustainable Development: Align discussions and actions with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), highlighting how digital technologies can drive progress in areas like education, healthcare, and economic growth1.
2. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Engagement: Foster collaboration among governments, private sector, civil society, and international organizations to create a comprehensive and inclusive digital governance framework2.
Advisory Bodies: Utilize high-level advisory bodies and expert groups to provide strategic guidance and innovative solutions for digital governance challenges1.
3. Policy Development and Implementation
Frameworks and Guidelines: Develop and promote frameworks and guidelines that support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact, ensuring they are adaptable to different regional and national contexts1.
Best Practices: Share and disseminate best practices and successful case studies from various regions to inspire and guide effective digital governance2.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation
Progress Tracking: Establish mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the progress of initiatives related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, ensuring accountability and continuous improvement2.
Feedback Loops: Create channels for stakeholders to provide feedback on the implementation process, allowing for adjustments and refinements based on real-world experiences1.
5. Capacity Building
Training and Education: Offer capacity-building programs and workshops to enhance the skills and knowledge of stakeholders involved in digital governance2.
1. Integration of Key Themes
Digital Inclusion: Focus on bridging the digital divide by promoting policies and initiatives that ensure equitable access to digital technologies for all, especially marginalized communities1.
Human Rights: Emphasize the protection of human rights in the digital space, ensuring that digital technologies are used to enhance freedoms and privacy2.
Sustainable Development: Align discussions and actions with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), highlighting how digital technologies can drive progress in areas like education, healthcare, and economic growth1.
2. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Engagement: Foster collaboration among governments, private sector, civil society, and international organizations to create a comprehensive and inclusive digital governance framework2.
Advisory Bodies: Utilize high-level advisory bodies and expert groups to provide strategic guidance and innovative solutions for digital governance challenges1.
3. Policy Development and Implementation
Frameworks and Guidelines: Develop and promote frameworks and guidelines that support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact, ensuring they are adaptable to different regional and national contexts1.
Best Practices: Share and disseminate best practices and successful case studies from various regions to inspire and guide effective digital governance2.
4. Monitoring and Evaluation
Progress Tracking: Establish mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the progress of initiatives related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, ensuring accountability and continuous improvement2.
Feedback Loops: Create channels for stakeholders to provide feedback on the implementation process, allowing for adjustments and refinements based on real-world experiences1.
5. Capacity Building
Training and Education: Offer capacity-building programs and workshops to enhance the skills and knowledge of stakeholders involved in digital governance2.
By focusing on these areas, the IGF can significantly contribute to the successful implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ultimately fostering a more inclusive, equitable, and sustainable digital future
Civil Society
ID12
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
We must amplify youth voices and ensuring their active participation in decision-making processes, particularly on issues such as AI governance and digital inclusion. We also need to see to it that we are prioritizing the integration of regional insights into global frameworks, ensuring diverse perspectives are represented, particularly from Africa and other underserved regions.
The IGF and intersessional work should prioritize amplifying youth voices, integrating regional perspectives, and fostering multistakeholder collaboration to advance the GDC and WSIS+20 outcomes. This includes ensuring meaningful youth participation in digital governance, leveraging regional insights like Africa’s focus on digital sovereignty and connectivity, and aligning themes with WSIS+20 priorities. Capacity-building efforts, follow-up mechanisms to track progress, and actionable recommendations are essential to drive inclusivity, sustainability, and measurable impact.
1.Why not introducing dedicated youth tracks in all thematic areas, ensuring intergenerational dialogue on critical digital issues.
2. Foster regional IGFs’ contributions by allocating specific plenary sessions to present local solutions that could influence global strategies.
3. Strengthen hybrid participation models.
4. We could alos promote continuous dialogue through regular "mini IGFs" or follow-up consultations throughout the year to ensure continuity and impact beyond the annual event.
2. Foster regional IGFs’ contributions by allocating specific plenary sessions to present local solutions that could influence global strategies.
3. Strengthen hybrid participation models.
4. We could alos promote continuous dialogue through regular "mini IGFs" or follow-up consultations throughout the year to ensure continuity and impact beyond the annual event.
Civil Society
ID13
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
,
,
1. Integrate Global Digital Compact themes: Incorporate the Compact's focus areas, such as digital cooperation, digital inclusion, and digital capacity building, into IGF session topics and agendas.
2. WSIS review and implementation: Dedicate sessions to reviewing progress, challenges, and best practices in implementing WSIS outcomes, and identify areas for improvement.
3. Multi-stakeholder engagement: Foster collaboration among governments, international organizations, civil society, private sector, and technical communities to ensure diverse perspectives and expertise.
4. Showcase successful initiatives: Highlight successful projects, initiatives, and policies that align with the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, to encourage knowledge sharing and replication.
5. Inform the 2025 high-level meeting: Ensure that IGF outputs, such as session reports and recommendations, inform the preparations for the 2025 high-level meeting, reviewing the overall implementation of WSIS outcomes.
By taking these steps, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ultimately advancing the United Nations' sustainable development goals.
2. WSIS review and implementation: Dedicate sessions to reviewing progress, challenges, and best practices in implementing WSIS outcomes, and identify areas for improvement.
3. Multi-stakeholder engagement: Foster collaboration among governments, international organizations, civil society, private sector, and technical communities to ensure diverse perspectives and expertise.
4. Showcase successful initiatives: Highlight successful projects, initiatives, and policies that align with the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, to encourage knowledge sharing and replication.
5. Inform the 2025 high-level meeting: Ensure that IGF outputs, such as session reports and recommendations, inform the preparations for the 2025 high-level meeting, reviewing the overall implementation of WSIS outcomes.
By taking these steps, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ultimately advancing the United Nations' sustainable development goals.
Civil Society
ID14
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
FGI peut contribué en donnant la parole a tout les participants désirant a émettre un avis sur les différents thématique et en tenant en compte la contribution de se dernier
tenir en compte les différentes langue des porteurs des résolutions des pistes thématiques en donnant la parole a tout les monde porteurs d'une résolution
Civil Society
ID15
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Technical Community
ID16
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Excellent work
Civil Society
ID17
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID18
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Government
ID19
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
Intergovernmental Organization
ID20
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID21
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF processes must out actionable checklist to show how far their conversation around all the various policy framework has been. It will help us track and improve the outcome through a measurement processes.
There must be a collaborative relationship with technical team who understands the Internet Governance processes and help support Hybrid system. Also analytical view of themes can be shared for user presentation.
Technical Community
ID22
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Private Sector
ID23
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID24
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
To better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the global digital pact and the examination of the overall implementation of the results of the WSIS:
it is imperative to apply the recommendations and suggestions defined in the IGF report above by all multi-stakeholder actors.
it is imperative to apply the recommendations and suggestions defined in the IGF report above by all multi-stakeholder actors.
NA
Civil Society
ID25
Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
The IGF has been very effective in bringing all stakeholders together to discuss issues related to Internet governance. While the Global Digital Compact (GDC) process was inclusive, it at some point lacked equal engagement from certain stakeholder groups, such as the technical community, civil society, and youth, compared to government, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), and the private sector.
I believe that the IGF, along with its intersessional and NRI activities, has much to contribute to the implementation of the GDC and the WSIS+20 review. It is important for the IGF to amplify its stakeholder engagement, underrepresented groups and youth participation, capacity building and recommendations this year. There should be a strong call for the renewal and strengthening of the IGF's mandate, as it remains a vital and relevant platform for discussing all matters related to digital technologies.
I believe that the IGF, along with its intersessional and NRI activities, has much to contribute to the implementation of the GDC and the WSIS+20 review. It is important for the IGF to amplify its stakeholder engagement, underrepresented groups and youth participation, capacity building and recommendations this year. There should be a strong call for the renewal and strengthening of the IGF's mandate, as it remains a vital and relevant platform for discussing all matters related to digital technologies.
Technical Community
ID26
Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Les changements climatiques sont des défis majeurs pour le monde, affectant la sécurité alimentaire, l'accès à l'eau et la stabilité de monde rural. L'Internet peut jouer un rôle essentiel dans la sensibilisation, la surveillance et la gestion des effets des changements climatiques, ainsi que dans la promotion de pratiques durables. Moi fils du sahel, en ce qui concerne la cyber sécurité et le discours de haine, notamment contre les femmes et les groupes vulnérables, mon choix est également basé sur l'information et la formation. Les médias sociaux et les plateformes en ligne peuvent être des vecteurs de discours de haine et de désinformation, contribuant à la violence et aux conflits. Il est donc important de promouvoir des politiques et des pratiques qui luttent contre ces formes de cyber violence et de discrimination en ligne.
Enfin, l'accès universel à Internet et la connectivité significative pour les groupes marginalisés et vulnérables est essentiel pour garantir que personne ne soit laissé pour compte dans la société numérique. En tant que défenseur de l'inclusion numérique, ma contribution thématique est capitale pour garantir que les populations vulnérables du monde aient accès aux outils nécessaires pour faire face aux défis sociaux, économiques et environnementaux auxquels sont confrontés.
Enfin, l'accès universel à Internet et la connectivité significative pour les groupes marginalisés et vulnérables est essentiel pour garantir que personne ne soit laissé pour compte dans la société numérique. En tant que défenseur de l'inclusion numérique, ma contribution thématique est capitale pour garantir que les populations vulnérables du monde aient accès aux outils nécessaires pour faire face aux défis sociaux, économiques et environnementaux auxquels sont confrontés.
La réunion annuelle du Forum de la gouvernance de l'Internet (FGI) et ses travaux intersessions peuvent jouer un rôle important pour mieux refléter et contribuer à la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et à l'examen de la mise en œuvre globale des résultats du Sommet mondial sur la société de l'information (SMSI) en vue de la réunion de haut niveau prévue fin 2025 de plusieurs manières:
Le FGI offre une plateforme unique pour faciliter les dialogues multipartites entre différentes parties prenantes, y compris les gouvernements, les entreprises, la société civile et les organisations internationales.
Le FGI permet aux participants de partager des expériences, des bonnes pratiques et des leçons apprises dans le domaine de la gouvernance de l'Internet.
Le FGI peut aider à identifier les lacunes et les besoins en matière de gouvernance de l'Internet pour la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et des résultats du SMSI.
le FGI peut jouer un rôle important pour soutenir la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et l'examen de la mise en œuvre globale des résultats du SMSI en permettant le dialogue, le partage de connaissances et en facilitant l'identification des lacunes et des besoins en matière de gouvernance de l'Internet. Sa réunion annuelle et ses travaux intersessions peuvent ainsi contribuer de manière significative à la réalisation des objectifs du Pacte numérique mondial et du SMSI.
Le FGI offre une plateforme unique pour faciliter les dialogues multipartites entre différentes parties prenantes, y compris les gouvernements, les entreprises, la société civile et les organisations internationales.
Le FGI permet aux participants de partager des expériences, des bonnes pratiques et des leçons apprises dans le domaine de la gouvernance de l'Internet.
Le FGI peut aider à identifier les lacunes et les besoins en matière de gouvernance de l'Internet pour la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et des résultats du SMSI.
le FGI peut jouer un rôle important pour soutenir la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et l'examen de la mise en œuvre globale des résultats du SMSI en permettant le dialogue, le partage de connaissances et en facilitant l'identification des lacunes et des besoins en matière de gouvernance de l'Internet. Sa réunion annuelle et ses travaux intersessions peuvent ainsi contribuer de manière significative à la réalisation des objectifs du Pacte numérique mondial et du SMSI.
pour améliorer le format et la conception de l'IGF, je propose :
Créer des sessions où les participants peuvent interagir directement, poser des questions en temps réel et contribuer activement à la discussion;
Assurer une représentation diversifiée des perspectives et des acteurs impliqués dans le débat sur la gouvernance d'Internet, en incluant des voix sous-représentées telles que les femmes, les jeunes et les pays en développement, augmenter surtout l'appui de participation des pays en sous-développement.
Aborder des sujets novateurs et en évolution rapide tels que l'intelligence artificielle, la blockchain, la protection des données et la cybersécurité;
Encourager la participation des jeunes et des parties prenantes non traditionnelles.
Créer des sessions où les participants peuvent interagir directement, poser des questions en temps réel et contribuer activement à la discussion;
Assurer une représentation diversifiée des perspectives et des acteurs impliqués dans le débat sur la gouvernance d'Internet, en incluant des voix sous-représentées telles que les femmes, les jeunes et les pays en développement, augmenter surtout l'appui de participation des pays en sous-développement.
Aborder des sujets novateurs et en évolution rapide tels que l'intelligence artificielle, la blockchain, la protection des données et la cybersécurité;
Encourager la participation des jeunes et des parties prenantes non traditionnelles.
Civil Society
ID27
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Government
ID28
Private Sector
ID29
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms
Private Sector
ID30
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Gostaria também que refletirmos sobre a justiça climática no mundo
Civil Society
ID31
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Thematic Area: Cybersecurity and Trust
Issue: Tech-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence
How can international cooperation and governance frameworks, such as the draft UN Cybercrime Convention, better address emerging TFGBV threats like deepfakes, sextortion, and non-consensual intimate image abuse (NCII)?
What role should tech companies play in preventing TFGBV, and how can the adoption of tools like StopNCII.org and proactive AI-driven solutions be incentivized globally?
How can we ensure that cybersecurity policies explicitly address the disproportionate impact of TFGBV on women and marginalized groups, incorporating victim-centered approaches into these frameworks?
Thematic Area: Artificial Intelligence
Issue: Ethical AI Implementation in Gender-Based Violence Prevention
What ethical considerations should guide the development of AI tools for detecting and preventing TFGBV, such as NCII and deepfake creation?
How can AI solutions balance the need for accurate identification of harmful content while protecting privacy and avoiding biases that may exclude underrepresented demographics?
What mechanisms can be implemented to foster trust in AI-driven TFGBV solutions, including transparency, third-party audits, and survivor-informed design processes?
Thematic Area: Rights and Freedoms
Issue: Digital Gender Equality and Safety
How can international human rights frameworks evolve to better protect individuals from TFGBV in the digital sphere, and what role can IGF play in advancing these discussions?
What strategies can ensure survivors of TFGBV have access to justice and digital safety, regardless of their geographical or socioeconomic circumstances?
How can advocacy for digital rights intersect with gender equality movements to ensure comprehensive and inclusive online safety strategies?
Issue: Tech-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence
How can international cooperation and governance frameworks, such as the draft UN Cybercrime Convention, better address emerging TFGBV threats like deepfakes, sextortion, and non-consensual intimate image abuse (NCII)?
What role should tech companies play in preventing TFGBV, and how can the adoption of tools like StopNCII.org and proactive AI-driven solutions be incentivized globally?
How can we ensure that cybersecurity policies explicitly address the disproportionate impact of TFGBV on women and marginalized groups, incorporating victim-centered approaches into these frameworks?
Thematic Area: Artificial Intelligence
Issue: Ethical AI Implementation in Gender-Based Violence Prevention
What ethical considerations should guide the development of AI tools for detecting and preventing TFGBV, such as NCII and deepfake creation?
How can AI solutions balance the need for accurate identification of harmful content while protecting privacy and avoiding biases that may exclude underrepresented demographics?
What mechanisms can be implemented to foster trust in AI-driven TFGBV solutions, including transparency, third-party audits, and survivor-informed design processes?
Thematic Area: Rights and Freedoms
Issue: Digital Gender Equality and Safety
How can international human rights frameworks evolve to better protect individuals from TFGBV in the digital sphere, and what role can IGF play in advancing these discussions?
What strategies can ensure survivors of TFGBV have access to justice and digital safety, regardless of their geographical or socioeconomic circumstances?
How can advocacy for digital rights intersect with gender equality movements to ensure comprehensive and inclusive online safety strategies?
In the lead-up to the 2025 World Summit on the Information Society review, what measures can be introduced to ensure that digital gender-based violence prevention remains a key consideration in global ICT development policies?
Suggestions for Format and Design of IGF 2025:
Thematic Tracks: Introduce a dedicated track on Tech-Facilitated Violence and Digital Safety, covering emerging threats, ethical innovations, and survivor-led policy development.
Workshops: Include survivor and advocate-led workshops to center lived experiences in policy recommendations.
Intersessional Work: Develop focused multistakeholder working groups addressing TFGBV and presenting actionable outputs at the IGF annual meeting.
Suggestions for Format and Design of IGF 2025:
Thematic Tracks: Introduce a dedicated track on Tech-Facilitated Violence and Digital Safety, covering emerging threats, ethical innovations, and survivor-led policy development.
Workshops: Include survivor and advocate-led workshops to center lived experiences in policy recommendations.
Intersessional Work: Develop focused multistakeholder working groups addressing TFGBV and presenting actionable outputs at the IGF annual meeting.
Civil Society
ID32
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Technical Community
ID33
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Digital ethics, International cooperation on data
IGF can develop a metric template that will be use to measure the performance of the different regions and countries on Global Digital Compact at its meetings.
Civil Society
ID34
Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms
" Internet Governance a key to reach sustainable development goals".
Workshops to increase interactions.
Government
ID35
Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
EDUCATE KIDS TO THE FUTURE OF INTERNET
AS I SAID IN THE OTHER FORM
WE NEED TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE ON THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. PERIOD
(NO MORE ETERNAL MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES AND TALKING TALKING TALKING )
PROF OF WORK
SHOW ME RESULT
I CAN LEAD THE UN AND IGF TO GET THIS.
UN AND IGF NEEDS INNOVATION.
THAT'S BITCOIN. THAT'S CRYPTO. THAT'S AI
I HAVE A BRILLIANT MIND TEAM OF DEVS WORKING TO THE NEXT PROTOCOL FOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
WE THE PEOPLE OWN THE INTERNET.
CONTACT ME. I HAVE WHAT THE UN NEEDS.
WE NEED TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE ON THE UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY. PERIOD
(NO MORE ETERNAL MEETINGS AND CONFERENCES AND TALKING TALKING TALKING )
PROF OF WORK
SHOW ME RESULT
I CAN LEAD THE UN AND IGF TO GET THIS.
UN AND IGF NEEDS INNOVATION.
THAT'S BITCOIN. THAT'S CRYPTO. THAT'S AI
I HAVE A BRILLIANT MIND TEAM OF DEVS WORKING TO THE NEXT PROTOCOL FOR THE SOCIAL MEDIA.
WE THE PEOPLE OWN THE INTERNET.
CONTACT ME. I HAVE WHAT THE UN NEEDS.
YES
I FOUNDED BITCOIN BANK ( AKA INTERNET BANK ) THIS IS THE FUND THAT G7 AND THE UN NEEDS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE.
NEW CRYPTO FINANCIAL SYSTEM. ( BITCOIN )
BUILT OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING.
CHECK IT OUT:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nnWWCamxScF6oE2LdC8fWVX84yC9aj4thhxj9_ihrwY/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/196gtWfT2QS2JPgCIoM2pBeMoBn0d0ZtuGjp4GnaqXuk/edit?usp=sharing
I FOUNDED BITCOIN BANK ( AKA INTERNET BANK ) THIS IS THE FUND THAT G7 AND THE UN NEEDS FOR CLIMATE CHANGE.
NEW CRYPTO FINANCIAL SYSTEM. ( BITCOIN )
BUILT OPEN SOURCE EVERYTHING.
CHECK IT OUT:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nnWWCamxScF6oE2LdC8fWVX84yC9aj4thhxj9_ihrwY/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/196gtWfT2QS2JPgCIoM2pBeMoBn0d0ZtuGjp4GnaqXuk/edit?usp=sharing
Intergovernmental Organization
ID36
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The IGF can better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes by:
1. Thematic Alignment: Focus annual meeting themes and intersessional work on GDC priorities and WSIS review areas.
2. Multistakeholder Engagement: Ensure diverse participation and capacity building, especially for developing countries.
3. Policy Outputs: Use intersessional activities to generate actionable recommendations for the GDC and WSIS+20 review.
1. Thematic Alignment: Focus annual meeting themes and intersessional work on GDC priorities and WSIS review areas.
2. Multistakeholder Engagement: Ensure diverse participation and capacity building, especially for developing countries.
3. Policy Outputs: Use intersessional activities to generate actionable recommendations for the GDC and WSIS+20 review.
The overall format and design of the IGF can be optimized to ensure broader participation, more actionable outcomes, and a better focus on priority themes. Here are some ideas:
1. Dynamic Thematic Tracks: Focus on evolving priorities with actionable outcomes.
2. Year-Round Engagement: Use virtual working groups and regional IGF contributions to shape annual discussions.
3. Interactive Formats: Include collaborative labs and debate forums to foster active participation.
4. Capacity Building: Dedicate sessions to empower underrepresented groups.
5. Outcome-Focused Reports: Ensure all sessions generate concise, actionable recommendations.
1. Dynamic Thematic Tracks: Focus on evolving priorities with actionable outcomes.
2. Year-Round Engagement: Use virtual working groups and regional IGF contributions to shape annual discussions.
3. Interactive Formats: Include collaborative labs and debate forums to foster active participation.
4. Capacity Building: Dedicate sessions to empower underrepresented groups.
5. Outcome-Focused Reports: Ensure all sessions generate concise, actionable recommendations.
Technical Community
ID37
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
1. Emerging Technologies and Internet Governance
AI and Machine Learning: Policies to govern ethical use of AI on the internet.
Blockchain in Internet Governance: Transparency, security, and decentralization implications.
Quantum Computing and Cryptography: Preparing for the future of internet security.
2. Sustainability and Green Internet
Energy Efficiency of Data Centers: Reducing the carbon footprint of the internet.
E-Waste Management: Strategies to minimize electronic waste generated by internet-enabled devices.
Green Networking: Renewable energy for internet infrastructure.
Global Collaboration on Governance Models
Multistakeholder Models: Exploring successes and challenges.
Role of International Organizations: Ensuring coordination between global entities like ITU and IGF.
Regional Collaboration: Case studies of successful regional internet governance.
3. Cultural and Ethical Dimensions of the Internet
Preserving Cultural Heritage Online: Digitization and protection of cultural assets.
Ethical Use of Data: Avoiding exploitation in developing regions.
Content Moderation Standards: Balancing cultural sensitivity with global standards.
4. Resilience and Preparedness
Disaster Recovery for Internet Infrastructure: Ensuring continuity during crises.
Global Health Crises: Leveraging internet governance during pandemics or other emergencies.
Resilience Against Disinformation: Building trust in online platforms.
AI and Machine Learning: Policies to govern ethical use of AI on the internet.
Blockchain in Internet Governance: Transparency, security, and decentralization implications.
Quantum Computing and Cryptography: Preparing for the future of internet security.
2. Sustainability and Green Internet
Energy Efficiency of Data Centers: Reducing the carbon footprint of the internet.
E-Waste Management: Strategies to minimize electronic waste generated by internet-enabled devices.
Green Networking: Renewable energy for internet infrastructure.
Global Collaboration on Governance Models
Multistakeholder Models: Exploring successes and challenges.
Role of International Organizations: Ensuring coordination between global entities like ITU and IGF.
Regional Collaboration: Case studies of successful regional internet governance.
3. Cultural and Ethical Dimensions of the Internet
Preserving Cultural Heritage Online: Digitization and protection of cultural assets.
Ethical Use of Data: Avoiding exploitation in developing regions.
Content Moderation Standards: Balancing cultural sensitivity with global standards.
4. Resilience and Preparedness
Disaster Recovery for Internet Infrastructure: Ensuring continuity during crises.
Global Health Crises: Leveraging internet governance during pandemics or other emergencies.
Resilience Against Disinformation: Building trust in online platforms.
The IGF can play a pivotal role in aligning its annual meetings and intersessional activities with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes. Here are actionable suggestions to ensure meaningful contributions and alignment:
1. Strategic Integration of the Global Digital Compact Goals
Thematic Focus: Incorporate GDC priorities into the annual meeting agenda and intersessional workstreams, such as digital inclusion, ethical AI, and data privacy.
Dedicated Sessions: Host dedicated discussions or workshops on how stakeholders can collaborate to implement the GDC at local, regional, and global levels.
Progress Tracking: Use the IGF platform to monitor and report progress on the GDC commitments.
2. Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Stakeholder Dialogues: Promote collaboration between governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities to address gaps in WSIS implementation.
Case Studies and Best Practices: Encourage stakeholders to present case studies on successful implementations of WSIS outcomes or related initiatives.
Capacity Building: Organize training and capacity-building programs aligned with WSIS and GDC goals.
3. Alignment with WSIS+20 Preparations
Targeted Policy Recommendations: Leverage the IGF's policy networks and intersessional activities to develop actionable recommendations for the WSIS+20 review.
Mapping Contributions: Create a framework to map IGF outcomes to the WSIS action lines and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Engagement with UN Processes: Strengthen coordination with UN DESA and other bodies to ensure IGF outputs are reflected in WSIS+20 and GDC discussions.
Strengthening Outcome Relevance
Concrete Deliverables: Ensure IGF outcomes include specific, actionable proposals that directly contribute to GDC and WSIS implementation.
Follow-Up Mechanisms: Develop follow-up mechanisms to track how IGF recommendations are implemented at national and international levels.
Stakeholder Accountability: Encourage stakeholders to report back on their commitments made during IGF sessions.
The IGF’s multi-stakeholder model, its convening power, and its ability to synthesize diverse perspectives uniquely position it to support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes effectively. By aligning its activities with these global initiatives, the IGF can solidify its role as a catalyst for inclusive and sustainable digital governance.
1. Strategic Integration of the Global Digital Compact Goals
Thematic Focus: Incorporate GDC priorities into the annual meeting agenda and intersessional workstreams, such as digital inclusion, ethical AI, and data privacy.
Dedicated Sessions: Host dedicated discussions or workshops on how stakeholders can collaborate to implement the GDC at local, regional, and global levels.
Progress Tracking: Use the IGF platform to monitor and report progress on the GDC commitments.
2. Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Stakeholder Dialogues: Promote collaboration between governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities to address gaps in WSIS implementation.
Case Studies and Best Practices: Encourage stakeholders to present case studies on successful implementations of WSIS outcomes or related initiatives.
Capacity Building: Organize training and capacity-building programs aligned with WSIS and GDC goals.
3. Alignment with WSIS+20 Preparations
Targeted Policy Recommendations: Leverage the IGF's policy networks and intersessional activities to develop actionable recommendations for the WSIS+20 review.
Mapping Contributions: Create a framework to map IGF outcomes to the WSIS action lines and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Engagement with UN Processes: Strengthen coordination with UN DESA and other bodies to ensure IGF outputs are reflected in WSIS+20 and GDC discussions.
Strengthening Outcome Relevance
Concrete Deliverables: Ensure IGF outcomes include specific, actionable proposals that directly contribute to GDC and WSIS implementation.
Follow-Up Mechanisms: Develop follow-up mechanisms to track how IGF recommendations are implemented at national and international levels.
Stakeholder Accountability: Encourage stakeholders to report back on their commitments made during IGF sessions.
The IGF’s multi-stakeholder model, its convening power, and its ability to synthesize diverse perspectives uniquely position it to support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes effectively. By aligning its activities with these global initiatives, the IGF can solidify its role as a catalyst for inclusive and sustainable digital governance.
1. Reimagined Thematic Tracks
Integrated Tracks: Design thematic tracks that reflect interconnected issues, such as "Digital Inclusion and Sustainability" or "Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies," to encourage holistic discussions.
Regional Tracks: Dedicate tracks to region-specific challenges and solutions, enabling a diverse representation of perspectives.
Outcome-Oriented Tracks: Focus on producing actionable outputs for each theme, ensuring that discussions translate into tangible recommendations.
2. Greater Focus on Outputs
Policy Roadmaps: Develop policy roadmaps or frameworks based on discussions within thematic tracks.
Outcome Reporting: Present consolidated reports at the end of each track, summarizing key takeaways and action points.
Implementation Follow-Ups: Use subsequent IGF sessions to track the progress of recommendations made in previous years.
3. Leveraging Technology
Hybrid Participation: Strengthen the hybrid model to ensure seamless engagement for both in-person and virtual attendees.
Interactive Platforms: Use apps or platforms to enable real-time voting, Q&A, and collaborative document drafting during sessions.
Gamification: Introduce gamified elements, such as quizzes or challenges, to encourage engagement and learning.
Focused Pre-Events
Thematic Pre-Forums: Organize pre-events focused on specific themes, allowing in-depth exploration before the main IGF.
Stakeholder Preparatory Sessions: Host preparatory meetings for specific stakeholder groups to align their contributions to the forum.
4. Cross-Sectoral Engagement
Interdisciplinary Panels: Invite experts from fields like environmental science, healthcare, and education to share how internet governance intersects with their domains.
Private Sector Integration: Encourage greater involvement from the private sector by showcasing their contributions to internet governance.
Integrated Tracks: Design thematic tracks that reflect interconnected issues, such as "Digital Inclusion and Sustainability" or "Cybersecurity and Emerging Technologies," to encourage holistic discussions.
Regional Tracks: Dedicate tracks to region-specific challenges and solutions, enabling a diverse representation of perspectives.
Outcome-Oriented Tracks: Focus on producing actionable outputs for each theme, ensuring that discussions translate into tangible recommendations.
2. Greater Focus on Outputs
Policy Roadmaps: Develop policy roadmaps or frameworks based on discussions within thematic tracks.
Outcome Reporting: Present consolidated reports at the end of each track, summarizing key takeaways and action points.
Implementation Follow-Ups: Use subsequent IGF sessions to track the progress of recommendations made in previous years.
3. Leveraging Technology
Hybrid Participation: Strengthen the hybrid model to ensure seamless engagement for both in-person and virtual attendees.
Interactive Platforms: Use apps or platforms to enable real-time voting, Q&A, and collaborative document drafting during sessions.
Gamification: Introduce gamified elements, such as quizzes or challenges, to encourage engagement and learning.
Focused Pre-Events
Thematic Pre-Forums: Organize pre-events focused on specific themes, allowing in-depth exploration before the main IGF.
Stakeholder Preparatory Sessions: Host preparatory meetings for specific stakeholder groups to align their contributions to the forum.
4. Cross-Sectoral Engagement
Interdisciplinary Panels: Invite experts from fields like environmental science, healthcare, and education to share how internet governance intersects with their domains.
Private Sector Integration: Encourage greater involvement from the private sector by showcasing their contributions to internet governance.
Private Sector
ID38
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
The reports of the intercessional collaborations such as the Policy networks, Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions and the NRIs
When it comes to gender issues, not limit to just women, and create a specific set of session led by teens and children.
Civil Society
ID39
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Media and Content
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can play a transformative role in bridging the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and reviewing the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in the lead-up to 2025.
From the perspective of Sanicle, we see opportunities for the IGF to enhance its impact through:
1. **Alignment with Global Health and Equity Agendas**
The GDC prioritizes equitable digital access and inclusivity, and the IGF should amplify discussions on how digital technologies can address health equity, including menstrual and menopausal health—a cornerstone of Sanicle's mission. By fostering policy dialogues that emphasize data protection and accessibility for women's health, the IGF can directly contribute to both global health outcomes and digital inclusion.
2. Facilitating Public-Private Partnerships
Through its intersessional work, the IGF could host dedicated tracks to showcase innovations such as Sanicle’s AI-powered solutions for menstrual & menopause health. Collaborations between governments, multilateral organizations, and private sector innovators can drive actionable frameworks, ensuring the GDC's principles are translated into scalable solutions.
3. Metrics for Success and Progress Reporting
The IGF should work to standardize metrics that evaluate digital access, data privacy, and inclusivity in health technologies, tying these metrics to WSIS outcomes. This includes monitoring how AI, like our personalized health insights platform, is democratizing access to care.
4. Regional Dialogues for Localized Implementation
Given the diversity of digital challenges globally, the IGF could expand its efforts in convening regional stakeholder consultations, ensuring that underrepresented voices—including women and marginalized groups—shape the GDC and WSIS implementation.
5. Capacity Building and Advocacy
Through initiatives like IGF training sessions and public campaigns, the forum could empower stakeholders with knowledge about digital tools addressing health inequities. Sanicle, as a pioneer in health-focused AI, could provide case studies on leveraging machine learning for impactful results.
By prioritizing partnerships, inclusive metrics, and community-driven dialogues, the IGF can solidify its role as a pivotal platform for shaping the future of equitable digital development. At Sanicle, we remain committed to advancing health equity as part of this global agenda and welcome opportunities to contribute our expertise.
Sanicle stands ready to collaborate with the IGF and its stakeholders to champion these transformative goals.
From the perspective of Sanicle, we see opportunities for the IGF to enhance its impact through:
1. **Alignment with Global Health and Equity Agendas**
The GDC prioritizes equitable digital access and inclusivity, and the IGF should amplify discussions on how digital technologies can address health equity, including menstrual and menopausal health—a cornerstone of Sanicle's mission. By fostering policy dialogues that emphasize data protection and accessibility for women's health, the IGF can directly contribute to both global health outcomes and digital inclusion.
2. Facilitating Public-Private Partnerships
Through its intersessional work, the IGF could host dedicated tracks to showcase innovations such as Sanicle’s AI-powered solutions for menstrual & menopause health. Collaborations between governments, multilateral organizations, and private sector innovators can drive actionable frameworks, ensuring the GDC's principles are translated into scalable solutions.
3. Metrics for Success and Progress Reporting
The IGF should work to standardize metrics that evaluate digital access, data privacy, and inclusivity in health technologies, tying these metrics to WSIS outcomes. This includes monitoring how AI, like our personalized health insights platform, is democratizing access to care.
4. Regional Dialogues for Localized Implementation
Given the diversity of digital challenges globally, the IGF could expand its efforts in convening regional stakeholder consultations, ensuring that underrepresented voices—including women and marginalized groups—shape the GDC and WSIS implementation.
5. Capacity Building and Advocacy
Through initiatives like IGF training sessions and public campaigns, the forum could empower stakeholders with knowledge about digital tools addressing health inequities. Sanicle, as a pioneer in health-focused AI, could provide case studies on leveraging machine learning for impactful results.
By prioritizing partnerships, inclusive metrics, and community-driven dialogues, the IGF can solidify its role as a pivotal platform for shaping the future of equitable digital development. At Sanicle, we remain committed to advancing health equity as part of this global agenda and welcome opportunities to contribute our expertise.
Sanicle stands ready to collaborate with the IGF and its stakeholders to champion these transformative goals.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can elevate its impact by incorporating innovative approaches to its format and thematic tracks. Here are ideas that align with emerging global needs, including AI applications, digital ethics, and equity-focused solutions:
1. AI for Impact: Thematic Track on Real-World Applications
- Focus on AI-powered solutions like Sanicle.cloud, which leverages machine learning for women’s health and workplace inclusion.
- Highlight how AI can address challenges such as menstrual health, menopause support, and predictive healthcare, driving gender equity in professional and public spaces.
- Case studies and panel discussions featuring startups and NGOs employing AI for social good.
2. Digital Ethics and Inclusion for Women in the Workplace
- Create a forum to discuss AI ethics in relation to gender equity, emphasizing transparency, data privacy, and the prevention of algorithmic bias.
- Showcase practical examples of workplace policies enabled by digital tools—e.g., gender-sensitive AI algorithms that ensure fair treatment and resources for women in tech and leadership roles.
3. Citizen Journalism: Shaping the Digital Narrative
- Establish workshops on citizen journalism as a tool to amplify underrepresented voices, particularly in advancing narratives around gender equality and corporate accountability.
- Partner with platforms that support open access to verified news and provide hands-on training in leveraging digital tools for storytelling.
4. Innovative Financing Tracks: Impact Investment and Gender Bonds
- Introduce discussions on impact investing for tech solutions addressing gender disparities, including how instruments like gender bonds can be structured to fund startups like Sanicle.cloud.
- Highlight successful collaborations between governments, private investors, and international organizations in fostering inclusive tech ecosystems.
5. Human-Centered Digital Governance
- Host design-thinking workshops to co-create actionable frameworks for implementing Global Digital Compact goals, especially concerning underserved groups.
- Develop regional focus tracks that bring local stakeholders into global conversations, ensuring solutions are both scalable and culturally sensitive.
Suggested Design Enhancements:
- Interactive Format: Use hybrid events with virtual reality elements to showcase innovations. For example, participants could explore a virtual demo of Sanicle.cloud’s menstrual & menopause health AI.
- Collaborative Labs: Establish "Solution Labs" during the event where startups, NGOs, and policymakers collaborate on prototype solutions addressing digital ethics or workplace inclusion.
- Recognition of Excellence: Include awards for AI and tech-driven projects that create meaningful social impact, building momentum for initiatives like Sanicle.
By focusing on these areas, the IGF can advance impactful, ethical, and inclusive digital governance, driving meaningful progress for individuals and societies worldwide.
1. AI for Impact: Thematic Track on Real-World Applications
- Focus on AI-powered solutions like Sanicle.cloud, which leverages machine learning for women’s health and workplace inclusion.
- Highlight how AI can address challenges such as menstrual health, menopause support, and predictive healthcare, driving gender equity in professional and public spaces.
- Case studies and panel discussions featuring startups and NGOs employing AI for social good.
2. Digital Ethics and Inclusion for Women in the Workplace
- Create a forum to discuss AI ethics in relation to gender equity, emphasizing transparency, data privacy, and the prevention of algorithmic bias.
- Showcase practical examples of workplace policies enabled by digital tools—e.g., gender-sensitive AI algorithms that ensure fair treatment and resources for women in tech and leadership roles.
3. Citizen Journalism: Shaping the Digital Narrative
- Establish workshops on citizen journalism as a tool to amplify underrepresented voices, particularly in advancing narratives around gender equality and corporate accountability.
- Partner with platforms that support open access to verified news and provide hands-on training in leveraging digital tools for storytelling.
4. Innovative Financing Tracks: Impact Investment and Gender Bonds
- Introduce discussions on impact investing for tech solutions addressing gender disparities, including how instruments like gender bonds can be structured to fund startups like Sanicle.cloud.
- Highlight successful collaborations between governments, private investors, and international organizations in fostering inclusive tech ecosystems.
5. Human-Centered Digital Governance
- Host design-thinking workshops to co-create actionable frameworks for implementing Global Digital Compact goals, especially concerning underserved groups.
- Develop regional focus tracks that bring local stakeholders into global conversations, ensuring solutions are both scalable and culturally sensitive.
Suggested Design Enhancements:
- Interactive Format: Use hybrid events with virtual reality elements to showcase innovations. For example, participants could explore a virtual demo of Sanicle.cloud’s menstrual & menopause health AI.
- Collaborative Labs: Establish "Solution Labs" during the event where startups, NGOs, and policymakers collaborate on prototype solutions addressing digital ethics or workplace inclusion.
- Recognition of Excellence: Include awards for AI and tech-driven projects that create meaningful social impact, building momentum for initiatives like Sanicle.
By focusing on these areas, the IGF can advance impactful, ethical, and inclusive digital governance, driving meaningful progress for individuals and societies worldwide.
Private Sector
ID40
Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
Mercie
Civil Society
ID41
Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
# Capacity building and inclusivity - Focus on building capacity in developing countries to ensure participation in the GDC and WSIS processes and
Strengthen youth and underserved community engagement to reflect diverse voices in global digital governance
Driving Actionable Outcomes
# Use IGF outcomes as direct contributions to the GDC and WSIS processes, ensuring they are actionable and can be integrated into UN-level deliberations.
# Develop "policy toolkits" or recommendations during intersessional work that align with the GDC framework and WSIS targets.
Strengthen youth and underserved community engagement to reflect diverse voices in global digital governance
Driving Actionable Outcomes
# Use IGF outcomes as direct contributions to the GDC and WSIS processes, ensuring they are actionable and can be integrated into UN-level deliberations.
# Develop "policy toolkits" or recommendations during intersessional work that align with the GDC framework and WSIS targets.
# Hack the IGF Challenge
Invite participants to propose and prototype solutions for improving Internet governance. The best ideas could be piloted in subsequent IGFs or integrated into ongoing intersessional work.
# "Voices of the Underserved Video Booths
Set up video booths where attendees can record short messages sharing their stories, challenges, or ideas. These videos could be showcased during sessions or compiled into a global advocacy campaign post-IGF
Invite participants to propose and prototype solutions for improving Internet governance. The best ideas could be piloted in subsequent IGFs or integrated into ongoing intersessional work.
# "Voices of the Underserved Video Booths
Set up video booths where attendees can record short messages sharing their stories, challenges, or ideas. These videos could be showcased during sessions or compiled into a global advocacy campaign post-IGF
Civil Society
ID42
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID43
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in promoting global digital cooperation and addressing pressing internet governance issues. To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work could consider the following:
Global Digital Compact:
1. Thematic focus
Dedicate a significant portion of the IGF annual meeting to discussing the Global Digital Compact's key themes, such as digital cooperation, infrastructure, and human rights.
2. Implementation workshops: Organize workshops and sessions focused on implementing the Compact's recommendations, featuring experts, policymakers, and stakeholders.
3. Multistakeholder engagement
Foster collaboration among governments, private sector, civil society, and the technical community to ensure inclusive implementation of the Compact.
4. Best practice sharing: Encourage the sharing of best practices and lessons learned from implementing the Compact's recommendations, facilitating peer-to-peer learning.
5. Stocktaking and review: Dedicate a session or workshop to reviewing the progress made in implementing the WSIS outcomes, identifying gaps, and discussing ways to address them.
6. Thematic reviews: Organize thematic reviews of specific WSIS action lines, such as e-government, e-business, or e-learning, to assess progress and challenges.
7. Stakeholder engagement: Ensure that all stakeholders, including governments, private sector, civil society, and the technical community, are engaged in the review process.
8. Recommendations for the high-level meeting
Develop recommendations for the high-level meeting in 2025, based on the outcomes of the IGF's intersessional work and annual meeting.
*Intersessional work:
9. Dynamic coalitions: Support dynamic coalitions, which are informal groups of stakeholders working on specific issues, to focus on implementing the Global Digital Compact and reviewing WSIS outcomes.
10. Best practice forums: Establish best practice forums to facilitate the sharing of experiences and lessons learned in implementing the Compact and WSIS outcomes.
11. Policy options
Develop policy options and recommendations for implementing the Compact and WSIS outcomes, through online discussions and expert contributions.
12. Outreach and engagement. Engage with a broader range of stakeholders, including those from developing countries, to ensure that their perspectives and concerns are taken into account.
By implementing these suggestions, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the WSIS outcomes, ultimately supporting the achievement of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
Global Digital Compact:
1. Thematic focus
Dedicate a significant portion of the IGF annual meeting to discussing the Global Digital Compact's key themes, such as digital cooperation, infrastructure, and human rights.
2. Implementation workshops: Organize workshops and sessions focused on implementing the Compact's recommendations, featuring experts, policymakers, and stakeholders.
3. Multistakeholder engagement
Foster collaboration among governments, private sector, civil society, and the technical community to ensure inclusive implementation of the Compact.
4. Best practice sharing: Encourage the sharing of best practices and lessons learned from implementing the Compact's recommendations, facilitating peer-to-peer learning.
5. Stocktaking and review: Dedicate a session or workshop to reviewing the progress made in implementing the WSIS outcomes, identifying gaps, and discussing ways to address them.
6. Thematic reviews: Organize thematic reviews of specific WSIS action lines, such as e-government, e-business, or e-learning, to assess progress and challenges.
7. Stakeholder engagement: Ensure that all stakeholders, including governments, private sector, civil society, and the technical community, are engaged in the review process.
8. Recommendations for the high-level meeting
Develop recommendations for the high-level meeting in 2025, based on the outcomes of the IGF's intersessional work and annual meeting.
*Intersessional work:
9. Dynamic coalitions: Support dynamic coalitions, which are informal groups of stakeholders working on specific issues, to focus on implementing the Global Digital Compact and reviewing WSIS outcomes.
10. Best practice forums: Establish best practice forums to facilitate the sharing of experiences and lessons learned in implementing the Compact and WSIS outcomes.
11. Policy options
Develop policy options and recommendations for implementing the Compact and WSIS outcomes, through online discussions and expert contributions.
12. Outreach and engagement. Engage with a broader range of stakeholders, including those from developing countries, to ensure that their perspectives and concerns are taken into account.
By implementing these suggestions, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the WSIS outcomes, ultimately supporting the achievement of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals.
No
Civil Society
ID44
Artificial Intelligence, Rights and Freedoms
Government
ID45
Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics
All the stakeholders need contrainte debate. Financing internet infrastructures in developing countries is a big challenge for some stakeholders.
Each country and sub région and région should document the wsis evaluation durant their specifical igf.
Ronde table format with more speakers per thematic discussing in détail for 2 hours will be better.
Government
ID46
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Technical and Operational Topics
https://oceaexpert.org/institution/20033
https://oceanliteracy.unesco.org/expert/prof-dr-lebeau-pemha-thina/
THE NEW INNOVATION NUMERIC AND THE BIODIVERDITY WORLD OF THE UN AGENDA 2030/2050/2100
Intergovernmental Organization
ID47
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
One of the factors in the success of the IGF 2024 was the facilitation of the process for obtaining entry visas by the organizing country (online form and rapid processing at embassies).
We hope that Norway, as the host country, will quickly set up visa procedures, bearing in mind that the event is only 6 months away and that Norway has very few embassies in Africa.
We hope that Norway, as the host country, will quickly set up visa procedures, bearing in mind that the event is only 6 months away and that Norway has very few embassies in Africa.
One of the factors in the success of the IGF 2024 was the facilitation of the process for obtaining entry visas by the organizing country (online form and rapid processing at embassies).
We hope that Norway, as the host country, will quickly set up visa procedures, bearing in mind that the event is only 6 months away and that Norway has very few embassies in Africa.
We hope that Norway, as the host country, will quickly set up visa procedures, bearing in mind that the event is only 6 months away and that Norway has very few embassies in Africa.
Technical Community
ID48
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Technical and Operational Topics
Media and content are pivotal in shaping public discourse, preserving cultural diversity, and combating misinformation in the digital age. Prioritizing this theme at IGF 2025 will also allow stakeholders to explore issues such as content moderation, the ethical use of AI in media production, and protecting freedom of expression while ensuring online safety. This focus is crucial for fostering a responsible and inclusive digital media environment.
The IGF annual conference and intersessional work can better support the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the evaluation of WSIS outcomes by:
Align Themes: To guarantee relevance to global goals, concentrate conversations on WSIS action lines and GDC pillars (such as digital inclusion and ethical AI).
Stakeholder Engagement: Through regional and national IGFs, increase the involvement of several stakeholders and integrate grassroots perspectives.
Strengthen virtual hub participation: encourage the establishment of regional hubs that operate in a hybrid format, where participants can join virtual sessions collectively and engage in local discussions simultaneously. This will create a sense of community and ensure active participation despite physical distance.
Work Together Worldwide: In order to support global governance processes, fortify relationships with national and regional agencies and showcase case studies.
Track Your Progress: Use indicators and annual reports to measure and display IGF’s contributions to the GDC and WSIS+20 goals.
Align Themes: To guarantee relevance to global goals, concentrate conversations on WSIS action lines and GDC pillars (such as digital inclusion and ethical AI).
Stakeholder Engagement: Through regional and national IGFs, increase the involvement of several stakeholders and integrate grassroots perspectives.
Strengthen virtual hub participation: encourage the establishment of regional hubs that operate in a hybrid format, where participants can join virtual sessions collectively and engage in local discussions simultaneously. This will create a sense of community and ensure active participation despite physical distance.
Work Together Worldwide: In order to support global governance processes, fortify relationships with national and regional agencies and showcase case studies.
Track Your Progress: Use indicators and annual reports to measure and display IGF’s contributions to the GDC and WSIS+20 goals.
The IGF 2024 format was thoughtfully designed and facilitated robust deliberations. However, the large number of sessions led to reduced attendance in some, as participants were often required to choose between overlapping topics of interest.
For IGF 2025, it would be beneficial to streamline the number of sessions to ensure fuller participation and engagement across all tracks. This could also enhance the depth of discussions and allow attendees to contribute more meaningfully without having to prioritize one session over another.
Focusing on fewer, carefully curated sessions while maintaining thematic diversity can help maximize impact and foster richer dialogue among participants.
For IGF 2025, it would be beneficial to streamline the number of sessions to ensure fuller participation and engagement across all tracks. This could also enhance the depth of discussions and allow attendees to contribute more meaningfully without having to prioritize one session over another.
Focusing on fewer, carefully curated sessions while maintaining thematic diversity can help maximize impact and foster richer dialogue among participants.
Technical Community
ID49
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
La réunion annuelle du FGI et ses travaux intersessions peuvent jouer un rôle essentiel en alignant leurs priorités sur les objectifs du Pacte numérique mondial et les recommandations issues du SMSI. En intégrant des thématiques ciblées, en renforçant la participation des parties prenantes et en établissant des mécanismes de suivi, le FGI pourrait mieux refléter ces initiatives. La production de rapports dédiés et la mise en place d’ateliers spécifiques contribueraient également à démontrer son impact concret, tout en mobilisant les efforts collectifs vers la réunion de haut niveau prévue en 2025.
Oui
Civil Society
ID50
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
security of data
By engaging and inviting policymakers to digest the outcomes of the IGF annual meeting.
By engaging more research
Government
ID51
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
Disinformation online hinders the progress in open science and Right to Development and the achievement of UN SDG2030.
INPUT on the Right to Access and Take Part in Scientific Progress: "The Royal Golden Cocoon of Java: Cricula trifenestrata (Indonesia)"
https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/2023/call-input-right-access-and-take-part-scientific-progress
Input for the 2024 reports by Special Rapporteur on the Right to Development
Purpose:
To collect information for the 2024 thematic reports of the mandate
Background:
The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 33/14 of 29 September 2016, established the mandate of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to development. The mandate was extended by resolution 51/7. Mr. Surya Deva was appointed Special Rapporteur for a period of three years and took up his functions on 1 May 2023.
In 2024, the Special Rapporteur will be presenting reports to the Human Rights Council and to the UN General Assembly on the following themes: (a) Climate justice: Loss and damage; and (b) The right to development of children and future generations.
Individual Input: Dolly Wong
https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/2024/call-input-2024-reports-special-rapporteur-right-development
INPUT on the Right to Access and Take Part in Scientific Progress: "The Royal Golden Cocoon of Java: Cricula trifenestrata (Indonesia)"
https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/2023/call-input-right-access-and-take-part-scientific-progress
Input for the 2024 reports by Special Rapporteur on the Right to Development
Purpose:
To collect information for the 2024 thematic reports of the mandate
Background:
The Human Rights Council, in its resolution 33/14 of 29 September 2016, established the mandate of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to development. The mandate was extended by resolution 51/7. Mr. Surya Deva was appointed Special Rapporteur for a period of three years and took up his functions on 1 May 2023.
In 2024, the Special Rapporteur will be presenting reports to the Human Rights Council and to the UN General Assembly on the following themes: (a) Climate justice: Loss and damage; and (b) The right to development of children and future generations.
Individual Input: Dolly Wong
https://www.ohchr.org/en/calls-for-input/2024/call-input-2024-reports-special-rapporteur-right-development
Better interactivity and user-friendliness for online participation.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID52
Data Governance, Media and Content, Technical and Operational Topics
Government
ID53
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
Government
ID54
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Civil Society
ID56
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
No
I will join in 2025 in Norway
Its best
Civil Society
ID57
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
We should arrange local day trips in between session where participants will get to know more about its history and cultural.
if possible apart from arranging hotels, We should arrange home stay (participants can stay at local resident homes to know their life style and cultural).
As you offer best hotels rate with discounts likewise if transport on major flight carrier should give discounts so more participants can visit.
This is great to see IGF 2025 will take place in June which good otherwise during December as it is Holiday Time and festival sessions things generally get expensive.
Please help us with VISA way in advance like 3-4 months so self arrangement can be done well in time.
if possible apart from arranging hotels, We should arrange home stay (participants can stay at local resident homes to know their life style and cultural).
As you offer best hotels rate with discounts likewise if transport on major flight carrier should give discounts so more participants can visit.
This is great to see IGF 2025 will take place in June which good otherwise during December as it is Holiday Time and festival sessions things generally get expensive.
Please help us with VISA way in advance like 3-4 months so self arrangement can be done well in time.
To better align the IGF with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF can:
1. Integrate GDC Principles: Ensure IGF sessions and discussions focus on the key GDC goals, such as universal digital inclusion, human rights, and digital sovereignty, aligning thematic tracks with these priorities.
2. Track Progress on WSIS Goals: Regularly assess the implementation of WSIS outcomes through dedicated sessions, workshops, and stakeholder reports, ensuring accountability in the lead-up to the 2025 high-level meeting.
3. Intersessional Work: Facilitate ongoing discussions and collaboration on the GDC and WSIS themes through intersessional activities (e.g., working groups, consultations, and research initiatives) to maintain momentum.
4. Collaborate with UN and Stakeholders: Strengthen partnerships with UN bodies, governments, and civil society to create actionable outcomes and contribute to global digital policy frameworks.
5. Actionable Reporting: Produce concrete policy recommendations and progress reports that track the status of both the GDC and WSIS implementation, feeding into the 2025 review.
1. Integrate GDC Principles: Ensure IGF sessions and discussions focus on the key GDC goals, such as universal digital inclusion, human rights, and digital sovereignty, aligning thematic tracks with these priorities.
2. Track Progress on WSIS Goals: Regularly assess the implementation of WSIS outcomes through dedicated sessions, workshops, and stakeholder reports, ensuring accountability in the lead-up to the 2025 high-level meeting.
3. Intersessional Work: Facilitate ongoing discussions and collaboration on the GDC and WSIS themes through intersessional activities (e.g., working groups, consultations, and research initiatives) to maintain momentum.
4. Collaborate with UN and Stakeholders: Strengthen partnerships with UN bodies, governments, and civil society to create actionable outcomes and contribute to global digital policy frameworks.
5. Actionable Reporting: Produce concrete policy recommendations and progress reports that track the status of both the GDC and WSIS implementation, feeding into the 2025 review.
This will ensure the IGF remains central to global digital governance efforts, directly contributing to the realization of the GDC and WSIS goals.
To improve the IGF’s format and design, consider the following ideas:
1. Revise Thematic Tracks:
Integrate cross-disciplinary themes (e.g., cybersecurity, privacy, and digital inclusion).
Add emerging tech tracks (AI, blockchain, quantum computing).
Focus on regional issues (e.g., internet governance in the Global South).
2. Interactive Formats:
Use open space sessions for participant-driven discussions.
Incorporate VR/AR experiences for immersive learning.
Use live polling and Q&A for real-time audience interaction.
3. Diversity and Inclusivity:
Create youth-focused and gender-inclusive tracks.
Include indigenous perspectives on data sovereignty.
Highlight regional consultations and satellite events for broader participation.
4. Regional Collaboration:
Host pre-IGF consultations in different regions to shape the agenda.
Use hybrid formats for more inclusive participation, especially in the Global South.
To improve the IGF’s format and design, consider the following ideas:
1. Revise Thematic Tracks:
Integrate cross-disciplinary themes (e.g., cybersecurity, privacy, and digital inclusion).
Add emerging tech tracks (AI, blockchain, quantum computing).
Focus on regional issues (e.g., internet governance in the Global South).
2. Interactive Formats:
Use open space sessions for participant-driven discussions.
Incorporate VR/AR experiences for immersive learning.
Use live polling and Q&A for real-time audience interaction.
3. Diversity and Inclusivity:
Create youth-focused and gender-inclusive tracks.
Include indigenous perspectives on data sovereignty.
Highlight regional consultations and satellite events for broader participation.
4. Regional Collaboration:
Host pre-IGF consultations in different regions to shape the agenda.
Use hybrid formats for more inclusive participation, especially in the Global South.
Private Sector
ID58
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID59
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
For additional input regarding the IGF 2025, there are several suggestions that could enhance the forum’s overall effectiveness, inclusivity, and relevance:
1. Engagement with Stakeholders Across the Global South: To ensure that the discussions at IGF 2025 reflect a global perspective, it would be crucial to increase engagement with stakeholders from the Global South. Providing targeted outreach and support for participation, including funding for representatives from low-income and developing countries, could help address disparities in participation and ensure that the discussions are more inclusive.
2. Youth Participation and Empowerment: IGF 2025 should place a greater emphasis on youth involvement by expanding opportunities for youth-led sessions, mentorship, and capacity building. By empowering younger generations to lead conversations on topics such as cybersecurity, data privacy, and digital rights, the forum can foster long-term solutions to critical digital challenges.
3. Strengthening the Link Between Policy and Practice: IGF 2025 should include more practical sessions that translate policy discussions into actionable steps for governments, businesses, and civil society. More case studies and real-life examples of successful initiatives could help attendees understand how digital governance frameworks can be implemented in diverse contexts.
4. Interdisciplinary Collaborations: The IGF 2025 should promote more interdisciplinary sessions that bring together technology experts, policymakers, economists, human rights advocates, and environmentalists. This could foster a more holistic approach to internet governance and digital policy, especially for areas like AI, climate change, and digital inclusion.
5. Facilitating Long-Term Outcomes: There could be a greater focus on facilitating concrete, long-term outcomes from the forum, such as multi-stakeholder agreements, policy recommendations, or collaborative initiatives. By prioritizing outcome-driven discussions and follow-up mechanisms, IGF 2025 could serve as a platform for actionable change rather than just dialogue.
6. Better Utilization of Technology for Remote Participation: To accommodate a wider range of participants, IGF 2025 should consider enhancing remote participation capabilities. This could include a more seamless and interactive virtual experience, offering access to sessions, networking opportunities, and workshops, making it easier for people worldwide to participate regardless of location or resources.
7. Monitoring and Evaluation: A strong system for monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of the IGF discussions and commitments could be implemented, with regular updates on the progress of initiatives launched at previous forums. This would ensure that the IGF evolves and adjusts to new challenges while remaining accountable to its global commitments.
8. Cross-Sector Collaboration: IGF 2025 should enhance collaboration with other international forums and agencies, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), World Health Organization (WHO), and World Economic Forum (WEF). This could help bring the digital governance discussions into broader international agendas, particularly for topics like the regulation of emerging technologies and global economic development.
9. Enhanced Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions: Further strengthening the policy networks and dynamic coalitions at IGF 2025 could enable more specialized discussions around complex issues like data privacy, digital trade, and AI ethics. These networks could work towards producing actionable policy frameworks or model regulations for implementation by governments and the private sector.
By incorporating these elements, IGF 2025 can continue to evolve into a dynamic platform for addressing key issues in internet governance while fostering collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity across all sectors of society.
1. Engagement with Stakeholders Across the Global South: To ensure that the discussions at IGF 2025 reflect a global perspective, it would be crucial to increase engagement with stakeholders from the Global South. Providing targeted outreach and support for participation, including funding for representatives from low-income and developing countries, could help address disparities in participation and ensure that the discussions are more inclusive.
2. Youth Participation and Empowerment: IGF 2025 should place a greater emphasis on youth involvement by expanding opportunities for youth-led sessions, mentorship, and capacity building. By empowering younger generations to lead conversations on topics such as cybersecurity, data privacy, and digital rights, the forum can foster long-term solutions to critical digital challenges.
3. Strengthening the Link Between Policy and Practice: IGF 2025 should include more practical sessions that translate policy discussions into actionable steps for governments, businesses, and civil society. More case studies and real-life examples of successful initiatives could help attendees understand how digital governance frameworks can be implemented in diverse contexts.
4. Interdisciplinary Collaborations: The IGF 2025 should promote more interdisciplinary sessions that bring together technology experts, policymakers, economists, human rights advocates, and environmentalists. This could foster a more holistic approach to internet governance and digital policy, especially for areas like AI, climate change, and digital inclusion.
5. Facilitating Long-Term Outcomes: There could be a greater focus on facilitating concrete, long-term outcomes from the forum, such as multi-stakeholder agreements, policy recommendations, or collaborative initiatives. By prioritizing outcome-driven discussions and follow-up mechanisms, IGF 2025 could serve as a platform for actionable change rather than just dialogue.
6. Better Utilization of Technology for Remote Participation: To accommodate a wider range of participants, IGF 2025 should consider enhancing remote participation capabilities. This could include a more seamless and interactive virtual experience, offering access to sessions, networking opportunities, and workshops, making it easier for people worldwide to participate regardless of location or resources.
7. Monitoring and Evaluation: A strong system for monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of the IGF discussions and commitments could be implemented, with regular updates on the progress of initiatives launched at previous forums. This would ensure that the IGF evolves and adjusts to new challenges while remaining accountable to its global commitments.
8. Cross-Sector Collaboration: IGF 2025 should enhance collaboration with other international forums and agencies, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), World Health Organization (WHO), and World Economic Forum (WEF). This could help bring the digital governance discussions into broader international agendas, particularly for topics like the regulation of emerging technologies and global economic development.
9. Enhanced Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions: Further strengthening the policy networks and dynamic coalitions at IGF 2025 could enable more specialized discussions around complex issues like data privacy, digital trade, and AI ethics. These networks could work towards producing actionable policy frameworks or model regulations for implementation by governments and the private sector.
By incorporating these elements, IGF 2025 can continue to evolve into a dynamic platform for addressing key issues in internet governance while fostering collaboration, innovation, and inclusivity across all sectors of society.
To better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS+20 review in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work could focus on the following strategies:
1. Alignment with the GDC Principles and Goals
Highlight and Integrate GDC Themes: IGF 2025 sessions should directly align with the principles and goals of the Global Digital Compact, particularly in areas such as universal connectivity, privacy protection, cybersecurity, and fostering inclusive digital economies. By ensuring that all thematic tracks at the IGF reflect these core issues, it can support the implementation of the GDC at a global level.
GDC Implementation Forum: Create a dedicated space within the IGF where stakeholders can report on progress, challenges, and innovations in implementing the GDC principles. This could be structured as a collaborative forum involving governments, civil society, businesses, and youth representatives, providing updates and exchanging best practices.
2. Collaborative Dialogue on WSIS+20
Track for WSIS+20 Review: Since the WSIS outcomes are crucial for shaping global digital governance, IGF 2025 could feature a special track that focuses on reviewing the progress of WSIS goals in the context of evolving technologies and internet governance. This would allow for a candid evaluation of the successes and gaps in implementing WSIS outcomes, ensuring the high-level meeting at the end of 2025 is well-informed.
Mapping WSIS Outcomes to Current Global Digital Challenges: IGF sessions could also map out how the original WSIS goals (such as access to information, capacity building, and digital literacy) are being impacted by emerging challenges like AI, cybersecurity threats, and data governance. This helps ensure that the review of WSIS+20 is relevant to today's technological landscape.
3. Strengthening Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Intersessional Working Groups: Establish working groups that operate throughout the year, engaging diverse stakeholders (governments, the private sector, civil society, and technical communities) to actively contribute to the implementation of GDC and WSIS+20 agendas. These working groups could focus on specific issues like data sovereignty, internet governance frameworks, and digital rights, and present recommendations during the IGF annual meeting.
National, Regional, and Youth IGFs: Encourage National and Regional IGF initiatives (NRIs) and Youth IGFs to conduct discussions and activities related to the GDC and WSIS+20. Their reports and outcomes could feed directly into the IGF annual meeting and the high-level review of the WSIS outcomes, ensuring that global discussions are rooted in regional and grassroots realities.
4. Inclusive and Transparent Monitoring Mechanisms
Tracking Progress and Reporting: Develop a transparent mechanism for tracking the implementation of GDC and WSIS outcomes, involving all stakeholders in reporting on key indicators. IGF could facilitate a process where progress towards these global initiatives is publicly documented, allowing for accountability and the identification of any gaps.
Regular Updates in Intersessional Work: Through its intersessional activities, IGF can act as a platform for regular updates on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes, providing a space for stakeholders to share their experiences and challenges. This could culminate in concrete reports or recommendations for the high-level review meeting in 2025.
5. Engaging in Policy Dialogue on Key Global Digital Issues
Workshops on Policy Implementation: IGF 2025 should organize focused workshops or panels that explore the intersection of policy and technology in implementing both the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These could address specific policy challenges such as privacy laws, cross-border data flow regulations, and cybersecurity protocols, and offer concrete solutions for enhancing international cooperation.
Interactive Debates and Knowledge Sharing: Facilitate debates and knowledge-sharing sessions on how the GDC can be implemented at the national level, particularly in developing countries, and how digital divides can be addressed to ensure equitable access. This would contribute significantly to the overall goal of universal access to the internet and digital technologies.
6. Special Sessions for High-Level Participation
WSIS+20 and GDC Joint Sessions: As part of the lead-up to the 2025 high-level review, IGF 2025 could organize special sessions inviting key UN stakeholders, such as the ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP, to discuss the intersection of the GDC and the WSIS+20 review. These sessions could aim to align global digital governance with broader UN agendas, like the SDGs and climate action.
Dedicated GDC and WSIS+20 Leaders’ Track: A high-level leaders' track could provide a forum for government ministers, industry leaders, and global civil society to discuss their commitments and progress on GDC and WSIS outcomes. This would reinforce the role of IGF as a platform for high-level political dialogue on internet governance.
7. Bringing Local Contexts into Global Discussions
Highlighting Local Initiatives: IGF could showcase local or regional projects that align with the goals of the GDC and WSIS. These projects, particularly from underserved or marginalized communities, would provide valuable insights into how global agendas are being implemented on the ground.
Interactive Mapping of Regional Needs: Facilitate sessions where local and regional stakeholders can map out their unique needs, challenges, and progress in implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This would ensure that the IGF reflects diverse perspectives, which can then inform global decision-making at the high-level meeting in 2025.
By focusing on these areas, IGF 2025 can strengthen its role in contributing to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and providing meaningful inputs for the WSIS+20 review process. The collaborative, multi-stakeholder nature of the IGF, combined with an action-oriented and inclusive approach, can ensure that these global initiatives are not only discussed but also actively implemented and monitored.
1. Alignment with the GDC Principles and Goals
Highlight and Integrate GDC Themes: IGF 2025 sessions should directly align with the principles and goals of the Global Digital Compact, particularly in areas such as universal connectivity, privacy protection, cybersecurity, and fostering inclusive digital economies. By ensuring that all thematic tracks at the IGF reflect these core issues, it can support the implementation of the GDC at a global level.
GDC Implementation Forum: Create a dedicated space within the IGF where stakeholders can report on progress, challenges, and innovations in implementing the GDC principles. This could be structured as a collaborative forum involving governments, civil society, businesses, and youth representatives, providing updates and exchanging best practices.
2. Collaborative Dialogue on WSIS+20
Track for WSIS+20 Review: Since the WSIS outcomes are crucial for shaping global digital governance, IGF 2025 could feature a special track that focuses on reviewing the progress of WSIS goals in the context of evolving technologies and internet governance. This would allow for a candid evaluation of the successes and gaps in implementing WSIS outcomes, ensuring the high-level meeting at the end of 2025 is well-informed.
Mapping WSIS Outcomes to Current Global Digital Challenges: IGF sessions could also map out how the original WSIS goals (such as access to information, capacity building, and digital literacy) are being impacted by emerging challenges like AI, cybersecurity threats, and data governance. This helps ensure that the review of WSIS+20 is relevant to today's technological landscape.
3. Strengthening Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
Intersessional Working Groups: Establish working groups that operate throughout the year, engaging diverse stakeholders (governments, the private sector, civil society, and technical communities) to actively contribute to the implementation of GDC and WSIS+20 agendas. These working groups could focus on specific issues like data sovereignty, internet governance frameworks, and digital rights, and present recommendations during the IGF annual meeting.
National, Regional, and Youth IGFs: Encourage National and Regional IGF initiatives (NRIs) and Youth IGFs to conduct discussions and activities related to the GDC and WSIS+20. Their reports and outcomes could feed directly into the IGF annual meeting and the high-level review of the WSIS outcomes, ensuring that global discussions are rooted in regional and grassroots realities.
4. Inclusive and Transparent Monitoring Mechanisms
Tracking Progress and Reporting: Develop a transparent mechanism for tracking the implementation of GDC and WSIS outcomes, involving all stakeholders in reporting on key indicators. IGF could facilitate a process where progress towards these global initiatives is publicly documented, allowing for accountability and the identification of any gaps.
Regular Updates in Intersessional Work: Through its intersessional activities, IGF can act as a platform for regular updates on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes, providing a space for stakeholders to share their experiences and challenges. This could culminate in concrete reports or recommendations for the high-level review meeting in 2025.
5. Engaging in Policy Dialogue on Key Global Digital Issues
Workshops on Policy Implementation: IGF 2025 should organize focused workshops or panels that explore the intersection of policy and technology in implementing both the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These could address specific policy challenges such as privacy laws, cross-border data flow regulations, and cybersecurity protocols, and offer concrete solutions for enhancing international cooperation.
Interactive Debates and Knowledge Sharing: Facilitate debates and knowledge-sharing sessions on how the GDC can be implemented at the national level, particularly in developing countries, and how digital divides can be addressed to ensure equitable access. This would contribute significantly to the overall goal of universal access to the internet and digital technologies.
6. Special Sessions for High-Level Participation
WSIS+20 and GDC Joint Sessions: As part of the lead-up to the 2025 high-level review, IGF 2025 could organize special sessions inviting key UN stakeholders, such as the ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP, to discuss the intersection of the GDC and the WSIS+20 review. These sessions could aim to align global digital governance with broader UN agendas, like the SDGs and climate action.
Dedicated GDC and WSIS+20 Leaders’ Track: A high-level leaders' track could provide a forum for government ministers, industry leaders, and global civil society to discuss their commitments and progress on GDC and WSIS outcomes. This would reinforce the role of IGF as a platform for high-level political dialogue on internet governance.
7. Bringing Local Contexts into Global Discussions
Highlighting Local Initiatives: IGF could showcase local or regional projects that align with the goals of the GDC and WSIS. These projects, particularly from underserved or marginalized communities, would provide valuable insights into how global agendas are being implemented on the ground.
Interactive Mapping of Regional Needs: Facilitate sessions where local and regional stakeholders can map out their unique needs, challenges, and progress in implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This would ensure that the IGF reflects diverse perspectives, which can then inform global decision-making at the high-level meeting in 2025.
By focusing on these areas, IGF 2025 can strengthen its role in contributing to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and providing meaningful inputs for the WSIS+20 review process. The collaborative, multi-stakeholder nature of the IGF, combined with an action-oriented and inclusive approach, can ensure that these global initiatives are not only discussed but also actively implemented and monitored.
To improve the format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and better recognize the contributions of self-funded organizations like Hazras Charity Foundation, several changes could be implemented in the structure, thematic tracks, and recognition processes:
1. Redesigning Thematic Tracks to Be More Interactive and Solution-Oriented
Interactive Thematic Tracks: Rather than traditional panel discussions, each thematic track could incorporate more interactive workshops, case study presentations, and collaborative group discussions. These sessions would allow participants to actively contribute ideas, share experiences, and discuss challenges in a more engaging manner, making the discussions more practical and action-oriented.
Thematic Challenges and Solutions: Organize thematic tracks around specific global challenges, such as "Bridging the Digital Divide," "Data Sovereignty," or "Cybersecurity for Small Communities," with sub-tracks focusing on innovative solutions, policy proposals, or pilot projects. This would help attendees not just discuss issues but also brainstorm and generate actionable outcomes that can be implemented in the real world.
Policy and Action-Oriented Panels: Rather than just discussing theoretical issues, thematic tracks could include sessions that focus on actionable policy recommendations and frameworks for implementing digital governance solutions. Each track could end with a practical summary of policy proposals that can be adopted at the national or regional level.
2. Incorporating Recognition and Support for Self-Funded Organizations
Self-Funded Organization Recognition: In the opening or closing sessions of the IGF, create a specific recognition segment for organizations that have self-funded their participation, such as Hazras Charity Foundation. This would highlight their commitment and contribution to the forum despite limited resources. Special certificates or public acknowledgments could be awarded to these organizations for their valuable input.
Dedicated Self-Funded Space: Create a dedicated space or networking lounge where self-funded organizations can gather, share experiences, and collaborate. This would not only recognize their efforts but also give them opportunities to expand their network and gain access to new funding or partnerships.
Travel Reimbursement Initiative: Establish a travel reimbursement program for organizations that self-fund their participation, as Hazras Charity Foundation did. To ensure fairness, the program could include a process where these organizations submit evidence of their self-funded contributions (e.g., receipts, travel documents) to receive partial reimbursement for travel and lodging costs. This would support the inclusion of a wider range of voices from grassroots and underserved communities.
3. Transparent and Inclusive Funding and Reimbursement Process
Clear Guidelines for Self-Funded Participants: Provide transparent guidelines for self-funded organizations on how they can apply for recognition and reimbursement. Include steps for submitting evidence, eligibility criteria, and deadlines to ensure a smooth and accessible process.
Micro-Funding Opportunities: To ensure broader participation, the IGF could explore partnerships with sponsors to offer micro-funding grants to self-funded organizations. These funds could cover specific activities, such as travel expenses, participation fees, or creating educational materials for their respective communities. This would ensure that small, grassroots organizations are not excluded due to financial constraints.
4. Emphasizing Local and Regional Perspectives
Regional Track Integration: Ensure that each thematic track includes a segment dedicated to the local or regional context of the issues discussed. For example, if a session is about "Cybersecurity," there could be a local/regional perspective on how cybersecurity challenges are being addressed in Africa or Asia, allowing self-funded organizations, especially those from developing regions, to present their insights and solutions.
Regional Focus Groups: Alongside global discussions, organize regional focus groups that allow self-funded organizations and local stakeholders to collaborate on issues specifically relevant to their region. This would allow self-funded organizations to engage in regional dialogues, share context-specific challenges, and propose solutions directly applicable to their communities.
5. Enhancing Community-Driven Solutions
Community-Led Track: A specific thematic track could be dedicated to community-driven digital solutions, where grassroots organizations, including self-funded ones, can showcase successful local projects. This would encourage a bottom-up approach to Internet governance, where participants can see how small initiatives are making an impact in their communities.
Open Call for Proposals: Prior to the IGF, issue an open call for proposals from self-funded organizations that have led innovative projects in the digital space. The selected proposals could be presented in a dedicated track, ensuring that self-funded organizations gain visibility and recognition for their contributions.
6. Encouraging Greater Participation Through Digital Platforms
Hybrid Format with Virtual Access: To further democratize participation, the IGF could adopt a hybrid format where self-funded organizations can join virtually if travel is financially prohibitive. The virtual platform could include specific spaces for self-funded participants to present their initiatives, engage in networking, and even apply for travel grants or reimbursements.
Digital Exhibitions and Showcases: Set up a digital exhibition space where self-funded organizations can showcase their work, share resources, and present success stories. This would give them visibility and allow for the sharing of their experiences with a broader global audience, creating opportunities for new partnerships.
7. Promoting Capacity Building for Self-Funded Organizations
Capacity-Building Sessions: Include capacity-building workshops aimed specifically at self-funded organizations, focusing on topics such as fundraising strategies, project management, digital tools for advocacy, and building sustainable partnerships. These workshops could help empower smaller organizations to navigate the digital governance space more effectively and foster long-term sustainability.
By incorporating these ideas, the IGF can better reflect the contributions of self-funded organizations like Hazras Charity Foundation, while also fostering a more inclusive, solution-oriented, and actionable dialogue. Recognizing the financial constraints of these organizations, while creating opportunities for them to engage meaningfully, will enrich the overall discussion and enhance the impact of the forum.
1. Redesigning Thematic Tracks to Be More Interactive and Solution-Oriented
Interactive Thematic Tracks: Rather than traditional panel discussions, each thematic track could incorporate more interactive workshops, case study presentations, and collaborative group discussions. These sessions would allow participants to actively contribute ideas, share experiences, and discuss challenges in a more engaging manner, making the discussions more practical and action-oriented.
Thematic Challenges and Solutions: Organize thematic tracks around specific global challenges, such as "Bridging the Digital Divide," "Data Sovereignty," or "Cybersecurity for Small Communities," with sub-tracks focusing on innovative solutions, policy proposals, or pilot projects. This would help attendees not just discuss issues but also brainstorm and generate actionable outcomes that can be implemented in the real world.
Policy and Action-Oriented Panels: Rather than just discussing theoretical issues, thematic tracks could include sessions that focus on actionable policy recommendations and frameworks for implementing digital governance solutions. Each track could end with a practical summary of policy proposals that can be adopted at the national or regional level.
2. Incorporating Recognition and Support for Self-Funded Organizations
Self-Funded Organization Recognition: In the opening or closing sessions of the IGF, create a specific recognition segment for organizations that have self-funded their participation, such as Hazras Charity Foundation. This would highlight their commitment and contribution to the forum despite limited resources. Special certificates or public acknowledgments could be awarded to these organizations for their valuable input.
Dedicated Self-Funded Space: Create a dedicated space or networking lounge where self-funded organizations can gather, share experiences, and collaborate. This would not only recognize their efforts but also give them opportunities to expand their network and gain access to new funding or partnerships.
Travel Reimbursement Initiative: Establish a travel reimbursement program for organizations that self-fund their participation, as Hazras Charity Foundation did. To ensure fairness, the program could include a process where these organizations submit evidence of their self-funded contributions (e.g., receipts, travel documents) to receive partial reimbursement for travel and lodging costs. This would support the inclusion of a wider range of voices from grassroots and underserved communities.
3. Transparent and Inclusive Funding and Reimbursement Process
Clear Guidelines for Self-Funded Participants: Provide transparent guidelines for self-funded organizations on how they can apply for recognition and reimbursement. Include steps for submitting evidence, eligibility criteria, and deadlines to ensure a smooth and accessible process.
Micro-Funding Opportunities: To ensure broader participation, the IGF could explore partnerships with sponsors to offer micro-funding grants to self-funded organizations. These funds could cover specific activities, such as travel expenses, participation fees, or creating educational materials for their respective communities. This would ensure that small, grassroots organizations are not excluded due to financial constraints.
4. Emphasizing Local and Regional Perspectives
Regional Track Integration: Ensure that each thematic track includes a segment dedicated to the local or regional context of the issues discussed. For example, if a session is about "Cybersecurity," there could be a local/regional perspective on how cybersecurity challenges are being addressed in Africa or Asia, allowing self-funded organizations, especially those from developing regions, to present their insights and solutions.
Regional Focus Groups: Alongside global discussions, organize regional focus groups that allow self-funded organizations and local stakeholders to collaborate on issues specifically relevant to their region. This would allow self-funded organizations to engage in regional dialogues, share context-specific challenges, and propose solutions directly applicable to their communities.
5. Enhancing Community-Driven Solutions
Community-Led Track: A specific thematic track could be dedicated to community-driven digital solutions, where grassroots organizations, including self-funded ones, can showcase successful local projects. This would encourage a bottom-up approach to Internet governance, where participants can see how small initiatives are making an impact in their communities.
Open Call for Proposals: Prior to the IGF, issue an open call for proposals from self-funded organizations that have led innovative projects in the digital space. The selected proposals could be presented in a dedicated track, ensuring that self-funded organizations gain visibility and recognition for their contributions.
6. Encouraging Greater Participation Through Digital Platforms
Hybrid Format with Virtual Access: To further democratize participation, the IGF could adopt a hybrid format where self-funded organizations can join virtually if travel is financially prohibitive. The virtual platform could include specific spaces for self-funded participants to present their initiatives, engage in networking, and even apply for travel grants or reimbursements.
Digital Exhibitions and Showcases: Set up a digital exhibition space where self-funded organizations can showcase their work, share resources, and present success stories. This would give them visibility and allow for the sharing of their experiences with a broader global audience, creating opportunities for new partnerships.
7. Promoting Capacity Building for Self-Funded Organizations
Capacity-Building Sessions: Include capacity-building workshops aimed specifically at self-funded organizations, focusing on topics such as fundraising strategies, project management, digital tools for advocacy, and building sustainable partnerships. These workshops could help empower smaller organizations to navigate the digital governance space more effectively and foster long-term sustainability.
By incorporating these ideas, the IGF can better reflect the contributions of self-funded organizations like Hazras Charity Foundation, while also fostering a more inclusive, solution-oriented, and actionable dialogue. Recognizing the financial constraints of these organizations, while creating opportunities for them to engage meaningfully, will enrich the overall discussion and enhance the impact of the forum.
Civil Society
ID60
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Digital ethics, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Government
ID61
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID62
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Open and inclusive discussions at IGF can contribute to the GDC and WSIS.
It would be good to plan the agenda so that the sessions on the same thematic area do not overlap, e.g. AI and Cyber can go in parallel but not two AI sessions. Surely it is not possible to achieve that 100% but should be kept in mind...
Government
ID63
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Intergovernmental Organization
ID64
Media and Content
The IGF can better connect with major global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review by focusing on these steps:
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Priorities: Design the annual meeting themes and discussions to reflect the key goals of the GDC and WSIS outcomes, such as universal internet access, digital inclusion, and data governance.
2. Highlight Progress and Gaps: Use IGF sessions to present updates, share case studies, and discuss challenges in achieving the goals outlined in the GDC and WSIS.
3. Encourage Multi-Stakeholder Contributions: Engage governments, businesses, civil society, and technical experts to provide insights and collaborate on actions that support the GDC and WSIS agendas.
4. Facilitate Cross-Sector Dialogue: Organize focused workshops or panels at the IGF that directly address the implementation of these global initiatives and identify synergies.
5. Produce Concrete Outcomes: Ensure the IGF outcomes, such as reports and recommendations, directly contribute to the discussions at the high-level meeting in 2025.
By aligning its work and promoting collaboration, the IGF can serve as a vital platform for advancing the goals of the GDC and WSIS.
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Priorities: Design the annual meeting themes and discussions to reflect the key goals of the GDC and WSIS outcomes, such as universal internet access, digital inclusion, and data governance.
2. Highlight Progress and Gaps: Use IGF sessions to present updates, share case studies, and discuss challenges in achieving the goals outlined in the GDC and WSIS.
3. Encourage Multi-Stakeholder Contributions: Engage governments, businesses, civil society, and technical experts to provide insights and collaborate on actions that support the GDC and WSIS agendas.
4. Facilitate Cross-Sector Dialogue: Organize focused workshops or panels at the IGF that directly address the implementation of these global initiatives and identify synergies.
5. Produce Concrete Outcomes: Ensure the IGF outcomes, such as reports and recommendations, directly contribute to the discussions at the high-level meeting in 2025.
By aligning its work and promoting collaboration, the IGF can serve as a vital platform for advancing the goals of the GDC and WSIS.
Here are some ideas to improve the overall format and design of the IGF, ensuring inclusivity, effectiveness, and relevance:
1. Dynamic Thematic Tracks
Rotating Themes: Base themes on current global challenges (e.g., AI, digital rights, cybersecurity) and rotate annually to reflect evolving priorities.
Cross-Cutting Themes: Introduce tracks that overlap across disciplines, such as "Sustainability and Digital Innovation," to break silos and encourage integrated solutions.
2. Interactive Formats
Roundtable Discussions: Replace some traditional panels with moderated, smaller roundtables for deeper engagement.
Lightning Talks: Include short, focused talks by diverse speakers to introduce innovative ideas quickly.
Hackathons: Host problem-solving sessions where participants collaboratively address pressing issues, producing tangible outputs.
3. Youth and Grassroots Involvement
Youth-Driven Tracks: Reserve a track for youth-led discussions and outcomes, amplifying young voices in decision-making.
Community Spotlights: Include sessions showcasing local or regional initiatives that align with IGF goals.
4. Thematic Merging and Flexibility
Merging Themes Dynamically: Allow overlapping tracks to merge into joint sessions for shared problem-solving.
Participant-Driven Sessions: Introduce open slots where attendees vote on topics they want to explore during the event.
5. Hybrid and Inclusive Participation
Virtual Reality Rooms: Create immersive, virtual meeting spaces for remote participants to simulate on-site engagement.
Language Diversity: Provide real-time translation and accessibility options in all major UN languages.
6. Pre-IGF Collaboration
Thematic Labs: Establish pre-event working groups to refine themes and prepare discussion frameworks.
Idea Crowdsourcing: Use online platforms to gather participant ideas before the event.
7. Action-Oriented Outcomes
Thematic Reports with Recommendations: Ensure every track produces actionable recommendations linked to global initiatives.
Accountability Framework: Follow up on past IGF commitments and progress during each annual meeting.
These changes can make the IGF more engaging, relevant, and impactful for all stakeholders.
1. Dynamic Thematic Tracks
Rotating Themes: Base themes on current global challenges (e.g., AI, digital rights, cybersecurity) and rotate annually to reflect evolving priorities.
Cross-Cutting Themes: Introduce tracks that overlap across disciplines, such as "Sustainability and Digital Innovation," to break silos and encourage integrated solutions.
2. Interactive Formats
Roundtable Discussions: Replace some traditional panels with moderated, smaller roundtables for deeper engagement.
Lightning Talks: Include short, focused talks by diverse speakers to introduce innovative ideas quickly.
Hackathons: Host problem-solving sessions where participants collaboratively address pressing issues, producing tangible outputs.
3. Youth and Grassroots Involvement
Youth-Driven Tracks: Reserve a track for youth-led discussions and outcomes, amplifying young voices in decision-making.
Community Spotlights: Include sessions showcasing local or regional initiatives that align with IGF goals.
4. Thematic Merging and Flexibility
Merging Themes Dynamically: Allow overlapping tracks to merge into joint sessions for shared problem-solving.
Participant-Driven Sessions: Introduce open slots where attendees vote on topics they want to explore during the event.
5. Hybrid and Inclusive Participation
Virtual Reality Rooms: Create immersive, virtual meeting spaces for remote participants to simulate on-site engagement.
Language Diversity: Provide real-time translation and accessibility options in all major UN languages.
6. Pre-IGF Collaboration
Thematic Labs: Establish pre-event working groups to refine themes and prepare discussion frameworks.
Idea Crowdsourcing: Use online platforms to gather participant ideas before the event.
7. Action-Oriented Outcomes
Thematic Reports with Recommendations: Ensure every track produces actionable recommendations linked to global initiatives.
Accountability Framework: Follow up on past IGF commitments and progress during each annual meeting.
These changes can make the IGF more engaging, relevant, and impactful for all stakeholders.
Civil Society
ID65
Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms, Technical and Operational Topics
Private Sector
ID66
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
IGF organization and role, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Another trend in industry is big tech monopolism
Maybe, more private sector must known about Global Digital Compact and collaborate with public or government.
No
Private Sector
ID67
Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
All is perfect
Private Sector
ID68
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID69
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Governments and Digital Innovations: cases
Identify achievements related to successful digital legislation, policies and models around the world that can be applied as standards for all countries. Consider them, if not mandatory, at least as inevitable in the current state of affairs.
Consider preparing short reports, aid memoires or executive summaries reflecting the main outcomes of IGF meetings.
Government
ID70
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Ensuring Wider Visa Participation for IGF 2025
To encourage broader participation and minimize barriers related to visa acquisition for the IGF 2025, the following recommendations could be implemented:
Streamlined Visa Facilitation Process
Partner with the host country's government to establish a fast-track visa process for IGF participants, especially for those from regions with traditionally higher visa rejection rates.
Provide official invitation letters early, detailing the participant's role and the significance of their presence at the IGF.
Dedicated Visa Support Desk
Create a dedicated visa support team within the IGF Secretariat to assist participants with inquiries, document requirements, and appeals for visa rejections.
Set up a helpline and email support system for real-time assistance with visa-related issues.
Engage Diplomatic Missions
Coordinate with embassies and consulates worldwide to sensitize them to the importance of the IGF and the necessity of ensuring smooth visa issuance for registered participants.
Offer travel grants or sponsorships that cover visa fees and associated costs for participants from low-income countries or marginalized groups.
Work with intergovernmental organizations or development agencies to co-fund travel and visa expenses for underrepresented participants.
To encourage broader participation and minimize barriers related to visa acquisition for the IGF 2025, the following recommendations could be implemented:
Streamlined Visa Facilitation Process
Partner with the host country's government to establish a fast-track visa process for IGF participants, especially for those from regions with traditionally higher visa rejection rates.
Provide official invitation letters early, detailing the participant's role and the significance of their presence at the IGF.
Dedicated Visa Support Desk
Create a dedicated visa support team within the IGF Secretariat to assist participants with inquiries, document requirements, and appeals for visa rejections.
Set up a helpline and email support system for real-time assistance with visa-related issues.
Engage Diplomatic Missions
Coordinate with embassies and consulates worldwide to sensitize them to the importance of the IGF and the necessity of ensuring smooth visa issuance for registered participants.
Offer travel grants or sponsorships that cover visa fees and associated costs for participants from low-income countries or marginalized groups.
Work with intergovernmental organizations or development agencies to co-fund travel and visa expenses for underrepresented participants.
The IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can serve as a platform to:
Foster Multistakeholder Cooperation: Enhance the integration of diverse stakeholders, including government, private sector, civil society, academia, and youth, to align actions with the principles outlined in the Global Digital Compact.
Advance Digital Equity: Prioritize initiatives focused on bridging the global digital divide, particularly for marginalized communities, to reflect WSIS+20 goals.
Promote Responsible AI and Cybersecurity: Establish working groups to address challenges in AI ethics, data governance, and cybersecurity, contributing to global digital peace and trust.
Regional Dialogues: Strengthen the engagement of National and Regional IGFs to incorporate local perspectives into global frameworks.
Foster Multistakeholder Cooperation: Enhance the integration of diverse stakeholders, including government, private sector, civil society, academia, and youth, to align actions with the principles outlined in the Global Digital Compact.
Advance Digital Equity: Prioritize initiatives focused on bridging the global digital divide, particularly for marginalized communities, to reflect WSIS+20 goals.
Promote Responsible AI and Cybersecurity: Establish working groups to address challenges in AI ethics, data governance, and cybersecurity, contributing to global digital peace and trust.
Regional Dialogues: Strengthen the engagement of National and Regional IGFs to incorporate local perspectives into global frameworks.
Introduce interactive thematic tracks: Sessions should follow a hybrid format, with live polling and Q&A, fostering real-time engagement.
Establish cross-thematic roundtables: Encourage interdisciplinary discussions to explore the intersection of AI, cybersecurity, and digital inclusion.
Create capacity-building workshops: Focus on marginalized groups, especially youth and women, to empower new voices in internet governance.
Expand the High-Level Leaders and Parliamentary Track: Include more representatives from the Global South and mid-tier policymakers to ensure broader representation.
Establish cross-thematic roundtables: Encourage interdisciplinary discussions to explore the intersection of AI, cybersecurity, and digital inclusion.
Create capacity-building workshops: Focus on marginalized groups, especially youth and women, to empower new voices in internet governance.
Expand the High-Level Leaders and Parliamentary Track: Include more representatives from the Global South and mid-tier policymakers to ensure broader representation.
Government
ID71
Artificial Intelligence
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in fostering dialogue and collaboration among stakeholders on internet-related issues, making it well-positioned to contribute to global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review. Here are some ways the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can better reflect and support these efforts:
1. **Alignment with the Global Digital Compact (GDC):**
The IGF can actively align its thematic discussions with the priorities outlined in the GDC, such as digital inclusion, trust and security, and fostering a sustainable digital future. This ensures that IGF discussions directly contribute to shaping and implementing the Compact's objectives.
2. **Enhanced Multistakeholder Engagement:**
By leveraging its unique multistakeholder approach, the IGF can gather diverse perspectives on the GDC and WSIS outcomes. Specific sessions or workshops at the annual meeting can focus on these initiatives, fostering actionable recommendations and creating collaborative frameworks.
3. **Dedicated WSIS Outcome Review Sessions:**
The IGF can host dedicated sessions to assess progress on WSIS outcomes, enabling stakeholders to share best practices, identify challenges, and propose solutions. The IGF can act as a platform for monitoring and reporting on these outcomes in preparation for the 2025 high-level meeting.
4. **Intersessional Work Contributions:**
IGF's intersessional workstreams, such as Best Practice Forums (BPFs), Dynamic Coalitions (DCs), and Policy Networks, can be tailored to explore specific GDC commitments and WSIS themes, producing concrete outputs that inform global policymaking.
5. **Promoting Synergies:**
The IGF can collaborate with other UN bodies and global initiatives to ensure its outputs contribute meaningfully to the GDC and WSIS review. Cross-referencing IGF outputs with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can also demonstrate how internet governance aligns with broader development agendas.
6. **Reporting and Advocacy:**
The IGF Secretariat can compile and disseminate reports that summarize discussions and recommendations from IGF meetings and intersessional activities. These reports can be shared with stakeholders involved in the GDC drafting process and the WSIS+20 review, ensuring that IGF insights inform these global efforts.
By proactively aligning its workstreams with the GDC and WSIS goals, the IGF can reinforce its position as a vital platform for shaping global digital governance and ensuring that digital transformation contributes to sustainable and inclusive development.
1. **Alignment with the Global Digital Compact (GDC):**
The IGF can actively align its thematic discussions with the priorities outlined in the GDC, such as digital inclusion, trust and security, and fostering a sustainable digital future. This ensures that IGF discussions directly contribute to shaping and implementing the Compact's objectives.
2. **Enhanced Multistakeholder Engagement:**
By leveraging its unique multistakeholder approach, the IGF can gather diverse perspectives on the GDC and WSIS outcomes. Specific sessions or workshops at the annual meeting can focus on these initiatives, fostering actionable recommendations and creating collaborative frameworks.
3. **Dedicated WSIS Outcome Review Sessions:**
The IGF can host dedicated sessions to assess progress on WSIS outcomes, enabling stakeholders to share best practices, identify challenges, and propose solutions. The IGF can act as a platform for monitoring and reporting on these outcomes in preparation for the 2025 high-level meeting.
4. **Intersessional Work Contributions:**
IGF's intersessional workstreams, such as Best Practice Forums (BPFs), Dynamic Coalitions (DCs), and Policy Networks, can be tailored to explore specific GDC commitments and WSIS themes, producing concrete outputs that inform global policymaking.
5. **Promoting Synergies:**
The IGF can collaborate with other UN bodies and global initiatives to ensure its outputs contribute meaningfully to the GDC and WSIS review. Cross-referencing IGF outputs with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can also demonstrate how internet governance aligns with broader development agendas.
6. **Reporting and Advocacy:**
The IGF Secretariat can compile and disseminate reports that summarize discussions and recommendations from IGF meetings and intersessional activities. These reports can be shared with stakeholders involved in the GDC drafting process and the WSIS+20 review, ensuring that IGF insights inform these global efforts.
By proactively aligning its workstreams with the GDC and WSIS goals, the IGF can reinforce its position as a vital platform for shaping global digital governance and ensuring that digital transformation contributes to sustainable and inclusive development.
NO
Private Sector
ID72
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, International cooperation on data
interoperability of data and data regulations; addressing data divide
1) Setting up a working group on GDC implementation observation within the MAG or among the IGF community, collaborating with NRIs to collect and analyze national & regional multistakeholders' efforts in implementing GDC goals. The working group will produce a report with detailed data and future advice for consideration.
2) Organize an at least half-day long session on the DGC implementation during the IGF annual meeting, to discuss the main challenges and solutions for multi-stakeholders to consider or learn to fulfill the GDC goals.
2) Organize an at least half-day long session on the DGC implementation during the IGF annual meeting, to discuss the main challenges and solutions for multi-stakeholders to consider or learn to fulfill the GDC goals.
Civil Society
ID73
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Include multilingualism in all steps of the IGF process, not only providing translation during IGF
No
Private Sector
ID74
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Government
ID75
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Giving more time for side events for marginalized communities.
It was good. More sponsorship for flight is needed for marginalized group.
Civil Society
ID76
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
As the founder of the University of Bosaso, I have the good capacity of the Future Action and implementation of the current contract and design of the project as well.
Though I am not part of the programs but I am very interesting to contribute to the best of my knowledge and ability.
Civil Society
ID77
Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics
None
Government
ID78
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
To better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and WSIS outcomes review for the high-level meeting in 2025, IGF 2025 can:
Align Sessions with GDC and WSIS themes, focusing on digital rights, inclusion, and sustainability.
Ensure high-level participation in dialogues to discuss global governance and contribute to WSIS+20 review.
Track Progress on digital inclusion, access, and other WSIS goals, providing insights for the WSIS review.
Promote cross-sector collaboration and regional engagement to ensure the GDC and WSIS outcomes are actionable globally.
This approach will ensure IGF 2025 supports both GDC implementation and WSIS+20 review effectively.
Align Sessions with GDC and WSIS themes, focusing on digital rights, inclusion, and sustainability.
Ensure high-level participation in dialogues to discuss global governance and contribute to WSIS+20 review.
Track Progress on digital inclusion, access, and other WSIS goals, providing insights for the WSIS review.
Promote cross-sector collaboration and regional engagement to ensure the GDC and WSIS outcomes are actionable globally.
This approach will ensure IGF 2025 supports both GDC implementation and WSIS+20 review effectively.
For IGF 2025:
Thematic Tracks:
Create interdisciplinary tracks that explore intersections (e.g., cybersecurity with gender equality).
Focus on emerging technologies like AI and blockchain, and global challenges such as climate change.
Session Formats:
Incorporate interactive workshops and real-time case studies for actionable outcomes.
Use dynamic roundtables for deep, focused discussions.
Thematic Integration:
Include Regional IGF perspectives in global tracks.
Enable continuous engagement through virtual meetings leading up to the event.
These changes will make IGF 2025 more collaborative and action-driven.
Thematic Tracks:
Create interdisciplinary tracks that explore intersections (e.g., cybersecurity with gender equality).
Focus on emerging technologies like AI and blockchain, and global challenges such as climate change.
Session Formats:
Incorporate interactive workshops and real-time case studies for actionable outcomes.
Use dynamic roundtables for deep, focused discussions.
Thematic Integration:
Include Regional IGF perspectives in global tracks.
Enable continuous engagement through virtual meetings leading up to the event.
These changes will make IGF 2025 more collaborative and action-driven.
Government
ID79
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Cross-border cooperation, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Government
ID80
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
This will help in shaping the mind of participant and enlighten them to be aware of this situation
Contributing to major global initiative development
No
Private Sector
ID81
Cybersecurity and Trust
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) has a vital role in aligning with major global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). To better reflect and contribute to these agendas, the IGF can implement several strategies:
To enhance the effectiveness and engagement of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), the overall format and design can be reimagined. Here are some ideas focusing on thematic tracks and innovative approaches to discussions:
Government
ID82
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Cross-border cooperation, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Leave no one behind - WSIS 20 years in/for/with developing countries
thematic workshop，regional/country IGF，flashing showcases，exhibition
Civil Society
ID83
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping African newsrooms by transforming how stories are produced, distributed, and consumed. Its role in the media sector is both promising and complex, making it an area that deserves prioritization at the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2025.
AI has significantly improved efficiency in newsrooms, automating tasks such as transcription, translation, and content recommendation. This allows journalists to focus on in-depth reporting and storytelling. AI also enhances data-driven journalism, enabling reporters to analyze large datasets to uncover trends and produce more impactful stories. Additionally, AI tools help media organizations tailor content to audience preferences, boosting engagement and broadening access to news, particularly in remote areas.
Despite its benefits, AI poses challenges that threaten the integrity of journalism. Biased algorithms can perpetuate stereotypes and marginalize voices that are already underrepresented in African media. Automation raises concerns about job displacement, particularly for entry-level and support roles in newsrooms. Furthermore, the proliferation of AI-generated content, such as deepfakes, undermines trust in news and increases the risk of misinformation.
Thematic areas like Artificial Intelligence and Media and Content are critical for IGF 2025 as they align with global efforts to address ethical, social, and economic implications of AI. Africa’s media landscape is uniquely positioned, with its growing digital economy and diverse cultural narratives, to demonstrate how AI can empower local voices and drive inclusive development. However, challenges such as misinformation and algorithmic bias require immediate attention to ensure the responsible use of AI in journalism.
I believe strongly that by prioritizing these areas, IGF 2025 can foster dialogue among policymakers, tech developers, journalists, and civil society to create frameworks that promote transparency, accountability, and equitable access.
This would not only enhance the role of AI in supporting credible journalism but also ensure that media and content are tools for empowerment rather than division in the digital age.
AI has significantly improved efficiency in newsrooms, automating tasks such as transcription, translation, and content recommendation. This allows journalists to focus on in-depth reporting and storytelling. AI also enhances data-driven journalism, enabling reporters to analyze large datasets to uncover trends and produce more impactful stories. Additionally, AI tools help media organizations tailor content to audience preferences, boosting engagement and broadening access to news, particularly in remote areas.
Despite its benefits, AI poses challenges that threaten the integrity of journalism. Biased algorithms can perpetuate stereotypes and marginalize voices that are already underrepresented in African media. Automation raises concerns about job displacement, particularly for entry-level and support roles in newsrooms. Furthermore, the proliferation of AI-generated content, such as deepfakes, undermines trust in news and increases the risk of misinformation.
Thematic areas like Artificial Intelligence and Media and Content are critical for IGF 2025 as they align with global efforts to address ethical, social, and economic implications of AI. Africa’s media landscape is uniquely positioned, with its growing digital economy and diverse cultural narratives, to demonstrate how AI can empower local voices and drive inclusive development. However, challenges such as misinformation and algorithmic bias require immediate attention to ensure the responsible use of AI in journalism.
I believe strongly that by prioritizing these areas, IGF 2025 can foster dialogue among policymakers, tech developers, journalists, and civil society to create frameworks that promote transparency, accountability, and equitable access.
This would not only enhance the role of AI in supporting credible journalism but also ensure that media and content are tools for empowerment rather than division in the digital age.
IGF plays a crucial role in addressing global digital challenges, and its work must align with major initiatives like the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes. As a journalist and advocate for Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI), I believe the IGF can meaningfully contribute to these frameworks, particularly as the world prepares for the 2025 high-level meeting.
The GDC emphasizes digital inclusion, human rights, and trust in technology. The IGF can support this by spotlighting how DPI, such as digital ID systems and open-source platforms, fosters equitable access and enhances trust. Through its multi-stakeholder approach, the IGF can bridge diverse perspectives and develop actionable strategies that align with the GDC’s goals, especially for underserved regions like Africa.
Similarly, the WSIS outcomes highlight the role of digital technologies in sustainable development. The IGF can amplify this by showcasing success stories of DPI driving economic growth and social inclusion while fostering discussions on overcoming barriers like digital exclusion. These efforts would ensure DPI is at the center of global strategies for sustainable development.
In the lead-up to 2025, the IGF’s intersessional work and annual meetings can strengthen accountability, monitor progress, and advocate for investments in sustainable DPI models. By bridging local and global perspectives, the IGF can ensure that digital transformation efforts reflect real-world needs and advance universal digital rights.
The GDC emphasizes digital inclusion, human rights, and trust in technology. The IGF can support this by spotlighting how DPI, such as digital ID systems and open-source platforms, fosters equitable access and enhances trust. Through its multi-stakeholder approach, the IGF can bridge diverse perspectives and develop actionable strategies that align with the GDC’s goals, especially for underserved regions like Africa.
Similarly, the WSIS outcomes highlight the role of digital technologies in sustainable development. The IGF can amplify this by showcasing success stories of DPI driving economic growth and social inclusion while fostering discussions on overcoming barriers like digital exclusion. These efforts would ensure DPI is at the center of global strategies for sustainable development.
In the lead-up to 2025, the IGF’s intersessional work and annual meetings can strengthen accountability, monitor progress, and advocate for investments in sustainable DPI models. By bridging local and global perspectives, the IGF can ensure that digital transformation efforts reflect real-world needs and advance universal digital rights.
I the only I have is that the Thematic Tracks should have a journalistic focus as well.
Private Sector
ID84
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content
Technical Community
ID85
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
To better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of WSIS outcomes leading up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can take several key actions:
1. Align IGF Themes with GDC and WSIS: Incorporate discussions on digital inclusion, cybersecurity, digital rights, and data governance into the IGF’s agenda, ensuring these themes directly address GDC objectives and WSIS action lines.
2. Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Engagement: Strengthen the IGF’s inclusive, multi-stakeholder model by ensuring active participation from global south regions, civil society, private sector, and governments. This can help address issues like affordable access and digital equity.
3. Monitor Progress and Accountability: Develop tools to track global progress on GDC goals and WSIS action lines, such as creating annual reports or state-of-the-internet assessments, ensuring that digital governance commitments are being met.
4. Promote Collaboration with Other Global Initiatives: Act as a coordinating platform between the IGF and other initiatives like the UN Digital Cooperation Roadmap and the OECD's Internet Economy Policies, fostering synergies to drive global digital policy forward.
5. Focus on Emerging Challenges: Prioritize thematic areas like gender equality, youth empowerment, and human rights in the digital space to ensure that marginalized groups are adequately represented in digital policy discussions.
6. Support Innovative Governance Models: Encourage discussions on new governance approaches, such as decentralized technologies (e.g., blockchain) and digital identity systems, to address both GDC and WSIS objectives.
1. Align IGF Themes with GDC and WSIS: Incorporate discussions on digital inclusion, cybersecurity, digital rights, and data governance into the IGF’s agenda, ensuring these themes directly address GDC objectives and WSIS action lines.
2. Facilitate Multi-Stakeholder Engagement: Strengthen the IGF’s inclusive, multi-stakeholder model by ensuring active participation from global south regions, civil society, private sector, and governments. This can help address issues like affordable access and digital equity.
3. Monitor Progress and Accountability: Develop tools to track global progress on GDC goals and WSIS action lines, such as creating annual reports or state-of-the-internet assessments, ensuring that digital governance commitments are being met.
4. Promote Collaboration with Other Global Initiatives: Act as a coordinating platform between the IGF and other initiatives like the UN Digital Cooperation Roadmap and the OECD's Internet Economy Policies, fostering synergies to drive global digital policy forward.
5. Focus on Emerging Challenges: Prioritize thematic areas like gender equality, youth empowerment, and human rights in the digital space to ensure that marginalized groups are adequately represented in digital policy discussions.
6. Support Innovative Governance Models: Encourage discussions on new governance approaches, such as decentralized technologies (e.g., blockchain) and digital identity systems, to address both GDC and WSIS objectives.
To increase its effectiveness, the IGF should be more results-oriented, integrating thematic discussions around the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes with more innovative formats like interactive workshops, year-round intersessional activities, and actionable roadmaps. By focusing on cross-cutting themes such as emerging technologies, youth participation, gender equality, and inclusive digital transformation, while fostering collaborative partnerships, the IGF can enhance its role as a vital platform for global digital governance and policy development.
Civil Society
ID86
Economic Issues and Development, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
1. Trust and Accountability in the Digital Age:
• Focus: Strengthening user trust and accountability in digital platforms.
• Key Points:
a. Addressing misinformation and hate speech on social media.
b. Evaluating the impact of data privacy laws (e.g., GDPR) on trust and governance.
c. Enhancing transparency in AI decision-making and algorithms.
d. Holding tech companies accountable for data breaches.
e. Encouraging diverse approaches to trust-building.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Promote transparent AI governance.
b. Encourage self-regulation and multi-stakeholder accountability.
c. Advocate for stronger global privacy and data protection laws.
2. Digital Inclusion and Bridging the Global Divide:
• Focus: Ensuring universal internet access and benefits.
• Key Points:
a. Bridging the urban-rural digital divide.
b. Overcoming barriers such as infrastructure, costs, and digital literacy.
c. Ensuring accessibility for marginalized groups.
d. Promoting affordable access via innovative solutions like satellite internet.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Foster public-private partnerships for expanding digital infrastructure.
b. Support digital literacy initiatives in underserved communities.
c. Promote inclusive policies for vulnerable populations.
3. The Future of Emerging Technologies and Internet Governance:
• Focus: Exploring governance issues around emerging technologies like AI, blockchain, and quantum computing.
• Key Points:
a. Balancing innovation and regulation in AI and blockchain.
b. Addressing ethical concerns of emerging technologies.
c. Analyzing AI’s impact on labor markets.
d. Managing the governance of digital currencies and decentralized finance.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Launch research initiatives on the societal impact of emerging technologies.
b. Promote ethical AI development with a human rights focus.
c. Develop global guidelines for blockchain use.
4. Sustainability and the Environmental Impact of the Internet:
• Focus: Addressing the environmental sustainability of the internet and its infrastructure.
• Key Points:
a. Investigating the environmental impact of data centers, cloud computing, and blockchain mining.
b. Promoting energy-efficient digital infrastructure.
c. Reducing e-waste and supporting the circular economy.
d. Aligning internet governance with global environmental goals.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Encourage tech companies to adopt green technologies.
b. Facilitate global discussions on the environmental impact of the digital economy.
c. Advocate for international cooperation on reducing e-waste and promoting sustainable technologies.
• Focus: Strengthening user trust and accountability in digital platforms.
• Key Points:
a. Addressing misinformation and hate speech on social media.
b. Evaluating the impact of data privacy laws (e.g., GDPR) on trust and governance.
c. Enhancing transparency in AI decision-making and algorithms.
d. Holding tech companies accountable for data breaches.
e. Encouraging diverse approaches to trust-building.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Promote transparent AI governance.
b. Encourage self-regulation and multi-stakeholder accountability.
c. Advocate for stronger global privacy and data protection laws.
2. Digital Inclusion and Bridging the Global Divide:
• Focus: Ensuring universal internet access and benefits.
• Key Points:
a. Bridging the urban-rural digital divide.
b. Overcoming barriers such as infrastructure, costs, and digital literacy.
c. Ensuring accessibility for marginalized groups.
d. Promoting affordable access via innovative solutions like satellite internet.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Foster public-private partnerships for expanding digital infrastructure.
b. Support digital literacy initiatives in underserved communities.
c. Promote inclusive policies for vulnerable populations.
3. The Future of Emerging Technologies and Internet Governance:
• Focus: Exploring governance issues around emerging technologies like AI, blockchain, and quantum computing.
• Key Points:
a. Balancing innovation and regulation in AI and blockchain.
b. Addressing ethical concerns of emerging technologies.
c. Analyzing AI’s impact on labor markets.
d. Managing the governance of digital currencies and decentralized finance.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Launch research initiatives on the societal impact of emerging technologies.
b. Promote ethical AI development with a human rights focus.
c. Develop global guidelines for blockchain use.
4. Sustainability and the Environmental Impact of the Internet:
• Focus: Addressing the environmental sustainability of the internet and its infrastructure.
• Key Points:
a. Investigating the environmental impact of data centers, cloud computing, and blockchain mining.
b. Promoting energy-efficient digital infrastructure.
c. Reducing e-waste and supporting the circular economy.
d. Aligning internet governance with global environmental goals.
• Proposed Actions:
a. Encourage tech companies to adopt green technologies.
b. Facilitate global discussions on the environmental impact of the digital economy.
c. Advocate for international cooperation on reducing e-waste and promoting sustainable technologies.
1. Align IGF themes with Global Digital Compact (GDC) goals: Ensure IGF discussions focus on key GDC priorities like digital inclusion, trust, security, and sustainability.
2. Foster multi-stakeholder engagement: Strengthen collaboration between governments, tech companies, civil society, and other stakeholders, reflecting the GDC’s inclusive approach.
3. Highlight policy development and best practices: Promote policy frameworks and practical solutions that align with GDC objectives, especially in bridging the digital divide.
4. Support accountability mechanisms: Encourage transparent governance models and accountability frameworks in line with GDC principles.
5. Promote capacity building and digital literacy: Integrate GDC's focus on education and skills development into IGF's intersessional activities and regional initiatives.
6. Ensure diversity in participation: Broaden participation from underrepresented regions and groups to reflect the GDC’s commitment to inclusivity and equity.
7. Monitor progress: Use IGF as a platform for tracking and reporting on GDC implementation and progress on its objectives.
Encourage dialogue on ethical AI and data governance: Address key GDC concerns regarding AI ethics, privacy, and human rights through IGF discussions.
2. Foster multi-stakeholder engagement: Strengthen collaboration between governments, tech companies, civil society, and other stakeholders, reflecting the GDC’s inclusive approach.
3. Highlight policy development and best practices: Promote policy frameworks and practical solutions that align with GDC objectives, especially in bridging the digital divide.
4. Support accountability mechanisms: Encourage transparent governance models and accountability frameworks in line with GDC principles.
5. Promote capacity building and digital literacy: Integrate GDC's focus on education and skills development into IGF's intersessional activities and regional initiatives.
6. Ensure diversity in participation: Broaden participation from underrepresented regions and groups to reflect the GDC’s commitment to inclusivity and equity.
7. Monitor progress: Use IGF as a platform for tracking and reporting on GDC implementation and progress on its objectives.
Encourage dialogue on ethical AI and data governance: Address key GDC concerns regarding AI ethics, privacy, and human rights through IGF discussions.
The time to demonstrate tangible progress is now. It is crucial to adopt a citizen-centric approach that highlights real work at the grassroots level, reflecting the core ideals of the IGF.
Civil Society
ID87
Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Civil Society
ID88
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
It is important to ensure we follow the IGF practices from pre-program events. Also, the use of Zoom should be well managed to ensure it is available right from day zero. Side attraction events should be well managed too.
Integrating GDC Principles: It is important to integrate GDC Principles into IGF discussion, which should also reflect on its output documents.
Action-Oriented Focus:It is high time, we started looking at how to make IGF action-oriented which can be bounded by setting specific target to review countries' action and roadmaps.
WSIS+20 Review Integration: We need to start to identifying gaps and lacunas that can accelerate the implementation of GDC.
Capacity Building: This is very important to support developing countries and marginalized communities in order to build digital skills and governance capacities toward GDC actualization.
Advocacy and Outreach:Civil organization like mine - ISOC should be empowered to raise awareness on the GDC among policymakers and the general citizenry for efficient and effective implementation.
Action-Oriented Focus:It is high time, we started looking at how to make IGF action-oriented which can be bounded by setting specific target to review countries' action and roadmaps.
WSIS+20 Review Integration: We need to start to identifying gaps and lacunas that can accelerate the implementation of GDC.
Capacity Building: This is very important to support developing countries and marginalized communities in order to build digital skills and governance capacities toward GDC actualization.
Advocacy and Outreach:Civil organization like mine - ISOC should be empowered to raise awareness on the GDC among policymakers and the general citizenry for efficient and effective implementation.
there should be more awareness around the main session so much to ensure more participation and also it should be treated like a plenary so that once main session is on other sessions should not be run.
Civil Society
ID89
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
I hope to see 2025 and the figures and plans discussed in 2024 have been achieved.
no , thanks
Civil Society
ID90
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) serves as a valuable platform for addressing global digital governance challenges and advancing major international initiatives such as the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes. Here are ways the IGF annual meetings and intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to these goals:
1. Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
• Inclusion of diverse voices: The IGF’s multi-stakeholder model should amplify engagement across governments, private sector entities, civil society, academia, and technical communities to ensure a comprehensive approach to the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
• Focused workshops and sessions: Create specific tracks during IGF meetings dedicated to GDC principles and WSIS objectives, enabling targeted discussions and recommendations on issues such as digital inclusion, data governance, and cybersecurity.
2. Aligning Themes with GDC and WSIS Priorities
• Digital cooperation and inclusion: Organize discussions on equitable internet access, especially for marginalized communities, to reflect the GDC’s emphasis on reducing the digital divide and the WSIS outcomes’ focus on universal connectivity.
• Sustainable development: Highlight the role of ICTs in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), addressing how IGF contributions can align with broader UN objectives.
• Trust and security: Provide actionable insights and best practices for building trust online and addressing emerging risks like misinformation and cyber threats.
3. Producing Actionable Outcomes
• Policy recommendations: Develop outcome-oriented reports that offer actionable insights on aligning digital governance with GDC and WSIS priorities, making these accessible to policymakers and stakeholders.
• Tracking progress: Establish mechanisms to review and monitor the implementation of recommendations stemming from IGF discussions, linking them to GDC and WSIS review processes.
4. Strengthening Inter-Sessional Work
• Dynamic Coalitions: Encourage IGF Dynamic Coalitions to align their work with the GDC’s thematic priorities and WSIS action lines, ensuring continuity between annual meetings.
• Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Focus BPF efforts on critical areas like digital inclusion, AI ethics, and sustainable digital infrastructure that resonate with both the GDC and WSIS goals.
5. Bridging Global and Regional Perspectives
• National and Regional IGFs (NRIs): Leverage NRIs to gather localized insights and best practices that can inform global-level discussions at IGF annual meetings, ensuring inclusivity and relevance across different contexts.
• Capacity-building initiatives: Promote regional workshops and capacity-building efforts to empower stakeholders from developing countries, aligning with WSIS’s focus on narrowing the global digital divide.
6. Preparatory Engagement with UN Processes
• Collaboration with UN bodies: Partner with UN agencies working on digital governance, such as the ITU and UNDP, to align IGF discussions with ongoing UN processes, including those leading up to the high-level WSIS+20 review in 2025.
• Input to the GDC: Use the IGF platform to consolidate stakeholder contributions to the GDC’s formulation and implementation, creating synergy between global digital policies and grassroots perspectives.
7. Leveraging Technology and Innovation
• Digital platforms: Enhance the IGF’s use of digital platforms for engagement, enabling real-time participation and feedback from a global audience, including those unable to attend in person.
• Emerging technologies: Dedicate sessions to the governance of emerging technologies such as AI, blockchain, and IoT, aligning with the GDC’s focus on fostering innovation responsibly.
By fostering inclusive dialogue, producing actionable recommendations, and aligning intersessional activities with key global initiatives, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC and WSIS outcomes, ultimately contributing to a more equitable and sustainable digital future.
1. Facilitating Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration
• Inclusion of diverse voices: The IGF’s multi-stakeholder model should amplify engagement across governments, private sector entities, civil society, academia, and technical communities to ensure a comprehensive approach to the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
• Focused workshops and sessions: Create specific tracks during IGF meetings dedicated to GDC principles and WSIS objectives, enabling targeted discussions and recommendations on issues such as digital inclusion, data governance, and cybersecurity.
2. Aligning Themes with GDC and WSIS Priorities
• Digital cooperation and inclusion: Organize discussions on equitable internet access, especially for marginalized communities, to reflect the GDC’s emphasis on reducing the digital divide and the WSIS outcomes’ focus on universal connectivity.
• Sustainable development: Highlight the role of ICTs in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), addressing how IGF contributions can align with broader UN objectives.
• Trust and security: Provide actionable insights and best practices for building trust online and addressing emerging risks like misinformation and cyber threats.
3. Producing Actionable Outcomes
• Policy recommendations: Develop outcome-oriented reports that offer actionable insights on aligning digital governance with GDC and WSIS priorities, making these accessible to policymakers and stakeholders.
• Tracking progress: Establish mechanisms to review and monitor the implementation of recommendations stemming from IGF discussions, linking them to GDC and WSIS review processes.
4. Strengthening Inter-Sessional Work
• Dynamic Coalitions: Encourage IGF Dynamic Coalitions to align their work with the GDC’s thematic priorities and WSIS action lines, ensuring continuity between annual meetings.
• Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Focus BPF efforts on critical areas like digital inclusion, AI ethics, and sustainable digital infrastructure that resonate with both the GDC and WSIS goals.
5. Bridging Global and Regional Perspectives
• National and Regional IGFs (NRIs): Leverage NRIs to gather localized insights and best practices that can inform global-level discussions at IGF annual meetings, ensuring inclusivity and relevance across different contexts.
• Capacity-building initiatives: Promote regional workshops and capacity-building efforts to empower stakeholders from developing countries, aligning with WSIS’s focus on narrowing the global digital divide.
6. Preparatory Engagement with UN Processes
• Collaboration with UN bodies: Partner with UN agencies working on digital governance, such as the ITU and UNDP, to align IGF discussions with ongoing UN processes, including those leading up to the high-level WSIS+20 review in 2025.
• Input to the GDC: Use the IGF platform to consolidate stakeholder contributions to the GDC’s formulation and implementation, creating synergy between global digital policies and grassroots perspectives.
7. Leveraging Technology and Innovation
• Digital platforms: Enhance the IGF’s use of digital platforms for engagement, enabling real-time participation and feedback from a global audience, including those unable to attend in person.
• Emerging technologies: Dedicate sessions to the governance of emerging technologies such as AI, blockchain, and IoT, aligning with the GDC’s focus on fostering innovation responsibly.
By fostering inclusive dialogue, producing actionable recommendations, and aligning intersessional activities with key global initiatives, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC and WSIS outcomes, ultimately contributing to a more equitable and sustainable digital future.
The overall format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can be enhanced to foster more impactful discussions, inclusivity, and actionable outcomes. Here are some ideas:
1. Thematic Tracks with Clear and Actionable Focus
Simplify Themes: Reduce the number of thematic tracks to ensure focused discussions. For example, categorize them into three to five overarching themes like:
Digital Inclusion and Access
Trust and Security
Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Sustainability and Digital Development
Data Governance and Privacy
Sub-Themes: Introduce sub-themes under each track to address specific issues, such as AI ethics under Emerging Technologies or cybersecurity frameworks under Trust and Security.
Outcome-Oriented Tracks: Each track should aim to produce actionable recommendations or a set of best practices to ensure discussions translate into tangible benefits.
2. Modular Format with Dynamic Sessions
Interactive Workshops: Replace some panel-heavy sessions with interactive, small-group workshops. These could involve:
Problem-solving exercises
Policy simulations
Real-time drafting of policy frameworks
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, 5-10 minute presentations by experts, young innovators, or stakeholders from marginalized communities to spotlight unique perspectives or solutions.
Role-Playing Sessions: Engage attendees in role-playing exercises to explore governance challenges from various perspectives (e.g., government, civil society, private sector).
3. Regional and Local Integration
Dedicated Regional Tracks: Highlight regional perspectives on global issues by integrating localized sessions. These tracks could showcase:
Regional challenges and solutions
Case studies of successful initiatives from National and Regional IGFs (NRIs)
Cross-Cultural Panels: Form panels with representatives from diverse regions to ensure a global view of key issues.
4. Multi-Stakeholder Design
Stakeholder-Specific Roundtables: Organize roundtables that focus on particular stakeholder groups (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector) while maintaining open outcomes for multi-stakeholder review.
Youth-Led Tracks: Dedicate space for youth leaders to design, lead, and moderate sessions, ensuring intergenerational dialogue.
Marginalized Voices: Ensure accessibility for underrepresented groups by prioritizing travel fellowships, remote participation tools, and translation services.
5. Emphasis on Tangible Outcomes
Policy Briefs: Require each thematic track to produce a brief summarizing key insights, recommendations, and next steps.
Outcome Harvesting: Integrate sessions that review and assess progress on recommendations from previous IGFs to track impact over time.
Cross-Sector Collaboration Pitches: Dedicate time for presenting cross-sector partnerships that arise from IGF discussions.
6. Innovative Technologies for Participation
AI-Driven Summaries: Use AI tools to generate real-time session summaries, ensuring participants stay informed even if they miss a session.
Hybrid Participation Enhancements: Create virtual breakout rooms, Q&A tools, and live polling for remote participants to ensure equity in contributions.
Interactive Digital Wall: Allow participants to contribute ideas or questions in real-time via a digital "idea wall" displayed at the venue and online.
7. Thematic Integration Across Years
Progressive Themes: Adopt multi-year themes to allow deeper exploration of evolving topics, with annual IGFs acting as milestones for these discussions.
Integration with UN Agendas: Align themes closely with ongoing UN initiatives, such as the Global Digital Compact and SDG targets, ensuring relevance and coherence.
8. Rethinking Plenary Sessions
Debate-Style Sessions: Introduce debate-style plenaries to explore controversial issues, promoting a dynamic exchange of ideas.
High-Level Town Halls: Host open Q&A town hall sessions with high-level stakeholders, such as UN representatives or tech CEOs, to engage the audience directly.
9. Celebrating Innovation and Creativity
Digital Showcases: Dedicate spaces for startups, researchers, or NGOs to present innovative solutions or tools aligned with IGF themes.
Hackathons: Include pre-event or concurrent hackathons focused on creating tools or frameworks to address pressing governance challenges.
10. Post-Event Engagement
Thematic Communities of Practice: Create communities of practice for each thematic track to continue collaboration and knowledge sharing throughout the year.
Outcome Dissemination: Ensure IGF outcomes are shared widely, with tailored reports for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and grassroots organizations.
By simplifying themes, emphasizing actionable outcomes, and integrating diverse voices and technologies, the IGF can become a more impactful and inclusive platform for shaping the future of internet governance
1. Thematic Tracks with Clear and Actionable Focus
Simplify Themes: Reduce the number of thematic tracks to ensure focused discussions. For example, categorize them into three to five overarching themes like:
Digital Inclusion and Access
Trust and Security
Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Sustainability and Digital Development
Data Governance and Privacy
Sub-Themes: Introduce sub-themes under each track to address specific issues, such as AI ethics under Emerging Technologies or cybersecurity frameworks under Trust and Security.
Outcome-Oriented Tracks: Each track should aim to produce actionable recommendations or a set of best practices to ensure discussions translate into tangible benefits.
2. Modular Format with Dynamic Sessions
Interactive Workshops: Replace some panel-heavy sessions with interactive, small-group workshops. These could involve:
Problem-solving exercises
Policy simulations
Real-time drafting of policy frameworks
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, 5-10 minute presentations by experts, young innovators, or stakeholders from marginalized communities to spotlight unique perspectives or solutions.
Role-Playing Sessions: Engage attendees in role-playing exercises to explore governance challenges from various perspectives (e.g., government, civil society, private sector).
3. Regional and Local Integration
Dedicated Regional Tracks: Highlight regional perspectives on global issues by integrating localized sessions. These tracks could showcase:
Regional challenges and solutions
Case studies of successful initiatives from National and Regional IGFs (NRIs)
Cross-Cultural Panels: Form panels with representatives from diverse regions to ensure a global view of key issues.
4. Multi-Stakeholder Design
Stakeholder-Specific Roundtables: Organize roundtables that focus on particular stakeholder groups (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector) while maintaining open outcomes for multi-stakeholder review.
Youth-Led Tracks: Dedicate space for youth leaders to design, lead, and moderate sessions, ensuring intergenerational dialogue.
Marginalized Voices: Ensure accessibility for underrepresented groups by prioritizing travel fellowships, remote participation tools, and translation services.
5. Emphasis on Tangible Outcomes
Policy Briefs: Require each thematic track to produce a brief summarizing key insights, recommendations, and next steps.
Outcome Harvesting: Integrate sessions that review and assess progress on recommendations from previous IGFs to track impact over time.
Cross-Sector Collaboration Pitches: Dedicate time for presenting cross-sector partnerships that arise from IGF discussions.
6. Innovative Technologies for Participation
AI-Driven Summaries: Use AI tools to generate real-time session summaries, ensuring participants stay informed even if they miss a session.
Hybrid Participation Enhancements: Create virtual breakout rooms, Q&A tools, and live polling for remote participants to ensure equity in contributions.
Interactive Digital Wall: Allow participants to contribute ideas or questions in real-time via a digital "idea wall" displayed at the venue and online.
7. Thematic Integration Across Years
Progressive Themes: Adopt multi-year themes to allow deeper exploration of evolving topics, with annual IGFs acting as milestones for these discussions.
Integration with UN Agendas: Align themes closely with ongoing UN initiatives, such as the Global Digital Compact and SDG targets, ensuring relevance and coherence.
8. Rethinking Plenary Sessions
Debate-Style Sessions: Introduce debate-style plenaries to explore controversial issues, promoting a dynamic exchange of ideas.
High-Level Town Halls: Host open Q&A town hall sessions with high-level stakeholders, such as UN representatives or tech CEOs, to engage the audience directly.
9. Celebrating Innovation and Creativity
Digital Showcases: Dedicate spaces for startups, researchers, or NGOs to present innovative solutions or tools aligned with IGF themes.
Hackathons: Include pre-event or concurrent hackathons focused on creating tools or frameworks to address pressing governance challenges.
10. Post-Event Engagement
Thematic Communities of Practice: Create communities of practice for each thematic track to continue collaboration and knowledge sharing throughout the year.
Outcome Dissemination: Ensure IGF outcomes are shared widely, with tailored reports for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and grassroots organizations.
By simplifying themes, emphasizing actionable outcomes, and integrating diverse voices and technologies, the IGF can become a more impactful and inclusive platform for shaping the future of internet governance
Private Sector
ID91
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Digital Inclusion and Accessibility
• Proposal: Addressing the digital divide in rural and underserved communities in Cameroon.
• Focus: Strategies to improve internet access, digital literacy, and affordable technology for marginalized groups.
2. Cybersecurity and Data Protection
• Proposal: Enhancing cybersecurity measures and data protection policies in Africa.
• Focus: Developing frameworks to protect personal data and combat cyber threats, with a special emphasis on protecting vulnerable populations.
3. Youth and Digital Skills Development
• Proposal: Empowering youth through digital skills training and entrepreneurship programs.
• Focus: Initiatives to equip young people with the skills needed for the digital economy, fostering innovation and job creation.
4. Internet Governance and Policy Development
• Proposal: Strengthening multi-stakeholder participation in internet governance in Cameroon.
• Focus: Encouraging inclusive policy-making processes that involve government, private sector, and civil society.
5. Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression
• Proposal: Promoting digital rights and freedom of expression online.
• Focus: Ensuring that internet policies respect human rights and support free speech, while addressing issues of online harassment and misinformation.
6. Sustainable Development and ICT
• Proposal: Leveraging ICT for sustainable development in Africa.
• Focus: Using digital technologies to support environmental sustainability, healthcare, and education.
These proposals can help address critical issues and contribute to the development of a more inclusive and secure digital environment in Africa and Cameroon.
• Proposal: Addressing the digital divide in rural and underserved communities in Cameroon.
• Focus: Strategies to improve internet access, digital literacy, and affordable technology for marginalized groups.
2. Cybersecurity and Data Protection
• Proposal: Enhancing cybersecurity measures and data protection policies in Africa.
• Focus: Developing frameworks to protect personal data and combat cyber threats, with a special emphasis on protecting vulnerable populations.
3. Youth and Digital Skills Development
• Proposal: Empowering youth through digital skills training and entrepreneurship programs.
• Focus: Initiatives to equip young people with the skills needed for the digital economy, fostering innovation and job creation.
4. Internet Governance and Policy Development
• Proposal: Strengthening multi-stakeholder participation in internet governance in Cameroon.
• Focus: Encouraging inclusive policy-making processes that involve government, private sector, and civil society.
5. Digital Rights and Freedom of Expression
• Proposal: Promoting digital rights and freedom of expression online.
• Focus: Ensuring that internet policies respect human rights and support free speech, while addressing issues of online harassment and misinformation.
6. Sustainable Development and ICT
• Proposal: Leveraging ICT for sustainable development in Africa.
• Focus: Using digital technologies to support environmental sustainability, healthcare, and education.
These proposals can help address critical issues and contribute to the development of a more inclusive and secure digital environment in Africa and Cameroon.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in aligning with major global initiatives and agendas. Here's are some ideas how the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes:
1. Integration with the Global Digital Compact
- Framework Development: The IGF can provide a platform for stakeholders to discuss and refine the Global Digital Compact, ensuring it addresses the latest digital governance challenges and opportunities.
- Stakeholder Engagement: By involving a diverse range of participants, including governments, civil society, and the private sector, the IGF can foster inclusive dialogue and collaboration on the Compact's implementation.
- Monitoring and Reporting: The IGF can serve as a forum for monitoring progress and sharing best practices related to the Compact, helping to ensure its goals are met effectively.
2. Review of WSIS Outcomes
- Progress Assessment: The IGF can facilitate sessions to assess the progress made since the WSIS, identifying successes and areas needing improvement.
- Policy Recommendations: Through its discussions, the IGF can generate policy recommendations that support the continued implementation of WSIS outcomes, particularly in the context of new digital challenges.
- Capacity Building: The IGF can offer workshops and training sessions to build the capacity of stakeholders to implement WSIS outcomes, ensuring that all regions and sectors are equipped to participate in the digital economy.
3. High-Level Engagement
- High-Level Sessions: Organizing high-level sessions during the IGF annual meeting can attract attention from global leaders and policymakers, ensuring that digital governance remains a priority on the international agenda.
- Intersessional Work: The IGF's intersessional work, including Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums, can continue to address specific issues related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes throughout the year.
By focusing on these areas, the IGF can significantly contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring that digital governance evolves to meet the needs of a rapidly changing world.
1. Integration with the Global Digital Compact
- Framework Development: The IGF can provide a platform for stakeholders to discuss and refine the Global Digital Compact, ensuring it addresses the latest digital governance challenges and opportunities.
- Stakeholder Engagement: By involving a diverse range of participants, including governments, civil society, and the private sector, the IGF can foster inclusive dialogue and collaboration on the Compact's implementation.
- Monitoring and Reporting: The IGF can serve as a forum for monitoring progress and sharing best practices related to the Compact, helping to ensure its goals are met effectively.
2. Review of WSIS Outcomes
- Progress Assessment: The IGF can facilitate sessions to assess the progress made since the WSIS, identifying successes and areas needing improvement.
- Policy Recommendations: Through its discussions, the IGF can generate policy recommendations that support the continued implementation of WSIS outcomes, particularly in the context of new digital challenges.
- Capacity Building: The IGF can offer workshops and training sessions to build the capacity of stakeholders to implement WSIS outcomes, ensuring that all regions and sectors are equipped to participate in the digital economy.
3. High-Level Engagement
- High-Level Sessions: Organizing high-level sessions during the IGF annual meeting can attract attention from global leaders and policymakers, ensuring that digital governance remains a priority on the international agenda.
- Intersessional Work: The IGF's intersessional work, including Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums, can continue to address specific issues related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes throughout the year.
By focusing on these areas, the IGF can significantly contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring that digital governance evolves to meet the needs of a rapidly changing world.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is designed to be a comprehensive and inclusive platform for discussing public policy issues related to the Internet. Here are some key aspects of its overall format and design:
Overall Format
Hybrid Meetings: The IGF meetings are typically held in a hybrid format, allowing both onsite and online participation. This ensures broader accessibility and inclusivity.
Multistakeholder Approach: The IGF brings together various stakeholders, including governments, civil society, the private sector, and technical communities, to discuss and collaborate on Internet governance issues.
Tracks and Sessions: The forum includes multiple tracks and sessions, such as high-level sessions, workshops, open forums, lightning talks, and networking sessions. These are designed to cater to different interests and expertise levels.
Themes and Tracks
Overarching Themes: Each IGF meeting has overarching themes that guide the discussions. For example, the 2024 IGF had the theme "Building our Multistakeholder Digital Future".
Specific Themes: Within the overarching theme, there are specific themes such as:
Advancing human rights and inclusion in the digital age
Enhancing the digital contribution to peace, development, and sustainability
Harnessing innovation and balancing risks in digital space
Improving digital governance for the Internet we want
Treating Themes in Different Ways
Thematic Inputs: The IGF collects thematic inputs from stakeholders to shape the agenda and ensure that the discussions are relevant and comprehensive.
Intersessional Work: The IGF engages in intersessional work, including dynamic coalitions and best practice forums, to continue discussions and develop outputs between annual meetings.
Special Tracks: The IGF includes special tracks such as the Youth Track, Parliamentary Track, and High-Level Leaders Track to address the needs and perspectives of different groups.
Engagement and Participation
Remote Hubs: To enhance participation, the IGF supports remote hubs where participants can join the discussions from different locations.
Interactive Platforms: The use of interactive platforms and virtual components ensures that online participants can engage meaningfully in the DISCUSSIONS about.
These elements collectively ensure that the IGF remains a dynamic and inclusive platform for addressing the complex and evolving issues of Internet governance.
Overall Format
Hybrid Meetings: The IGF meetings are typically held in a hybrid format, allowing both onsite and online participation. This ensures broader accessibility and inclusivity.
Multistakeholder Approach: The IGF brings together various stakeholders, including governments, civil society, the private sector, and technical communities, to discuss and collaborate on Internet governance issues.
Tracks and Sessions: The forum includes multiple tracks and sessions, such as high-level sessions, workshops, open forums, lightning talks, and networking sessions. These are designed to cater to different interests and expertise levels.
Themes and Tracks
Overarching Themes: Each IGF meeting has overarching themes that guide the discussions. For example, the 2024 IGF had the theme "Building our Multistakeholder Digital Future".
Specific Themes: Within the overarching theme, there are specific themes such as:
Advancing human rights and inclusion in the digital age
Enhancing the digital contribution to peace, development, and sustainability
Harnessing innovation and balancing risks in digital space
Improving digital governance for the Internet we want
Treating Themes in Different Ways
Thematic Inputs: The IGF collects thematic inputs from stakeholders to shape the agenda and ensure that the discussions are relevant and comprehensive.
Intersessional Work: The IGF engages in intersessional work, including dynamic coalitions and best practice forums, to continue discussions and develop outputs between annual meetings.
Special Tracks: The IGF includes special tracks such as the Youth Track, Parliamentary Track, and High-Level Leaders Track to address the needs and perspectives of different groups.
Engagement and Participation
Remote Hubs: To enhance participation, the IGF supports remote hubs where participants can join the discussions from different locations.
Interactive Platforms: The use of interactive platforms and virtual components ensures that online participants can engage meaningfully in the DISCUSSIONS about.
These elements collectively ensure that the IGF remains a dynamic and inclusive platform for addressing the complex and evolving issues of Internet governance.
Civil Society
ID92
Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID93
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Technical Community
ID94
Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Technical Community
ID95
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
As part of the institution we are trying our best to be among top ten.
We are a higher quality educational institution located in East Africa, and we hope that we will make a big difference.
Civil Society
ID96
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Multilingualism
By strategically aligning its activities with the Global Digital Compact and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing global digital cooperation. Through inclusive dialogue, knowledge sharing, and actionable commitments, the IGF can contribute significantly to achieving the objectives set forth in these critical global frameworks as we approach the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
By diversifying session formats, emphasizing interactivity, and fostering inclusivity, the IGF can create a more vibrant and impactful environment for addressing critical issues in internet governance. These enhancements not only encourage greater participation but also facilitate meaningful dialogue that can lead to actionable outcomes and collaborative solutions.
Civil Society
ID97
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Technical and Operational Topics
Technical Community
ID98
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Private Sector
ID100
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID101
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Technical Community
ID102
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
Enhance Thematic Alignment with Global Priorities
Integrate Global Stakeholders including Policy makers
Develop Actionable Outputs and tracking
Promote Regional and Local Engagement, Localized case studies etc
Mobilize IGF Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums to address specific GDC themes
Youth Engagement
Showcase Alignment with WSIS+20 and Highlight IGF Contributions
Integrate Global Stakeholders including Policy makers
Develop Actionable Outputs and tracking
Promote Regional and Local Engagement, Localized case studies etc
Mobilize IGF Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums to address specific GDC themes
Youth Engagement
Showcase Alignment with WSIS+20 and Highlight IGF Contributions
Multi-Year Thematic Focus
Interconnected Tracks
Thematic Campaigns
Use social media and storytelling platforms to share the human impact of IGF discussions, bringing its themes to life
Proposed Themes
AI and Human Dignity
Digital Sovereignty and Global Cooperation
Big Data Governance
Interconnected Tracks
Thematic Campaigns
Use social media and storytelling platforms to share the human impact of IGF discussions, bringing its themes to life
Proposed Themes
AI and Human Dignity
Digital Sovereignty and Global Cooperation
Big Data Governance
Civil Society
ID103
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Emerging Technologies and the Widening Digital Divide: Challenges and Pathways to Equity"
The Dark Side of AI
The Dark Side of AI
Youth Panels and Ambassadors: Encourage youth participation as speakers and session leaders.
Live Polling and Q&A: Enable real-time audience input during sessions.
Feature all-women panels or women-majority panels to highlight female expertise.
Awards and Recognition
Live Polling and Q&A: Enable real-time audience input during sessions.
Feature all-women panels or women-majority panels to highlight female expertise.
Awards and Recognition
Government
ID104
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The IGF can strengthen its alignment with the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes by ensuring thematic alignment in annual meetings, fostering multistakeholder dialogues, and leveraging intersessional work to produce actionable policy recommendations. Enhanced reporting, showcasing best practices, and engaging high-level stakeholders can further amplify its contributions, driving progress toward global digital goals ahead of the 2025 high-level meeting.
The overall format and design of the IGF can be enhanced to foster deeper engagement and impactful outcomes. Here are some positive ideas:
Dynamic Thematic Tracks: Introduce adaptive thematic tracks that evolve yearly based on emerging global digital priorities. This approach ensures the IGF remains relevant and responsive to pressing issues like AI governance, digital inclusion, and cybersecurity.
Interactive Formats: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive session formats, such as design-thinking workshops, roundtables, and simulation exercises. These formats encourage hands-on collaboration and innovative problem-solving.
Regional and Local Tracks: Introduce regional-specific tracks to address unique challenges and opportunities in different parts of the world, fostering localized solutions while maintaining a global perspective.
Youth and Future Leaders Track: Dedicate a thematic track to youth perspectives and future leaders, enabling younger voices to contribute meaningfully to digital governance discussions.
Integrated Intersessional Work: Seamlessly integrate outputs from intersessional work (e.g., Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions) into the main event by hosting dedicated sessions to discuss and refine these findings.
Collaborative Plenary Sessions: Design plenary sessions as collaborative dialogues, inviting diverse stakeholders to co-create actionable recommendations rather than delivering one-way presentations.
Hybrid Engagement Innovations: Enhance the hybrid format with immersive technologies, such as virtual reality or AI-driven networking tools, to create equitable participation experiences for virtual attendees.
Theme-Specific Networking Spaces: Set up dedicated networking zones—both physical and virtual—aligned with thematic tracks to encourage informal discussions and connections among participants with shared interests.
Measurable Outcomes: Focus on actionable outcomes by concluding each track with a session that synthesizes key takeaways and outlines practical next steps, contributing to global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact.
These ideas aim to make the IGF more dynamic, inclusive, and results-oriented while maintaining its reputation as a leading platform for multistakeholder dialogue on internet governance.
Dynamic Thematic Tracks: Introduce adaptive thematic tracks that evolve yearly based on emerging global digital priorities. This approach ensures the IGF remains relevant and responsive to pressing issues like AI governance, digital inclusion, and cybersecurity.
Interactive Formats: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive session formats, such as design-thinking workshops, roundtables, and simulation exercises. These formats encourage hands-on collaboration and innovative problem-solving.
Regional and Local Tracks: Introduce regional-specific tracks to address unique challenges and opportunities in different parts of the world, fostering localized solutions while maintaining a global perspective.
Youth and Future Leaders Track: Dedicate a thematic track to youth perspectives and future leaders, enabling younger voices to contribute meaningfully to digital governance discussions.
Integrated Intersessional Work: Seamlessly integrate outputs from intersessional work (e.g., Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions) into the main event by hosting dedicated sessions to discuss and refine these findings.
Collaborative Plenary Sessions: Design plenary sessions as collaborative dialogues, inviting diverse stakeholders to co-create actionable recommendations rather than delivering one-way presentations.
Hybrid Engagement Innovations: Enhance the hybrid format with immersive technologies, such as virtual reality or AI-driven networking tools, to create equitable participation experiences for virtual attendees.
Theme-Specific Networking Spaces: Set up dedicated networking zones—both physical and virtual—aligned with thematic tracks to encourage informal discussions and connections among participants with shared interests.
Measurable Outcomes: Focus on actionable outcomes by concluding each track with a session that synthesizes key takeaways and outlines practical next steps, contributing to global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact.
These ideas aim to make the IGF more dynamic, inclusive, and results-oriented while maintaining its reputation as a leading platform for multistakeholder dialogue on internet governance.
Technical Community
ID105
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Technical and Operational Topics
The IGF 2025 should actively engage in implementing the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and reviewing the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes. This involves creating action-oriented initiatives, fostering multistakeholder dialogues, and developing progress monitoring mechanisms. By transitioning from a discussion platform to a key player in global digital governance, the IGF can strengthen international cooperation, promote inclusive digital societies, and enhance global trust in the digital future.
The IGF 2025 will be a crucial milestone for advancing multistakeholder discussions on internet governance, digital transformation, and policymaking. To ensure that the IGF remains relevant, impactful, and adaptable to the rapidly evolving digital landscape, several improvements can be made to its structure, content, and format. Here are some ideas for the IGF 2025 in Norway, focusing on key areas that should be included in the event:
The IGF should develop adaptive thematic frameworks that can evolve to address emerging global trends and crises. This could be achieved by introducing a mechanism that allows emerging issues to be added as thematic tracks during the event itself, enabling discussions to adapt to global challenges such as cyberattacks, climate-related technology issues, or digital health crises.
The IGF needs to increase the integration of youth and next-generation leadership. Youth participants should be empowered to draft policy recommendations on topics such as digital inclusion, online privacy, and AI regulation, and to present these recommendations to senior stakeholders for consideration. Expanding digital platforms and facilitating hybrid participation can also enable meaningful contributions from people around the world.
Additionally, the IGF should promote greater representation of women in technology and enhance gender diversity in leadership roles, particularly in discussions about AI ethics, cybersecurity, and digital inclusion. Moreover, the IGF should incorporate regional perspectives and local solutions more effectively.
Finally, the IGF should encourage hosting countries to facilitate visa access for all participants, especially young individuals with technical backgrounds, who wish to attend the events.
The IGF should develop adaptive thematic frameworks that can evolve to address emerging global trends and crises. This could be achieved by introducing a mechanism that allows emerging issues to be added as thematic tracks during the event itself, enabling discussions to adapt to global challenges such as cyberattacks, climate-related technology issues, or digital health crises.
The IGF needs to increase the integration of youth and next-generation leadership. Youth participants should be empowered to draft policy recommendations on topics such as digital inclusion, online privacy, and AI regulation, and to present these recommendations to senior stakeholders for consideration. Expanding digital platforms and facilitating hybrid participation can also enable meaningful contributions from people around the world.
Additionally, the IGF should promote greater representation of women in technology and enhance gender diversity in leadership roles, particularly in discussions about AI ethics, cybersecurity, and digital inclusion. Moreover, the IGF should incorporate regional perspectives and local solutions more effectively.
Finally, the IGF should encourage hosting countries to facilitate visa access for all participants, especially young individuals with technical backgrounds, who wish to attend the events.
Technical Community
ID106
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Je demanderai d'inviter tous les acteurs des gouvernements et partenaires à répondre présent à la prochaine réunion pour contribuer aux meilleures modalités d'un internet accessible et fiable , et plus particulièrement consolider les plates formes internationales
Civil Society
ID107
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
-
-
-
Civil Society
ID108
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Government
ID109
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Civil Society
ID111
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust
Please, change your conference app, publish the program enough in advance, and make it available to all registered users. Send notifications to the users who registered for the sessions.
Private Sector
ID112
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Thank you
I think this presence can help IGF to implement GDC and the more you have events the more stronger you can perform. there are many topics that can be held many times during the year
I think everything was great
Government
ID113
Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Les technologies émergentes, de la biologie synthétique et de la neurotechnologie à l'intelligence artificielle, en passant par les technologies immersives et quantiques, se caractérisent par un développement rapide et une incertitude quant à leur trajectoire et leur impact. Le lien entre innovation et technologie : l'innovation se nourrit de technologie, même si toutes les innovations ne sont pas technologiques.
Pour contribuer à la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondiale et à l'examen de la mise en œuvre globale des résultats du Sommet mondial sur la société de l'information en vue de la réunion de haut niveau prévue fin 2025, nous proposons les recommandations suivantes :
Faire progresser les engagements concrets et les indicateurs de mesure pour réduire la fracture numérique persistante implique de garantir une connectivité significative du point de vue des droits humains ;
Iles essentiel de reconnaître que l'accès à l'internet fait partie intégrante du droit à la liberté d'expression et qu'il facilite l'exercice d'autres droits fondamentaux ;
Les politiques de connectivité devraient être élaborées et évaluées dans le cadre de processus participatifs, en mettant l'accent sur la transparence, la responsabilité et divers mécanismes de fourniture d'infrastructures, y compris les réseaux communautaires ;
Souligner qu’il est essentiel de respecter l'autodétermination des groupes autochtones en matière d'infrastructures et de déploiement technologique ;
La lutte contre les inégalités, les prix élevés et les problèmes d'infrastructure nécessite une perspective holistique et interculturelle. Une connectivité significative est essentielle pour permettre l'exercice des droits humains et s'aligner sur les agendas mondiaux en matière de transformation numérique et de développement durable.
Faire progresser les engagements concrets et les indicateurs de mesure pour réduire la fracture numérique persistante implique de garantir une connectivité significative du point de vue des droits humains ;
Iles essentiel de reconnaître que l'accès à l'internet fait partie intégrante du droit à la liberté d'expression et qu'il facilite l'exercice d'autres droits fondamentaux ;
Les politiques de connectivité devraient être élaborées et évaluées dans le cadre de processus participatifs, en mettant l'accent sur la transparence, la responsabilité et divers mécanismes de fourniture d'infrastructures, y compris les réseaux communautaires ;
Souligner qu’il est essentiel de respecter l'autodétermination des groupes autochtones en matière d'infrastructures et de déploiement technologique ;
La lutte contre les inégalités, les prix élevés et les problèmes d'infrastructure nécessite une perspective holistique et interculturelle. Une connectivité significative est essentielle pour permettre l'exercice des droits humains et s'aligner sur les agendas mondiaux en matière de transformation numérique et de développement durable.
Exhorter les États à donner la priorité aux politiques publiques qui s'attaquent aux disparités d'accès à l'internet dans le monde, en particulier dans les régions marginalisées, afin de promouvoir l'accès universel à l'internet en tant que moteur de divers droits humains. Cela implique d'élaborer des propositions de politiques publiques globales intégrant l'inter culturalité, garantissant une participation effective et encourageant la culture numérique.
Private Sector
ID114
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
I have to prepare other related thematic inputs 2025.
IGF is a global initiative to lead the Global Digital Compact.
This is enough ideas. I am thinking of a better future through IGF.
Civil Society
ID115
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
I am journalist from Islamabad Capital of Pakistan. I would like to attend this IGF 2025 .....
I hope you will consider me in this event,
Thanks.
I hope you will consider me in this event,
Thanks.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a crucial role in addressing global digital issues. To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work could consider the following:
IGF Annual Meeting
1. *Dedicated sessions*: Organize specific sessions focused on the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, allowing for in-depth discussions and stakeholder inputs.
2. *High-level participation*: Invite key stakeholders, including government representatives, industry leaders, and civil society organizations, to participate in the discussions and share their perspectives.
3. *Interactive formats*: Incorporate interactive formats, such as roundtable discussions, workshops, and hackathons, to foster collaboration and innovative thinking.
4. *Youth engagement*: Ensure active participation of young people, as they are critical stakeholders in the digital ecosystem and will be impacted by the outcomes.
Intersessional Work
1. *Dynamic Coalitions*: Establish or strengthen Dynamic Coalitions focused on specific aspects of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, enabling continuous discussion and collaboration.
2. *Best Practice Forums (BPFs)*: Develop BPFs to explore specific issues related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and human rights.
3. *Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion (CNB)*: Continue the CNB initiative, focusing on policy options to address the digital divide and promote meaningful connectivity.
4. *National and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs)*: Encourage NRIs to incorporate discussions on the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, ensuring a bottom-up approach and diverse perspectives.
Contribution to the Global Digital Compact
1. *Substantive contributions*: Provide input on the development of the Global Digital Compact, drawing from the IGF's expertise and multistakeholder discussions.
2. *Capacity building*: Offer capacity-building programs and resources to support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact, particularly in developing countries.
3. *Awareness raising*: Organize awareness-raising activities to promote the Global Digital Compact and its objectives, targeting various stakeholder groups.
Contribution to the WSIS Review
1. *Stocktaking and review*: Conduct a comprehensive review of the WSIS outcomes and their implementation, identifying successes, challenges, and areas for improvement.
2. *Multistakeholder engagement*: Facilitate inclusive discussions among stakeholders to gather input on the WSIS review and provide recommendations for future actions.
3. *Recommendations for the future*: Develop and present recommendations for the future implementation of the WSIS outcomes, taking into account the evolving digital landscape and emerging issues.
By implementing these suggestions, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the WSIS outcomes, ultimately advancing the global digital agenda.
IGF Annual Meeting
1. *Dedicated sessions*: Organize specific sessions focused on the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, allowing for in-depth discussions and stakeholder inputs.
2. *High-level participation*: Invite key stakeholders, including government representatives, industry leaders, and civil society organizations, to participate in the discussions and share their perspectives.
3. *Interactive formats*: Incorporate interactive formats, such as roundtable discussions, workshops, and hackathons, to foster collaboration and innovative thinking.
4. *Youth engagement*: Ensure active participation of young people, as they are critical stakeholders in the digital ecosystem and will be impacted by the outcomes.
Intersessional Work
1. *Dynamic Coalitions*: Establish or strengthen Dynamic Coalitions focused on specific aspects of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, enabling continuous discussion and collaboration.
2. *Best Practice Forums (BPFs)*: Develop BPFs to explore specific issues related to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and human rights.
3. *Policy Options for Connecting the Next Billion (CNB)*: Continue the CNB initiative, focusing on policy options to address the digital divide and promote meaningful connectivity.
4. *National and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs)*: Encourage NRIs to incorporate discussions on the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, ensuring a bottom-up approach and diverse perspectives.
Contribution to the Global Digital Compact
1. *Substantive contributions*: Provide input on the development of the Global Digital Compact, drawing from the IGF's expertise and multistakeholder discussions.
2. *Capacity building*: Offer capacity-building programs and resources to support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact, particularly in developing countries.
3. *Awareness raising*: Organize awareness-raising activities to promote the Global Digital Compact and its objectives, targeting various stakeholder groups.
Contribution to the WSIS Review
1. *Stocktaking and review*: Conduct a comprehensive review of the WSIS outcomes and their implementation, identifying successes, challenges, and areas for improvement.
2. *Multistakeholder engagement*: Facilitate inclusive discussions among stakeholders to gather input on the WSIS review and provide recommendations for future actions.
3. *Recommendations for the future*: Develop and present recommendations for the future implementation of the WSIS outcomes, taking into account the evolving digital landscape and emerging issues.
By implementing these suggestions, the IGF can effectively contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the WSIS outcomes, ultimately advancing the global digital agenda.
Here are some ideas for the overall format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), including thematic tracks and alternative approaches:
Thematic Tracks
1. *Inclusive Internet Governance*: Focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion in internet governance, including gender, youth, and disability perspectives.
2. *Digital Economy and Society*: Explore the intersection of the digital economy and society, including issues like digital trade, e-commerce, and the future of work.
3. *Cybersecurity and Trust*: Address cybersecurity threats, trust, and confidence in the digital environment, including issues like data protection and privacy.
4. *Infrastructure and Connectivity*: Discuss infrastructure development, connectivity, and access, including issues like 5G, IoT, and community networks.
5. *Human Rights and Ethics*: Focus on human rights, ethics, and social responsibility in the digital age, including issues like online freedom of expression and digital literacy.
Alternative Approaches
1. *Cross-Cutting Themes*: Instead of separate thematic tracks, use cross-cutting themes like sustainability, inclusivity, and human rights to tie together different sessions and discussions.
2. *Scenario-Based Discussions*: Use scenario-based discussions to explore potential future developments and their implications for internet governance, such as the impact of emerging technologies like AI and blockchain.
3. *Design Thinking Workshops*: Incorporate design thinking workshops to encourage collaborative problem-solving and innovative thinking around internet governance challenges.
4. *High-Level Panels*: Organize high-level panels featuring prominent stakeholders to discuss pressing internet governance issues and set the tone for the IGF.
5. *Youth-Led Sessions*: Dedicate sessions to youth-led initiatives and perspectives, ensuring that the voices and concerns of the next generation are heard.
Innovative Formats
1. *Unconferences*: Host unconferences or open spaces for participants to discuss topics of their choice, fostering a more dynamic and interactive environment.
2. *Hackathons*: Organize hackathons or coding challenges to develop innovative solutions to internet governance challenges.
3. *Simulation Exercises*: Conduct simulation exercises to mimic real-world internet governance scenarios, allowing participants to practice decision-making and collaboration.
4. *Virtual Reality Experiences*: Incorporate virtual reality experiences to illustrate internet governance issues and their impact on society.
5. *Art and Cultural Performances*: Use art and cultural performances to convey internet governance themes and messages, making the IGF more engaging and accessible.
Hybrid and Online Participation
1. *Remote Participation*: Ensure robust remote participation options, including live streaming, real-time transcription, and online discussion forums.
2. *Hybrid Sessions*: Offer hybrid sessions that combine in-person and online participation, allowing for greater inclusivity and diversity.
3. *Online Pre-Events*: Host online pre-events, such as webinars or online discussions, to build momentum and generate interest in IGF topics.
These ideas can help revitalize the IGF format, increase participation, and foster more interactive and inclusive discussions.
Thematic Tracks
1. *Inclusive Internet Governance*: Focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion in internet governance, including gender, youth, and disability perspectives.
2. *Digital Economy and Society*: Explore the intersection of the digital economy and society, including issues like digital trade, e-commerce, and the future of work.
3. *Cybersecurity and Trust*: Address cybersecurity threats, trust, and confidence in the digital environment, including issues like data protection and privacy.
4. *Infrastructure and Connectivity*: Discuss infrastructure development, connectivity, and access, including issues like 5G, IoT, and community networks.
5. *Human Rights and Ethics*: Focus on human rights, ethics, and social responsibility in the digital age, including issues like online freedom of expression and digital literacy.
Alternative Approaches
1. *Cross-Cutting Themes*: Instead of separate thematic tracks, use cross-cutting themes like sustainability, inclusivity, and human rights to tie together different sessions and discussions.
2. *Scenario-Based Discussions*: Use scenario-based discussions to explore potential future developments and their implications for internet governance, such as the impact of emerging technologies like AI and blockchain.
3. *Design Thinking Workshops*: Incorporate design thinking workshops to encourage collaborative problem-solving and innovative thinking around internet governance challenges.
4. *High-Level Panels*: Organize high-level panels featuring prominent stakeholders to discuss pressing internet governance issues and set the tone for the IGF.
5. *Youth-Led Sessions*: Dedicate sessions to youth-led initiatives and perspectives, ensuring that the voices and concerns of the next generation are heard.
Innovative Formats
1. *Unconferences*: Host unconferences or open spaces for participants to discuss topics of their choice, fostering a more dynamic and interactive environment.
2. *Hackathons*: Organize hackathons or coding challenges to develop innovative solutions to internet governance challenges.
3. *Simulation Exercises*: Conduct simulation exercises to mimic real-world internet governance scenarios, allowing participants to practice decision-making and collaboration.
4. *Virtual Reality Experiences*: Incorporate virtual reality experiences to illustrate internet governance issues and their impact on society.
5. *Art and Cultural Performances*: Use art and cultural performances to convey internet governance themes and messages, making the IGF more engaging and accessible.
Hybrid and Online Participation
1. *Remote Participation*: Ensure robust remote participation options, including live streaming, real-time transcription, and online discussion forums.
2. *Hybrid Sessions*: Offer hybrid sessions that combine in-person and online participation, allowing for greater inclusivity and diversity.
3. *Online Pre-Events*: Host online pre-events, such as webinars or online discussions, to build momentum and generate interest in IGF topics.
These ideas can help revitalize the IGF format, increase participation, and foster more interactive and inclusive discussions.
Private Sector
ID116
Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Youths must be included as a separated stakeholder
Civil Society
ID117
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Civil Society
ID118
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF is an organization for good. It must be seen as a means to develop protocols for the connectivity of underserved and hard to reach communities. It must work in unison with all stakeholders, government, regional, private service providers ,the Judiciary and Parliament to make the internet affordable, accessible to all communities.
Not really
Government
ID119
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
1. Basic Framework for Collaboration:
Create a centralised, simple to navigate web portal that allows stakeholders, and youth, to voice opinions, upload materials and monitor relevant activities such as AI Threat Scenarios and IoT governance efforts.
2. Local Context Integration:
Add sessions that deal with applying the ideas emanating from the Global Digital Compact to practical issues so that global initiatives relating to issues such as connectivity and innovation are not divorced from regional realities as is the case with Africa.
3. Youth Driven Reporting:
Establish a Youth Digital Compact Report wherein the youth participants explain how their participation vis-a-vis the digital cross-border content contributes to the objectives of universal connectivity and how this has advancements on the WSIS outcomes.
Create a centralised, simple to navigate web portal that allows stakeholders, and youth, to voice opinions, upload materials and monitor relevant activities such as AI Threat Scenarios and IoT governance efforts.
2. Local Context Integration:
Add sessions that deal with applying the ideas emanating from the Global Digital Compact to practical issues so that global initiatives relating to issues such as connectivity and innovation are not divorced from regional realities as is the case with Africa.
3. Youth Driven Reporting:
Establish a Youth Digital Compact Report wherein the youth participants explain how their participation vis-a-vis the digital cross-border content contributes to the objectives of universal connectivity and how this has advancements on the WSIS outcomes.
1. New Basic Approach - “Three-Step Solution Tracks”:
For each troubled area (e.g. humanity, AI, IoT, Youth) establishes on the basis of Problem Definition and Scoping Phase, then Embodied Concepts Phase where prototypes are planned and turned into outlines, then Coupling Fusion Phase which includes how the prototypes will fit with the set frameworks.
2. Dedicated Youth Innovation Space:
Establish a “Youth Lab” that enables forward looking youth to come up with simple implementable and cost-effective strategies on connectivity and IoT solutions.
3. Open-Ended Forums:
Present “Unstructured Dialogue Sessions” in which all participants can speak about their own thoughts and problems including how IoT technology can offset AI’s threat or youth and women’s support in ICT governance.
This simple and fresh approach would encourage in many ways the effectiveness, contemporariness and aim of inclusion with regard to the issues of the IGF.
For each troubled area (e.g. humanity, AI, IoT, Youth) establishes on the basis of Problem Definition and Scoping Phase, then Embodied Concepts Phase where prototypes are planned and turned into outlines, then Coupling Fusion Phase which includes how the prototypes will fit with the set frameworks.
2. Dedicated Youth Innovation Space:
Establish a “Youth Lab” that enables forward looking youth to come up with simple implementable and cost-effective strategies on connectivity and IoT solutions.
3. Open-Ended Forums:
Present “Unstructured Dialogue Sessions” in which all participants can speak about their own thoughts and problems including how IoT technology can offset AI’s threat or youth and women’s support in ICT governance.
This simple and fresh approach would encourage in many ways the effectiveness, contemporariness and aim of inclusion with regard to the issues of the IGF.
Civil Society
ID120
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Many grassroots civil society organizations in the global south do not understand basic AI functioning hence they cannot point out big data and algorithms for human rights violations in their communities.
Civil Society
ID121
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Government
ID122
Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Technical Community
ID123
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Cross-border cooperation, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
The IGF was and still needs to be a global cooperation platform among all stakeholders. To better contribute to the implementation of the GDC, financial institutions should be encouraged to join and the role of NRIs should be highlighted and strengthened to ensure inclusion of all voices in national and regional digital policy making.
The overarching theme and discussions to be centered around users rights and informed participation in the digital sphere.
Government
ID124
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Private Sector
ID125
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Technical and Operational Topics
Private Sector
ID126
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
The online experience can be made better
Private Sector
ID127
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Government
ID128
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
A closer weaving together of the Digital Compact priority themes with the WSIS themes to ensure consistency of voice.
If the IGF could be structured around the thematic areas of the Digital compact this would help with a more coherent dialogue,
Intergovernmental Organization
ID129
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
For Emerging technologies and innovation issues:
- Responsible Innovation
- Regulatory experimentation / sandboxes
Furthermore, considering the upcoming WSIS+20 it would be nice to have a track to focus on the improvement of the Internet Governance framework and the multistakeholder methodology
- Responsible Innovation
- Regulatory experimentation / sandboxes
Furthermore, considering the upcoming WSIS+20 it would be nice to have a track to focus on the improvement of the Internet Governance framework and the multistakeholder methodology
I believe the IGF must have a dedicated track to discuss Internet Governance as a process and how to improve its mechanisms, such as the multistakeholder methodology. In 2024, during NetMundial+10, an outcome document was published, presenting a framework to improve Internet governance and digital policy processes (https://netmundial.br/pdf/NETmundial10-MultistakeholderStatement-2024.pdf). It is a good starting point for reflecting on this topic. There is a need for better interconnection between national, regional and global IGF, so challenges and opportunities can be benchmarked between different regions.
It would be nice if there were sessions/tracks in the IGF to showcase practical use cases in which multistakeholder processes have been implemented for digital policy making. For example, in Brazil, the Data Protection Authority is supported by a Multistakeholder Council, which contributes to inputs for the Authorities's oversight activities.
Technical Community
ID130
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development
The IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can advance the Global Digital Compact and support the WSIS outcomes review by aligning discussions with global goals to promote inclusive AI governance, cybersecurity frameworks, and equitable digital access; showcasing best practices and case studies that highlight successful policies and innovations for bridging the digital divide and fostering economic growth; and facilitating collaborations and partnerships among stakeholders to accelerate digital transformation while monitoring progress and accountability through thematic reports and capacity-building sessions.
Private Sector
ID131
Artificial Intelligence, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Actionable outcomes of all IGF initiatives and forums should be properly documented so as to make them implementable. There is need for a plan to follow up on the progress on suggested actions from these engagements. This will help in measuring the effectiveness of the entire IGF process and provide the data that can show its relevance and why it should not be scrapped or replaced with another initiative.
The IGF for me now look more like a talk shop. This is the need to have a process to make its outcomes actionable so that part of what will be done before the forum every year is to measure the progress made from the suggested actionable steps and how that can help in shaping the theme of the new year. This well progress and achievements could be properly documented for sustainability sake.
Civil Society
ID132
Government
ID133
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Technical Community
ID134
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
To better align with global initiatives, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can:
1. *Integrate Global Digital Compact themes* into sessions and discussions.
2. *Dedicate sessions to WSIS+20 Review*, identifying gaps and improving implementation.
3. *Foster inclusive participation*, ensuring diverse stakeholders, youth, and marginalized groups are involved.
4. *Streamline communication* and focus on practical, actionable recommendations.
By leveraging intersessional work through:
1. *Dynamic Coalitions* for ongoing discussions on specific issues.
2. *Policy Networks* to connect stakeholders and share knowledge.
The IGF can strengthen its contributions to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS+20 review.
1. *Integrate Global Digital Compact themes* into sessions and discussions.
2. *Dedicate sessions to WSIS+20 Review*, identifying gaps and improving implementation.
3. *Foster inclusive participation*, ensuring diverse stakeholders, youth, and marginalized groups are involved.
4. *Streamline communication* and focus on practical, actionable recommendations.
By leveraging intersessional work through:
1. *Dynamic Coalitions* for ongoing discussions on specific issues.
2. *Policy Networks* to connect stakeholders and share knowledge.
The IGF can strengthen its contributions to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS+20 review.
Thematic Tracks*
1. *Streamline tracks*: Consolidate tracks to focus on core themes, reducing overlap and increasing coherence.
2. *Dynamic tracks*: Introduce flexible, adaptive tracks that evolve based on stakeholder feedback and emerging issues.
3. *Cross-cutting themes*: Incorporate themes that intersect multiple tracks, fostering collaboration and holistic discussions.
*Alternative Theme Approaches*
1. *Challenge-based approach*: Organize discussions around specific challenges, such as digital divide, cybersecurity, or data governance.
2. *Scenario-based approach*: Explore potential future scenarios, encouraging stakeholders to think critically about emerging issues and opportunities.
3. *Design thinking approach*: Apply design thinking principles to tackle complex issues, emphasizing empathy, creativity, and prototyping.
*Innovative Session Formats*
1. *Interactive workshops*: Incorporate hands-on activities, group work, and immersive experiences to foster engagement and knowledge sharing.
2. *Debates and dialogues*: Host structured debates and dialogues on contentious issues, promoting critical thinking and respectful discourse.
3. *Lightning talks and showcases*: Offer brief, showcase-style presentations to highlight innovative solutions, research, or initiatives.
*Enhanced Participation and Engagement*
1. *Hybrid participation*: Combine in-person and online participation, ensuring broader accessibility and inclusivity.
2. *Youth and mentorship programs*: Develop programs to engage youth and pair them with experienced mentors, fostering intergenerational knowledge transfer.
3. *Remote hubs and regional events*: Establish remote hubs and regional events to expand the IGF's reach and encourage local discussions.
*Evaluation and Improvement*
1. *Continuous feedback mechanisms*: Establish regular feedback channels to gather insights from stakeholders and improve the IGF format.
2. *Post-event evaluations*: Conduct comprehensive evaluations after each IGF event to assess impact, identify areas for improvement, and inform future design.
By incorporating these ideas, the IGF can evolve into a more dynamic, inclusive, and effective platform for addressing Internet governance challenges.
1. *Streamline tracks*: Consolidate tracks to focus on core themes, reducing overlap and increasing coherence.
2. *Dynamic tracks*: Introduce flexible, adaptive tracks that evolve based on stakeholder feedback and emerging issues.
3. *Cross-cutting themes*: Incorporate themes that intersect multiple tracks, fostering collaboration and holistic discussions.
*Alternative Theme Approaches*
1. *Challenge-based approach*: Organize discussions around specific challenges, such as digital divide, cybersecurity, or data governance.
2. *Scenario-based approach*: Explore potential future scenarios, encouraging stakeholders to think critically about emerging issues and opportunities.
3. *Design thinking approach*: Apply design thinking principles to tackle complex issues, emphasizing empathy, creativity, and prototyping.
*Innovative Session Formats*
1. *Interactive workshops*: Incorporate hands-on activities, group work, and immersive experiences to foster engagement and knowledge sharing.
2. *Debates and dialogues*: Host structured debates and dialogues on contentious issues, promoting critical thinking and respectful discourse.
3. *Lightning talks and showcases*: Offer brief, showcase-style presentations to highlight innovative solutions, research, or initiatives.
*Enhanced Participation and Engagement*
1. *Hybrid participation*: Combine in-person and online participation, ensuring broader accessibility and inclusivity.
2. *Youth and mentorship programs*: Develop programs to engage youth and pair them with experienced mentors, fostering intergenerational knowledge transfer.
3. *Remote hubs and regional events*: Establish remote hubs and regional events to expand the IGF's reach and encourage local discussions.
*Evaluation and Improvement*
1. *Continuous feedback mechanisms*: Establish regular feedback channels to gather insights from stakeholders and improve the IGF format.
2. *Post-event evaluations*: Conduct comprehensive evaluations after each IGF event to assess impact, identify areas for improvement, and inform future design.
By incorporating these ideas, the IGF can evolve into a more dynamic, inclusive, and effective platform for addressing Internet governance challenges.
Private Sector
ID135
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Integrating these frameworks into its agenda, fostering multi-stakeholder dialogue and producing actionable recommendations can allow the IGF to promote Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes more effectively. Focused sessions on key priorities and aligning intersessional work with global objectives would increase its impact before 2025.
Technical Community
ID136
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms
By breaking down to the lowest level for every body to understand more.
Private Sector
ID137
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The concept of accessibility can be veined into every issue listed above. The voices of the minority groups should always reach the "table" of change.
Technical Community
ID138
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID139
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
The themes to be always looked from human rights and SDGs perpectives. Focus on framing the issues always through a human rights lens, emphasizing principles like freedom, equality, and accountability.
1. Bridge the digital divide: empower regional IGS and actors to address locally relevant challenges while ensuring alignment of the frameworks on regional and global levels.
2. Multistakeholder engagement: Only 12% of particiants where CSOs, while gender wise 31% identified as female and 1% as other at IGF24. Representation from civil society, especially Global South, as well as gender balance voices are important to ensure that discussions as well as implementation of frameworks reflect diverse voices, realities and challenges.
3. Information Integrity: address the challenge of misinformation and disinformation from a global perspective by facilitating actionable multistakeholder outcome sessions (working sessions to draft specific actions reflecting all voices)
2. Multistakeholder engagement: Only 12% of particiants where CSOs, while gender wise 31% identified as female and 1% as other at IGF24. Representation from civil society, especially Global South, as well as gender balance voices are important to ensure that discussions as well as implementation of frameworks reflect diverse voices, realities and challenges.
3. Information Integrity: address the challenge of misinformation and disinformation from a global perspective by facilitating actionable multistakeholder outcome sessions (working sessions to draft specific actions reflecting all voices)
Actionable multistakeholder outcomes sessions: facilitate sessions where consesus-driven actions are drafted to be followed-up from a multistakeholder perspective based on the theme of the year, and in achieving GDC commitments and WSIS outcomes. So that it is not only facilitating discussions but also measurable progress from IGF to the another. Working documents with final actionable outcomes, follow-up working-groups and mechanisms to track progress, showcase stories and impact.
Civil Society
ID140
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
,
,
I work for National Authority for Digital Certification in Sudan,we lost all data centre due to the war
I want additinal input that IGF can share and help our situation
1. Knowledge Sharing: The IGF could facilitate knowledge exchange with other countries and organizations that have faced similar disruptions, sharing lessons on data recovery, rebuilding digital infrastructure, and securing data in conflict zones.
2. Technical Assistance and Partnerships: IGF can help connect you with global technical experts, development organizations, and private sector partners who can offer support in rebuilding data centers, securing digital infrastructure, and providing backup solutions.
3. Capacity Building: IGF sessions can focus on building the digital resilience of institutions in post-crisis scenarios. You could benefit from workshops and discussions around disaster recovery planning, cybersecurity in unstable environments, and cloud-based solutions that can help mitigate data loss.
4. Advocacy and Support: IGF’s platform can help raise awareness about the challenges faced by your institution, potentially mobilizing international support and collaboration through humanitarian efforts or specific funding for digital reconstruction in conflict zones.
5. Policy Frameworks: IGF can help highlight the importance of robust digital policies for conflict resilience, and offer frameworks that help your country build a more secure, future-proof digital landscape.
The IGF community's global reach and multistakeholder approach can be a crucial resource in rebuilding and safeguarding Sudan’s digital infrastructure.
I want additinal input that IGF can share and help our situation
1. Knowledge Sharing: The IGF could facilitate knowledge exchange with other countries and organizations that have faced similar disruptions, sharing lessons on data recovery, rebuilding digital infrastructure, and securing data in conflict zones.
2. Technical Assistance and Partnerships: IGF can help connect you with global technical experts, development organizations, and private sector partners who can offer support in rebuilding data centers, securing digital infrastructure, and providing backup solutions.
3. Capacity Building: IGF sessions can focus on building the digital resilience of institutions in post-crisis scenarios. You could benefit from workshops and discussions around disaster recovery planning, cybersecurity in unstable environments, and cloud-based solutions that can help mitigate data loss.
4. Advocacy and Support: IGF’s platform can help raise awareness about the challenges faced by your institution, potentially mobilizing international support and collaboration through humanitarian efforts or specific funding for digital reconstruction in conflict zones.
5. Policy Frameworks: IGF can help highlight the importance of robust digital policies for conflict resilience, and offer frameworks that help your country build a more secure, future-proof digital landscape.
The IGF community's global reach and multistakeholder approach can be a crucial resource in rebuilding and safeguarding Sudan’s digital infrastructure.
The IGF can better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact by amplifying discussions on key issues like digital inclusion, rights, and governance. Through its annual meetings and intersessional work, the IGF can engage diverse stakeholders to produce actionable recommendations and foster cooperation. Leading up to the 2025 high-level meeting, the IGF can highlight progress and gaps in implementing WSIS outcomes, ensuring that global digital policies align with sustainable development goals and promote inclusive digital transformation.
To enhance the IGF’s format and design, it could consider introducing more interactive and solution-oriented sessions, such as workshops or collaborative task forces that produce concrete outcomes. Thematic tracks could focus on emerging issues like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and digital equity, ensuring they are cross-cutting and integrated into all discussions. Additionally, integrating more real-time feedback mechanisms from participants could help shape the discussions dynamically, creating a more inclusive and responsive environment. Lastly, creating dedicated sessions for youth, marginalized groups, and grassroots organizations could ensure broader representation in shaping global digital policies.
Government
ID141
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
A global framework for cybersecurity and emerging technology regulation
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and its intersessional work can significantly contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes by considering the following measures:
1. Integrating Global Digital Compact principles into IGF's thematic tracks and workshops.
2. Hosting dedicated sessions on WSIS review and Global Digital Compact implementation.
3. Facilitating multistakeholder discussions on digital governance, cooperation on cybersecurity/digital trust, balancing sovereign and human rights, and development transformation.
4. Showcasing successful WSIS implementation experiences and best practices.
5. Informing the WSIS review process with IGF's intersessional work and community inputs.
6. Collaborating with UN agencies, governments, civil society, and private sector entities.
7. Developing policy recommendations and guidelines for Global Digital Compact implementation.
8. Utilizing IGF's intersessional work to monitor WSIS progress and identify gaps.
By aligning with the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, the IGF can enhance its relevance and impact, foster collaborative governance, promote digital transformation, ensure inclusive and equitable digital development, and support the achievement of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This strategic approach will strengthen the IGF's role as a premier global platform for digital governance discussions and contribute meaningfully to the Global Digital Compact's implementation and WSIS review.
1. Integrating Global Digital Compact principles into IGF's thematic tracks and workshops.
2. Hosting dedicated sessions on WSIS review and Global Digital Compact implementation.
3. Facilitating multistakeholder discussions on digital governance, cooperation on cybersecurity/digital trust, balancing sovereign and human rights, and development transformation.
4. Showcasing successful WSIS implementation experiences and best practices.
5. Informing the WSIS review process with IGF's intersessional work and community inputs.
6. Collaborating with UN agencies, governments, civil society, and private sector entities.
7. Developing policy recommendations and guidelines for Global Digital Compact implementation.
8. Utilizing IGF's intersessional work to monitor WSIS progress and identify gaps.
By aligning with the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, the IGF can enhance its relevance and impact, foster collaborative governance, promote digital transformation, ensure inclusive and equitable digital development, and support the achievement of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This strategic approach will strengthen the IGF's role as a premier global platform for digital governance discussions and contribute meaningfully to the Global Digital Compact's implementation and WSIS review.
Here are some ideas for enhancing the overall format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),
Thematic Tracks
i. Integrated Tracks: Combine related themes (e.g., digital rights, governance, and cybersecurity) for cohesive discussions.
ii. Dynamic Tracks: Allow participants to propose and vote on tracks, ensuring relevance and inclusivity
iii. Thematic Clusters: Group-related sessions, workshops, and panels for easier navigation
Creative Session Formats
i. Interactive Panels: Incorporate audience participation, polls, and Q&A.
ii. Solution-Focused Workshops: Encourage collaborative problem-solving.
iii. Fishbowl Discussions: Intimate, facilitated conversations.
iv. Internet Café: Small-group discussions on specific topics.
Inclusive Elements and Engaging Dimension
i. Multilingual Support: Interpretation, translation, and multilingual materials.
ii. Accessibility Features: Audio descriptions, sign language, and wheelchair accessibility.
iii. YouTube Participation: facilitate robust remote engagement options.
Collaborative and Dynamic Program
i. Crowdsourced Agenda for open submission and voting process.
ii. Real-time program updates offering adjustable scheduling.
Outcome-Oriented Approach
i. Policy Briefs: Summarize key discussions and recommendations.
ii. Action Items and Next Steps: Clearly outline follow-up tasks.
iii. IGF Report: Comprehensive summary of proceedings.
iv. Post-IGF Engagement: Online discussions, webinars, and updates.
Technical and Operational Enhancements
i. Mobile App: Personalized schedules, networking features.
ii. Introduce a Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) for participants for immersive experiences for participants.
iii. Use Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Tools for Session matching, networking suggestions.
Partnerships and Outreach
i. UN Agency Collaboration: Enhanced cooperation with relevant UN agencies.
ii. Stakeholder Engagement Increased outreach to underrepresented groups through educational institutions.
iii. Professional Promotion: Targeted professional bodies and social media campaigns.
iv. Divesify IGFfellows and Ambassadors: Community champions for outreach and support.
Thematic Tracks
i. Integrated Tracks: Combine related themes (e.g., digital rights, governance, and cybersecurity) for cohesive discussions.
ii. Dynamic Tracks: Allow participants to propose and vote on tracks, ensuring relevance and inclusivity
iii. Thematic Clusters: Group-related sessions, workshops, and panels for easier navigation
Creative Session Formats
i. Interactive Panels: Incorporate audience participation, polls, and Q&A.
ii. Solution-Focused Workshops: Encourage collaborative problem-solving.
iii. Fishbowl Discussions: Intimate, facilitated conversations.
iv. Internet Café: Small-group discussions on specific topics.
Inclusive Elements and Engaging Dimension
i. Multilingual Support: Interpretation, translation, and multilingual materials.
ii. Accessibility Features: Audio descriptions, sign language, and wheelchair accessibility.
iii. YouTube Participation: facilitate robust remote engagement options.
Collaborative and Dynamic Program
i. Crowdsourced Agenda for open submission and voting process.
ii. Real-time program updates offering adjustable scheduling.
Outcome-Oriented Approach
i. Policy Briefs: Summarize key discussions and recommendations.
ii. Action Items and Next Steps: Clearly outline follow-up tasks.
iii. IGF Report: Comprehensive summary of proceedings.
iv. Post-IGF Engagement: Online discussions, webinars, and updates.
Technical and Operational Enhancements
i. Mobile App: Personalized schedules, networking features.
ii. Introduce a Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) for participants for immersive experiences for participants.
iii. Use Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Tools for Session matching, networking suggestions.
Partnerships and Outreach
i. UN Agency Collaboration: Enhanced cooperation with relevant UN agencies.
ii. Stakeholder Engagement Increased outreach to underrepresented groups through educational institutions.
iii. Professional Promotion: Targeted professional bodies and social media campaigns.
iv. Divesify IGFfellows and Ambassadors: Community champions for outreach and support.
Private Sector
ID142
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust
At the intersection of cybersecurity and AI we see an interesting trend. Whilst fighting malicious actors online hitherto was a reactive discipline, there is now a development towards predictive and preemptive capabilities. This allows us to do more than just plug a hole, exchange threat intel, include in blocklist AFTER the damage has been done. It is allows us to identify threats as they emerge, and block malicious infrastructure and practices BEFORE damage is done. With the help of AI we are now able to move to the left on the cyber response spectrum, taking measure "left of bang" . This has not just positive financal consequences for those protected by these capabilities, but it also opens new angles to cyber forensics, attribution and deterrence.
I'd be happy to host a round table on this topic at IGF 2025.
Timo Koster
fmr Cyber Ambassador of the Netherlands
I'd be happy to host a round table on this topic at IGF 2025.
Timo Koster
fmr Cyber Ambassador of the Netherlands
We all subscribe to the multi-stakeholder model. Having represented government (NL) , NGO's (Quad9, PCH) and the private sector (BforeAI) at these kind of events I see a clear under-representation of the private sector. Partly because they don't speak the governance lingo, partly because the focus is mostly on state actors.
Please allow the private sector to participate in full by giving them a slot to fill and shape according to their views.
I'd be very happy to assist with this !
Please allow the private sector to participate in full by giving them a slot to fill and shape according to their views.
I'd be very happy to assist with this !
Private Sector
ID143
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
It would be great if the IGF2025 could have a dedicated track on practical approaches towards implementing the principles of the Global Digital Compact, covering roles and responsibilities of government, public sector, private sector and civil-society actors.
Having had the opportunity to support panel contributions to the Parliamentary track at IGF2023 and IGF2024, I believe it would be very interesting to add some additional open sessions for interaction and engagement by IGF contributors with the participating parliamentarians.
Private Sector
ID144
Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Civil Society
ID145
e-Government Assessment
Assessment of e-Government in differenet levels (e.g. national, local, organisational). Methods of assessing e-Government and how can be improved and cover the contemporary needs (citizens, businesses)
Intergovernmental Organization
ID146
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Cross-border cooperation, International cooperation on data
La réunion annuelle du Forum sur la Gouvernance de l'Internet (FGI) et ses travaux intersessions peuvent jouer un rôle essentiel dans la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et dans l'examen des résultats du Sommet mondial sur la société de l'information (SMSI). Voici quelques pistes pour mieux aligner les activités du FGI avec ces objectifs :
1. Alignement thématique avec le Pacte numérique mondial
- Priorités communes : Intégrer dans le programme annuel du FGI des sessions et des panels centrés sur les principes du Pacte numérique mondial, tels que l'accès universel à l'Internet, la connectivité, la protection des droits de l'homme en ligne, et l'utilisation éthique des technologies numériques.
- Groupes de travail thématiques : Créer ou renforcer des groupes de travail intersessions sur des sujets spécifiques liés au Pacte, comme la réduction de la fracture numérique, la cybersécurité, ou la régulation des grandes plateformes technologiques.
2. Engagement multiacteurs pour l'examen du SMSI
- Inclusion des parties prenantes: Faciliter un dialogue inclusif et représentatif en invitant des gouvernements, le secteur privé, la société civile, les universitaires et les organisations internationales à contribuer à l'évaluation des progrès réalisés depuis le SMSI.
- Rapports coordonnés: Collecter et compiler des contributions spécifiques sur la mise en œuvre des résultats du SMSI, qui pourraient être présentées comme un rapport collectif lors de la réunion de haut niveau en 2025.
3. Renforcement des travaux intersessions
- Initiatives continues: Lancer des initiatives intersessions, telles que des plateformes en ligne ou des groupes de travail axés sur des résultats concrets, pour suivre les progrès entre les réunions annuelles.
- Partage des meilleures pratiques: Mettre en lumière des exemples concrets de mise en œuvre des principes du Pacte numérique mondial à travers des cas d'études régionaux ou nationaux.
4. Coordination et suivi
- Table ronde de haut niveau : Organiser lors de chaque réunion annuelle une session dédiée à l'état d'avancement du Pacte numérique mondial et des résultats du SMSI.
- Outil de suivi: Développer un tableau de bord interactif pour suivre les progrès réalisés par les différentes parties prenantes sur les engagements pris dans le cadre de ces initiatives mondiales.
5.Sensibilisation et renforcement des capacités
- Formation et inclusion : Offrir des formations ou des ateliers ciblés sur les thématiques clés du Pacte numérique mondial pour les pays en développement et les communautés sous-représentées.
- Documentation accessible: Rendre les résultats des discussions et les recommandations facilement disponibles et accessibles dans plusieurs langues.
6. Préparation à la réunion de haut niveau de 2025
- Soutien à la préparation : Utiliser les réunions annuelles de 2024 et 2025 comme plateformes pour formuler des recommandations concrètes pour la réunion de haut niveau.
- Coalitions multipartites : Encourager des coalitions multipartites à travailler ensemble sur des propositions spécifiques, qui seront soumises lors de l'examen final.
En adoptant ces approches, le FGI pourrait renforcer son rôle en tant que plateforme de collaboration mondiale et contribuer de manière substantielle à la réalisation des objectifs du Pacte numérique mondial et à l'examen des progrès du SMSI.
1. Alignement thématique avec le Pacte numérique mondial
- Priorités communes : Intégrer dans le programme annuel du FGI des sessions et des panels centrés sur les principes du Pacte numérique mondial, tels que l'accès universel à l'Internet, la connectivité, la protection des droits de l'homme en ligne, et l'utilisation éthique des technologies numériques.
- Groupes de travail thématiques : Créer ou renforcer des groupes de travail intersessions sur des sujets spécifiques liés au Pacte, comme la réduction de la fracture numérique, la cybersécurité, ou la régulation des grandes plateformes technologiques.
2. Engagement multiacteurs pour l'examen du SMSI
- Inclusion des parties prenantes: Faciliter un dialogue inclusif et représentatif en invitant des gouvernements, le secteur privé, la société civile, les universitaires et les organisations internationales à contribuer à l'évaluation des progrès réalisés depuis le SMSI.
- Rapports coordonnés: Collecter et compiler des contributions spécifiques sur la mise en œuvre des résultats du SMSI, qui pourraient être présentées comme un rapport collectif lors de la réunion de haut niveau en 2025.
3. Renforcement des travaux intersessions
- Initiatives continues: Lancer des initiatives intersessions, telles que des plateformes en ligne ou des groupes de travail axés sur des résultats concrets, pour suivre les progrès entre les réunions annuelles.
- Partage des meilleures pratiques: Mettre en lumière des exemples concrets de mise en œuvre des principes du Pacte numérique mondial à travers des cas d'études régionaux ou nationaux.
4. Coordination et suivi
- Table ronde de haut niveau : Organiser lors de chaque réunion annuelle une session dédiée à l'état d'avancement du Pacte numérique mondial et des résultats du SMSI.
- Outil de suivi: Développer un tableau de bord interactif pour suivre les progrès réalisés par les différentes parties prenantes sur les engagements pris dans le cadre de ces initiatives mondiales.
5.Sensibilisation et renforcement des capacités
- Formation et inclusion : Offrir des formations ou des ateliers ciblés sur les thématiques clés du Pacte numérique mondial pour les pays en développement et les communautés sous-représentées.
- Documentation accessible: Rendre les résultats des discussions et les recommandations facilement disponibles et accessibles dans plusieurs langues.
6. Préparation à la réunion de haut niveau de 2025
- Soutien à la préparation : Utiliser les réunions annuelles de 2024 et 2025 comme plateformes pour formuler des recommandations concrètes pour la réunion de haut niveau.
- Coalitions multipartites : Encourager des coalitions multipartites à travailler ensemble sur des propositions spécifiques, qui seront soumises lors de l'examen final.
En adoptant ces approches, le FGI pourrait renforcer son rôle en tant que plateforme de collaboration mondiale et contribuer de manière substantielle à la réalisation des objectifs du Pacte numérique mondial et à l'examen des progrès du SMSI.
Plateforme numérique dédiée : Une application IGF interactive où les participants peuvent consulter le programme, réseauter, poser des questions en direct, et participer à des sondages.
Cartographie des discussions : Visualiser les sujets abordés, les parties prenantes impliquées, et les résultats attendus grâce à des outils de données interactifs.
Réalité augmentée (RA) : Ajouter des expériences immersives dans le cadre des présentations ou des ateliers.
Cartographie des discussions : Visualiser les sujets abordés, les parties prenantes impliquées, et les résultats attendus grâce à des outils de données interactifs.
Réalité augmentée (RA) : Ajouter des expériences immersives dans le cadre des présentations ou des ateliers.
Government
ID147
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Intervention in states or countries that curtail freedom of access to internet
To align the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and intersessional work with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), here are actionable recommendations:
1. Incorporate the Global Digital Compact (GDC) Principles into IGF Themes
• The GDC emphasizes digital cooperation, equity, and sustainability. Future IGF meetings should explicitly integrate these principles within their themes, as seen in the 2024 IGF theme “Building Our Multistakeholder Digital Future”.
• For instance, creating dedicated sessions on equitable digital access, promoting digital trust, and fostering inclusive governance aligns with the GDC vision.
2. Strengthen Multistakeholder Engagement
• Expand representation from marginalized communities and developing nations to reflect the global digital landscape more inclusively.
• Address the issues noted in the IGF 2024 process, such as improving transparency in sponsorship decisions and reducing barriers for newcomers, ensuring wider participation.
3. Leverage Intersessional Work for Tangible Outcomes
• Use IGF’s intersessional work (Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions, and Policy Networks) to develop actionable recommendations for implementing GDC and WSIS principles.
• Document and disseminate progress on digital inclusion, sustainability, and human rights to provide concrete contributions to global reviews like the WSIS+20 process.
4. Enhance Accessibility and Digital Inclusivity
• Improve online participation by addressing technical interruptions and ensuring all participants have access to meeting resources.
• Provide multilingual documentation and tools to include non-English speakers, supporting global participation and reflecting the diversity of the WSIS agenda.
5. Monitor and Report on Contributions to Global Goals
• Establish a framework to track IGF’s contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This could include:
o Publishing annual reports on IGF’s alignment with global initiatives.
o Hosting workshops to measure the implementation of past commitments.
• Engage in regular dialogue with stakeholders to review progress and identify gaps.
6. Collaborate with Global and Regional Initiatives
• Strengthen ties with regional IGFs to ensure alignment and amplify the impact of IGF discussions.
• Work with intergovernmental organizations to translate IGF recommendations into policies that support GDC and WSIS goals.
7. Focus on Digital Development and AI
• Given the rise of AI, IGF discussions should emphasize ethical AI development, fair data practices, and mitigating AI-driven risks to align with the WSIS emphasis on technology’s role in sustainable development.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF can effectively contribute to global digital governance while ensuring its annual meetings and intersessional work align with the GDC and WSIS outcomes leading up to 2025.
1. Incorporate the Global Digital Compact (GDC) Principles into IGF Themes
• The GDC emphasizes digital cooperation, equity, and sustainability. Future IGF meetings should explicitly integrate these principles within their themes, as seen in the 2024 IGF theme “Building Our Multistakeholder Digital Future”.
• For instance, creating dedicated sessions on equitable digital access, promoting digital trust, and fostering inclusive governance aligns with the GDC vision.
2. Strengthen Multistakeholder Engagement
• Expand representation from marginalized communities and developing nations to reflect the global digital landscape more inclusively.
• Address the issues noted in the IGF 2024 process, such as improving transparency in sponsorship decisions and reducing barriers for newcomers, ensuring wider participation.
3. Leverage Intersessional Work for Tangible Outcomes
• Use IGF’s intersessional work (Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions, and Policy Networks) to develop actionable recommendations for implementing GDC and WSIS principles.
• Document and disseminate progress on digital inclusion, sustainability, and human rights to provide concrete contributions to global reviews like the WSIS+20 process.
4. Enhance Accessibility and Digital Inclusivity
• Improve online participation by addressing technical interruptions and ensuring all participants have access to meeting resources.
• Provide multilingual documentation and tools to include non-English speakers, supporting global participation and reflecting the diversity of the WSIS agenda.
5. Monitor and Report on Contributions to Global Goals
• Establish a framework to track IGF’s contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This could include:
o Publishing annual reports on IGF’s alignment with global initiatives.
o Hosting workshops to measure the implementation of past commitments.
• Engage in regular dialogue with stakeholders to review progress and identify gaps.
6. Collaborate with Global and Regional Initiatives
• Strengthen ties with regional IGFs to ensure alignment and amplify the impact of IGF discussions.
• Work with intergovernmental organizations to translate IGF recommendations into policies that support GDC and WSIS goals.
7. Focus on Digital Development and AI
• Given the rise of AI, IGF discussions should emphasize ethical AI development, fair data practices, and mitigating AI-driven risks to align with the WSIS emphasis on technology’s role in sustainable development.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF can effectively contribute to global digital governance while ensuring its annual meetings and intersessional work align with the GDC and WSIS outcomes leading up to 2025.
Suggestions for Enhancing the Format and Design of the IGF
To improve the overall format and design of the IGF and ensure it meets the evolving needs of stakeholders, the following ideas can be considered:
1. Adopt a Modular Thematic Approach
• Organize thematic tracks into modular blocks based on specific priorities such as AI governance, digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and sustainability.
• These modules can feature overlapping subthemes to address cross-cutting issues like human rights and innovation.
2. Create Tiered Participation Tracks
• Beginner Track: Provide newcomers with introductory sessions explaining Internet governance concepts and processes.
• Expert Track: Allow seasoned participants to delve deeper into advanced topics, offering workshops and brainstorming sessions for actionable outcomes.
3. Incorporate Regional Tracks
• Dedicate a day or specific sessions to regional IGF issues, encouraging localized problem-solving and showcasing regional innovation.
• This ensures that the global discussion reflects regional diversity while addressing unique challenges.
4. Improve Online Participation Design
• Ensure seamless online access by improving technical infrastructure to reduce interruptions.
• Provide interactive tools like live polls, Q&A sessions, and virtual breakout rooms to boost engagement.
• Share all documents and session recordings promptly to ensure equitable access to resources.
5. Introduce a Policy Incubation Zone
• Create a policy incubation space where stakeholders collaboratively draft actionable recommendations or frameworks based on the thematic discussions.
• This approach fosters real-time outputs that can be refined and presented at the closing session.
To improve the overall format and design of the IGF and ensure it meets the evolving needs of stakeholders, the following ideas can be considered:
1. Adopt a Modular Thematic Approach
• Organize thematic tracks into modular blocks based on specific priorities such as AI governance, digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and sustainability.
• These modules can feature overlapping subthemes to address cross-cutting issues like human rights and innovation.
2. Create Tiered Participation Tracks
• Beginner Track: Provide newcomers with introductory sessions explaining Internet governance concepts and processes.
• Expert Track: Allow seasoned participants to delve deeper into advanced topics, offering workshops and brainstorming sessions for actionable outcomes.
3. Incorporate Regional Tracks
• Dedicate a day or specific sessions to regional IGF issues, encouraging localized problem-solving and showcasing regional innovation.
• This ensures that the global discussion reflects regional diversity while addressing unique challenges.
4. Improve Online Participation Design
• Ensure seamless online access by improving technical infrastructure to reduce interruptions.
• Provide interactive tools like live polls, Q&A sessions, and virtual breakout rooms to boost engagement.
• Share all documents and session recordings promptly to ensure equitable access to resources.
5. Introduce a Policy Incubation Zone
• Create a policy incubation space where stakeholders collaboratively draft actionable recommendations or frameworks based on the thematic discussions.
• This approach fosters real-time outputs that can be refined and presented at the closing session.
Civil Society
ID148
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Child online safety, Cyber attacks and cyber conflict, Hate speech, including against women and vulnerable groups
Private Sector
ID149
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
I have presented a paper on Meaningful Access amd Affordable Internet for Women in the Chinese IGF session on Day 3 of IGF 2024 as a guest speaker. I would like to focus more on Women IGF and Gender Inclusion and Universal Access issues in Future IGF.
Would Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) reviewing the the agendas of IGF 2024 to implement the outcomes to create a successful digital society by the Global Digital Compact. Since the WSIS conference is the important platform for the IGF Participants, it should be open for all the stakeholders to join and give feedbacks among the world leaders and the community.
The IGF conference is in right track. I would like to focus to involve more women leaders in the future upcoming IGF.
Government
ID150
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Technical Community
ID151
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
- connectivity to remote villages entertainment centres across Africa;
- creation of Internet connectivity in impenetrable water logged areas;
- ²
- Internet to the remote villages of African countries
- African countries should closely monitor the negative effects of cyber risks;
- African governments adequately fund the digital connectivity;
- IGF should Fund the participation of NGOS from developing countries of Africa;
- There should constant dialogue and synergy between the civil society and IGF Officials in terms of the Internet connectivity some particular zones of designated African countries;
- Above all IGF Officials should listen carefully to the complaints of stake holders on the Internet connectivity advantages and disadvantages.
- creation of Internet connectivity in impenetrable water logged areas;
- ²
- Internet to the remote villages of African countries
- African countries should closely monitor the negative effects of cyber risks;
- African governments adequately fund the digital connectivity;
- IGF should Fund the participation of NGOS from developing countries of Africa;
- There should constant dialogue and synergy between the civil society and IGF Officials in terms of the Internet connectivity some particular zones of designated African countries;
- Above all IGF Officials should listen carefully to the complaints of stake holders on the Internet connectivity advantages and disadvantages.
In order for the IGF annual meeting and its intercessional sessions to get more significant impact on the implementation of the Global Digital Compact more efforts should be deployed to make the Internet. available to the grass-roots. By so doing, the overall agenda of the World Summit on the Information Society as well as the forthcoming high-level meeting in 2025, will be more meaningful.
I have no specific idea for now. The present format IGF is adopting to discuss themes is the right order
Civil Society
ID152
Privacy Protection laws
In concluding our discussion on how the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can enhance its contributions to the Global Digital Compact and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes ahead of the high-level meeting in 2025, several key points have emerged.
Firstly, the IGF’s annual meetings and intersessional work must prioritize alignment with the principles and objectives of the Global Digital Compact. This can be achieved by ensuring that the themes and topics discussed at the IGF directly reflect the goals of the Compact, such as promoting universal connectivity, digital inclusion, and the protection of human rights in the digital space. By creating dedicated tracks or sessions within the IGF focusing on these initiatives, stakeholders can directly engage in meaningful dialogues that highlight progress and challenges, ultimately fostering a collaborative environment for all participants.
Secondly, the IGF should enhance its multi-stakeholder approach by actively involving representatives from underrepresented and marginalized communities to provide their insights and needs. This inclusivity will not only reflect the core tenets of the Global Digital Compact but also ensure that the dialogue encompasses diverse perspectives, thus enriching the policy-making process. Efforts should be made to facilitate broader participation from developing countries, civil society, and youth organizations, who are often the most affected by the digital divide.
Thirdly, data-driven assessments of previous IGF initiatives and their impact on the WSIS outcomes could inform the discussions leading up to the 2025 meeting. By systematically reviewing successes and areas for improvement, the IGF can provide actionable recommendations and highlight best practices that have emerged within the digital landscape. Partnership with academic institutions and think tanks might also yield valuable research that can guide and enhance the IGF's framework.
Moreover, focusing on the synergies between ongoing global discussions on digital governance and local implementations will be critical. The IGF can serve as a platform for sharing localized experiences and solutions that align with the broader digital agenda, ensuring that the voices of grassroots actors are included in global conversations.
Finally, enhancing communication and outreach efforts to ensure that outputs from the IGF resonate throughout the various stakeholders engaged in the Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes is imperative. A dedicated mechanism for translating discussions into actionable insights and clear recommendations could strengthen the integration of IGF outputs into national and international policies.
In conclusion, as we approach the 2025 high-level meeting, the IGF has a pivotal role to play in shaping the digital future for all. By aligning its agenda with global priorities, ensuring inclusivity, leveraging data-driven assessments, fostering partnerships, and enhancing communication, the IGF can contribute significantly to both the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, paving the way for an equitable and inclusive digital world.
Firstly, the IGF’s annual meetings and intersessional work must prioritize alignment with the principles and objectives of the Global Digital Compact. This can be achieved by ensuring that the themes and topics discussed at the IGF directly reflect the goals of the Compact, such as promoting universal connectivity, digital inclusion, and the protection of human rights in the digital space. By creating dedicated tracks or sessions within the IGF focusing on these initiatives, stakeholders can directly engage in meaningful dialogues that highlight progress and challenges, ultimately fostering a collaborative environment for all participants.
Secondly, the IGF should enhance its multi-stakeholder approach by actively involving representatives from underrepresented and marginalized communities to provide their insights and needs. This inclusivity will not only reflect the core tenets of the Global Digital Compact but also ensure that the dialogue encompasses diverse perspectives, thus enriching the policy-making process. Efforts should be made to facilitate broader participation from developing countries, civil society, and youth organizations, who are often the most affected by the digital divide.
Thirdly, data-driven assessments of previous IGF initiatives and their impact on the WSIS outcomes could inform the discussions leading up to the 2025 meeting. By systematically reviewing successes and areas for improvement, the IGF can provide actionable recommendations and highlight best practices that have emerged within the digital landscape. Partnership with academic institutions and think tanks might also yield valuable research that can guide and enhance the IGF's framework.
Moreover, focusing on the synergies between ongoing global discussions on digital governance and local implementations will be critical. The IGF can serve as a platform for sharing localized experiences and solutions that align with the broader digital agenda, ensuring that the voices of grassroots actors are included in global conversations.
Finally, enhancing communication and outreach efforts to ensure that outputs from the IGF resonate throughout the various stakeholders engaged in the Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes is imperative. A dedicated mechanism for translating discussions into actionable insights and clear recommendations could strengthen the integration of IGF outputs into national and international policies.
In conclusion, as we approach the 2025 high-level meeting, the IGF has a pivotal role to play in shaping the digital future for all. By aligning its agenda with global priorities, ensuring inclusivity, leveraging data-driven assessments, fostering partnerships, and enhancing communication, the IGF can contribute significantly to both the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, paving the way for an equitable and inclusive digital world.
As a privacy protection lawyer, my input to the Secretariat of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) regarding the overall format and design of the event would focus on a few key themes that align with contemporary issues in internet governance, specifically around privacy, data protection, and the role of emerging technologies. Here are my suggestions:
1. Thematic Tracks on Privacy and Data Protection:
Dedicated Privacy Track: Establish a specific thematic track focused solely on privacy and data protection. This track can address current challenges such as data breaches, surveillance, and consent management, ensuring that privacy remains a core topic within the larger discourse of internet governance.
- Intersectional Themes: Create sessions that explore the intersection of privacy with other vital topics, such as AI ethics, digital rights, cybersecurity, and access to information. This would encourage holistic discussions that recognize how privacy impacts and is impacted by various aspects of the digital ecosystem.
2. Increased Participation from Diverse Stakeholders:
- Engagement of Underrepresented Groups: Strive to ensure participation from diverse voices, including civil society, marginalized communities, and local advocates, especially those who are most affected by privacy violations. This could involve scholarships or grants enabling wider representation.
- Multidisciplinary Panels: organise panels that include technologists, ethicists, policy makers, and privacy advocates to foster conversations that acknowledge the complexity of privacy issues from multiple perspectives.
3. Interactive Formats:
- Workshops and Hackathons: Introduce interactive workshops and hackathons where participants can collaborate on solutions to practical privacy challenges. This hands-on approach would not only enhance engagement but also generate viable ideas for policy and technological advancements in privacy protection.
- *lLive Case Studies: Feature real-world case studies that allow participants to analyze and discuss both successes and failures in privacy governance. This can provide valuable lessons and encourage participants to think critically about future applications in their own contexts.
4. Innovative Use of Technology:
- Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) Experiences: Utilise VR and AR to create immersive environments that simulate the implications of privacy-related decisions, allowing participants to experience scenarios and their consequences in a controlled setting. This could serve as a powerful tool for awareness and education.
- Digital Participation Tools: Leverage digital platforms to facilitate remote participation, enabling a broader audience to contribute insights and engage in discussions, particularly those who cannot attend in person.
5. Continued Monitoring and Evaluation:
- Post-Event Surveys and Feedback: Implement a robust mechanism for gathering feedback from participants post-event to refine future iterations of the IGF. Ensuring that participants can voice their thoughts will help align future meetings with the needs and concerns of the community.
Conclusion:
Overall, enhancing the IGF's format and design to prioritize privacy protection will be crucial in addressing the growing concerns surrounding data privacy and security in the digital age. By fostering an inclusive environment that embraces diverse perspectives and innovative formats, the IGF can significantly contribute to shaping a safe and equitable digital future for all.
Thank you for considering these recommendations. I believe they could foster impactful discussions and lead to actionable outcomes while emphasizing the importance of privacy within the broader context of internet governance.
1. Thematic Tracks on Privacy and Data Protection:
Dedicated Privacy Track: Establish a specific thematic track focused solely on privacy and data protection. This track can address current challenges such as data breaches, surveillance, and consent management, ensuring that privacy remains a core topic within the larger discourse of internet governance.
- Intersectional Themes: Create sessions that explore the intersection of privacy with other vital topics, such as AI ethics, digital rights, cybersecurity, and access to information. This would encourage holistic discussions that recognize how privacy impacts and is impacted by various aspects of the digital ecosystem.
2. Increased Participation from Diverse Stakeholders:
- Engagement of Underrepresented Groups: Strive to ensure participation from diverse voices, including civil society, marginalized communities, and local advocates, especially those who are most affected by privacy violations. This could involve scholarships or grants enabling wider representation.
- Multidisciplinary Panels: organise panels that include technologists, ethicists, policy makers, and privacy advocates to foster conversations that acknowledge the complexity of privacy issues from multiple perspectives.
3. Interactive Formats:
- Workshops and Hackathons: Introduce interactive workshops and hackathons where participants can collaborate on solutions to practical privacy challenges. This hands-on approach would not only enhance engagement but also generate viable ideas for policy and technological advancements in privacy protection.
- *lLive Case Studies: Feature real-world case studies that allow participants to analyze and discuss both successes and failures in privacy governance. This can provide valuable lessons and encourage participants to think critically about future applications in their own contexts.
4. Innovative Use of Technology:
- Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) Experiences: Utilise VR and AR to create immersive environments that simulate the implications of privacy-related decisions, allowing participants to experience scenarios and their consequences in a controlled setting. This could serve as a powerful tool for awareness and education.
- Digital Participation Tools: Leverage digital platforms to facilitate remote participation, enabling a broader audience to contribute insights and engage in discussions, particularly those who cannot attend in person.
5. Continued Monitoring and Evaluation:
- Post-Event Surveys and Feedback: Implement a robust mechanism for gathering feedback from participants post-event to refine future iterations of the IGF. Ensuring that participants can voice their thoughts will help align future meetings with the needs and concerns of the community.
Conclusion:
Overall, enhancing the IGF's format and design to prioritize privacy protection will be crucial in addressing the growing concerns surrounding data privacy and security in the digital age. By fostering an inclusive environment that embraces diverse perspectives and innovative formats, the IGF can significantly contribute to shaping a safe and equitable digital future for all.
Thank you for considering these recommendations. I believe they could foster impactful discussions and lead to actionable outcomes while emphasizing the importance of privacy within the broader context of internet governance.
Private Sector
ID153
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Leverage the new book Digital Technology 360 ° to understand the convergence of technologies and strategy to land Global Digital Compact. https://bpbonline.com/products/digital-technology-360?variant=44317301932232
Technical Community
ID154
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
,
,
Semantic Web Ontology need for AI and ML regulation.
Technical Community
ID155
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can focus on the following strategies:
Aligning Themes and Objectives:
Thematic Alignment: Ensure that the themes of the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities are closely aligned with the goals and principles of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include themes such as digital inclusion, human rights, cybersecurity, and sustainable development.
Integration of GDC Principles: Integrate the principles of the GDC into the IGF programme, ensuring that sessions and activities promote a secure, human-centered digital future.
Enhanced Collaboration and Coordination:
Stakeholder Engagement: Engage a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations, to ensure diverse perspectives are represented in discussions and decision-making processes.
Joint Initiatives: Collaborate with other global initiatives and organizations to develop joint projects and initiatives that address common goals and challenges. This can include partnerships with the United Nations, ITU, and other relevant bodies.
Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing:
Training and Workshops: Organize training sessions and workshops focused on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These sessions can provide stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to contribute effectively.
Best Practices and Case Studies: Share best practices and case studies from different regions and sectors that demonstrate successful implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Monitoring and Reporting:
Progress Reports: Develop mechanisms for monitoring and reporting on the progress of implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include regular updates, progress reports, and evaluation frameworks.
Feedback Mechanisms: Establish feedback mechanisms to gather input from stakeholders on the effectiveness of the IGF's contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This feedback can be used to make necessary adjustments and improvements.
Increasing Visibility and Outreach:
Communication Campaigns: Launch communication campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and WSIS outcomes and the IGF's role in their implementation. Utilize social media, newsletters, and other platforms to reach a wider audience.
Inclusive Participation: Ensure that the IGF is accessible to all stakeholders, including those from underserved communities. This can include providing remote participation options and financial support for travel and accommodation.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring a more inclusive and effective approach to digital governance.
Aligning Themes and Objectives:
Thematic Alignment: Ensure that the themes of the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities are closely aligned with the goals and principles of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include themes such as digital inclusion, human rights, cybersecurity, and sustainable development.
Integration of GDC Principles: Integrate the principles of the GDC into the IGF programme, ensuring that sessions and activities promote a secure, human-centered digital future.
Enhanced Collaboration and Coordination:
Stakeholder Engagement: Engage a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations, to ensure diverse perspectives are represented in discussions and decision-making processes.
Joint Initiatives: Collaborate with other global initiatives and organizations to develop joint projects and initiatives that address common goals and challenges. This can include partnerships with the United Nations, ITU, and other relevant bodies.
Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing:
Training and Workshops: Organize training sessions and workshops focused on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These sessions can provide stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to contribute effectively.
Best Practices and Case Studies: Share best practices and case studies from different regions and sectors that demonstrate successful implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Monitoring and Reporting:
Progress Reports: Develop mechanisms for monitoring and reporting on the progress of implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include regular updates, progress reports, and evaluation frameworks.
Feedback Mechanisms: Establish feedback mechanisms to gather input from stakeholders on the effectiveness of the IGF's contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This feedback can be used to make necessary adjustments and improvements.
Increasing Visibility and Outreach:
Communication Campaigns: Launch communication campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and WSIS outcomes and the IGF's role in their implementation. Utilize social media, newsletters, and other platforms to reach a wider audience.
Inclusive Participation: Ensure that the IGF is accessible to all stakeholders, including those from underserved communities. This can include providing remote participation options and financial support for travel and accommodation.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring a more inclusive and effective approach to digital governance.
Absolutely! Here are some innovative ideas for the overall format and design of the IGF, focusing on thematic tracks and treating themes in a novel way:
Thematic Tracks and Design:
Interconnected Themes: Rather than having isolated thematic tracks, design the programme so that themes are interconnected. For example, sessions on digital inclusion can also touch upon cybersecurity, innovation, and human rights. This holistic approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how different aspects of Internet governance are interrelated.
Cross-Cutting Issues: Identify and emphasize cross-cutting issues such as gender equality, youth participation, and sustainable development. These issues can be woven into multiple thematic tracks, ensuring they receive consistent attention throughout the event.
Innovative Session Formats:
Interactive Panels: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive elements such as live polls, breakout groups, and audience-led Q&A. This can make sessions more engaging and participatory.
Debate Sessions: Organize formal debate sessions on controversial topics in Internet governance. This format can encourage critical thinking and present multiple perspectives on important issues.
Lightning Rounds: Include short, focused "lightning rounds" where speakers present key points or innovative ideas within a limited time. This can keep the energy high and ensure a variety of viewpoints are heard.
Participant Engagement:
Pre-Event Collaboration: Encourage participants to collaborate and prepare for sessions before the event through online forums, discussion boards, and virtual meetups. This can help build connections and set the stage for productive in-person discussions.
Mentorship and Buddy Systems: Implement a mentorship or buddy system where experienced participants are paired with newcomers or youth representatives. This can enhance the experience for all participants and promote knowledge exchange.
Real-Time Feedback: Utilize mobile apps or online platforms to gather real-time feedback from participants during sessions. This can help moderators adjust discussions on the fly and ensure that sessions are meeting attendees' needs.
Post-Event Follow-Up:
Action Plans and Roadmaps: Encourage each thematic track to develop actionable recommendations or roadmaps that participants can take back to their communities or organizations. This can help ensure that the discussions lead to tangible outcomes.
Ongoing Engagement: Maintain engagement with participants through regular updates, webinars, and online forums. This can help sustain momentum and keep the community connected between annual IGF events.
Additional Features:
Hybrid and Remote Participation: Enhance the hybrid format to ensure seamless interaction between in-person and online participants. Provide robust technical support and interactive features to engage remote attendees.
Exhibition and Innovation Spaces: Create dedicated spaces for showcasing innovations, interactive demos, and hands-on activities. This can provide participants with opportunities to explore new technologies and best practices.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can create a dynamic, engaging, and impactful event that fosters meaningful discussions and collaborations in Internet governance.
Thematic Tracks and Design:
Interconnected Themes: Rather than having isolated thematic tracks, design the programme so that themes are interconnected. For example, sessions on digital inclusion can also touch upon cybersecurity, innovation, and human rights. This holistic approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how different aspects of Internet governance are interrelated.
Cross-Cutting Issues: Identify and emphasize cross-cutting issues such as gender equality, youth participation, and sustainable development. These issues can be woven into multiple thematic tracks, ensuring they receive consistent attention throughout the event.
Innovative Session Formats:
Interactive Panels: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive elements such as live polls, breakout groups, and audience-led Q&A. This can make sessions more engaging and participatory.
Debate Sessions: Organize formal debate sessions on controversial topics in Internet governance. This format can encourage critical thinking and present multiple perspectives on important issues.
Lightning Rounds: Include short, focused "lightning rounds" where speakers present key points or innovative ideas within a limited time. This can keep the energy high and ensure a variety of viewpoints are heard.
Participant Engagement:
Pre-Event Collaboration: Encourage participants to collaborate and prepare for sessions before the event through online forums, discussion boards, and virtual meetups. This can help build connections and set the stage for productive in-person discussions.
Mentorship and Buddy Systems: Implement a mentorship or buddy system where experienced participants are paired with newcomers or youth representatives. This can enhance the experience for all participants and promote knowledge exchange.
Real-Time Feedback: Utilize mobile apps or online platforms to gather real-time feedback from participants during sessions. This can help moderators adjust discussions on the fly and ensure that sessions are meeting attendees' needs.
Post-Event Follow-Up:
Action Plans and Roadmaps: Encourage each thematic track to develop actionable recommendations or roadmaps that participants can take back to their communities or organizations. This can help ensure that the discussions lead to tangible outcomes.
Ongoing Engagement: Maintain engagement with participants through regular updates, webinars, and online forums. This can help sustain momentum and keep the community connected between annual IGF events.
Additional Features:
Hybrid and Remote Participation: Enhance the hybrid format to ensure seamless interaction between in-person and online participants. Provide robust technical support and interactive features to engage remote attendees.
Exhibition and Innovation Spaces: Create dedicated spaces for showcasing innovations, interactive demos, and hands-on activities. This can provide participants with opportunities to explore new technologies and best practices.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can create a dynamic, engaging, and impactful event that fosters meaningful discussions and collaborations in Internet governance.
Private Sector
ID156
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can focus on the following strategies:
Aligning Themes and Objectives:
Thematic Alignment: Ensure that the themes of the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities are closely aligned with the goals and principles of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include themes such as digital inclusion, human rights, cybersecurity, and sustainable development.
Integration of GDC Principles: Integrate the principles of the GDC into the IGF programme, ensuring that sessions and activities promote a secure, human-centered digital future.
Enhanced Collaboration and Coordination:
Stakeholder Engagement: Engage a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations, to ensure diverse perspectives are represented in discussions and decision-making processes.
Joint Initiatives: Collaborate with other global initiatives and organizations to develop joint projects and initiatives that address common goals and challenges. This can include partnerships with the United Nations, ITU, and other relevant bodies.
Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing:
Training and Workshops: Organize training sessions and workshops focused on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These sessions can provide stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to contribute effectively.
Best Practices and Case Studies: Share best practices and case studies from different regions and sectors that demonstrate successful implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Monitoring and Reporting:
Progress Reports: Develop mechanisms for monitoring and reporting on the progress of implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include regular updates, progress reports, and evaluation frameworks.
Feedback Mechanisms: Establish feedback mechanisms to gather input from stakeholders on the effectiveness of the IGF's contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This feedback can be used to make necessary adjustments and improvements.
Increasing Visibility and Outreach:
Communication Campaigns: Launch communication campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and WSIS outcomes and the IGF's role in their implementation. Utilize social media, newsletters, and other platforms to reach a wider audience.
Inclusive Participation: Ensure that the IGF is accessible to all stakeholders, including those from underserved communities. This can include providing remote participation options and financial support for travel and accommodation.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring a more inclusive and effective approach to digital governance.
Aligning Themes and Objectives:
Thematic Alignment: Ensure that the themes of the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities are closely aligned with the goals and principles of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include themes such as digital inclusion, human rights, cybersecurity, and sustainable development.
Integration of GDC Principles: Integrate the principles of the GDC into the IGF programme, ensuring that sessions and activities promote a secure, human-centered digital future.
Enhanced Collaboration and Coordination:
Stakeholder Engagement: Engage a wide range of stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, and international organizations, to ensure diverse perspectives are represented in discussions and decision-making processes.
Joint Initiatives: Collaborate with other global initiatives and organizations to develop joint projects and initiatives that address common goals and challenges. This can include partnerships with the United Nations, ITU, and other relevant bodies.
Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing:
Training and Workshops: Organize training sessions and workshops focused on the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes. These sessions can provide stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to contribute effectively.
Best Practices and Case Studies: Share best practices and case studies from different regions and sectors that demonstrate successful implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Monitoring and Reporting:
Progress Reports: Develop mechanisms for monitoring and reporting on the progress of implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This can include regular updates, progress reports, and evaluation frameworks.
Feedback Mechanisms: Establish feedback mechanisms to gather input from stakeholders on the effectiveness of the IGF's contributions to the GDC and WSIS outcomes. This feedback can be used to make necessary adjustments and improvements.
Increasing Visibility and Outreach:
Communication Campaigns: Launch communication campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and WSIS outcomes and the IGF's role in their implementation. Utilize social media, newsletters, and other platforms to reach a wider audience.
Inclusive Participation: Ensure that the IGF is accessible to all stakeholders, including those from underserved communities. This can include providing remote participation options and financial support for travel and accommodation.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes, ensuring a more inclusive and effective approach to digital governance.
Here are some innovative ideas for the overall format and design of the IGF, focusing on thematic tracks and treating themes in a novel way:
Thematic Tracks and Design:
Interconnected Themes: Rather than having isolated thematic tracks, design the programme so that themes are interconnected. For example, sessions on digital inclusion can also touch upon cybersecurity, innovation, and human rights. This holistic approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how different aspects of Internet governance are interrelated.
Cross-Cutting Issues: Identify and emphasize cross-cutting issues such as gender equality, youth participation, and sustainable development. These issues can be woven into multiple thematic tracks, ensuring they receive consistent attention throughout the event.
Innovative Session Formats:
Interactive Panels: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive elements such as live polls, breakout groups, and audience-led Q&A. This can make sessions more engaging and participatory.
Debate Sessions: Organize formal debate sessions on controversial topics in Internet governance. This format can encourage critical thinking and present multiple perspectives on important issues.
Lightning Rounds: Include short, focused "lightning rounds" where speakers present key points or innovative ideas within a limited time. This can keep the energy high and ensure a variety of viewpoints are heard.
Participant Engagement:
Pre-Event Collaboration: Encourage participants to collaborate and prepare for sessions before the event through online forums, discussion boards, and virtual meetups. This can help build connections and set the stage for productive in-person discussions.
Mentorship and Buddy Systems: Implement a mentorship or buddy system where experienced participants are paired with newcomers or youth representatives. This can enhance the experience for all participants and promote knowledge exchange.
Real-Time Feedback: Utilize mobile apps or online platforms to gather real-time feedback from participants during sessions. This can help moderators adjust discussions on the fly and ensure that sessions are meeting attendees' needs.
Post-Event Follow-Up:
Action Plans and Roadmaps: Encourage each thematic track to develop actionable recommendations or roadmaps that participants can take back to their communities or organizations. This can help ensure that the discussions lead to tangible outcomes.
Ongoing Engagement: Maintain engagement with participants through regular updates, webinars, and online forums. This can help sustain momentum and keep the community connected between annual IGF events.
Additional Features:
Hybrid and Remote Participation: Enhance the hybrid format to ensure seamless interaction between in-person and online participants. Provide robust technical support and interactive features to engage remote attendees.
Exhibition and Innovation Spaces: Create dedicated spaces for showcasing innovations, interactive demos, and hands-on activities. This can provide participants with opportunities to explore new technologies and best practices.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can create a dynamic, engaging, and impactful event that fosters meaningful discussions and collaborations in Internet governance.
Thematic Tracks and Design:
Interconnected Themes: Rather than having isolated thematic tracks, design the programme so that themes are interconnected. For example, sessions on digital inclusion can also touch upon cybersecurity, innovation, and human rights. This holistic approach can provide a more comprehensive understanding of how different aspects of Internet governance are interrelated.
Cross-Cutting Issues: Identify and emphasize cross-cutting issues such as gender equality, youth participation, and sustainable development. These issues can be woven into multiple thematic tracks, ensuring they receive consistent attention throughout the event.
Innovative Session Formats:
Interactive Panels: Move beyond traditional panel discussions by incorporating interactive elements such as live polls, breakout groups, and audience-led Q&A. This can make sessions more engaging and participatory.
Debate Sessions: Organize formal debate sessions on controversial topics in Internet governance. This format can encourage critical thinking and present multiple perspectives on important issues.
Lightning Rounds: Include short, focused "lightning rounds" where speakers present key points or innovative ideas within a limited time. This can keep the energy high and ensure a variety of viewpoints are heard.
Participant Engagement:
Pre-Event Collaboration: Encourage participants to collaborate and prepare for sessions before the event through online forums, discussion boards, and virtual meetups. This can help build connections and set the stage for productive in-person discussions.
Mentorship and Buddy Systems: Implement a mentorship or buddy system where experienced participants are paired with newcomers or youth representatives. This can enhance the experience for all participants and promote knowledge exchange.
Real-Time Feedback: Utilize mobile apps or online platforms to gather real-time feedback from participants during sessions. This can help moderators adjust discussions on the fly and ensure that sessions are meeting attendees' needs.
Post-Event Follow-Up:
Action Plans and Roadmaps: Encourage each thematic track to develop actionable recommendations or roadmaps that participants can take back to their communities or organizations. This can help ensure that the discussions lead to tangible outcomes.
Ongoing Engagement: Maintain engagement with participants through regular updates, webinars, and online forums. This can help sustain momentum and keep the community connected between annual IGF events.
Additional Features:
Hybrid and Remote Participation: Enhance the hybrid format to ensure seamless interaction between in-person and online participants. Provide robust technical support and interactive features to engage remote attendees.
Exhibition and Innovation Spaces: Create dedicated spaces for showcasing innovations, interactive demos, and hands-on activities. This can provide participants with opportunities to explore new technologies and best practices.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can create a dynamic, engaging, and impactful event that fosters meaningful discussions and collaborations in Internet governance.
Private Sector
ID157
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
AI governance in Pharmaceutical management: Ensuring pharmacovigilence and Global supply chain
This proposal invites stakeholders to explore the role of AI governance in pharmacy, addressing regulatory frameworks, ethical concerns, and data privacy. Contributions will focus on enhancing patient safety, promoting transparency in pharmaceutical AI applications, and aligning with global digital health strategies. This initiative supports sustainable and accountable AI integration.
This proposal invites stakeholders to explore the role of AI governance in pharmacy, addressing regulatory frameworks, ethical concerns, and data privacy. Contributions will focus on enhancing patient safety, promoting transparency in pharmaceutical AI applications, and aligning with global digital health strategies. This initiative supports sustainable and accountable AI integration.
The IGF annual meeting provides a critical platform to address the intersection of AI governance and pharmacy. By fostering cross-sector collaboration, it can influence global health outcomes aligned with the World Summit’s goals. This proposal highlights the need for transparent regulations, data privacy, and equitable access to AI-driven pharmaceutical innovations. Enhanced global cooperation will ensure that AI applications support public health priorities and sustainable development in line with international digital governance frameworks.
To reimagine the IGF format, I propose a “Living Forum” approach that extends beyond the annual meeting. This format would transform IGF into an evolving, year-round participatory platform that adapts to ongoing global developments. Each thematic track, such as AI governance in pharmacy, could be treated as an “Impact Challenge,” where stakeholders collaborate on real-world case studies with set milestones and measurable goals.
Instead of limiting discussions to sessions, the IGF could host “Open Innovation Sprints” where diverse stakeholders co-create actionable frameworks and prototypes. These sprints would culminate in a showcase at the annual meeting, with winning initiatives receiving support for scaling. Additionally, immersive digital spaces using virtual and augmented reality could foster more inclusive participation, particularly for stakeholders in low-resource settings.
By treating themes as dynamic, outcome-driven initiatives rather than static discussions, the IGF can create sustained impact and foster a culture of continuous global collaboration and innovation.
Instead of limiting discussions to sessions, the IGF could host “Open Innovation Sprints” where diverse stakeholders co-create actionable frameworks and prototypes. These sprints would culminate in a showcase at the annual meeting, with winning initiatives receiving support for scaling. Additionally, immersive digital spaces using virtual and augmented reality could foster more inclusive participation, particularly for stakeholders in low-resource settings.
By treating themes as dynamic, outcome-driven initiatives rather than static discussions, the IGF can create sustained impact and foster a culture of continuous global collaboration and innovation.
Private Sector
ID158
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Media and Content
The use of IA in journalism how to prevent plagiarism fake news and improve citizenship
We must lead towards a highest cooperation between north and south to fulfil the gap between developped countries and others in order to realize digital equality or digital justice
Add athema about the role of IA to facilitate opportunities and IA must be just a mean not an aim
Government
ID159
Government
ID160
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The IGF could prioritize topics of interest for the Global South, in particular policy areas that are essential for connecting digital transformation to broader economic development and achievement of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Cyber resilience is increasingly a key topic, as in recent years developing countries have been incapacitated for months due to major cyber incidents, from Albania and Costa Rica to Indonesia and others. This worrisome trend is preventing the buildup of trust in the internet and digital transformation more broadly, and the impact of quantum computing, 5G and AI on the cyber resilience of the Global South must be further examined. International cooperation mechanisms to further enhance capacity building in the field of cyber resilience should be discussed.
The discussion could focus on the progress made since WSIS+10 and the main remaining gaps that deserve attention from the international community, in particular in the field of cyber resilience and emerging technologies.
Cyber resilience, AI / quantum could be key tracks for thematic areas.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID161
Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Partnerships: Collaborate with private companies to expand internet governance coverage .
Local Content Development: Encourage the creation of local content in native languages to make the internet governance relevant and accessiblity
Local Content Development: Encourage the creation of local content in native languages to make the internet governance relevant and accessiblity
The IGF should establish mechanisms for monitoring and evaluating the progress of digital initiatives. This helps to identify gaps and challenges, ensuring that the goals of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS are achieved
Civil Society
ID162
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
We believe that it is important to be more involved with the global major open-source communities in the IGF-related agenda and initiatives that are deeply concerned with AI and advanced connectivity developments. such as e.g. AI-RAN Alliance, Bharat 6G Alliance, O-RAN Alliance, The Linux Foundation, ONF"Open Networks Fondations", TIP "Telecom Infra Project" and many others.
We recommend initiating a track dedicated to the open-source communities that are deeply concerned with AI and advanced connectivity developments.
Private Sector
ID163
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID164
Artificial Intelligence, Rights and Freedoms, Technical and Operational Topics
Technical Community
ID165
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Private Sector
ID166
Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
أعطاء فرصة أكبر للمنظمات الغير الحكومية أن يشارك في العمل مع الجهات المسؤولة عن الحالات التي يراد الوصول الى نتائج مرضية وشفافة لتحقيق الأهداف خدمة للجميع .
التعامل مع الموضوعات يستحسن أن تكون بطريقة يعطي الوقت الكافي للفرد أو المنظمة الحصول على معلومات أكثر ويسمح له بالمشاركة .
Civil Society
ID167
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
I am interested in bringing a greater attention to biometrics and digital identity at IGF2025
Civil Society
ID168
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
The thematic areas listed above all very relevant, however, we as a center agree that the areas we have selected should definitely feature in IGF 2025.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can play a significant role in contributing to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes leading up to the 2025 high-level meeting. Here are key ways we as a center believe the IGF can enhance its contributions:
Aligning with GDC Priorities:
1. Closing digital divides and fostering an inclusive digital economy
2. Building an inclusive, open, safe, and secure digital space
3. Strengthening international data governance and AI governance
By focusing on these priorities, the IGF can directly contribute to advancing the GDC's objectives of enhancing Multistakeholder Collaboration
The IGF should leverage its position as the primary multistakeholder platform for Internet governance discussions to facilitate dialogue between governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities on GDC implementation strategies.
Also to promote cross-border learning and identify policy solutions to emerging digital challenges.
And Lastly, to encourage stakeholders to engage with the IGF to advance Compact commitments on Internet governance.
Aligning with GDC Priorities:
1. Closing digital divides and fostering an inclusive digital economy
2. Building an inclusive, open, safe, and secure digital space
3. Strengthening international data governance and AI governance
By focusing on these priorities, the IGF can directly contribute to advancing the GDC's objectives of enhancing Multistakeholder Collaboration
The IGF should leverage its position as the primary multistakeholder platform for Internet governance discussions to facilitate dialogue between governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities on GDC implementation strategies.
Also to promote cross-border learning and identify policy solutions to emerging digital challenges.
And Lastly, to encourage stakeholders to engage with the IGF to advance Compact commitments on Internet governance.
Generally, the Thematic tracks are very comprehensive as it covers a wide range of crucial topics regarding internet governance, we would like to see the diversity in the planning of the IGF 2025, calling for this thematic input from the public is already a great step to this diverse representation at the IGF 2025.
Civil Society
ID169
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Enhancing IGF’s Role in Advancing the Global Digital Compact and WSIS Outcomes
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) occupies a unique position as a multistakeholder platform, making it vital to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of outcomes from the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). With the high-level meeting in 2025 approaching, the IGF can focus on three core strategies to align its work with these initiatives:
1. Aligning IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Goals
The IGF should prioritize themes that resonate with the GDC’s principles, such as:
Universal Connectivity: Showcasing models for inclusive and affordable internet access, especially in underserved regions.
Human Rights Online: Facilitating discussions on freedom of expression, privacy, and data protection.
Sustainability: Exploring the intersection of digital technologies and environmental sustainability.
2. Strengthening Multistakeholder Collaboration
The IGF can amplify its impact by fostering deeper collaboration across sectors:
Promoting Partnerships: Serving as a bridge between governments, private entities, and civil society to drive actionable outcomes.
Showcasing Best Practices: Highlighting regional initiatives that address WSIS goals, offering scalable models for global adoption.
3. Delivering Actionable and Measurable Outputs
The IGF can ensure its work leads to tangible outcomes by:
I strongly propose actionablerRecommendations: Producing clear, concise outputs that inform GDC and WSIS processes.
Preparatory Engagement: Organizing pre-meeting consultations to refine stakeholder input and shape global discussions.
Conclusion
By focusing on these strategies, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the Global Digital Compact and strengthening the review of WSIS outcomes. Its ability to convene diverse stakeholders and generate actionable insights ensures that the digital future will be equitable, inclusive, and sustainable.
Peterking Quaye
Regional Director, West Africa ICT Action Network (WAICTANet)
Focal Point, Liberia Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) occupies a unique position as a multistakeholder platform, making it vital to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of outcomes from the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). With the high-level meeting in 2025 approaching, the IGF can focus on three core strategies to align its work with these initiatives:
1. Aligning IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Goals
The IGF should prioritize themes that resonate with the GDC’s principles, such as:
Universal Connectivity: Showcasing models for inclusive and affordable internet access, especially in underserved regions.
Human Rights Online: Facilitating discussions on freedom of expression, privacy, and data protection.
Sustainability: Exploring the intersection of digital technologies and environmental sustainability.
2. Strengthening Multistakeholder Collaboration
The IGF can amplify its impact by fostering deeper collaboration across sectors:
Promoting Partnerships: Serving as a bridge between governments, private entities, and civil society to drive actionable outcomes.
Showcasing Best Practices: Highlighting regional initiatives that address WSIS goals, offering scalable models for global adoption.
3. Delivering Actionable and Measurable Outputs
The IGF can ensure its work leads to tangible outcomes by:
I strongly propose actionablerRecommendations: Producing clear, concise outputs that inform GDC and WSIS processes.
Preparatory Engagement: Organizing pre-meeting consultations to refine stakeholder input and shape global discussions.
Conclusion
By focusing on these strategies, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the Global Digital Compact and strengthening the review of WSIS outcomes. Its ability to convene diverse stakeholders and generate actionable insights ensures that the digital future will be equitable, inclusive, and sustainable.
Peterking Quaye
Regional Director, West Africa ICT Action Network (WAICTANet)
Focal Point, Liberia Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
Suggestions for Enhancing the IGF Format : Streamlined Thematic Tracks: Organize sessions around fewer, broader themes to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and reduce fragmentation. For example, group related topics under "Digital Inclusion," "Data Governance," and "Sustainability."- Interactive Formats: Incorporate more participatory sessions, such as workshops, roundtables,to foster collaboration and produce actionable outcomes. Also Regional Perspectives: Dedicate sessions to addressing region-specific challenges and solutions, ensuring equitable representation from the Global South and underserved communities.
In conclusion by simplifying themes, encouraging engagement, and amplifying diverse voices, the IGF can become more dynamic and impactful.
In conclusion by simplifying themes, encouraging engagement, and amplifying diverse voices, the IGF can become more dynamic and impactful.
Civil Society
ID170
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
High-Level Engagement:
Foster high-level dialogues and direct engagement with policymakers to ensure IGF discussions influence decision-making processes at the 2025 high-level meeting.
Showcasing Success Stories:
Use the IGF platform to highlight successful case studies and projects that exemplify the principles of the GDC and WSIS, inspiring replication and scaling.
Foster high-level dialogues and direct engagement with policymakers to ensure IGF discussions influence decision-making processes at the 2025 high-level meeting.
Showcasing Success Stories:
Use the IGF platform to highlight successful case studies and projects that exemplify the principles of the GDC and WSIS, inspiring replication and scaling.
Creating Ambassadorial Roles for Tech Leaders
Appoint Tech Ambassadors globally to represent the IGF and advocate for its goals in local communities.
Establish local chapters to promote IGF initiatives and organize community-level events and discussions.
Ambassadors can act as liaisons between the IGF and local stakeholders, ensuring regional priorities are reflected in global discussions.
Youth and Emerging Voices Track
Dedicated track for young professionals, students, and marginalized groups to share perspectives on digital futures.
Mentorship opportunities connecting youth with established leaders.
Incorporating Arts and Culture
Integrate cultural exhibitions, digital art installations, and storytelling sessions to explore the human side of digital transformation.
Appoint Tech Ambassadors globally to represent the IGF and advocate for its goals in local communities.
Establish local chapters to promote IGF initiatives and organize community-level events and discussions.
Ambassadors can act as liaisons between the IGF and local stakeholders, ensuring regional priorities are reflected in global discussions.
Youth and Emerging Voices Track
Dedicated track for young professionals, students, and marginalized groups to share perspectives on digital futures.
Mentorship opportunities connecting youth with established leaders.
Incorporating Arts and Culture
Integrate cultural exhibitions, digital art installations, and storytelling sessions to explore the human side of digital transformation.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID171
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Regarding AI, it is urgent to have debates around the provision of common ressources for AI training, the strengths and challenges of publicly available and open source models, especially in a development context, and the common and democratic governance of AI. The benefits of AI need to be made available to the global community, yet these benefits should not come at the cost of a centralization of control. What models are available that share benefits equitably? What policy solutions exist to promote such models?
Media freedom and freedom of expressions remain at risk and need to take a prominent position at the next IGF. In addition to the long debates around content moderation, I would be interested in discussion surrounding support for (local) journalism and its promotion through digital fora, as well as potential collaborations across jurisdictions.
Media freedom and freedom of expressions remain at risk and need to take a prominent position at the next IGF. In addition to the long debates around content moderation, I would be interested in discussion surrounding support for (local) journalism and its promotion through digital fora, as well as potential collaborations across jurisdictions.
Civil Society
ID172
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
Technical Community
ID173
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
We believe that, by the time the IGF takes place, there are going to be more GDC definitions and the The Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD) working group on data governance will already have been convened. This group should be invited to the IGF and a workshop or special session around its work should be happening so we can learn more about its work.
Civil Society
ID174
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
1. Alignment with Global Digital Compact Priorities
Incorporate GDC Themes: Structure IGF sessions and intersessional activities to address key GDC themes, such as:
Universal connectivity and digital inclusion.
Data protection, privacy, and digital rights.
Promoting trust, security, and stability in cyberspace.
Advancing AI governance and ethical technology development.
Policy Recommendations: Develop actionable policy outputs from IGF discussions that can feed into the GDC drafting and implementation process.
2. Supporting the WSIS Review
Stocktaking of WSIS Outcomes: Host sessions at IGF annual meetings to evaluate the progress of WSIS outcomes, such as:
Access to ICTs for development.
Bridging the digital divide.
Capacity building and local content creation.
Gap Analysis: Identify challenges and areas needing improvement in WSIS implementation, providing evidence-based recommendations for the 2025 review.
3. Enhanced Multistakeholder Engagement
Diverse Participation: Strengthen outreach to underrepresented groups, such as youth, Indigenous communities, women, and small and developing states, to ensure their voices shape global policies.
Multistakeholder Coalitions: Foster collaboration between governments, private sector entities, civil society, and technical experts to align IGF efforts with GDC and WSIS goals
Incorporate GDC Themes: Structure IGF sessions and intersessional activities to address key GDC themes, such as:
Universal connectivity and digital inclusion.
Data protection, privacy, and digital rights.
Promoting trust, security, and stability in cyberspace.
Advancing AI governance and ethical technology development.
Policy Recommendations: Develop actionable policy outputs from IGF discussions that can feed into the GDC drafting and implementation process.
2. Supporting the WSIS Review
Stocktaking of WSIS Outcomes: Host sessions at IGF annual meetings to evaluate the progress of WSIS outcomes, such as:
Access to ICTs for development.
Bridging the digital divide.
Capacity building and local content creation.
Gap Analysis: Identify challenges and areas needing improvement in WSIS implementation, providing evidence-based recommendations for the 2025 review.
3. Enhanced Multistakeholder Engagement
Diverse Participation: Strengthen outreach to underrepresented groups, such as youth, Indigenous communities, women, and small and developing states, to ensure their voices shape global policies.
Multistakeholder Coalitions: Foster collaboration between governments, private sector entities, civil society, and technical experts to align IGF efforts with GDC and WSIS goals
Civil Society
ID175
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
These issues should be reflected in the new narrative of the " Second World Social Summit" in DOHA, 4-6 November 2025.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is pivotal in bridging global digital policy and development discussions. To align its annual meetings and intercessional work more effectively with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF could undertake the following strategies:
1. Facilitating Multistakeholder Dialogues on the GDC and WSIS
Dedicated Sessions: Incorporate thematic sessions in the IGF annual meeting specifically focused on the principles of the GDC and the WSIS review, inviting participation from governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities.
Public Consultations: Use the IGF as a platform to gather insights and feedback on the implementation of GDC principles and WSIS outcomes, fostering inclusive and diverse contributions.
Policy Mapping: Create a framework that maps IGF discussions to the GDC and WSIS targets, ensuring coherence and alignment.
2. Strengthening Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks: Mobilize existing dynamic coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to produce actionable recommendations that align with GDC goals and WSIS priorities.
Thematic Working Groups: Establish inter-sessional working groups dedicated to specific GDC pillars, such as digital inclusion, human rights online, and data governance, to generate year-round outputs.
3. Capacity Building and Awareness
Training and Toolkits: Develop educational resources to enhance understanding of the GDC and WSIS outcomes among stakeholders, particularly in underserved regions.
Regional Engagements: Collaborate with regional and national IGFs to localize discussions, ensuring global agendas resonate with regional and local priorities.
4. Monitoring and Accountability Mechanisms
Progress Reports: Encourage the IGF Secretariat to provide annual progress reports on how its discussions and outputs are contributing to GDC implementation and WSIS outcomes.
Indicators and Metrics: Develop measurable indicators to track the impact of IGF discussions on global digital policy agendas.
5. Promoting Synergies with UN Processes
Coordination with UN Agencies: Enhance collaboration between the IGF and UN entities, such as ITU, UNESCO, and DESA, to integrate IGF outputs into formal UN policy discussions.
High-Level Advocacy: Use the IGF as a preparatory platform for the 2025 high-level meeting, ensuring that its outcomes are prominently featured in the agenda.
By focusing on these strategies, the IGF can position itself as a critical enabler for implementing the Global Digital Compact and reviewing WSIS outcomes, fostering a truly inclusive and sustainable digital future.
1. Facilitating Multistakeholder Dialogues on the GDC and WSIS
Dedicated Sessions: Incorporate thematic sessions in the IGF annual meeting specifically focused on the principles of the GDC and the WSIS review, inviting participation from governments, private sector, civil society, and technical communities.
Public Consultations: Use the IGF as a platform to gather insights and feedback on the implementation of GDC principles and WSIS outcomes, fostering inclusive and diverse contributions.
Policy Mapping: Create a framework that maps IGF discussions to the GDC and WSIS targets, ensuring coherence and alignment.
2. Strengthening Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks: Mobilize existing dynamic coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to produce actionable recommendations that align with GDC goals and WSIS priorities.
Thematic Working Groups: Establish inter-sessional working groups dedicated to specific GDC pillars, such as digital inclusion, human rights online, and data governance, to generate year-round outputs.
3. Capacity Building and Awareness
Training and Toolkits: Develop educational resources to enhance understanding of the GDC and WSIS outcomes among stakeholders, particularly in underserved regions.
Regional Engagements: Collaborate with regional and national IGFs to localize discussions, ensuring global agendas resonate with regional and local priorities.
4. Monitoring and Accountability Mechanisms
Progress Reports: Encourage the IGF Secretariat to provide annual progress reports on how its discussions and outputs are contributing to GDC implementation and WSIS outcomes.
Indicators and Metrics: Develop measurable indicators to track the impact of IGF discussions on global digital policy agendas.
5. Promoting Synergies with UN Processes
Coordination with UN Agencies: Enhance collaboration between the IGF and UN entities, such as ITU, UNESCO, and DESA, to integrate IGF outputs into formal UN policy discussions.
High-Level Advocacy: Use the IGF as a preparatory platform for the 2025 high-level meeting, ensuring that its outcomes are prominently featured in the agenda.
By focusing on these strategies, the IGF can position itself as a critical enabler for implementing the Global Digital Compact and reviewing WSIS outcomes, fostering a truly inclusive and sustainable digital future.
Innovative Session Formats
Roundtable Dialogues:
Replace some traditional panels with smaller, interactive roundtables to encourage direct exchanges between diverse stakeholder groups.
Open Co-Creation Labs:
Dedicate sessions to real-time drafting of recommendations, policies, or toolkits, engaging participants as co-creators rather than passive listeners.
Lightning Talks & Demonstrations:
Introduce 10-minute lightning talks or live demonstrations of innovations, policies, or initiatives, offering digestible insights to stimulate further discussion.
Roundtable Dialogues:
Replace some traditional panels with smaller, interactive roundtables to encourage direct exchanges between diverse stakeholder groups.
Open Co-Creation Labs:
Dedicate sessions to real-time drafting of recommendations, policies, or toolkits, engaging participants as co-creators rather than passive listeners.
Lightning Talks & Demonstrations:
Introduce 10-minute lightning talks or live demonstrations of innovations, policies, or initiatives, offering digestible insights to stimulate further discussion.
Civil Society
ID176
Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
I propose a full thematic focus on gender equality and women's empowerment, not just as a sub-theme. 2025 marks the 30th anniversary of the Beijing declaration and Platform for Action, so it would be fitting for the IGF to connect to the important milestone in a substantive and meaningful way.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID177
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Promotion of the Global Digital Compact and support the development of local digital communities
Organize Hackathons, trainings and organize between civil society organizations and potential donors
Civil Society
ID178
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Private Sector
ID180
Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Technical Community
ID181
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Proof of Humanity / personality
Civil Society
ID182
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Civil Society
ID183
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Underseas internet cable cutting has been used as a gray area tactic between nations. More focus on this infrastructure warfare is needed.
Take into account global demographic trends to address aging and the human sitation.
We suggest that lightening talks be broadcast online as well to give greater access to the information shared at the event. A focus on regional approaches to AI liability would be useful, such as initiatives by Digital Governance Asia's AI Harm Remedy Tracker: https://digitalgovernance.asia/ai-harm-remedy-tracker
Civil Society
ID184
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
The IGF can enhance its contribution to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS review by:
1. Thematic Alignment: Tailoring annual themes and sub-themes to align with GDC priorities and WSIS outcomes.
2. Intersessional Work: Leveraging Policy Networks and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to develop actionable recommendations and practical resources.
3. Stakeholder Engagement: Enhancing collaboration among governments, private sectors, and underrepresented groups, particularly from the Global South.
4. Monitoring and Accountability: Establishing mechanisms to track and report progress on GDC principles and WSIS recommendations through IGF outputs.
5. Capacity Building: Organizing workshops and knowledge-sharing initiatives to empower local implementation of GDC and WSIS goals.
6. High-Level Track: Using high-level IGF tracks to drive actionable discussions in preparation for the 2025 high-level meeting.
By aligning its efforts with global digital agendas, the IGF can play a pivotal role in achieving the vision of the GDC and WSIS.
1. Thematic Alignment: Tailoring annual themes and sub-themes to align with GDC priorities and WSIS outcomes.
2. Intersessional Work: Leveraging Policy Networks and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to develop actionable recommendations and practical resources.
3. Stakeholder Engagement: Enhancing collaboration among governments, private sectors, and underrepresented groups, particularly from the Global South.
4. Monitoring and Accountability: Establishing mechanisms to track and report progress on GDC principles and WSIS recommendations through IGF outputs.
5. Capacity Building: Organizing workshops and knowledge-sharing initiatives to empower local implementation of GDC and WSIS goals.
6. High-Level Track: Using high-level IGF tracks to drive actionable discussions in preparation for the 2025 high-level meeting.
By aligning its efforts with global digital agendas, the IGF can play a pivotal role in achieving the vision of the GDC and WSIS.
Government
ID185
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Intergovernmental Organization
ID186
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Intergovernmental Organization
ID187
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Child online safety, Data trust-building, Hate speech, including against women and vulnerable groups
To ensure the IGF contributes effectively to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS+20 review ahead of the high-level meeting at the end of 2025, it can refine its annual meeting and intersessional activities in several ways. The IGF is uniquely positioned to bring together multi-stakeholder communities and address key issues in digital cooperation, which directly aligns with the objectives of both the GDC and the WSIS+20 review.
1. Strengthening the Alignment Between IGF and the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
2. Thematic Sessions Focused on GDC Principles
3. Incorporating the GDC into IGF Capacity-Building Activities
4. Tracking Progress and Accountability for GDC
5. Deepening the Connection Between IGF and the WSIS+20 Review
6. Integrating WSIS Action Lines into IGF Sessions
7. Synthesizing Contributions from National and Regional IGFs
8. Enhancing Intersessional Work and Its Role in the GDC and WSIS+20
9. Policy Networks and Best Practice Forums Focused on GDC Implementation
10. Cross-Sector Collaboration on Intersessional Outputs
11. Increasing Visibility and Outreach of IGF’s Contributions to WSIS and the GDC
12. A Communications Strategy for IGF’s Role in Global Digital Cooperation
The IGF is a vital platform for driving forward both the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 review. By aligning its annual meeting agenda, intersessional activities, and multi-stakeholder engagement processes with the principles of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, IGF 2025 can make a significant contribution to advancing global digital cooperation. Through focused thematic sessions, collaborative policy development, and regional contributions, the IGF can provide a space for inclusive dialogue, policy innovation, and tracking progress, all of which are essential to addressing current and future digital challenges on the global stage.
1. Strengthening the Alignment Between IGF and the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
2. Thematic Sessions Focused on GDC Principles
3. Incorporating the GDC into IGF Capacity-Building Activities
4. Tracking Progress and Accountability for GDC
5. Deepening the Connection Between IGF and the WSIS+20 Review
6. Integrating WSIS Action Lines into IGF Sessions
7. Synthesizing Contributions from National and Regional IGFs
8. Enhancing Intersessional Work and Its Role in the GDC and WSIS+20
9. Policy Networks and Best Practice Forums Focused on GDC Implementation
10. Cross-Sector Collaboration on Intersessional Outputs
11. Increasing Visibility and Outreach of IGF’s Contributions to WSIS and the GDC
12. A Communications Strategy for IGF’s Role in Global Digital Cooperation
The IGF is a vital platform for driving forward both the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 review. By aligning its annual meeting agenda, intersessional activities, and multi-stakeholder engagement processes with the principles of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes, IGF 2025 can make a significant contribution to advancing global digital cooperation. Through focused thematic sessions, collaborative policy development, and regional contributions, the IGF can provide a space for inclusive dialogue, policy innovation, and tracking progress, all of which are essential to addressing current and future digital challenges on the global stage.
Improving the format and design of the IGF for 2025 and beyond could enhance the relevance, inclusivity, and impact of the event, aligning it more effectively with global priorities and ensuring greater stakeholder engagement. Here are a few ideas for potential improvements in terms of overall structure, thematic tracks, and ways to treat the themes differently:
1. Refining and Streamlining Focus Areas
2. Organize Around Cross-Cutting Themes
3. Digital Inclusion and Equity
4. Thematic Integration with Emerging Topics
5. Innovative Session Formats: Expanding Beyond Traditional Panels
6. Interactive Workshops and Breakout Groups
7. Scenario-based workshops where participants create policy solutions to hypothetical or real-world challenges.
8. Peer-to-peer exchanges for sharing knowledge and best practices between stakeholders from different regions or sectors.
9. Roundtable Discussions with Stakeholder Representation
10. "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) Sessions with Experts
11. Policy Lab/Innovation Space
12. Incorporating Regional and National Perspectives More Effectively
13. Asia-Pacific Internet Governance
14. Youth and Future Leaders Integration
15. Youth-led innovation challenges where young people propose digital solutions or policy ideas.
16. Youth mentorship programs
17. Digital literacy workshops
18. Outcome-Oriented Approach, bridging Discussions to Action
19. Draft agreements or frameworks for tackling digital divides or promoting digital literacy.
20. Hybrid and Remote Participation Enhancements
21. Include virtual exhibition spaces where organizations, companies, and policy groups can showcase digital projects and innovations for virtual participants
22. Collaborative Policy Proposals and Global Recommendations
Revising the IGF's format and design could significantly enhance its role as a global forum for digital cooperation. Focusing on cross-cutting themes, incorporating innovative session formats, better regional integration, action-oriented outcomes, and enhanced virtual engagement would create a more dynamic and impactful event. Additionally, the IGF's ability to track progress on themes like the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes would make it a central player in global digital governance in the coming years.
1. Refining and Streamlining Focus Areas
2. Organize Around Cross-Cutting Themes
3. Digital Inclusion and Equity
4. Thematic Integration with Emerging Topics
5. Innovative Session Formats: Expanding Beyond Traditional Panels
6. Interactive Workshops and Breakout Groups
7. Scenario-based workshops where participants create policy solutions to hypothetical or real-world challenges.
8. Peer-to-peer exchanges for sharing knowledge and best practices between stakeholders from different regions or sectors.
9. Roundtable Discussions with Stakeholder Representation
10. "Ask Me Anything" (AMA) Sessions with Experts
11. Policy Lab/Innovation Space
12. Incorporating Regional and National Perspectives More Effectively
13. Asia-Pacific Internet Governance
14. Youth and Future Leaders Integration
15. Youth-led innovation challenges where young people propose digital solutions or policy ideas.
16. Youth mentorship programs
17. Digital literacy workshops
18. Outcome-Oriented Approach, bridging Discussions to Action
19. Draft agreements or frameworks for tackling digital divides or promoting digital literacy.
20. Hybrid and Remote Participation Enhancements
21. Include virtual exhibition spaces where organizations, companies, and policy groups can showcase digital projects and innovations for virtual participants
22. Collaborative Policy Proposals and Global Recommendations
Revising the IGF's format and design could significantly enhance its role as a global forum for digital cooperation. Focusing on cross-cutting themes, incorporating innovative session formats, better regional integration, action-oriented outcomes, and enhanced virtual engagement would create a more dynamic and impactful event. Additionally, the IGF's ability to track progress on themes like the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes would make it a central player in global digital governance in the coming years.
Civil Society
ID188
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Elaborating main sessions especially focused on these issues, to collect input and inform the diverse group of stakeholders present in the meeting.
A better review process of workshops, guaranteeing that they do not come mostly from newcomers and people with little to no experience in Internet Governance specific themes.
Technical Community
ID189
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF can play an important role in advancing the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes by fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration. Encouraging partnerships among governments, the private sector, and civil society will ensure that digital policies are inclusive and sustainable. Thematic tracks focusing on youth, gender, and marginalized groups can promote inclusive policy frameworks that address digital inequalities while providing a platform for diverse voices. Additionally, IGF should highlight best practices and success stories from global initiatives to serve as actionable examples for WSIS objectives, emphasizing strategies for implementation at local and global levels.
To make the IGF more impactful, the event format should incorporate interactive thematic tracks that combine expert panels with workshops and open discussions. These formats will enhance stakeholder engagement and lead to actionable outcomes. Youth-led initiatives should also be prioritized, empowering young leaders to contribute their perspectives and shape the future of digital policies. Finally, dedicated sessions for regional and local stakeholders would provide a platform to address unique challenges and share solutions tailored to specific contexts, ensuring the IGF remains globally relevant and locally impactful.
Dedicating specific sessions to youth-led initiatives can bring fresh perspectives and innovative ideas to the front line. These sessions could be designed and moderated by young leaders, focusing on critical issues such as digital inclusion, skills development, and emerging technologies.
Civil Society
ID190
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Child online safety, Cyber attacks and cyber conflict, Hate speech, including against women and vulnerable groups
Intelligence artificielle
Oui bien évidemment
Ou sera la place des humains face à l'intelligence artificielle
Private Sector
ID191
Cybersecurity and Trust, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Technical Community
ID192
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Civil Society
ID193
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Encourage partnerships between governments, businesses, and civil society organizations to advocate for inclusive digital policies that support innovation and bridge the digital divide.integrating these elements into the intersessional work leading up to the high-level meeting in 2025, stakeholders can ensure a more coordinated, inclusive, and effective approach to the implementation and review of both the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes. implementation of digital literacy and education programs, particularly in developing countries. Intersessional work should prioritize capacity-building initiatives to ensure that all stakeholders, especially in the Global South, can fully participate in and benefit from the digital transformation.
To ensure that intersession work better reflects or contributes to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025, several actions could be taken. These actions would focus on improving collaboration, aligning objectives, and strengthening monitoring and accountability mechanisms. Below are key suggestions to enhance intersession intersectionality discussions involve a broad range of stakeholders, including governments, the private sector, civil society, academia, and international organizations. This will help align efforts across sectors, ensuring that various perspectives contribute to the implementation of both the GDC and the WSIS outcomes.
Data Collection and Analysis: Leverage existing data sources, national reports, and stakeholder feedback to track trends related to digital inclusion, online safety, access to technology, and capacity building. This information should be used to inform decision-making processes during the intersessional period.Strengthen cooperation between the UN Secretary-General’s office, relevant UN agencies (such as ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP), and other international organizations involved in digital policy. This would ensure consistency in messaging and strategies across different global forums, including those related to climate change, trade, and development.to intersessional work. This includes responding to feedback from stakeholders and adjusting priorities based on new developments in the digital landscape. A regular review process could help refine strategies and ensure they remain relevant and effective.
Private Sector
ID194
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Cyberbullying
AI in Education
AI in Education
IGF really motivate me as my first meeting. It does motivate new and fresh minds to contribute in whatever ways to implement the Global Digital Compact. We are facing the same and ongoing issues where we applied the same solutions, yet we still have them. The IGF annual meeting was insightful and if all that has been discussed can be enforced by each community into actions, im sure no one is left behind.
It is easier to put all thematic tracks under each theme. There were so many iteresting sessions running at the same time. Maybe 2 themes per day and people tend to join and choose the sessions that they want to join. By the afternoon no one wants to listen, Would be great if by 3pm or 4pm all is done.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID195
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Ai and Blockchain - GBBC global standards mapping initiative 5.0 - see AI Convergence https://www.gbbc.io/uploads/gsmi50.pdf?mc_cid=575588a0cd&mc_eid=1e51946115
TRUST - join gan.foundation
https://gan.foundation/
Newly Restructured & Swiss-based as Ayra and being publicly released January 13th and at Davos January 22nd
https://gan.foundation/
Newly Restructured & Swiss-based as Ayra and being publicly released January 13th and at Davos January 22nd
Ai and Blockchain - GBBC global standards mapping initiative 5.0 - see AI Convergence https://www.gbbc.io/uploads/gsmi50.pdf?mc_cid=575588a0cd&mc_eid=1e51946115
Civil Society
ID196
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Civil Society
ID197
Artificial Intelligence
The Role of the IGF in Supporting the Global Digital Compact and WSIS+20 Review
1. Aligning IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles:
The Global Digital Compact emphasizes inclusivity, connectivity, data governance, and digital human rights. The IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities can integrate these principles by:
- Hosting targeted discussions on fostering equitable access to digital infrastructure and skills, particularly in developing regions like Southeast Asia.
- Promoting sessions focused on rights-based approaches to data governance, aligning with legal frameworks.
2. Strengthening Policy Recommendations:
Drawing on the IGF's multi-stakeholder model, legal scholars and policymakers can refine actionable recommendations that bridge gaps between national regulations and global standards. You could emphasize the role of legal frameworks in:
- Addressing cybersecurity and data privacy challenges, ensuring compliance with international norms.
- Encouraging digital inclusion policies, particularly for marginalized communities.
3. Collaborating with Regional Initiatives:
The IGF should leverage insights from regional forums to ensure diverse perspectives in crafting the Global Digital Compact. Cambodia, for example, could contribute lessons learned from its growing digital economy, especially in e-commerce and mentorship platforms like "7 Stars Digitalize Mentorship."
4. Contributing to the WSIS+20 Review:
- The IGF can serve as a platform to assess progress on WSIS action lines, particularly in legal frameworks enabling ICT growth.
- Facilitate sessions on legal innovation to close gaps between traditional and digital systems, ensuring sustainable development goals are met.
5. Capacity Building and Advocacy:
Your knowledge of mentorship and education aligns well with the IGF’s role in capacity-building. You could propose:
- Initiatives that train policymakers and entrepreneurs on digital law and governance.
- A mentorship program integrated into IGF intersessional activities, promoting knowledge-sharing across sectors.
By integrating these approaches, the IGF can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and support the review of WSIS+20 outcomes.
1. Aligning IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles:
The Global Digital Compact emphasizes inclusivity, connectivity, data governance, and digital human rights. The IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities can integrate these principles by:
- Hosting targeted discussions on fostering equitable access to digital infrastructure and skills, particularly in developing regions like Southeast Asia.
- Promoting sessions focused on rights-based approaches to data governance, aligning with legal frameworks.
2. Strengthening Policy Recommendations:
Drawing on the IGF's multi-stakeholder model, legal scholars and policymakers can refine actionable recommendations that bridge gaps between national regulations and global standards. You could emphasize the role of legal frameworks in:
- Addressing cybersecurity and data privacy challenges, ensuring compliance with international norms.
- Encouraging digital inclusion policies, particularly for marginalized communities.
3. Collaborating with Regional Initiatives:
The IGF should leverage insights from regional forums to ensure diverse perspectives in crafting the Global Digital Compact. Cambodia, for example, could contribute lessons learned from its growing digital economy, especially in e-commerce and mentorship platforms like "7 Stars Digitalize Mentorship."
4. Contributing to the WSIS+20 Review:
- The IGF can serve as a platform to assess progress on WSIS action lines, particularly in legal frameworks enabling ICT growth.
- Facilitate sessions on legal innovation to close gaps between traditional and digital systems, ensuring sustainable development goals are met.
5. Capacity Building and Advocacy:
Your knowledge of mentorship and education aligns well with the IGF’s role in capacity-building. You could propose:
- Initiatives that train policymakers and entrepreneurs on digital law and governance.
- A mentorship program integrated into IGF intersessional activities, promoting knowledge-sharing across sectors.
By integrating these approaches, the IGF can better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and support the review of WSIS+20 outcomes.
1. Revamping Thematic Tracks
Thematic tracks could be restructured to reflect emerging global priorities and align with initiatives like the Global Digital Compact. Suggested tracks include:
- Digital Rights and Governance: Focus on legal frameworks, data protection, and human rights in the digital age.
- Inclusive Connectivity:Address digital divides, particularly in underserved regions.
- Digital Economy and Innovation: Highlight entrepreneurial ecosystems, with a focus on mentorship and platforms like "7 Stars Digitalize Mentorship."
- AI, Ethics, and Regulation: Examine the intersection of AI development and regulatory frameworks.
- Cybersecurity and Resilience: Provide practical solutions for legal and technological challenges in online safety.
Alternative Approach: Replace thematic tracks with cross-cutting themes, enabling more interdisciplinary discussions (e.g., "Equity in AI Governance" or "Sustainability in Digital Transformation").
2. Interactive Formats
Move beyond traditional panels to more engaging formats:
- Legal Clinics and Workshops: Focused sessions for attendees to discuss and draft policy or legal solutions.
- Hackathons: Encourage collaboration on digital solutions for societal challenges.
- Case Study Roundtables:Share successes and failures from various regions and industries.
- Mock Negotiations:Simulate international treaty negotiations on digital governance to engage stakeholders.
3. Strengthened Regional and Local Voices
Create space for regional perspectives by:
- Allocating dedicated sessions for regional issues and priorities.
- Featuring localized case studies to demonstrate practical applications of global principles.
Your Contribution: Leverage Cambodia's experience with digital transformation and legal development to inform these discussions.
4. Pre-IGF Preparatory Sessions
Offer preparatory sessions or toolkits to:
- Equip participants, especially newcomers, with foundational knowledge.
- Provide resources for engaging with complex legal and technical themes.
5. Multistakeholder Labs
Introduce "Policy Labs" or "Action Labs" where stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, entrepreneurs, legal experts) co-develop frameworks or initiatives. For example:
- A lab on "Legal Harmonization for Cross-Border Data Transfers."
- A mentorship-driven session on supporting startups in navigating digital laws.
6. Incorporating AI and Tech Tools
Use digital tools to enhance participation and outputs:
- AI-driven discussion summaries to streamline reporting.
- Interactive platforms for real-time collaboration on documents or policies.
7. Focus on Measurable Outcomes
Shift focus from broad discussions to actionable outputs, such as:
- Model policies or frameworks for digital governance.
- Legal toolkits for countries navigating digital transformation.
Thematic tracks could be restructured to reflect emerging global priorities and align with initiatives like the Global Digital Compact. Suggested tracks include:
- Digital Rights and Governance: Focus on legal frameworks, data protection, and human rights in the digital age.
- Inclusive Connectivity:Address digital divides, particularly in underserved regions.
- Digital Economy and Innovation: Highlight entrepreneurial ecosystems, with a focus on mentorship and platforms like "7 Stars Digitalize Mentorship."
- AI, Ethics, and Regulation: Examine the intersection of AI development and regulatory frameworks.
- Cybersecurity and Resilience: Provide practical solutions for legal and technological challenges in online safety.
Alternative Approach: Replace thematic tracks with cross-cutting themes, enabling more interdisciplinary discussions (e.g., "Equity in AI Governance" or "Sustainability in Digital Transformation").
2. Interactive Formats
Move beyond traditional panels to more engaging formats:
- Legal Clinics and Workshops: Focused sessions for attendees to discuss and draft policy or legal solutions.
- Hackathons: Encourage collaboration on digital solutions for societal challenges.
- Case Study Roundtables:Share successes and failures from various regions and industries.
- Mock Negotiations:Simulate international treaty negotiations on digital governance to engage stakeholders.
3. Strengthened Regional and Local Voices
Create space for regional perspectives by:
- Allocating dedicated sessions for regional issues and priorities.
- Featuring localized case studies to demonstrate practical applications of global principles.
Your Contribution: Leverage Cambodia's experience with digital transformation and legal development to inform these discussions.
4. Pre-IGF Preparatory Sessions
Offer preparatory sessions or toolkits to:
- Equip participants, especially newcomers, with foundational knowledge.
- Provide resources for engaging with complex legal and technical themes.
5. Multistakeholder Labs
Introduce "Policy Labs" or "Action Labs" where stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, entrepreneurs, legal experts) co-develop frameworks or initiatives. For example:
- A lab on "Legal Harmonization for Cross-Border Data Transfers."
- A mentorship-driven session on supporting startups in navigating digital laws.
6. Incorporating AI and Tech Tools
Use digital tools to enhance participation and outputs:
- AI-driven discussion summaries to streamline reporting.
- Interactive platforms for real-time collaboration on documents or policies.
7. Focus on Measurable Outcomes
Shift focus from broad discussions to actionable outputs, such as:
- Model policies or frameworks for digital governance.
- Legal toolkits for countries navigating digital transformation.
Private Sector
ID198
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of WSIS outcomes in several ways:
Aligning Themes: The IGF can align its annual themes with GDC goals, such as digital inclusion, trust, and human rights, and host discussions focused on these issues.
Monitoring and Reporting: IGF can track progress on WSIS Action Lines, offering a space for multi-stakeholder discussions, sharing best practices, and identifying challenges in meeting WSIS goals.
Regional Input: By supporting regional IGFs, the Forum can highlight localized solutions and foster inclusive discussions that align with GDC and WSIS priorities.
intersessional Work: IGF's Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks can develop concrete recommendations that contribute to both the GDC’s and WSIS’s goals, including digital public goods and inclusive digital economies.
Collaboration: The IGF can strengthen partnerships with UN agencies, private sector, and international organizations to drive forward these global initiatives, ensuring a coordinated approach to digital transformation. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of WSIS outcomes in several ways:
Aligning Themes: The IGF can align its annual themes with GDC goals, such as digital inclusion, trust, and human rights, and host discussions focused on these issues.
Monitoring and Reporting: IGF can track progress on WSIS Action Lines, offering a space for multi-stakeholder discussions, sharing best practices, and identifying challenges in meeting WSIS goals.
Regional Input: By supporting regional IGFs, the Forum can highlight localized solutions and foster inclusive discussions that align with GDC and WSIS priorities.
Inter sessional Work: IGF's Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks can develop concrete recommendations that contribute to both the GDC’s and WSIS’s goals, including digital public goods and inclusive digital economies.
Collaboration: The IGF can strengthen partnerships with UN agencies, private sector, and international organizations to drive forward these global initiatives, ensuring a coordinated approach to digital transformation.
Aligning Themes: The IGF can align its annual themes with GDC goals, such as digital inclusion, trust, and human rights, and host discussions focused on these issues.
Monitoring and Reporting: IGF can track progress on WSIS Action Lines, offering a space for multi-stakeholder discussions, sharing best practices, and identifying challenges in meeting WSIS goals.
Regional Input: By supporting regional IGFs, the Forum can highlight localized solutions and foster inclusive discussions that align with GDC and WSIS priorities.
intersessional Work: IGF's Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks can develop concrete recommendations that contribute to both the GDC’s and WSIS’s goals, including digital public goods and inclusive digital economies.
Collaboration: The IGF can strengthen partnerships with UN agencies, private sector, and international organizations to drive forward these global initiatives, ensuring a coordinated approach to digital transformation. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of WSIS outcomes in several ways:
Aligning Themes: The IGF can align its annual themes with GDC goals, such as digital inclusion, trust, and human rights, and host discussions focused on these issues.
Monitoring and Reporting: IGF can track progress on WSIS Action Lines, offering a space for multi-stakeholder discussions, sharing best practices, and identifying challenges in meeting WSIS goals.
Regional Input: By supporting regional IGFs, the Forum can highlight localized solutions and foster inclusive discussions that align with GDC and WSIS priorities.
Inter sessional Work: IGF's Dynamic Coalitions and Policy Networks can develop concrete recommendations that contribute to both the GDC’s and WSIS’s goals, including digital public goods and inclusive digital economies.
Collaboration: The IGF can strengthen partnerships with UN agencies, private sector, and international organizations to drive forward these global initiatives, ensuring a coordinated approach to digital transformation.
To enhance the format and design of the IGF, consider the following ideas:
Thematic Tracks with Clear Actionable Outcomes: Instead of broad themes, focus on specific, actionable sub-themes (e.g., "Digital Inclusion in Rural Areas" or "AI and Human Rights"). Each track should produce concrete recommendations or reports for policy makers and stakeholders.
Interactive Formats: Incorporate more interactive formats like live polls, hackathons, and “real-time solutions” workshops that encourage collaboration and problem-solving among participants.
Increased Focus on Regional Voices: Dedicate more time and space to regional issues by creating tracks or sessions that highlight regional digital challenges, ensuring broader global representation.
Policy and Action-Oriented Sessions: Shift from purely discussion-oriented panels to action-focused sessions where governments, private sector, and civil society co-create policy frameworks or initiatives.
Year-Round Engagement: Expand IGF's intercessional work by involving stakeholders throughout the year in smaller, focused events, webinars, and thematic working groups leading up to the annual meeting, rather than just during the event.
Cross-Cutting Themes: Focus on cross-cutting issues like cyber security, digital ethics, and emerging technologies in a more integrated, holistic manner to address the intersectionality of these challenges.
Thematic Tracks with Clear Actionable Outcomes: Instead of broad themes, focus on specific, actionable sub-themes (e.g., "Digital Inclusion in Rural Areas" or "AI and Human Rights"). Each track should produce concrete recommendations or reports for policy makers and stakeholders.
Interactive Formats: Incorporate more interactive formats like live polls, hackathons, and “real-time solutions” workshops that encourage collaboration and problem-solving among participants.
Increased Focus on Regional Voices: Dedicate more time and space to regional issues by creating tracks or sessions that highlight regional digital challenges, ensuring broader global representation.
Policy and Action-Oriented Sessions: Shift from purely discussion-oriented panels to action-focused sessions where governments, private sector, and civil society co-create policy frameworks or initiatives.
Year-Round Engagement: Expand IGF's intercessional work by involving stakeholders throughout the year in smaller, focused events, webinars, and thematic working groups leading up to the annual meeting, rather than just during the event.
Cross-Cutting Themes: Focus on cross-cutting issues like cyber security, digital ethics, and emerging technologies in a more integrated, holistic manner to address the intersectionality of these challenges.
Private Sector
ID199
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development
Government
ID200
Artificial Intelligence
When addressing Artificial Intelligence (AI) issues in an event, here are some potential angles you could consider:
1. Ethical AI Issues
Discuss the implications of AI bias and fairness.
Explore AI’s impact on privacy and data protection.
Examine ethical dilemmas like deepfakes and misinformation.
2. AI in Policy and Regulation
Discuss the global disparity in AI governance and regulation.
Highlight the role of AI in shaping public policies.
Address the challenges of regulating AI while fostering innovation.
3. Economic and Employment Impacts
Explore AI’s effect on job markets (automation vs. job creation).
Discuss the economic potential of AI in various sectors.
Evaluate the digital divide and access to AI technologies.
4. AI and Sustainability
Highlight AI’s role in addressing climate change and resource management.
Discuss ethical AI development in low-resource settings.
Examine the energy consumption and environmental impact of AI systems.
5. AI for Social Good
Share success stories of AI in healthcare, education, and disaster response.
Discuss AI’s role in promoting inclusivity and accessibility.
Address barriers to implementing AI solutions in underserved communities.
Event Format Suggestions:
Keynotes or Panels: Experts discuss critical issues.
Workshops: Focus on ethical AI design or practical applications.
Hackathons: Develop innovative solutions for AI challenges.
Networking Opportunities: Encourage discussions on AI collaborati
1. Ethical AI Issues
Discuss the implications of AI bias and fairness.
Explore AI’s impact on privacy and data protection.
Examine ethical dilemmas like deepfakes and misinformation.
2. AI in Policy and Regulation
Discuss the global disparity in AI governance and regulation.
Highlight the role of AI in shaping public policies.
Address the challenges of regulating AI while fostering innovation.
3. Economic and Employment Impacts
Explore AI’s effect on job markets (automation vs. job creation).
Discuss the economic potential of AI in various sectors.
Evaluate the digital divide and access to AI technologies.
4. AI and Sustainability
Highlight AI’s role in addressing climate change and resource management.
Discuss ethical AI development in low-resource settings.
Examine the energy consumption and environmental impact of AI systems.
5. AI for Social Good
Share success stories of AI in healthcare, education, and disaster response.
Discuss AI’s role in promoting inclusivity and accessibility.
Address barriers to implementing AI solutions in underserved communities.
Event Format Suggestions:
Keynotes or Panels: Experts discuss critical issues.
Workshops: Focus on ethical AI design or practical applications.
Hackathons: Develop innovative solutions for AI challenges.
Networking Opportunities: Encourage discussions on AI collaborati
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a critical role in fostering dialogue and cooperation on internet governance and digital policy issues. To better align with major global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review, the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can take the following steps:
---
1. Enhanced Thematic Alignment
Focus on GDC Priorities: Structure IGF sessions around key pillars of the GDC, such as digital inclusion, human rights in the digital age, sustainability, and the regulation of AI and emerging technologies.
Highlight WSIS Targets: Incorporate WSIS Action Lines and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into the agenda to reflect the digital dimensions of global development priorities.
---
2. Multistakeholder Engagement and Capacity Building
Engage Diverse Stakeholders: Include governments, private sector, civil society, and technical community representatives to discuss actionable strategies for implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Capacity Building Workshops: Organize sessions aimed at building capacity in regions that are underserved or underrepresented in global internet governance discussions.
---
3. Policy Incubation and Innovation
Develop Policy Recommendations: Use IGF's Best Practice Forums (BPFs) and Policy Networks to develop recommendations that can feed into the GDC and WSIS review processes.
Support Regional and National IGFs: Strengthen their ability to contribute region-specific insights to global dialogues.
---
4. Strengthened Interlinkages and Synergies
Collaborate with Global Processes: Create direct pathways for IGF outputs to inform GDC discussions and WSIS reviews.
Liaise with UN Agencies: Partner with UN organizations working on digital transformation, such as ITU, UNDP, and UNESCO, to ensure coherence.
---
5. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Track Contributions: Establish mechanisms to track how IGF initiatives align with and contribute to GDC objectives and WSIS outcomes.
Review Progress: Dedicate sessions to evaluating the progress of WSIS Action Lines and identifying gaps that IGF stakeholders can address.
---
6. Tangible Outputs and Communication
Develop Actionable Outputs: Produce clear, action-oriented outcomes from annual meetings that can be presented at the GDC and WSIS review.
Promote Findings: Use digital platforms, publications, and events to disseminate IGF contributions widely.
---
---
1. Enhanced Thematic Alignment
Focus on GDC Priorities: Structure IGF sessions around key pillars of the GDC, such as digital inclusion, human rights in the digital age, sustainability, and the regulation of AI and emerging technologies.
Highlight WSIS Targets: Incorporate WSIS Action Lines and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into the agenda to reflect the digital dimensions of global development priorities.
---
2. Multistakeholder Engagement and Capacity Building
Engage Diverse Stakeholders: Include governments, private sector, civil society, and technical community representatives to discuss actionable strategies for implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Capacity Building Workshops: Organize sessions aimed at building capacity in regions that are underserved or underrepresented in global internet governance discussions.
---
3. Policy Incubation and Innovation
Develop Policy Recommendations: Use IGF's Best Practice Forums (BPFs) and Policy Networks to develop recommendations that can feed into the GDC and WSIS review processes.
Support Regional and National IGFs: Strengthen their ability to contribute region-specific insights to global dialogues.
---
4. Strengthened Interlinkages and Synergies
Collaborate with Global Processes: Create direct pathways for IGF outputs to inform GDC discussions and WSIS reviews.
Liaise with UN Agencies: Partner with UN organizations working on digital transformation, such as ITU, UNDP, and UNESCO, to ensure coherence.
---
5. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Track Contributions: Establish mechanisms to track how IGF initiatives align with and contribute to GDC objectives and WSIS outcomes.
Review Progress: Dedicate sessions to evaluating the progress of WSIS Action Lines and identifying gaps that IGF stakeholders can address.
---
6. Tangible Outputs and Communication
Develop Actionable Outputs: Produce clear, action-oriented outcomes from annual meetings that can be presented at the GDC and WSIS review.
Promote Findings: Use digital platforms, publications, and events to disseminate IGF contributions widely.
---
Here are some ideas to enhance the format and design of the IGF, focusing on inclusivity, innovation, and alignment with global digital governance priorities:
---
1. Thematic Tracks with Interconnected Focus Areas
Fewer but Broader Themes: Group related topics under fewer, overarching tracks such as:
Digital Inclusion and Accessibility
Emerging Technologies and Regulation
Sustainability and Climate Action
Trust, Security, and Rights
Cross-Cutting Discussions: Incorporate sub-themes like Artificial Intelligence (AI), data governance, and cybersecurity into multiple tracks to ensure interconnections.
---
2. Year-Round Participation and Thematic Continuity
Pre-Event Consultations: Use intersessional work (Dynamic Coalitions, BPFs, and Policy Networks) to shape the thematic priorities ahead of the annual meeting.
Post-Event Action: Develop follow-up mechanisms to track progress on key themes after the IGF.
---
3. Interactive and Innovative Formats
Workshops with Outcomes: Encourage workshops to produce tangible outputs, such as policy proposals, technical guidelines, or frameworks.
Simultaneous Tracks with Cohesive Themes: Introduce simultaneous sessions around one core theme each day to focus attention on specific topics.
Debate Panels: Include sessions where experts debate controversial topics to foster engagement.
---
4. Regional and Context-Specific Integration
Regional Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to issues faced by different regions to elevate underrepresented voices.
Local Policy Labs: Showcase innovations or policies from national and regional IGFs.
---
5. Improved Engagement Mechanisms
Hybrid Format: Ensure seamless participation for in-person and remote attendees, with live Q&A, polls, and breakout rooms.
Interactive Tools: Use virtual collaboration platforms for brainstorming or co-creating solutions during sessions.
Youth Participation: Create a dedicated track for youth, empowering young people to lead discussions on emerging technologies and challenges.
---
6. Aligning with Global Agendas
GDC and WSIS Alignment: Use thematic tracks to address key pillars of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS action lines, such as universal connectivity, human rights, and AI governance.
UN SDGs: Integrate SDG priorities explicitly into the thematic tracks to ensure global relevance.
---
7. Tangible and Actionable Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Sessions should aim to deliver actionable insights or guidelines for stakeholders.
Outcome Repository: Establish an easily accessible repository for IGF outputs to enhance visibility and adoption.
---
8. Inclusivity and Accessibility
Accessible Formats: Ensure materials and sessions are available in multiple languages, and use captioning, sign language, and screen reader-friendly tools.
Open Calls for Input: Actively solicit inputs from marginalized groups and smaller nations during the agenda-setting phase.
---
---
1. Thematic Tracks with Interconnected Focus Areas
Fewer but Broader Themes: Group related topics under fewer, overarching tracks such as:
Digital Inclusion and Accessibility
Emerging Technologies and Regulation
Sustainability and Climate Action
Trust, Security, and Rights
Cross-Cutting Discussions: Incorporate sub-themes like Artificial Intelligence (AI), data governance, and cybersecurity into multiple tracks to ensure interconnections.
---
2. Year-Round Participation and Thematic Continuity
Pre-Event Consultations: Use intersessional work (Dynamic Coalitions, BPFs, and Policy Networks) to shape the thematic priorities ahead of the annual meeting.
Post-Event Action: Develop follow-up mechanisms to track progress on key themes after the IGF.
---
3. Interactive and Innovative Formats
Workshops with Outcomes: Encourage workshops to produce tangible outputs, such as policy proposals, technical guidelines, or frameworks.
Simultaneous Tracks with Cohesive Themes: Introduce simultaneous sessions around one core theme each day to focus attention on specific topics.
Debate Panels: Include sessions where experts debate controversial topics to foster engagement.
---
4. Regional and Context-Specific Integration
Regional Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to issues faced by different regions to elevate underrepresented voices.
Local Policy Labs: Showcase innovations or policies from national and regional IGFs.
---
5. Improved Engagement Mechanisms
Hybrid Format: Ensure seamless participation for in-person and remote attendees, with live Q&A, polls, and breakout rooms.
Interactive Tools: Use virtual collaboration platforms for brainstorming or co-creating solutions during sessions.
Youth Participation: Create a dedicated track for youth, empowering young people to lead discussions on emerging technologies and challenges.
---
6. Aligning with Global Agendas
GDC and WSIS Alignment: Use thematic tracks to address key pillars of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS action lines, such as universal connectivity, human rights, and AI governance.
UN SDGs: Integrate SDG priorities explicitly into the thematic tracks to ensure global relevance.
---
7. Tangible and Actionable Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Sessions should aim to deliver actionable insights or guidelines for stakeholders.
Outcome Repository: Establish an easily accessible repository for IGF outputs to enhance visibility and adoption.
---
8. Inclusivity and Accessibility
Accessible Formats: Ensure materials and sessions are available in multiple languages, and use captioning, sign language, and screen reader-friendly tools.
Open Calls for Input: Actively solicit inputs from marginalized groups and smaller nations during the agenda-setting phase.
---
Private Sector
ID201
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Universal Acceptance and Challenges towards digital inclusion.
Government
ID202
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
Here are comments on the listed issues:
Artificial Intelligence Issues
AI raises concerns about ethics, accountability, and transparency. Misuse of AI can lead to biased decisions, job displacement, and privacy breaches. Additionally, ensuring responsible AI deployment requires regulatory frameworks and collaboration among stakeholders.
AI and Data
Data is the foundation of AI, but its collection and usage often lack adequate privacy protections. Issues like data ownership, consent, and security need addressing to avoid exploitation and ensure AI systems are trained on unbiased, diverse datasets.
Cybersecurity and Trust Issues
With the rise of digital technologies, cyber threats such as hacking, phishing, and ransomware attacks have become prevalent. Building public trust requires robust cybersecurity measures, capacity building, and cross-border collaboration to address these risks effectively.
Encryption
Encryption is critical for protecting data and communications, but it is often contested by governments citing national security concerns. Balancing strong encryption for privacy with law enforcement's needs is an ongoing challenge.
Digital Cooperation Issues
Global digital cooperation is essential for addressing issues like the digital divide, cross-border data flows, and sustainable development goals. It demands multilateral and multistakeholder approaches to ensure inclusivity and equity in shaping digital policies.
Broadening Stakeholder Engagement in Internet Governance
The Internet affects everyone, yet many communities lack representation in governance. Efforts should focus on including marginalized groups, grassroots organizations, and small businesses to ensure diverse perspectives in decision-making.
Additional Input
Emerging Technologies: Addressing the governance and ethical implications of emerging technologies such as blockchain and quantum computing.
Digital Inclusion: Ens
Artificial Intelligence Issues
AI raises concerns about ethics, accountability, and transparency. Misuse of AI can lead to biased decisions, job displacement, and privacy breaches. Additionally, ensuring responsible AI deployment requires regulatory frameworks and collaboration among stakeholders.
AI and Data
Data is the foundation of AI, but its collection and usage often lack adequate privacy protections. Issues like data ownership, consent, and security need addressing to avoid exploitation and ensure AI systems are trained on unbiased, diverse datasets.
Cybersecurity and Trust Issues
With the rise of digital technologies, cyber threats such as hacking, phishing, and ransomware attacks have become prevalent. Building public trust requires robust cybersecurity measures, capacity building, and cross-border collaboration to address these risks effectively.
Encryption
Encryption is critical for protecting data and communications, but it is often contested by governments citing national security concerns. Balancing strong encryption for privacy with law enforcement's needs is an ongoing challenge.
Digital Cooperation Issues
Global digital cooperation is essential for addressing issues like the digital divide, cross-border data flows, and sustainable development goals. It demands multilateral and multistakeholder approaches to ensure inclusivity and equity in shaping digital policies.
Broadening Stakeholder Engagement in Internet Governance
The Internet affects everyone, yet many communities lack representation in governance. Efforts should focus on including marginalized groups, grassroots organizations, and small businesses to ensure diverse perspectives in decision-making.
Additional Input
Emerging Technologies: Addressing the governance and ethical implications of emerging technologies such as blockchain and quantum computing.
Digital Inclusion: Ens
To better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and intersessional work could focus on the following strategies:
1. Alignment with the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
Thematic Integration: Ensure that IGF sessions address key GDC principles, such as digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and accountability in AI.
Stakeholder Engagement: Broaden participation from governments, private sectors, civil society, and technical experts to foster collaborative discussions on implementing the GDC.
Policy Recommendations: Develop actionable recommendations aligned with the GDC's focus areas, offering practical steps for governments and organizations to adopt.
2. Supporting WSIS Outcomes Review
Progress Tracking: Organize sessions that evaluate progress on WSIS Action Lines, including ICT infrastructure, capacity building, cybersecurity, and enabling environments.
Data Sharing: Provide a platform for sharing national and regional reports on WSIS implementation progress to enhance transparency and accountability.
Case Studies: Highlight successful WSIS-related projects that demonstrate tangible impacts in areas like education, e-governance, and rural connectivity.
3. Strengthening Interlinkages Between IGF and Global Agendas
High-Level Panels: Host high-level discussions involving global leaders to align IGF outputs with GDC and WSIS objectives, ensuring relevance to the 2025 review.
Intersessional Workstreams: Focus on practical projects (e.g., Best Practice Forums or Policy Networks) that directly contribute to GDC goals and WSIS outcomes, such as enabling affordable Internet access or promoting secure and inclusive digital spaces.
Collaboration with UN Agencies: Partner with UN bodies like ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP to harmonize IGF activities with broader UN agendas.
4. Concrete Outputs and Follow-Up Mechanisms
Policy Papers: Ensure that IGF outputs, such as recommendations and reports, directly feed into the GDC process and WSIS review mechanisms.
Implementation Roadmaps: Develop specific roadmaps for translating IGF discussions into tangible actions aligned with global digital development goals.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish mechanisms to track how IGF recommendations are being implemented at national and regional levels, with a focus on accountability and scalability.
5. Capacity Building and Awareness
Workshops and Training: Offer workshops to equip stakeholders with tools to implement GDC principles and WSIS action lines effectively.
Localized Engagement: Encourage national and regional IGFs to integrate global agendas into their discussions, building bottom-up contributions to the annual IGF meeting.
6. Inclusive and Diverse Participation
Youth Engagement: Amplify the voices of young people, especially those from marginalized communities, to reflect diverse perspectives in the GDC and WSIS implementation.
Private Sector Involvement: Strengthen partnerships with private sector actors to leverage innovation and investment for implementing global digital goals.
By embedding these strategies into its annual meeting and intersessional work, the IGF can serve as a vital platform for driving progress on the GDC and WSIS, ensuring meaningful contributions to the 2025 high-level meeting.
1. Alignment with the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
Thematic Integration: Ensure that IGF sessions address key GDC principles, such as digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and accountability in AI.
Stakeholder Engagement: Broaden participation from governments, private sectors, civil society, and technical experts to foster collaborative discussions on implementing the GDC.
Policy Recommendations: Develop actionable recommendations aligned with the GDC's focus areas, offering practical steps for governments and organizations to adopt.
2. Supporting WSIS Outcomes Review
Progress Tracking: Organize sessions that evaluate progress on WSIS Action Lines, including ICT infrastructure, capacity building, cybersecurity, and enabling environments.
Data Sharing: Provide a platform for sharing national and regional reports on WSIS implementation progress to enhance transparency and accountability.
Case Studies: Highlight successful WSIS-related projects that demonstrate tangible impacts in areas like education, e-governance, and rural connectivity.
3. Strengthening Interlinkages Between IGF and Global Agendas
High-Level Panels: Host high-level discussions involving global leaders to align IGF outputs with GDC and WSIS objectives, ensuring relevance to the 2025 review.
Intersessional Workstreams: Focus on practical projects (e.g., Best Practice Forums or Policy Networks) that directly contribute to GDC goals and WSIS outcomes, such as enabling affordable Internet access or promoting secure and inclusive digital spaces.
Collaboration with UN Agencies: Partner with UN bodies like ITU, UNESCO, and UNDP to harmonize IGF activities with broader UN agendas.
4. Concrete Outputs and Follow-Up Mechanisms
Policy Papers: Ensure that IGF outputs, such as recommendations and reports, directly feed into the GDC process and WSIS review mechanisms.
Implementation Roadmaps: Develop specific roadmaps for translating IGF discussions into tangible actions aligned with global digital development goals.
Monitoring and Evaluation: Establish mechanisms to track how IGF recommendations are being implemented at national and regional levels, with a focus on accountability and scalability.
5. Capacity Building and Awareness
Workshops and Training: Offer workshops to equip stakeholders with tools to implement GDC principles and WSIS action lines effectively.
Localized Engagement: Encourage national and regional IGFs to integrate global agendas into their discussions, building bottom-up contributions to the annual IGF meeting.
6. Inclusive and Diverse Participation
Youth Engagement: Amplify the voices of young people, especially those from marginalized communities, to reflect diverse perspectives in the GDC and WSIS implementation.
Private Sector Involvement: Strengthen partnerships with private sector actors to leverage innovation and investment for implementing global digital goals.
By embedding these strategies into its annual meeting and intersessional work, the IGF can serve as a vital platform for driving progress on the GDC and WSIS, ensuring meaningful contributions to the 2025 high-level meeting.
Here are some ideas to enhance the format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF):
---
1. Thematic Tracks with Structured Layers
Layered Approach: Divide thematic tracks into three layers:
Policy and Regulation: Focus on high-level discussions for policymakers.
Technology and Innovation: Target technical experts and innovators.
Community Impact: Highlight grassroots initiatives and community-driven solutions.
Dynamic Tracks: Ensure thematic tracks align with pressing global issues (e.g., AI governance, digital equity, and cybersecurity). Update tracks annually based on global trends.
---
2. A Mixed Format for Better Engagement
Plenary Sessions: Dedicated to high-level policy discussions involving global leaders and key stakeholders.
Thematic Breakout Sessions: Smaller, focused discussions on specific sub-themes to encourage deeper exploration and idea generation.
Lightning Talks: Short, focused presentations for individuals to share innovative ideas or success stories within 5–10 minutes.
Roundtables and Dialogues: Foster informal, solution-oriented conversations among participants from diverse sectors.
Hackathons and Labs: Interactive workshops for practical problem-solving, such as developing tools or frameworks for digital inclusion or cybersecurity.
---
3. Cross-Thematic Integration
Cross-Cutting Sessions: Organize sessions that explore intersections between thematic tracks (e.g., "AI and Data in Cybersecurity" or "Digital Inclusion in the Age of AI").
Joint Panels: Invite representatives from multiple thematic tracks to discuss overlapping challenges and opportunities.
---
4. Outcome-Oriented Structure
Day 1: Agenda-Setting: Engage participants in defining key objectives for the forum.
Mid-Forum: Solution Development: Focus on practical and collaborative problem-solving.
Day 5: Actionable Outputs: Dedicate the final day to presenting session outcomes, policy recommendations, and roadmaps for implementation.
---
5. Innovative Session Formats
Storytelling Sessions: Highlight real-world impacts of Internet policies or governance through narratives from affected communities.
Fishbowl Discussions: Use an open, interactive format where participants can join or leave the panel at will.
Role-Playing Simulations: Explore Internet governance challenges through immersive scenarios that require participants to assume various stakeholder roles.
Gamification: Introduce elements like quizzes, polls, or interactive games to boost engagement during sessions.
---
6. Incorporating Regional and Local Contexts
Regional Hubs: Integrate discussions from national and regional IGFs into the global forum, ensuring local perspectives are represented.
Localized Themes: Dedicate sessions to exploring specific regional challenges and opportunities (e.g., connecting the unconnected in Africa or tackling misinformation in Asia).
---
7. Enhanced Participation and Accessibility
Virtual and Hybrid Models: Ensure accessibility for participants worldwide through robust online participation tools, especially for those from underserved areas.
Youth and Marginalized Voices: Dedicate sessions or tracks to youth perspectives, indigenous communities, and other underrepresented groups.
Multilingual Options: Provide real-time translation for greater inclusivity.
---
8. Pre- and Post-IGF Activities
Pre-Forum Consultations: Engage stakeholders before the IGF to co-develop themes and session plans.
Post-Forum Action Groups: Form working groups to implement outcomes and track progress on recommendations throughout the year.
---
9. Feedback and Iteration
Continuous Improvement: Use real-time feedback tools like polls and surveys to improve session formats during the IGF.
Annual Review: Analyze the effectiveness of thematic tracks and formats to refine the design for subsequent years.
By adopting these strategies, the IGF can enhance participation, foster meaningful dialogue, and deliver actionable outcomes for global Internet governance.
---
1. Thematic Tracks with Structured Layers
Layered Approach: Divide thematic tracks into three layers:
Policy and Regulation: Focus on high-level discussions for policymakers.
Technology and Innovation: Target technical experts and innovators.
Community Impact: Highlight grassroots initiatives and community-driven solutions.
Dynamic Tracks: Ensure thematic tracks align with pressing global issues (e.g., AI governance, digital equity, and cybersecurity). Update tracks annually based on global trends.
---
2. A Mixed Format for Better Engagement
Plenary Sessions: Dedicated to high-level policy discussions involving global leaders and key stakeholders.
Thematic Breakout Sessions: Smaller, focused discussions on specific sub-themes to encourage deeper exploration and idea generation.
Lightning Talks: Short, focused presentations for individuals to share innovative ideas or success stories within 5–10 minutes.
Roundtables and Dialogues: Foster informal, solution-oriented conversations among participants from diverse sectors.
Hackathons and Labs: Interactive workshops for practical problem-solving, such as developing tools or frameworks for digital inclusion or cybersecurity.
---
3. Cross-Thematic Integration
Cross-Cutting Sessions: Organize sessions that explore intersections between thematic tracks (e.g., "AI and Data in Cybersecurity" or "Digital Inclusion in the Age of AI").
Joint Panels: Invite representatives from multiple thematic tracks to discuss overlapping challenges and opportunities.
---
4. Outcome-Oriented Structure
Day 1: Agenda-Setting: Engage participants in defining key objectives for the forum.
Mid-Forum: Solution Development: Focus on practical and collaborative problem-solving.
Day 5: Actionable Outputs: Dedicate the final day to presenting session outcomes, policy recommendations, and roadmaps for implementation.
---
5. Innovative Session Formats
Storytelling Sessions: Highlight real-world impacts of Internet policies or governance through narratives from affected communities.
Fishbowl Discussions: Use an open, interactive format where participants can join or leave the panel at will.
Role-Playing Simulations: Explore Internet governance challenges through immersive scenarios that require participants to assume various stakeholder roles.
Gamification: Introduce elements like quizzes, polls, or interactive games to boost engagement during sessions.
---
6. Incorporating Regional and Local Contexts
Regional Hubs: Integrate discussions from national and regional IGFs into the global forum, ensuring local perspectives are represented.
Localized Themes: Dedicate sessions to exploring specific regional challenges and opportunities (e.g., connecting the unconnected in Africa or tackling misinformation in Asia).
---
7. Enhanced Participation and Accessibility
Virtual and Hybrid Models: Ensure accessibility for participants worldwide through robust online participation tools, especially for those from underserved areas.
Youth and Marginalized Voices: Dedicate sessions or tracks to youth perspectives, indigenous communities, and other underrepresented groups.
Multilingual Options: Provide real-time translation for greater inclusivity.
---
8. Pre- and Post-IGF Activities
Pre-Forum Consultations: Engage stakeholders before the IGF to co-develop themes and session plans.
Post-Forum Action Groups: Form working groups to implement outcomes and track progress on recommendations throughout the year.
---
9. Feedback and Iteration
Continuous Improvement: Use real-time feedback tools like polls and surveys to improve session formats during the IGF.
Annual Review: Analyze the effectiveness of thematic tracks and formats to refine the design for subsequent years.
By adopting these strategies, the IGF can enhance participation, foster meaningful dialogue, and deliver actionable outcomes for global Internet governance.
Private Sector
ID203
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Technical Community
ID204
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID205
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes by:
Aligning themes with GDC priorities, such as digital inclusion, human rights, and emerging technologies.
Incorporating GDC targets into IGF discussions to track progress and overcome challenges.
Facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogues to foster collaboration between governments, private sectors, and civil society.
Reviewing WSIS outcomes, identifying gaps, and highlighting successful case studies.
Linking with broader UN initiatives to create synergies in digital development efforts.
Providing actionable policy recommendations to support the GDC and WSIS objectives.
Focusing intersessional work on key areas like digital inclusion and regulatory models for emerging technologies.
These steps would help the IGF play a pivotal role in advancing global digital agendas as we approach the 2025 high level meeting
Aligning themes with GDC priorities, such as digital inclusion, human rights, and emerging technologies.
Incorporating GDC targets into IGF discussions to track progress and overcome challenges.
Facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogues to foster collaboration between governments, private sectors, and civil society.
Reviewing WSIS outcomes, identifying gaps, and highlighting successful case studies.
Linking with broader UN initiatives to create synergies in digital development efforts.
Providing actionable policy recommendations to support the GDC and WSIS objectives.
Focusing intersessional work on key areas like digital inclusion and regulatory models for emerging technologies.
These steps would help the IGF play a pivotal role in advancing global digital agendas as we approach the 2025 high level meeting
Here are some ideas to enhance the IGF's format and design:
- Action-oriented Thematic Tracks: Focus on specialized tracks (e.g., digital inclusion, AI ethics) that lead to concrete outcomes or policy recommendations.
- Interactive Workshops: Include problem-solving sessions, hackathons, and collaborative platforms for developing solutions.
- Regional Dialogues: Highlight regional perspectives and share success stories and challenges specific to regions.
- Intersessional Work: Establish thematic task forces or working groups to continue discussions and create proposals year-round.
-Youth and Community Engagement: Dedicate space for youth-led sessions and grassroots community voices.
- Cross-cutting Interdisciplinary Themes: Address interconnected issues like data governance, privacy, and AI ethics with diverse stakeholders.
- Hybrid and Media Engagement: Combine in-person and virtual sessions for broader participation, and use podcasts and social media for real-time engagement.
These changes would make the IGF more inclusive, interactive, and focused on actionable outcomes.
- Action-oriented Thematic Tracks: Focus on specialized tracks (e.g., digital inclusion, AI ethics) that lead to concrete outcomes or policy recommendations.
- Interactive Workshops: Include problem-solving sessions, hackathons, and collaborative platforms for developing solutions.
- Regional Dialogues: Highlight regional perspectives and share success stories and challenges specific to regions.
- Intersessional Work: Establish thematic task forces or working groups to continue discussions and create proposals year-round.
-Youth and Community Engagement: Dedicate space for youth-led sessions and grassroots community voices.
- Cross-cutting Interdisciplinary Themes: Address interconnected issues like data governance, privacy, and AI ethics with diverse stakeholders.
- Hybrid and Media Engagement: Combine in-person and virtual sessions for broader participation, and use podcasts and social media for real-time engagement.
These changes would make the IGF more inclusive, interactive, and focused on actionable outcomes.
Civil Society
ID206
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
/
/
/
Technical Community
ID207
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Gender digital divide should be one of the key themes of IGF this year, alongside digital rights and meaningful connectivity. Developing countries have already lost USD 1 trillion dollars in the past decade and are set to lose another USD 500 billion over the next five years, if this issue is not address.
IGF should serve as a hub to collect and synthesize the state of GDC and WSIS implementation across its NRIs network.
IGF should undertake an internal analysis of the audience numbers that actually attend workshops/plenary sessions and rationalize the number of workshops/forums accordingly. Many times, there isnt enough audience in the workshop room, especially during the lunch time.
Shuttle service should be available from major hubs in the city, rather than designated hotels only
Shuttle service should be available from major hubs in the city, rather than designated hotels only
Civil Society
ID208
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID209
Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
My PhD is on digital governance framework for emerging technologies.
To collaborate effectively with the special interest group and make my research impactful, I would like to contribute in the following manner.
Engage stakeholders across countries:
Identify and reach out to stakeholders in the special interest group, including policymakers, industry leaders, academics, and civil society representatives from participating countries.
Propose a working group dedicated to exploring localised adaptations of the digital governance framework.
Develop a Modular Framework:
Create a core governance framework that includes universal principles for emerging technologies.
Outline customisable modules that countries can adapt to their legal, cultural, and economic contexts.
Host collaborative workshops:
Organise workshops or webinars to discuss the framework with international participants.
Collect feedback on potential challenges and local considerations to refine the framework.
Leverage Academic and Industry Networks:
Partner with universities, think tanks, and technology organisations to validate the framework and enhance its credibility.
Collaborate on research papers, case studies, and implementation guides to share best practices.
Create accessible resources:
Develop user-friendly resources, such as toolkits, guidelines, and training modules, to support countries in adopting and implementing the framework.
Translate these resources into multiple languages for accessibility.
Advocate Through Policy Channels:
Present the framework at international forums such as IGF, WSIS, and UN Digital Cooperation meetings.
Advocate for its inclusion in global and regional digital governance discussions.
To collaborate effectively with the special interest group and make my research impactful, I would like to contribute in the following manner.
Engage stakeholders across countries:
Identify and reach out to stakeholders in the special interest group, including policymakers, industry leaders, academics, and civil society representatives from participating countries.
Propose a working group dedicated to exploring localised adaptations of the digital governance framework.
Develop a Modular Framework:
Create a core governance framework that includes universal principles for emerging technologies.
Outline customisable modules that countries can adapt to their legal, cultural, and economic contexts.
Host collaborative workshops:
Organise workshops or webinars to discuss the framework with international participants.
Collect feedback on potential challenges and local considerations to refine the framework.
Leverage Academic and Industry Networks:
Partner with universities, think tanks, and technology organisations to validate the framework and enhance its credibility.
Collaborate on research papers, case studies, and implementation guides to share best practices.
Create accessible resources:
Develop user-friendly resources, such as toolkits, guidelines, and training modules, to support countries in adopting and implementing the framework.
Translate these resources into multiple languages for accessibility.
Advocate Through Policy Channels:
Present the framework at international forums such as IGF, WSIS, and UN Digital Cooperation meetings.
Advocate for its inclusion in global and regional digital governance discussions.
Incorporate GDC (Global Digital Compact) Pillars: Design annual IGF themes and workshops around the pillars of the GDC, such as digital inclusion, data governance, digital trust, and digital sustainability.
Synergy with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Align discussions with the broader UN 2030 Agenda and the digital dimensions of SDGs to create coherence.
Enhanced Multistakeholder Participation - host special tracks related to Emerging technologies such as Distributed Ledger Technology
Integrate Intersessional Outputs - such as policy framework demonstrations and knowledge sharing and repositary
Localization of Agendas - docomented case studies and make this available as case studies for others to review and replicate
Synergy with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Align discussions with the broader UN 2030 Agenda and the digital dimensions of SDGs to create coherence.
Enhanced Multistakeholder Participation - host special tracks related to Emerging technologies such as Distributed Ledger Technology
Integrate Intersessional Outputs - such as policy framework demonstrations and knowledge sharing and repositary
Localization of Agendas - docomented case studies and make this available as case studies for others to review and replicate
All sessions should be recorded and promptly made available, along with their transcripts, to facilitate academic research. Additionally, an academic stream should be established, providing researchers with the opportunity to interview participants or presenters using pre-defined questions.
Civil Society
ID210
Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Government
ID211
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID212
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Platform regulation, biometric data in AI, net neutrality
The IGF is the key structure to implement multi-stakeholder voices in the internet governace dialogue. Ensuring cross-stakeholder interaction and a diversity of topics and perspectives should be priority. However, this also requires the participation of decision makers in both a speaking and listening capacity on the issues.
Civil Society
ID213
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID214
The inclusion of neurotechnologies, neurorights, and their cybersecurity in the next IGF is crucial for several reasons:
1. Emerging technological frontiers. Neurotechnologies, such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), have transformative potential in healthcare, education, and communication. However, their rapid development raises critical ethical, legal, and technological challenges that need to be addressed proactively. The IGF, as a multistakeholder platform, is well-positioned to foster dialogue on their governance and responsible deployment.
2. Protecting neurorights as fundamental rights. The concept of neurorights—such as mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from cognitive manipulation—is gaining international traction, with countries like Chile incorporating them into constitutional frameworks. These rights intersect with broader digital rights, and the IGF can provide a global platform to discuss how to safeguard these rights in the context of emerging digital technologies.
3. Cybersecurity risks unique to neurotechnologies. Neurotechnologies introduce unprecedented cybersecurity risks. Unauthorized access to neural data, brain-hacking, and manipulation of cognitive processes are potential threats that could compromise individual autonomy and privacy. The IGF can facilitate discussions on establishing robust cybersecurity standards and practices to protect neural data and systems.
4. Ethical and multistakeholder governance
The ethical implications of neurotechnologies—such as the potential for surveillance, discrimination, or coercion—demand input from diverse stakeholders, including governments, industry, academia, and civil society. The IGF’s multistakeholder model is ideal for addressing these complex issues and developing inclusive governance frameworks.
5. Bridging neurotechnology and digital ecosystems. As neurotechnologies increasingly integrate with the internet and digital platforms, their governance becomes intrinsically linked to broader issues like data privacy, artificial intelligence, and connectivity. Addressing neurotechnologies at the IGF will ensure they are considered within the larger context of internet governance and digital rights.
6. Promoting global equity and inclusion. The development and deployment of neurotechnologies must not exacerbate global inequalities or exclude marginalized communities. The IGF can serve as a forum to discuss equitable access, ethical considerations, and the prevention of a digital divide in neurotechnologies.
7. Supporting global policy alignment. As neurotechnologies and neurorights gain attention globally, the IGF can play a key role in aligning international policy frameworks and fostering collaboration. This alignment is crucial to creating coherent standards for protecting neurorights and addressing cross-border cybersecurity threats.
1. Emerging technological frontiers. Neurotechnologies, such as brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), have transformative potential in healthcare, education, and communication. However, their rapid development raises critical ethical, legal, and technological challenges that need to be addressed proactively. The IGF, as a multistakeholder platform, is well-positioned to foster dialogue on their governance and responsible deployment.
2. Protecting neurorights as fundamental rights. The concept of neurorights—such as mental privacy, freedom of thought, and protection from cognitive manipulation—is gaining international traction, with countries like Chile incorporating them into constitutional frameworks. These rights intersect with broader digital rights, and the IGF can provide a global platform to discuss how to safeguard these rights in the context of emerging digital technologies.
3. Cybersecurity risks unique to neurotechnologies. Neurotechnologies introduce unprecedented cybersecurity risks. Unauthorized access to neural data, brain-hacking, and manipulation of cognitive processes are potential threats that could compromise individual autonomy and privacy. The IGF can facilitate discussions on establishing robust cybersecurity standards and practices to protect neural data and systems.
4. Ethical and multistakeholder governance
The ethical implications of neurotechnologies—such as the potential for surveillance, discrimination, or coercion—demand input from diverse stakeholders, including governments, industry, academia, and civil society. The IGF’s multistakeholder model is ideal for addressing these complex issues and developing inclusive governance frameworks.
5. Bridging neurotechnology and digital ecosystems. As neurotechnologies increasingly integrate with the internet and digital platforms, their governance becomes intrinsically linked to broader issues like data privacy, artificial intelligence, and connectivity. Addressing neurotechnologies at the IGF will ensure they are considered within the larger context of internet governance and digital rights.
6. Promoting global equity and inclusion. The development and deployment of neurotechnologies must not exacerbate global inequalities or exclude marginalized communities. The IGF can serve as a forum to discuss equitable access, ethical considerations, and the prevention of a digital divide in neurotechnologies.
7. Supporting global policy alignment. As neurotechnologies and neurorights gain attention globally, the IGF can play a key role in aligning international policy frameworks and fostering collaboration. This alignment is crucial to creating coherent standards for protecting neurorights and addressing cross-border cybersecurity threats.
The IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and reviewing the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025. Here are several strategies to enhance its contributions:
1. Align IGF themes with GDC and WSIS priorities
Focus on shared agendas: Ensure that the annual IGF meeting themes directly address the principles and goals outlined in the Global Digital Compact, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, trust, and human rights.
Highlight WSIS action lines: Structure sessions to explicitly map IGF discussions to WSIS action lines, fostering continuity and accountability in the review process.
2. Strengthen multistakeholder engagement
Diverse participation: Encourage broader participation from underrepresented regions, including the Global South, ensuring inclusivity in shaping recommendations that reflect global priorities.
Targeted stakeholder dialogues: Host dedicated sessions for governments, private sector, and civil society to discuss their roles in implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
3. Leverage intersessional work
Dynamic coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task these groups with producing focused analyses and recommendations on key topics like data governance, digital rights, and AI ethics, tying their findings to GDC and WSIS objectives.
Policy Networks: Strengthen IGF's policy networks (e.g., on meaningful access and trust) to create actionable frameworks that align with the Compact's ambitions.
4. Produce actionable outcomes
Clear policy recommendations: Ensure IGF outputs are practical and directly relevant to the GDC and WSIS processes, offering concrete steps for governments and stakeholders to adopt.
Reporting to the UN: Provide comprehensive reports from the IGF annual meeting to inform the UN Secretary-General and stakeholders involved in the GDC and WSIS review.
5. Enhance the role of national and regional IGFs (NRIs)
Localized insights: Gather input from NRIs on how digital governance issues are being addressed at regional and national levels, linking these insights to the global context of the GDC and WSIS.
Capacity building: Use NRIs to build capacity among stakeholders, helping them implement GDC principles in their contexts.
6. Monitor and evaluate progress
Track Implementation: Develop mechanisms to assess how discussions and recommendations from the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities contribute to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Public dashboards: Use digital platforms to share progress metrics and updates with stakeholders transparently.
7. Bridge dialogues between stakeholders and policymakers
High-Level Panels: Organize high-level panels during IGF meetings to connect the multistakeholder community with decision-makers involved in the GDC and WSIS review.
Collaborative platforms: Create platforms for ongoing dialogue between technical, policy, and social actors to synchronize efforts in addressing digital governance challenges.
8. Focus on emerging challenges and technologies
Future-Proof agendas: Address emerging issues like AI governance, digital sovereignty, and cybersecurity, ensuring that IGF discussions remain relevant and forward-looking.
Policy incubation: Serve as an incubator for innovative policies that can be scaled to support GDC and WSIS objectives.
1. Align IGF themes with GDC and WSIS priorities
Focus on shared agendas: Ensure that the annual IGF meeting themes directly address the principles and goals outlined in the Global Digital Compact, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, trust, and human rights.
Highlight WSIS action lines: Structure sessions to explicitly map IGF discussions to WSIS action lines, fostering continuity and accountability in the review process.
2. Strengthen multistakeholder engagement
Diverse participation: Encourage broader participation from underrepresented regions, including the Global South, ensuring inclusivity in shaping recommendations that reflect global priorities.
Targeted stakeholder dialogues: Host dedicated sessions for governments, private sector, and civil society to discuss their roles in implementing the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
3. Leverage intersessional work
Dynamic coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task these groups with producing focused analyses and recommendations on key topics like data governance, digital rights, and AI ethics, tying their findings to GDC and WSIS objectives.
Policy Networks: Strengthen IGF's policy networks (e.g., on meaningful access and trust) to create actionable frameworks that align with the Compact's ambitions.
4. Produce actionable outcomes
Clear policy recommendations: Ensure IGF outputs are practical and directly relevant to the GDC and WSIS processes, offering concrete steps for governments and stakeholders to adopt.
Reporting to the UN: Provide comprehensive reports from the IGF annual meeting to inform the UN Secretary-General and stakeholders involved in the GDC and WSIS review.
5. Enhance the role of national and regional IGFs (NRIs)
Localized insights: Gather input from NRIs on how digital governance issues are being addressed at regional and national levels, linking these insights to the global context of the GDC and WSIS.
Capacity building: Use NRIs to build capacity among stakeholders, helping them implement GDC principles in their contexts.
6. Monitor and evaluate progress
Track Implementation: Develop mechanisms to assess how discussions and recommendations from the IGF annual meeting and intersessional activities contribute to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Public dashboards: Use digital platforms to share progress metrics and updates with stakeholders transparently.
7. Bridge dialogues between stakeholders and policymakers
High-Level Panels: Organize high-level panels during IGF meetings to connect the multistakeholder community with decision-makers involved in the GDC and WSIS review.
Collaborative platforms: Create platforms for ongoing dialogue between technical, policy, and social actors to synchronize efforts in addressing digital governance challenges.
8. Focus on emerging challenges and technologies
Future-Proof agendas: Address emerging issues like AI governance, digital sovereignty, and cybersecurity, ensuring that IGF discussions remain relevant and forward-looking.
Policy incubation: Serve as an incubator for innovative policies that can be scaled to support GDC and WSIS objectives.
The IGF’s format could benefit from an expansion of its thematic tracks to include emerging and interdisciplinary topics that address the intersection of technology, human rights, and governance. One such proposal is the introduction of a dedicated Best Practice Forum (BPF) on Neurotechnologies, Neurorights, and Cybersecurity.
The proposed BPF on Neurotechnologies could follow a structured yet inclusive format:
Multistakeholder Contributions: Involve experts from neuroscience, cybersecurity, legal frameworks, human rights, and technical communities.
Interdisciplinary Dialogues: Foster cross-sector discussions to bridge gaps between technology, policy, and ethics.
Global Representation: Ensure input from diverse regions and communities to address equitable access and inclusion in neurotechnologies.
Outcome-Oriented Sessions: Focus on actionable recommendations, such as developing frameworks for neuroright protections and cybersecurity standards.
The proposed BPF on Neurotechnologies could follow a structured yet inclusive format:
Multistakeholder Contributions: Involve experts from neuroscience, cybersecurity, legal frameworks, human rights, and technical communities.
Interdisciplinary Dialogues: Foster cross-sector discussions to bridge gaps between technology, policy, and ethics.
Global Representation: Ensure input from diverse regions and communities to address equitable access and inclusion in neurotechnologies.
Outcome-Oriented Sessions: Focus on actionable recommendations, such as developing frameworks for neuroright protections and cybersecurity standards.
The proposed BPF on Neurotechnologies could follow a structured yet inclusive format:
Multistakeholder Contributions: Involve experts from neuroscience, cybersecurity, legal frameworks, human rights, and technical communities.
Interdisciplinary Dialogues: Foster cross-sector discussions to bridge gaps between technology, policy, and ethics.
Global Representation: Ensure input from diverse regions and communities to address equitable access and inclusion in neurotechnologies.
Outcome-Oriented Sessions: Focus on actionable recommendations, such as developing frameworks for neuroright protections and cybersecurity standards.
The proposed BPF on Neurotechnologies could follow a structured yet inclusive format:
Multistakeholder Contributions: Involve experts from neuroscience, cybersecurity, legal frameworks, human rights, and technical communities.
Interdisciplinary Dialogues: Foster cross-sector discussions to bridge gaps between technology, policy, and ethics.
Global Representation: Ensure input from diverse regions and communities to address equitable access and inclusion in neurotechnologies.
Outcome-Oriented Sessions: Focus on actionable recommendations, such as developing frameworks for neuroright protections and cybersecurity standards.
Civil Society
ID215
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
I have worked for more than 15 years in the Government Sector and how it has been modernizing every day, from the use of typewriters to the implementation of technological solutions such as AI and Bots to provide better services to citizens. I believe that my experience can be shared and replicated in many sectors that have important challenges, especially in the service of citizens.
Disruptive Governments through the incentive to Use New Technologies for the benefit of the Citizen
Government
ID216
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Cross-border cooperation, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Civil Society
ID217
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Local Voices: Amplify voices from underrepresented regions to ensure the global digital agenda reflects diverse needs and perspectives.
Impact Assessment: Develop mechanisms to assess the impact of IGF discussions on the implementation of GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Impact Assessment: Develop mechanisms to assess the impact of IGF discussions on the implementation of GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Private Sector
ID218
Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
Government
ID219
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
Private Sector
ID220
Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
One way is to ensure that there are sufficient opportunities to connect and integrate the GDC and WSIS processes and leaders with the IGF program and thematic areas, including through skilled coordination at the annual meetings and intersessional work, as well as through synergies along the implementation processes. In addition, IGF could create spaces to ensure that those responsible for the GDC implementation are responsive to the IGF community and its concerns. This can be done via policy dialogues, roundtables, direct engagements with IGF community groups (DCs. PNs, etc), among other approaches to increase collaboration.
Civil Society
ID222
Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Disability and human rights
I suggest to involve people with disabilities and our organisations in the organisation and planning of the IGF, in order ensure that all necessities are covered, to comply with the accessibility guidelines and to leave no-one behind.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
• Badge with distinction for people with disabilities.
• Wheelchairs and assistance available throughout the event for transportation and support.
• Prior the IGF: Training for all staff and volunteers on disability perspective and the DCAD Accessibility Guidelines.
• Involve people with disabilities in the organization and planning of the following editions.
• Ensure the availability of accessible and exclusive bathrooms.
• Reserved spaces in the dining area, halls, and workshops.
• Place a bus waiting area with reserved seats and spaces.
• Programs in braille, sign language and other accessible formats.
• Sign language interpretation for all events.
• Accessible website and registration process.
• Badge with distinction for people with disabilities.
• Wheelchairs and assistance available throughout the event for transportation and support.
• Prior the IGF: Training for all staff and volunteers on disability perspective and the DCAD Accessibility Guidelines.
• Involve people with disabilities in the organization and planning of the following editions.
• Ensure the availability of accessible and exclusive bathrooms.
• Reserved spaces in the dining area, halls, and workshops.
• Place a bus waiting area with reserved seats and spaces.
• Programs in braille, sign language and other accessible formats.
• Sign language interpretation for all events.
• Accessible website and registration process.
Technical Community
ID223
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Civil Society
ID224
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
An area of growing importance for many development countries is digital public infrastructure. It would be important to explore the models of open and inclusive DPI and multistakeholder models that support digital services for different target groups.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID225
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development
Concentration of power is a serious issue in internet governance and yet remains underdeveloped as a thematic focus. Economic development themes should include consideration of market power.
Putting thematic areas into conversation with each other would be welcome, especially where there are tensions between different stakeholder perspectives
Putting thematic areas into conversation with each other would be welcome, especially where there are tensions between different stakeholder perspectives
Civil Society
ID226
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
Intergovernmental Organization
ID227
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Civil Society
ID228
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Technical Community
ID229
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
IGF 2024 was my first, and it was an extremely important event. I'm grateful to the organizers, participants, and host country. I regret not attending when it was held in Addis Ababa.
Here are a few points: Some sessions are repeated, which indicates a lack of progress in the discussions. One key issue is the mismatch in definitions, particularly regarding 'critical infrastructure.' We need clarity on what qualifies as 'critical,' as this confusion hampers action. A thematic track focused on laying foundational frameworks could address this.
Stakeholder representation is another concern. IGF participation is crucial, and important stakeholders shouldn't attend by chance. Identifying, informing, and directly contacting stakeholders is essential. For example, there were too few private sector representatives, academics, and government bodies. The discussions also lacked input from technical experts, who should be exposed to policy issues.
In conclusion, the IGF is on the right path, in good hands, and I hope it remains a key event in the future.
Here are a few points: Some sessions are repeated, which indicates a lack of progress in the discussions. One key issue is the mismatch in definitions, particularly regarding 'critical infrastructure.' We need clarity on what qualifies as 'critical,' as this confusion hampers action. A thematic track focused on laying foundational frameworks could address this.
Stakeholder representation is another concern. IGF participation is crucial, and important stakeholders shouldn't attend by chance. Identifying, informing, and directly contacting stakeholders is essential. For example, there were too few private sector representatives, academics, and government bodies. The discussions also lacked input from technical experts, who should be exposed to policy issues.
In conclusion, the IGF is on the right path, in good hands, and I hope it remains a key event in the future.
Government
ID230
Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Disinformation, Legal and regulatory issues, Access and connectivity, Youth engagement.
Civil Society
ID231
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Intergovernmental Organization
ID232
Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
In line with United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO's) initiative on 2025 as the International Year of Quantum Science and Technology (IYQ), which recognizes 100 years since the initial development of quantum mechanics : https://quantum2025.org/. I propose advancing topics that align with the IYQ. Quantum technologies hold the promise of breakthroughs in critical sectors such as cryptography, healthcare, climate modeling, and artificial intelligence. Yet, the governance of quantum ecosystems remains in its infancy. The societal implications—ranging from security risks and workforce displacement to ethical concerns around access and equity—demand urgent attention. Without proactive, inclusive, and global governance mechanisms, quantum technologies risk perpetuating or intensifying disparities, undermining trust in technological systems, and failing to align with the UN sustainable development goals.
In 2024, I contributed to the WSIS process by organizing a session titled "Pioneering Responsible Global Governance for Quantum Technologies,"which explored the societal and ethical implications of quantum advancements and proposed frameworks for equitable global governance. See here: https://dig.watch/event/wsis20-forum/pioneering-responsible-global-governance-for-quantum-technologies. This session highlighted the urgency of addressing the "quantum divide" to ensure that emerging technologies do not exacerbate existing inequalities but instead foster global cooperation for inclusive development. Building on this momentum, including quantum governance as a theme for IGF 2025 would expand this dialogue by integrating it with the broader goals of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS+20 review. It would position the IGF as a platform to advance actionable recommendations for a responsible quantum innovation ecosystem, ensuring that the benefits of quantum technologies are aligned with public good, human rights, and sustainable development, while reinforcing its role in bridging global initiatives for a just and inclusive digital future.
To enhance the IGF's impact, the format could adopt **flexible thematic tracks** that integrate cross-cutting global priorities, such as sustainability, equity, and innovation, across all sessions. For example, themes like "Emerging Technologies," "Digital Inclusion," and "Governance for Development" could be addressed through dynamic formats, including "interactive roundtables", "participatory policy sprints", and "case-based workshops", ensuring actionable outputs. Additionally, developing a "Global Priorities Integration Hub" could bridge thematic tracks, aligning discussions with the UNESCO, Global Digital Compact, and WSIS+20 review. Treating themes in a more interdisciplinary way would foster synergies across stakeholder groups and ensure that outcomes are both innovative and globally relevant.
Technical Community
ID233
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Session proposals should be linked to aims and goals of the GDC and declaire how they contribute to them.
One in three users of the internet and the digital environment worldwide is a child. Priority should therefore be given to issues that affect the interests and rights of minors and young people.
Civil Society
ID234
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Government
ID235
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
AI plays important role in enhancing financial inclusion in Pakistan by providing accessible financial services to consumers. Through data analysis and model machine learning, AI can assess creditworthiness, enabling microloans and tailored financial products for low-income individuals. This technology helps reduce income inequality by empowering small businesses and entrepreneurs, fostering economic growth. Additionally, AI-driven platforms can facilitate digital payments and remittances, making financial transactions more efficient. By bridging the gap between traditional banking and marginalized communities, AI contributes to alleviating poverty and promoting economic stability in local community and also in Pakistan.
In my opinion, the IGF can enhance its relevance by focusing on measurable outcomes that drive economic growth and digital equity. Aligning discussions with the Global Digital Compact can facilitate investment in digital infrastructure, particularly in underserved regions, thus boosting productivity and innovation. The IGF should prioritize data-driven assessments of the World Summit on the Information Society outcomes, identifying gaps and opportunities for economic advancement. By fostering partnerships among stakeholders, including private sector investors and policymakers, the IGF can create a robust framework for sustainable digital economies, ensuring that economic benefits are widely shared as we approach the 2025 high-level meeting.
the IGF could enhance its format by introducing thematic tracks centered on economic impact, such as introduce digital currency, digital trade, investment in technology, and workforce development. Each track could feature data-driven presentations and case studies, highlighting successful economic models. Incorporating interactive sessions that allow for stakeholder collaboration on policy design would foster innovative solutions. establishing and evaluating the economic outcomes of discussed initiatives can ensure accountability and effectiveness. This approach will align discussions with tangible economic benefits, driving meaningful progress in digital governance.
IGF 2025 must be support for participants by streamlining the visa process and providing financial assistance for airfare and accommodation. This initiative aims to enhance accessibility, ensuring that a diverse range of voices can contribute to the discussions. By facilitating travel and lodging arrangements, the IGF can encourage broader participation from stakeholders across various sectors and regions, particularly those from underserved communities. This approach will promote inclusivity and ensure that critical perspectives are represented in shaping the future of global digital governance.
IGF 2025 must be support for participants by streamlining the visa process and providing financial assistance for airfare and accommodation. This initiative aims to enhance accessibility, ensuring that a diverse range of voices can contribute to the discussions. By facilitating travel and lodging arrangements, the IGF can encourage broader participation from stakeholders across various sectors and regions, particularly those from underserved communities. This approach will promote inclusivity and ensure that critical perspectives are represented in shaping the future of global digital governance.
Government
ID236
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
Also important is the need for "Meaningful multistakeholderism for the Future Ahead"
IGF indeed relates to major global initiatives and agendas particularly the World Summit on Information Society. As an outcome of the WSIS, the IGF should encapsulate the expectation of WSIS. Its relevance can be drawn from its rich outputs over time which have stimulated great enthutiasm for learning and collaboration for new and impactful projects over time. Therefore, IGF serves as a platform to measure the progress, impact and relevance of WSIS.
It can be recalled that the Global Digital Compact is a culmination of the discussion on Enhanced Cooperation on public policy matters pertaining to the Internet, a WSIS Tunis agenda outcome. As such, IGF should serve as veritable platform to review the implementation of the GDC. It should remain a thematic point in all the discussions. A new track to be called the GDC track should be initiated at the IGF2025. The track should focus on the implementation strategies of the GDC.
To make it easy, a measurement platform could be evolved for which stakeholders (including governments) can measure their compliance and implementation process from time to time.
It can be recalled that the Global Digital Compact is a culmination of the discussion on Enhanced Cooperation on public policy matters pertaining to the Internet, a WSIS Tunis agenda outcome. As such, IGF should serve as veritable platform to review the implementation of the GDC. It should remain a thematic point in all the discussions. A new track to be called the GDC track should be initiated at the IGF2025. The track should focus on the implementation strategies of the GDC.
To make it easy, a measurement platform could be evolved for which stakeholders (including governments) can measure their compliance and implementation process from time to time.
No. The approach so far has been good.
Private Sector
ID237
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
I am deeply interested in digital issues, particularly how technology can be leveraged to solve social and economic challenges. My fascination lies in the potential of digital platforms to enhance connectivity, promote sustainable development, and create new opportunities for youth. I am eager to explore how digital tools can be used to foster innovation, improve access to education and employment, and drive positive change in communities. This interest motivates me to stay updated on the latest digital trends and to seek opportunities where I can contribute to impactful digital initiatives.
Civil Society
ID238
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID239
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
Cross-border cooperation, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Civil Society
ID240
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
The active participation of the WSIS+20 review co-facilitators and the personnel from the UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) will be crucial to strengthening multistakeholder engagement in the WSIS+20 review and the implementation of the Global Digital Compact. Attending the IGF 2025 and actively engaging in its sessions is the best way to extract the most value from the IGF, allowing the Forum to demonstrate its true value for the Internet governance and digital cooperation communities.
Also, close and agile communication between the WSIS+20 review co-facilitators, the UN ODET, the IGF Secretariat, the IGF Leadership Panel, and the IGF MAG in the lead-up to the IGF 2025 meeting will allow for better alignment among several parallel efforts while incorporating improvements to different processes in line with the guidelines outlined in the NETmundial+10 outcome document. Aligning processes to these guidelines will allow for truly multistakeholder implementation, avoiding a common confusion with collaborative processes where transparency, accountability, and participation are not at the same level as in multistakeholder processes.
Also, close and agile communication between the WSIS+20 review co-facilitators, the UN ODET, the IGF Secretariat, the IGF Leadership Panel, and the IGF MAG in the lead-up to the IGF 2025 meeting will allow for better alignment among several parallel efforts while incorporating improvements to different processes in line with the guidelines outlined in the NETmundial+10 outcome document. Aligning processes to these guidelines will allow for truly multistakeholder implementation, avoiding a common confusion with collaborative processes where transparency, accountability, and participation are not at the same level as in multistakeholder processes.
One of the most pressing challenges the IGF community will face in 2025 while designing the 2025 meeting is striking a balance between the space and sessions devoted to the WSIS+20 review and those focused on the relatively usual programmatic issues related to Internet governance and digital cooperation. As explained above, we recommend a close and agile collaboration with relevant actors of the WSIS+20 review, but we also acknowledge that the highest value the IGF can offer to that process and the GDC implementation resides in the projects and activities implemented by the IGF community at the regional and local levels. This impact is achieved yearly thanks to the continuous participation in the multistakeholder spaces and processes enabled by the IGF intersessional activities and the NRIs network.
To better illustrate this point, session organizers may be invited to identify which WSIS Action Lines and GDC commitments each session contributes to. This information can help map out a direct link between the IGF sessions and the WSIS and GDC processes, illustrating the added value represented by the IGF and its community. To complement this action, session organizers can also be invited to identify potential follow-up spaces, ranging from multilateral global spaces to focalized projects at the national or regional level, which will help demonstrate the spaces and topics where the IGF community directly helps produce concrete outputs.
To better illustrate this point, session organizers may be invited to identify which WSIS Action Lines and GDC commitments each session contributes to. This information can help map out a direct link between the IGF sessions and the WSIS and GDC processes, illustrating the added value represented by the IGF and its community. To complement this action, session organizers can also be invited to identify potential follow-up spaces, ranging from multilateral global spaces to focalized projects at the national or regional level, which will help demonstrate the spaces and topics where the IGF community directly helps produce concrete outputs.
Technical Community
ID241
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is a critical platform for fostering multistakeholder dialogue on pressing global digital challenges. To maximize its impact, the format and design of the IGF should evolve to reflect the diverse needs of its participants while ensuring inclusivity, sustainability, and actionable outcomes. Below are additional suggestions for enhancing the IGF.
Strengthening Stakeholder Representation:
The IGF must prioritize inclusivity by increasing participation from underrepresented regions, particularly the Global South. Financial support for stakeholders from developing countries can ensure diverse perspectives are included in discussions. Specialized tracks tailored to sectors like education, health, and finance can further deepen engagement, while dedicated spaces for civil society advocacy will allow grassroots voices to influence policymaking.
Data-Driven and Evidence-Based Discussions:
Integrating data and research into IGF sessions can enhance the quality of dialogue and outcomes. Thematic discussions should leverage global reports, case studies, and surveys to promote evidence-based policymaking. Real-time analytics during sessions can provide participants with actionable insights, fostering more informed debates.
Innovative Use of Technology:
The IGF can embrace emerging technologies to expand participation and improve the attendee experience. AI-assisted tools could generate live session summaries, while virtual reality (VR) platforms can create immersive environments for remote participants. A crowdsourced ideas platform can enable stakeholders to contribute suggestions and vote on agenda topics, fostering inclusivity in the planning process.
Capacity Building and Awareness:
Pre-event training workshops tailored for youth, newcomers, and underserved communities can build stakeholder capacity and deepen engagement. Additionally, the IGF can serve as a platform for promoting digital literacy campaigns, focusing on rights, safety, and equitable access to digital resources.
Sustainability and Green Initiatives:
To align with global efforts to combat climate change, the IGF should adopt eco-friendly event practices, such as encouraging hybrid participation, minimizing waste, and using sustainable materials. A dedicated track on digital sustainability could explore energy-efficient technologies and the environmental impact of the digital transformation.
Tailored Post-Event Engagement:
Post-event activities are essential for sustaining the momentum of IGF discussions. Stakeholder-specific reports summarizing outcomes can make recommendations actionable for governments, businesses, and civil society. Establishing Communities of Practice (CoPs) can facilitate year-round collaboration on implementing IGF recommendations. Moreover, developing metrics to assess the impact of the IGF on policy and practice will ensure accountability and continuous improvement.
Partnerships with Global Initiatives:
The IGF can enhance its relevance by collaborating with UN agencies like UNESCO, ITU, and UNDP to align its discussions with broader global goals, such as the
Strengthening Stakeholder Representation:
The IGF must prioritize inclusivity by increasing participation from underrepresented regions, particularly the Global South. Financial support for stakeholders from developing countries can ensure diverse perspectives are included in discussions. Specialized tracks tailored to sectors like education, health, and finance can further deepen engagement, while dedicated spaces for civil society advocacy will allow grassroots voices to influence policymaking.
Data-Driven and Evidence-Based Discussions:
Integrating data and research into IGF sessions can enhance the quality of dialogue and outcomes. Thematic discussions should leverage global reports, case studies, and surveys to promote evidence-based policymaking. Real-time analytics during sessions can provide participants with actionable insights, fostering more informed debates.
Innovative Use of Technology:
The IGF can embrace emerging technologies to expand participation and improve the attendee experience. AI-assisted tools could generate live session summaries, while virtual reality (VR) platforms can create immersive environments for remote participants. A crowdsourced ideas platform can enable stakeholders to contribute suggestions and vote on agenda topics, fostering inclusivity in the planning process.
Capacity Building and Awareness:
Pre-event training workshops tailored for youth, newcomers, and underserved communities can build stakeholder capacity and deepen engagement. Additionally, the IGF can serve as a platform for promoting digital literacy campaigns, focusing on rights, safety, and equitable access to digital resources.
Sustainability and Green Initiatives:
To align with global efforts to combat climate change, the IGF should adopt eco-friendly event practices, such as encouraging hybrid participation, minimizing waste, and using sustainable materials. A dedicated track on digital sustainability could explore energy-efficient technologies and the environmental impact of the digital transformation.
Tailored Post-Event Engagement:
Post-event activities are essential for sustaining the momentum of IGF discussions. Stakeholder-specific reports summarizing outcomes can make recommendations actionable for governments, businesses, and civil society. Establishing Communities of Practice (CoPs) can facilitate year-round collaboration on implementing IGF recommendations. Moreover, developing metrics to assess the impact of the IGF on policy and practice will ensure accountability and continuous improvement.
Partnerships with Global Initiatives:
The IGF can enhance its relevance by collaborating with UN agencies like UNESCO, ITU, and UNDP to align its discussions with broader global goals, such as the
To ensure the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work better reflect and contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the following approaches can be proposed:
1. Thematic Alignment with the Global Digital Compact
Incorporate GDC Pillars into IGF Themes:
Align the IGF’s annual themes with the core pillars of the GDC, such as:
a) Universal connectivity:
Inclusive and affordable access to digital technology
b) Human rights protection in the digital age
c) Ensuring trust and security online
d) Addressing emerging technologies (AI, blockchain, etc.)
e) Facilitating Stakeholder Input on GDC Implementation by hosting focused discussions, workshops, and sessions on how stakeholders can contribute to and operationalize the GDC goals at national, regional, and global levels.
2. Strengthen Intersessional Work for WSIS Outcomes Review
Policy Tracks Linked to WSIS Action Lines:
Map intersessional work and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to WSIS action lines (e.g., C1: ICT infrastructure, C4: Capacity building, C10: Ethical dimensions of the information society).
Multistakeholder Dialogue for Progress Measurement:
Facilitate roundtables that assess progress on WSIS implementation and identify gaps in specific regions or sectors.
Encourage Regional Contributions:
Mobilize regional IGFs to provide actionable insights and localized implementation strategies for WSIS outcomes.
3. Build Collaboration Between IGF, GDC, and WSIS Processes
Integrated Reporting and Knowledge Sharing:
Ensure that IGF outcomes feed directly into the UN’s processes for the GDC and WSIS review. This could include a dedicated session during IGF annual meetings for presenting insights to inform these processes.
Highlight Linkages:
Identify and emphasize how IGF intersessional work (e.g., Dynamic Coalitions and BPFs) contributes to specific WSIS goals and GDC objectives.
Promote Global South Representation:
Support the inclusion of voices from underrepresented regions to ensure GDC and WSIS-related discussions are inclusive and globally representative.
4. Foster Stakeholder Accountability
Develop Implementation Roadmaps:
Create roadmaps for how governments, private sector, and civil society can adopt and implement IGF recommendations to advance GDC and WSIS objectives.
Monitor Progress and Provide Feedback:
Establish mechanisms for ongoing feedback and monitoring of GDC and WSIS implementation through IGF activities.
5. Innovate Meeting Formats for Greater Impact
High-Level Thematic Tracks:
Dedicate a track at the IGF annual meeting to discuss the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS review, ensuring the involvement of policymakers and high-level participants.
Outcome-Oriented Outputs:
Develop actionable, consensus-driven outputs from IGF discussions that can feed directly into the GDC and WSIS review frameworks.
These strategies will help position the IGF as a critical platform for fostering collaboration, driving implementation, and ensuring accountability in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
1. Thematic Alignment with the Global Digital Compact
Incorporate GDC Pillars into IGF Themes:
Align the IGF’s annual themes with the core pillars of the GDC, such as:
a) Universal connectivity:
Inclusive and affordable access to digital technology
b) Human rights protection in the digital age
c) Ensuring trust and security online
d) Addressing emerging technologies (AI, blockchain, etc.)
e) Facilitating Stakeholder Input on GDC Implementation by hosting focused discussions, workshops, and sessions on how stakeholders can contribute to and operationalize the GDC goals at national, regional, and global levels.
2. Strengthen Intersessional Work for WSIS Outcomes Review
Policy Tracks Linked to WSIS Action Lines:
Map intersessional work and Best Practice Forums (BPFs) to WSIS action lines (e.g., C1: ICT infrastructure, C4: Capacity building, C10: Ethical dimensions of the information society).
Multistakeholder Dialogue for Progress Measurement:
Facilitate roundtables that assess progress on WSIS implementation and identify gaps in specific regions or sectors.
Encourage Regional Contributions:
Mobilize regional IGFs to provide actionable insights and localized implementation strategies for WSIS outcomes.
3. Build Collaboration Between IGF, GDC, and WSIS Processes
Integrated Reporting and Knowledge Sharing:
Ensure that IGF outcomes feed directly into the UN’s processes for the GDC and WSIS review. This could include a dedicated session during IGF annual meetings for presenting insights to inform these processes.
Highlight Linkages:
Identify and emphasize how IGF intersessional work (e.g., Dynamic Coalitions and BPFs) contributes to specific WSIS goals and GDC objectives.
Promote Global South Representation:
Support the inclusion of voices from underrepresented regions to ensure GDC and WSIS-related discussions are inclusive and globally representative.
4. Foster Stakeholder Accountability
Develop Implementation Roadmaps:
Create roadmaps for how governments, private sector, and civil society can adopt and implement IGF recommendations to advance GDC and WSIS objectives.
Monitor Progress and Provide Feedback:
Establish mechanisms for ongoing feedback and monitoring of GDC and WSIS implementation through IGF activities.
5. Innovate Meeting Formats for Greater Impact
High-Level Thematic Tracks:
Dedicate a track at the IGF annual meeting to discuss the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS review, ensuring the involvement of policymakers and high-level participants.
Outcome-Oriented Outputs:
Develop actionable, consensus-driven outputs from IGF discussions that can feed directly into the GDC and WSIS review frameworks.
These strategies will help position the IGF as a critical platform for fostering collaboration, driving implementation, and ensuring accountability in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
Enhancing the Format and Design of the IGF, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a vital role in addressing global digital challenges and fostering multistakeholder collaboration. To make it more engaging, inclusive, and impactful, the overall format and design of the IGF can be reimagined. Below are suggestions on thematic tracks and alternative ways to organize the forum.
1. Multi-Layered Thematic Tracks
Core Themes with Cross-Cutting Issues
The IGF can focus on 3-5 core themes, such as Connectivity, Cybersecurity, Human Rights, Emerging Technologies, and Digital Inclusion. These can have cross-cutting issues like gender, youth engagement, and regional representation integrated into each theme.
Tracks for Different Stakeholders
Design tracks catering to specific stakeholder groups, such as governments, private sector innovators, civil society, academia, and youth, ensuring targeted discussions relevant to their priorities.
Alignment with Global Frameworks
Dedicate specific tracks to global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 Review, encouraging discussions around their implementation and progress.
2. New and Engaging Session Formats
Scenario-Based Workshops
Introduce collaborative sessions where participants address real-world or hypothetical scenarios (e.g., AI ethics, bridging digital divides) to propose actionable solutions.
Rapid-Fire Panels
Short, dynamic sessions where speakers deliver concise presentations to maintain engagement and provide diverse perspectives.
Solution Showcases
Include sessions to highlight innovative digital governance projects, startups, or solutions that can inspire broader application.
Open Mic Discussions
Create space for unscripted, inclusive dialogues where participants can share ideas, challenges, or perspectives without pre-structured agendas.
3. Interconnected and Inclusive Events
Regional Pre-IGFs and Bridging
Incorporate inputs from regional IGFs by hosting bridging sessions that connect regional outcomes to global themes.
Youth-Centric Track
Create a dedicated track for young participants, focusing on skills development, emerging trends, and fostering their active involvement in internet governance.
Satellite Hubs
Enable broader participation through local hubs that facilitate regional discussions and virtual attendance at the global IGF.
4. Hybrid and Accessible Design
Interactive Hybrid Format
Provide tools for virtual attendees, such as live polls, breakout rooms, and interactive Q&A sessions, to make the event engaging for both in-person and remote participants.
Inclusive Accessibility Features
Offer translation services, sign language interpretation, and real-time captions to ensure inclusivity for all participants.
Time-Zone-Friendly Scheduling
Rotate key sessions to accommodate global time zones, maximizing participation across different regions.
5. Focus on Actionable Outcomes
Thematic Deliverables
Ensure that each thematic track produces clear, actionable recommendations or roadmaps that stakeholders can implement post-event.
Monitoring and Follow-Up
Dedicate a segment of the subsequent IGF to reviewing progress on recommendations made during the previous year, creating continuity and accountability.
6. Fostering Collaboration and Networking
Mentorship Programs
Pair experienced stakeholders with newcomers to promote capacity building and networking, particularly for youth and underrepresented groups.
Innovation Labs
Set up interactive spaces for brainstorming and developing solutions to pressing digital challenges.
Networking Lounges
Provide themed spaces for informal interactions among participants with shared interests or expertise.
7. Emphasizing Regional and Cultural Representation
Cultural Integration
Highlight the host country’s digital governance achievements and challenges as case studies to enrich discussions.
Regional Spotlight Sessions
Dedicate sessions to exploring unique regional digital governance challenges and sharing best practices.
Reimagining the IGF’s format and design by integrating thematic alignment, innovative session formats, inclusivity, and actionable outcomes will strengthen its role as a platform for meaningful dialogue and collaboration. These changes will ensure that the IGF remains relevant, dynamic, and impactful in addressing the complexities of internet governance in an ever-evolving digital world.
1. Multi-Layered Thematic Tracks
Core Themes with Cross-Cutting Issues
The IGF can focus on 3-5 core themes, such as Connectivity, Cybersecurity, Human Rights, Emerging Technologies, and Digital Inclusion. These can have cross-cutting issues like gender, youth engagement, and regional representation integrated into each theme.
Tracks for Different Stakeholders
Design tracks catering to specific stakeholder groups, such as governments, private sector innovators, civil society, academia, and youth, ensuring targeted discussions relevant to their priorities.
Alignment with Global Frameworks
Dedicate specific tracks to global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 Review, encouraging discussions around their implementation and progress.
2. New and Engaging Session Formats
Scenario-Based Workshops
Introduce collaborative sessions where participants address real-world or hypothetical scenarios (e.g., AI ethics, bridging digital divides) to propose actionable solutions.
Rapid-Fire Panels
Short, dynamic sessions where speakers deliver concise presentations to maintain engagement and provide diverse perspectives.
Solution Showcases
Include sessions to highlight innovative digital governance projects, startups, or solutions that can inspire broader application.
Open Mic Discussions
Create space for unscripted, inclusive dialogues where participants can share ideas, challenges, or perspectives without pre-structured agendas.
3. Interconnected and Inclusive Events
Regional Pre-IGFs and Bridging
Incorporate inputs from regional IGFs by hosting bridging sessions that connect regional outcomes to global themes.
Youth-Centric Track
Create a dedicated track for young participants, focusing on skills development, emerging trends, and fostering their active involvement in internet governance.
Satellite Hubs
Enable broader participation through local hubs that facilitate regional discussions and virtual attendance at the global IGF.
4. Hybrid and Accessible Design
Interactive Hybrid Format
Provide tools for virtual attendees, such as live polls, breakout rooms, and interactive Q&A sessions, to make the event engaging for both in-person and remote participants.
Inclusive Accessibility Features
Offer translation services, sign language interpretation, and real-time captions to ensure inclusivity for all participants.
Time-Zone-Friendly Scheduling
Rotate key sessions to accommodate global time zones, maximizing participation across different regions.
5. Focus on Actionable Outcomes
Thematic Deliverables
Ensure that each thematic track produces clear, actionable recommendations or roadmaps that stakeholders can implement post-event.
Monitoring and Follow-Up
Dedicate a segment of the subsequent IGF to reviewing progress on recommendations made during the previous year, creating continuity and accountability.
6. Fostering Collaboration and Networking
Mentorship Programs
Pair experienced stakeholders with newcomers to promote capacity building and networking, particularly for youth and underrepresented groups.
Innovation Labs
Set up interactive spaces for brainstorming and developing solutions to pressing digital challenges.
Networking Lounges
Provide themed spaces for informal interactions among participants with shared interests or expertise.
7. Emphasizing Regional and Cultural Representation
Cultural Integration
Highlight the host country’s digital governance achievements and challenges as case studies to enrich discussions.
Regional Spotlight Sessions
Dedicate sessions to exploring unique regional digital governance challenges and sharing best practices.
Reimagining the IGF’s format and design by integrating thematic alignment, innovative session formats, inclusivity, and actionable outcomes will strengthen its role as a platform for meaningful dialogue and collaboration. These changes will ensure that the IGF remains relevant, dynamic, and impactful in addressing the complexities of internet governance in an ever-evolving digital world.
Civil Society
ID242
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF operates a multistakeholder bottom-up approach, which can be utilised to achieve the objectives of the GDC. At the IGF, stakeholders from across the globe meet and share best practice on the responsible use of the Internet. It serves as a platform for stocktaking on Internet governance activities including concerns, policy implementation, innovations, human rights online, meaningful internet access amongst many others. Consequently, it can be utilised as a catalyst for implementing the GDC. It has also been instrumental in promoting the governance of the internet from a global perspective. Through the IGF, meaningful connectivity has become a major global agenda, digital rights are treated as a priority, the impact of emerging technologies on the humans is a consistent discuss at the IGF. This shows that the platform has been instrumental in implementing the outcomes of WSIS 2005.
The parliamentary track is an important addition to the IGF, however, it would be nice if there are opportunities to make parliamentarians more accountable (especially those from the Global South). There should be a forum where they can present how they have facilitated the adoption of best practices discussed at the IGF. They should not just make the numbers, concerted efforts to adopt best practice in their countries as concerns the governance of the Internet.
Government
ID243
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
NA
1. Maintain to have output documents from each session: 1 official by rapporteur (as usual) + maybe another 1 that allow audience to input and jam their thoughts ( allow discussion flow on) > we can try to see what common ideas/ interesting debate can be arisen there in a buttom-up approach
2. The above inputs can be part of the Submission of Input/ consultation of formal GDC process and WSIS+20 process
3. Actively demand both GDC and WSIS+20 have process that engage Public Consultation -
4. Back up Advocacy - create platform for community to voice out
2. The above inputs can be part of the Submission of Input/ consultation of formal GDC process and WSIS+20 process
3. Actively demand both GDC and WSIS+20 have process that engage Public Consultation -
4. Back up Advocacy - create platform for community to voice out
not yet
Technical Community
ID244
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Crisis response, IGF organization and role
The 2025 IGF is a timely opportunity to consider the ongoing implementation of the Global Digital Compact and propose matters for consideration by UN Member States through the WSIS+20 review, including those related to the IGF’s governance, mandate, funding, and participation.
Consistent with the IGF’s mandate outlined in paragraph 72 of the Tunis Agenda, the 2025 IGF should consider a dedicated WSIS+20 track. An associated output document that represents the considered views of the IGF community could be developed to capture the outputs from this track, plus relevant outputs and links to WSIS+20 from other tracks, and forwarded to the co-facilitators ahead of the review’s finalisation.
A preparatory process ahead of IGF 2025 could also be considered, with dedicated support by the secretariat, to develop the track’s agenda. This work should be informed by, and incorporate, the existing work of the IGF Leadership Panel and the Working Group on IGF Strategy.
Consistent with the IGF’s mandate outlined in paragraph 72 of the Tunis Agenda, the 2025 IGF should consider a dedicated WSIS+20 track. An associated output document that represents the considered views of the IGF community could be developed to capture the outputs from this track, plus relevant outputs and links to WSIS+20 from other tracks, and forwarded to the co-facilitators ahead of the review’s finalisation.
A preparatory process ahead of IGF 2025 could also be considered, with dedicated support by the secretariat, to develop the track’s agenda. This work should be informed by, and incorporate, the existing work of the IGF Leadership Panel and the Working Group on IGF Strategy.
Proposed sessions should be submitted with a clear format, agreed speakers, and structure for hybrid participation as part of the submission process. These details should be worked through well in advance to assist the MAG to curate the IGF agenda and structure each IGF theme to maximise opportunities for conversation and dialogue. Less duplication between sessions should be sought, along with improved audience interaction within sessions (facilitation support for session leads might be a useful addition) and IT-based solutions, such as live-polling of the audience. More visibility for the work of the dynamic coalitions could be considered.
Documenting the relationship between IGF sessions and WSIS Action lines should also be considered. This would showcase the important role the IGF plays in delivering the Geneva Plan of Action and the Tunis Agenda, and help better orientate IGF sessions to WSIS action line outcomes.
Documenting the relationship between IGF sessions and WSIS Action lines should also be considered. This would showcase the important role the IGF plays in delivering the Geneva Plan of Action and the Tunis Agenda, and help better orientate IGF sessions to WSIS action line outcomes.
Government
ID245
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
The IGF can significantly enhance its contribution to the WSIS+20 Review and the implementation of the Global Digital Compact by:
1. Explicitly Aligning with the GDC and WSIS+20:
Dedicated Sessions: Integrate dedicated sessions specifically focused on the GDC principles and the implementation of WSIS Action Lines.
Thematic Focus: Align the overall thematic focus of the IGF 2025 with the key priorities of the GDC, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and the ethical development of AI.
GDC Framework: Utilize the GDC as a guiding framework for discussions and deliberations throughout the IGF.
2. Strengthening Inter-sessional Activities:
GDC-Focused Dynamic Coalitions: Encourage the formation of Dynamic Coalitions specifically focused on implementing GDC principles and contributing to the WSIS+20 Review.
NRI Contributions: Foster stronger collaboration between NRIs and the IGF Secretariat to ensure that local and regional perspectives on the GDC and WSIS+20 are effectively integrated into the global discussion.
Best Practice Sharing: Facilitate the sharing of best practices in implementing the GDC principles at the national and regional levels through Best Practice Forums and other mechanisms.
3. Enhancing Output and Dissemination:
Develop Actionable Recommendations: Focus on developing concrete and actionable recommendations for implementing the GDC and addressing the challenges identified in the WSIS+20 Review.
Disseminate Findings Widely: Ensure that the findings and recommendations of the IGF 2025 are widely disseminated to the UN General Assembly, other relevant international bodies, and the broader public.
Engage with Policymakers: Actively engage with policymakers at all levels to ensure that the recommendations of the IGF are considered in the development and implementation of national and international policies related to the GDC and WSIS+20.
4. Fostering Innovation and Collaboration:
Support Innovative Solutions: Encourage and support the development of innovative solutions for addressing the challenges of the digital age, such as those related to digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and the ethical development of AI.
Promote Collaboration: Foster collaboration among stakeholders to develop and implement joint initiatives that contribute to the implementation of the GDC and the achievement of WSIS objectives.
By implementing these recommendations, the IGF can significantly enhance its contribution to the WSIS+20 Review and play a crucial role in supporting the implementation of the Global Digital Compact.
Key Considerations:
Inclusivity: Ensure that the voices of all stakeholders, including those from developing countries, marginalized communities, and youth, are fully represented and heard in the discussions.
Transparency and Accountability: Ensure that the IGF process is transparent and accountable to all stakeholders.
Continuous Improvement: Continuously evaluate and improve the IGF's contribution to the GDC and WSIS+20 Review based on lessons learned and emerging challenges.
1. Explicitly Aligning with the GDC and WSIS+20:
Dedicated Sessions: Integrate dedicated sessions specifically focused on the GDC principles and the implementation of WSIS Action Lines.
Thematic Focus: Align the overall thematic focus of the IGF 2025 with the key priorities of the GDC, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and the ethical development of AI.
GDC Framework: Utilize the GDC as a guiding framework for discussions and deliberations throughout the IGF.
2. Strengthening Inter-sessional Activities:
GDC-Focused Dynamic Coalitions: Encourage the formation of Dynamic Coalitions specifically focused on implementing GDC principles and contributing to the WSIS+20 Review.
NRI Contributions: Foster stronger collaboration between NRIs and the IGF Secretariat to ensure that local and regional perspectives on the GDC and WSIS+20 are effectively integrated into the global discussion.
Best Practice Sharing: Facilitate the sharing of best practices in implementing the GDC principles at the national and regional levels through Best Practice Forums and other mechanisms.
3. Enhancing Output and Dissemination:
Develop Actionable Recommendations: Focus on developing concrete and actionable recommendations for implementing the GDC and addressing the challenges identified in the WSIS+20 Review.
Disseminate Findings Widely: Ensure that the findings and recommendations of the IGF 2025 are widely disseminated to the UN General Assembly, other relevant international bodies, and the broader public.
Engage with Policymakers: Actively engage with policymakers at all levels to ensure that the recommendations of the IGF are considered in the development and implementation of national and international policies related to the GDC and WSIS+20.
4. Fostering Innovation and Collaboration:
Support Innovative Solutions: Encourage and support the development of innovative solutions for addressing the challenges of the digital age, such as those related to digital inclusion, cybersecurity, and the ethical development of AI.
Promote Collaboration: Foster collaboration among stakeholders to develop and implement joint initiatives that contribute to the implementation of the GDC and the achievement of WSIS objectives.
By implementing these recommendations, the IGF can significantly enhance its contribution to the WSIS+20 Review and play a crucial role in supporting the implementation of the Global Digital Compact.
Key Considerations:
Inclusivity: Ensure that the voices of all stakeholders, including those from developing countries, marginalized communities, and youth, are fully represented and heard in the discussions.
Transparency and Accountability: Ensure that the IGF process is transparent and accountable to all stakeholders.
Continuous Improvement: Continuously evaluate and improve the IGF's contribution to the GDC and WSIS+20 Review based on lessons learned and emerging challenges.
Shifting Focus: Instead of rigid thematic tracks (e.g., "Cybersecurity," "AI"), consider structuring around overarching "Challenge Areas." These could be more dynamic and cross-cutting, like:
"Digital Inclusion and Equity" encompassing digital divide, accessibility, and equitable access to technology and its benefits.
"Human-Centered AI" focusing on ethical development, algorithmic bias, and the societal impact of AI.
"Building Trust and Security" encompassing cybersecurity, data privacy, and online safety.
"Sustainable Digital Transformation" focusing on environmental impact, climate change, and the role of technology in sustainable development.
Benefits: This approach encourages more holistic and interdisciplinary discussions, breaking down siloes between traditional thematic tracks.
"Digital Inclusion and Equity" encompassing digital divide, accessibility, and equitable access to technology and its benefits.
"Human-Centered AI" focusing on ethical development, algorithmic bias, and the societal impact of AI.
"Building Trust and Security" encompassing cybersecurity, data privacy, and online safety.
"Sustainable Digital Transformation" focusing on environmental impact, climate change, and the role of technology in sustainable development.
Benefits: This approach encourages more holistic and interdisciplinary discussions, breaking down siloes between traditional thematic tracks.
Private Sector
ID246
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Government
ID247
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Technical and Operational Topics
Civil Society
ID248
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The Global Digital Compact covers key areas such as infrastructure construction, digital skills development, digital human rights protection, and data and AI governance, reflecting the common concerns and vision of the international community regarding the development and governance of digital technologies. Consistent with the Global Digital Compact's emphasis on "multi-stakeholder cooperation," he IGF aims to promote exchanges, discussions, dialogues and consultations related to Internet governance.
In the future, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) should continuously update its agenda in line with advancements in digital technologies and evolving governance trends. For instance, in China, artificial intelligence (AI) has been extensively integrated into various sectors, leading to significant transformations in both production and daily life. However, this integration has also introduced numerous emerging risks. Consequently, the Chinese IGF has intensified discussions on topics such as AI governance and digital equity. By fostering multi-stakeholder dialogues among government entities, enterprises, research institutions, and social organizations, the IGF is steadily building community consensus and accumulating practical and reference-worthy cases and achievements. Furthermore, it promotes China's digital governance concepts and experiences, providing valuable references for global digital governance.
In the future, the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) should continuously update its agenda in line with advancements in digital technologies and evolving governance trends. For instance, in China, artificial intelligence (AI) has been extensively integrated into various sectors, leading to significant transformations in both production and daily life. However, this integration has also introduced numerous emerging risks. Consequently, the Chinese IGF has intensified discussions on topics such as AI governance and digital equity. By fostering multi-stakeholder dialogues among government entities, enterprises, research institutions, and social organizations, the IGF is steadily building community consensus and accumulating practical and reference-worthy cases and achievements. Furthermore, it promotes China's digital governance concepts and experiences, providing valuable references for global digital governance.
At the thematic level, as explicitly mentioned in the Global Digital Compact, issues such as the protection of digital human rights, the governance of data and AI, etc., require the high attention of all parties. The progression of technology should not serve as an enabler for widening disparities in societal well-being but instead act as a bridge to reduce these gaps. Therefore, it is recommended that the IGF prioritize the following areas:
1) Building responsible AI: On the one hand, discussions should focus on key risk governance and ethical frameworks such as the increased risk of personal information leakage due to AI and the generation of false content by AI, and form a consensus among multiple stakeholders. On the other hand, discussions should revolve around topics such as AI promoting information accessibility, AI bridging the digital divide, and AI promoting educational equity, and encourage enterprises, universities and other entities to exchange practical experiences and share cases.
2)Focusing on AI's "Invisible Groups"：
By integrating the daily lives and specific needs of these groups, it is crucial to examine the issue of the AI divide in the context of AI development. To achieve digital equity, particular attention should be given to the survival and development challenges faced by information-disadvantaged populations, including the elderly, minors, and individuals with disabilities, in the era of AI. Among these challenges, there are both "long-standing issues" and "emerging concerns". Long-standing issues include the insufficient acceptance of emerging technologies and weak information discrimination abilities due to the physical and mental characteristics of certain groups. Emerging concerns involve potential biases in AI large models. Such biases can lead to widespread systemic problems and trigger a "vicious cycle": models with inherent biases may overlook the needs of marginalized groups, leading to their exclusion. The resulting "silence" of these groups further skews the model's data set, thereby exacerbating existing biases.
3)Building an inclusive and shared data governance system:
Pay attention to the multiple values of data resources in enhancing social governance capabilities, promoting industrial development, and advancing public welfare.Explore the mechanisms, paths, and typical cases of data resources empowering the construction of national social governance capabilities and systems.Gradually promote all stakeholders to build a global digital governance system.Handle the positive and negative externalities of data resources. Focus on outstanding issues such as the data infrastructure divide and insufficient universal sharing of data resources. Pay attention to the concern of data elements for the well-being of people's livelihoods, advocate digital inclusion, and strengthen data protection and governance.Promote the open sharing and utilization of public data resources.
1) Building responsible AI: On the one hand, discussions should focus on key risk governance and ethical frameworks such as the increased risk of personal information leakage due to AI and the generation of false content by AI, and form a consensus among multiple stakeholders. On the other hand, discussions should revolve around topics such as AI promoting information accessibility, AI bridging the digital divide, and AI promoting educational equity, and encourage enterprises, universities and other entities to exchange practical experiences and share cases.
2)Focusing on AI's "Invisible Groups"：
By integrating the daily lives and specific needs of these groups, it is crucial to examine the issue of the AI divide in the context of AI development. To achieve digital equity, particular attention should be given to the survival and development challenges faced by information-disadvantaged populations, including the elderly, minors, and individuals with disabilities, in the era of AI. Among these challenges, there are both "long-standing issues" and "emerging concerns". Long-standing issues include the insufficient acceptance of emerging technologies and weak information discrimination abilities due to the physical and mental characteristics of certain groups. Emerging concerns involve potential biases in AI large models. Such biases can lead to widespread systemic problems and trigger a "vicious cycle": models with inherent biases may overlook the needs of marginalized groups, leading to their exclusion. The resulting "silence" of these groups further skews the model's data set, thereby exacerbating existing biases.
3)Building an inclusive and shared data governance system:
Pay attention to the multiple values of data resources in enhancing social governance capabilities, promoting industrial development, and advancing public welfare.Explore the mechanisms, paths, and typical cases of data resources empowering the construction of national social governance capabilities and systems.Gradually promote all stakeholders to build a global digital governance system.Handle the positive and negative externalities of data resources. Focus on outstanding issues such as the data infrastructure divide and insufficient universal sharing of data resources. Pay attention to the concern of data elements for the well-being of people's livelihoods, advocate digital inclusion, and strengthen data protection and governance.Promote the open sharing and utilization of public data resources.
Private Sector
ID249
Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF 2025 meeting should prioritize input from civil society organizations from the Global Majority world, representing historically marginalized and oppressed communities. It should also address the issue of shrinking online civic spaces and increasing digital threats (e.g. use of commercial spyware to target organizations and individuals and extract sensitive information, targeting of websites and social media accounts, online harassment and tech-facilitated gender-based violence) facing civil society organizations and activists, which create an increasingly unsafe environment for human rights-based work, and identify multistakeholder strategies for protection and mitigation of such threats in terms of skills, capacities and infrastructure.
The IGF 2025 meeting should focus on meaningful multistakeholder engagement to identify lessons learned and co-design what the IGF mandate should be going forward. It should also ensure coordination and integration with the implementation of the GDC and the WSIS+20 review process to avoid redundancy and facilitate effective monitoring and follow-up of digital governance initiatives, at international, regional and national levels. Every effort must be made to integrate the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work with other aspects of international multistakeholder cooperation so that digital governance is not treated as a separate concern, but one that is salient to all other concerns, political, economic and otherwise.
The IGF 2025 meeting should facilitate good-faith discussions and negotiations between governments, civil society and private sector actors towards a series of clear and actionable commitments that prioritize equitable access, assurances of privacy, protection of digital civic spaces and activities, and investments in digital literacy for traditionally marginalized and oppressed groups, including women, young people, elders, LGBTQIA+ people, people with disabilities, migrants, indigenous people, and racial and ethnic groups in the global majority. This entails having interactive and output-focused sessions and embracing the core feminist principle of "nothing about us without us" at every point. The meeting should allow for remote participation and provide language support to participants who need it.
Civil Society
ID250
Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Freedom of expression and Privacy are directly impacted by the way in which disinformation, hate speech, encryption and Internet Fragmentation are dealt with, however all these topics are included in the Cybersecurity and Trust bucket, and they are also part of content policy and regulation discussions. This illustrates the overlapping nature of human rights considerations. Similarly, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity, AI Governance and Data Governance are central in ensuring that digital technologies do not hinder and rather promote the exercise of civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. The IGF program should be mindful of this rather than artificially isolate the human rights discussion in a separate track aiming for its crosscutting integration in the thematic discussions.
With respect to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC), we support the recommendation of the co-chairs of the MAG Working Group on IGF Strengthening and Strategy and others that the IGF should implement a track dedicated to the follow-up, monitoring and review of the implementation of the Compact. As recognised by the Compact, the IGF is “the primary multi-stakeholder platform for discussion of Internet governance issues” making it uniquely positioned to collate holistic, bottom-up evidence from different stakeholder communities and assess trends from different regions on the Compact’s implementation. More specifically, the presence of the human rights community within the IGF will fulfil a vital monitoring function, making recommendations on states’ adherence to their obligations under international human rights law, as reiterated by the Compact.
The GDC implementation track should be designed to facilitate dialogue among different stakeholder communities and with relevant UN institutional actors. It should also take into account best practices by other UN processes responsible for monitoring global-level outcomes to ensure it is designed to facilitate meaningful stakeholder engagement and leverages the IGF’s intersessional work and national and regional IGFs. It should also be an opportunity to enlarge the participation of stakeholders in the key milestones of GDC implementation, by providing relevant information on the current status of different processes inside it and the upcoming opportunities to engage and influence their outcomes.
Regarding the review of the overall outcomes of the WSIS, the IGF was established by the Tunis Agenda and is one of the principal outcomes emanating from the WSIS. The lead-up to the high-level meeting in 2025 corresponds with the key period in the review of the twenty-year outcomes of the WSIS (WSIS+20 process). It will be vital for the IGF to facilitate consultation within the IGF community to assess how it has fulfilled its mandate and how this mandate should evolve in the future. Practically, the IGF could provide for written and verbal opportunities to input and convene dialogues with its diverse communities ahead of key dates and milestones in the WSIS+20 review process. The IGF should make recommendations for how its mandate should evolve to respond to the changing technological and multilateral environment and increased need for its functions. We recommend that the IGF mandate becomes permanent, supported by adequate resourcing and more transparent and accessible procedures.
The IGF should also seek to directly engage with the WSIS+20 review process. For example, it should aim to provide evidence and examples of how it has served the achievement of a people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society through providing a forum for cross-stakeholder dialogue. Drawing from its long-history and experience of applying multistakeholder principles in practice, the IGF should advise the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review process on how to ensure opportunities for meaningful engagement in the review process. One possible option for making this is leveraging the intersessional work through a dedicated working group to build a set of case studies that illustrate the role of IGF in implementing the Tunis Agenda through multistakeholder and multidisciplinary participation.
The GDC implementation track should be designed to facilitate dialogue among different stakeholder communities and with relevant UN institutional actors. It should also take into account best practices by other UN processes responsible for monitoring global-level outcomes to ensure it is designed to facilitate meaningful stakeholder engagement and leverages the IGF’s intersessional work and national and regional IGFs. It should also be an opportunity to enlarge the participation of stakeholders in the key milestones of GDC implementation, by providing relevant information on the current status of different processes inside it and the upcoming opportunities to engage and influence their outcomes.
Regarding the review of the overall outcomes of the WSIS, the IGF was established by the Tunis Agenda and is one of the principal outcomes emanating from the WSIS. The lead-up to the high-level meeting in 2025 corresponds with the key period in the review of the twenty-year outcomes of the WSIS (WSIS+20 process). It will be vital for the IGF to facilitate consultation within the IGF community to assess how it has fulfilled its mandate and how this mandate should evolve in the future. Practically, the IGF could provide for written and verbal opportunities to input and convene dialogues with its diverse communities ahead of key dates and milestones in the WSIS+20 review process. The IGF should make recommendations for how its mandate should evolve to respond to the changing technological and multilateral environment and increased need for its functions. We recommend that the IGF mandate becomes permanent, supported by adequate resourcing and more transparent and accessible procedures.
The IGF should also seek to directly engage with the WSIS+20 review process. For example, it should aim to provide evidence and examples of how it has served the achievement of a people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society through providing a forum for cross-stakeholder dialogue. Drawing from its long-history and experience of applying multistakeholder principles in practice, the IGF should advise the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review process on how to ensure opportunities for meaningful engagement in the review process. One possible option for making this is leveraging the intersessional work through a dedicated working group to build a set of case studies that illustrate the role of IGF in implementing the Tunis Agenda through multistakeholder and multidisciplinary participation.
To strengthen its impact, the design of thematic tracks should reflect both the IGF’s core principles and the evolving global digital policy landscape, particularly in the areas of digital cooperation and human rights.
Under the theme of Digital Cooperation: Multistakeholderism and Multidisciplinary Approaches, we propose that this track be given prominence in the IGF 2025 programming to reflect its foundational importance to the forum’s mission. As the WSIS+20 review process advances and the GDC implementation roadmap develops, the IGF has a unique opportunity to underscore the critical role of stakeholders—especially civil society—in these processes. Unfortunately, opportunities for engagement in these global processes have often been limited or unclear, which makes the IGF an essential venue to explore how the principles of multistakeholderism can be better applied in practice.
This track should acknowledge the significant progress made to strengthen multistakeholder approaches and continue refining them for its effective application to different digital policy issues, while also addressing the broader challenge of shrinking civic space. A particular focus could be placed on reflecting the principles laid out in the NETmundial+10 Multistakeholder Statement, which provides a set of guidelines and related process steps (“São Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines”) in Internet governance and digital policy processes at the international, regional and national levels, based upon existing foundational documents and best practice. As recommended in the São Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines and reinforced by the MAG Working Group on IGF Strengthening and Strategy, the IGF would be well-placed to act as a depositary or caretaker of these guidelines. This track could provide a platform to reflect on the Principles, the invitation for IGF to become the depositary for the Principles and how these Principles could be useful applied across a variety of processes, forums and digital policy issues.
Under the theme of Rights and Freedoms: Civil, Political, Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the IGF should focus on tangible action and practical tools. A wide range of key policy documents, notably including the Global Digital Compact, emphasise the responsibility of technology companies and developers to respect international human rights principles. Building on this recognition, the IGF could highlight existing tools and frameworks designed to help companies assess and mitigate human rights risks associated with their technologies. This track should emphasise the need to move from theoretical discussions to practical implementation, providing a space for sessions that address specific mechanisms, such as human rights due diligence and impact assessments.
To ensure the discussions are grounded in real-world challenges, this track should actively engage human rights organisations and defenders from around the world, particularly those based in Global Majority countries, who bring evidence-based insights and on-the-ground experience. Drawing on the work of National and Regional Initiatives (NRIs) would further enhance the track by incorporating local perspectives and community-level concerns. Additionally, collaboration with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) could provide valuable guidance and expertise and could highlight their valuable work providing an advisory service to companies.
We recommend incorporating innovative session designs that facilitate greater interaction and knowledge-sharing among participants from different sectors and regions. Formats that encourage multistakeholder dialogue and collaboration can help participants explore practical solutions to global human rights challenges, fostering a shared understanding of how to address these risks effectively.
Under the theme of Digital Cooperation: Multistakeholderism and Multidisciplinary Approaches, we propose that this track be given prominence in the IGF 2025 programming to reflect its foundational importance to the forum’s mission. As the WSIS+20 review process advances and the GDC implementation roadmap develops, the IGF has a unique opportunity to underscore the critical role of stakeholders—especially civil society—in these processes. Unfortunately, opportunities for engagement in these global processes have often been limited or unclear, which makes the IGF an essential venue to explore how the principles of multistakeholderism can be better applied in practice.
This track should acknowledge the significant progress made to strengthen multistakeholder approaches and continue refining them for its effective application to different digital policy issues, while also addressing the broader challenge of shrinking civic space. A particular focus could be placed on reflecting the principles laid out in the NETmundial+10 Multistakeholder Statement, which provides a set of guidelines and related process steps (“São Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines”) in Internet governance and digital policy processes at the international, regional and national levels, based upon existing foundational documents and best practice. As recommended in the São Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines and reinforced by the MAG Working Group on IGF Strengthening and Strategy, the IGF would be well-placed to act as a depositary or caretaker of these guidelines. This track could provide a platform to reflect on the Principles, the invitation for IGF to become the depositary for the Principles and how these Principles could be useful applied across a variety of processes, forums and digital policy issues.
Under the theme of Rights and Freedoms: Civil, Political, Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, the IGF should focus on tangible action and practical tools. A wide range of key policy documents, notably including the Global Digital Compact, emphasise the responsibility of technology companies and developers to respect international human rights principles. Building on this recognition, the IGF could highlight existing tools and frameworks designed to help companies assess and mitigate human rights risks associated with their technologies. This track should emphasise the need to move from theoretical discussions to practical implementation, providing a space for sessions that address specific mechanisms, such as human rights due diligence and impact assessments.
To ensure the discussions are grounded in real-world challenges, this track should actively engage human rights organisations and defenders from around the world, particularly those based in Global Majority countries, who bring evidence-based insights and on-the-ground experience. Drawing on the work of National and Regional Initiatives (NRIs) would further enhance the track by incorporating local perspectives and community-level concerns. Additionally, collaboration with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) could provide valuable guidance and expertise and could highlight their valuable work providing an advisory service to companies.
We recommend incorporating innovative session designs that facilitate greater interaction and knowledge-sharing among participants from different sectors and regions. Formats that encourage multistakeholder dialogue and collaboration can help participants explore practical solutions to global human rights challenges, fostering a shared understanding of how to address these risks effectively.
Civil Society
ID251
Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
To strengthen the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) and ensure its alignment with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, it is vital to integrate their goals and frameworks while advancing actionable strategies. Merging WSIS Action Lines with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) outlined in the GDC and introducing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the multistakeholder model can help amplify the IGF’s relevance and impact.
1. Align WSIS Action Lines with GDC’s SDGs
Integrated Framework: The IGF should ensure that WSIS Action Lines—focusing on digital inclusion, capacity-building, cybersecurity, and cultural diversity—align with the SDGs emphasized in the GDC. This alignment would allow digital strategies to contribute directly to sustainability goals such as poverty reduction, quality education, and climate action.
Example: WSIS Action Line C2 (ICT Infrastructure) can be integrated with SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) to improve equitable access to technology.
Synergistic Approaches: IGF discussions should identify overlaps between WSIS and SDG objectives, fostering integrated solutions that bridge technical governance goals with global societal priorities.
Cross-Sector Collaboration: Leverage the IGF’s multistakeholder structure to engage governments, civil society, the private sector, and technical communities in co-developing initiatives that address both WSIS Action Lines and GDC goals.
2. Advocate for KPIs for the Multistakeholder Model
Define Metrics for Success: Establish KPIs to measure the effectiveness, inclusivity, and impact of multistakeholder participation. Suggested metrics include:
Diversity of Participation: Assess representation across sectors, regions, and marginalized groups in IGF processes.
Actionable Outputs: Track the adoption and implementation of IGF recommendations within global and regional policymaking.
Engagement and Impact: Evaluate the extent of stakeholder collaboration and the tangible outcomes of IGF initiatives, such as policy reforms and capacity-building programs.
Transparency and Accountability: Publish regular evaluations against these KPIs to demonstrate progress and address gaps in participation or influence.
Innovation in Engagement: Use KPIs to drive continuous improvement, ensuring that the multistakeholder model evolves to meet emerging challenges and remains inclusive.
3. Strengthen IGF’s Contributions to Global Initiatives
Thematic Alignment: Ensure IGF annual meetings and intersessional work prioritize discussions on GDC and WSIS goals, such as digital inclusion, equitable access, and sustainable innovation.
Regional Contributions: Amplify the role of National and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs) to reflect grassroots perspectives in global IGF outcomes, ensuring a bottom-up approach.
Policy Recommendations: Frame IGF outputs as clear, actionable recommendations that directly contribute to GDC and WSIS discussions.
Follow-Up Mechanisms: Create structures to monitor and evaluate how IGF outputs are adopted in global and regional processes.
4. Leverage Technology for Inclusion
Digital Tools for Engagement: Utilize advanced digital platforms to enable inclusive participation, especially from underrepresented regions, ensuring equitable representation in discussions.
AI as a Bridge: Deploy artificial intelligence to address language barriers, improve knowledge sharing, and support efficient policy recommendations while safeguarding against bias and inequality.
5. High-Level Dialogues and Advocacy
Specialized Sessions: Dedicate IGF discussions to aligning outputs with GDC and WSIS objectives, focusing on shared priorities and opportunities.
Policy Interfaces: Facilitate dialogues between IGF participants and representatives of global digital governance initiatives to integrate efforts and bridge local and global priorities.
Awareness Campaigns: Promote understanding of WSIS and GDC goals within IGF forums and publish materials that highlight IGF’s contributions to these frameworks.
By integrating WSIS Action Lines with the GDC’s SDGs, establishing KPIs for multistakeholder models, and enhancing alignment with global initiatives, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing inclusive, accountable, and sustainable internet governance. This approach ensures that the IGF not only responds to the rapidly evolving digital landscape but also contributes meaningfully to global digital equity and development.
1. Align WSIS Action Lines with GDC’s SDGs
Integrated Framework: The IGF should ensure that WSIS Action Lines—focusing on digital inclusion, capacity-building, cybersecurity, and cultural diversity—align with the SDGs emphasized in the GDC. This alignment would allow digital strategies to contribute directly to sustainability goals such as poverty reduction, quality education, and climate action.
Example: WSIS Action Line C2 (ICT Infrastructure) can be integrated with SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) to improve equitable access to technology.
Synergistic Approaches: IGF discussions should identify overlaps between WSIS and SDG objectives, fostering integrated solutions that bridge technical governance goals with global societal priorities.
Cross-Sector Collaboration: Leverage the IGF’s multistakeholder structure to engage governments, civil society, the private sector, and technical communities in co-developing initiatives that address both WSIS Action Lines and GDC goals.
2. Advocate for KPIs for the Multistakeholder Model
Define Metrics for Success: Establish KPIs to measure the effectiveness, inclusivity, and impact of multistakeholder participation. Suggested metrics include:
Diversity of Participation: Assess representation across sectors, regions, and marginalized groups in IGF processes.
Actionable Outputs: Track the adoption and implementation of IGF recommendations within global and regional policymaking.
Engagement and Impact: Evaluate the extent of stakeholder collaboration and the tangible outcomes of IGF initiatives, such as policy reforms and capacity-building programs.
Transparency and Accountability: Publish regular evaluations against these KPIs to demonstrate progress and address gaps in participation or influence.
Innovation in Engagement: Use KPIs to drive continuous improvement, ensuring that the multistakeholder model evolves to meet emerging challenges and remains inclusive.
3. Strengthen IGF’s Contributions to Global Initiatives
Thematic Alignment: Ensure IGF annual meetings and intersessional work prioritize discussions on GDC and WSIS goals, such as digital inclusion, equitable access, and sustainable innovation.
Regional Contributions: Amplify the role of National and Regional IGF Initiatives (NRIs) to reflect grassroots perspectives in global IGF outcomes, ensuring a bottom-up approach.
Policy Recommendations: Frame IGF outputs as clear, actionable recommendations that directly contribute to GDC and WSIS discussions.
Follow-Up Mechanisms: Create structures to monitor and evaluate how IGF outputs are adopted in global and regional processes.
4. Leverage Technology for Inclusion
Digital Tools for Engagement: Utilize advanced digital platforms to enable inclusive participation, especially from underrepresented regions, ensuring equitable representation in discussions.
AI as a Bridge: Deploy artificial intelligence to address language barriers, improve knowledge sharing, and support efficient policy recommendations while safeguarding against bias and inequality.
5. High-Level Dialogues and Advocacy
Specialized Sessions: Dedicate IGF discussions to aligning outputs with GDC and WSIS objectives, focusing on shared priorities and opportunities.
Policy Interfaces: Facilitate dialogues between IGF participants and representatives of global digital governance initiatives to integrate efforts and bridge local and global priorities.
Awareness Campaigns: Promote understanding of WSIS and GDC goals within IGF forums and publish materials that highlight IGF’s contributions to these frameworks.
By integrating WSIS Action Lines with the GDC’s SDGs, establishing KPIs for multistakeholder models, and enhancing alignment with global initiatives, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing inclusive, accountable, and sustainable internet governance. This approach ensures that the IGF not only responds to the rapidly evolving digital landscape but also contributes meaningfully to global digital equity and development.
Here are some ideas to enhance the format and design of the IGF to improve inclusivity, effectiveness, and engagement:
1. Session Formats can be improved by having:
1.1 Feature “Key Insights” sessions at the end of each day to recap highlights and provide actionable takeaways.
1.2 Debate and Dialogue Formats: Introduce structured debates on controversial topics, featuring opposing perspectives to spark engagement and critical thinking.
2. Establish Outcome-Oriented Structures
2.1 Thematic Task Forces: Form task forces for each theme to synthesize discussions and draft actionable outputs, such as recommendations or best practices.
2.2 Outcome-Focused Dialogues: Dedicate time for identifying specific actions or commitments from stakeholders at the end of each thematic track.
Introduce “Commitment Corners” where stakeholders can publicly pledge actions related to IGF themes.
3. Enhance Networking and Knowledge Sharing
3.1 Dedicated Networking Spaces: Create informal “networking lounges” where stakeholders can connect and collaborate in person and online.
Introduce thematic “matchmaking” tools to pair participants based on interests and expertise.
3.2 Knowledge Hubs: Establish online repositories of session content, policy briefs, and insights, ensuring IGF outcomes remain accessible post-event.
4. Leverage Technology for Enhanced Engagement
4.1 Interactive Tools: In the last IGF meeting in Saudi, technology was a big failure. This needs to improve to enable features such as: live polling, Q&A platforms, and gamification to make sessions more interactive and engaging. Additionally, Virtual Reality (VR) and Holographic Tools and AI-Driven Insights could be very helpful.
5. Foster Continuity Through Intersessional Work:
5.1 Year-Round Engagement: Strengthen Dynamic Coalitions (DCs), Best Practice Forums (BPFs), and Policy Networks (PNs) as ongoing platforms for collaboration. Publish periodic updates on intersessional work to maintain momentum between annual meetings.
5.2 Regional Integration: Deepen integration with regional and national IGFs, ensuring grassroots priorities consistently inform global discussions.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can better reflect the diversity of its participants, adapt to the fast-evolving digital landscape, and ensure its work contributes meaningfully to global digital governance initiatives.
1. Session Formats can be improved by having:
1.1 Feature “Key Insights” sessions at the end of each day to recap highlights and provide actionable takeaways.
1.2 Debate and Dialogue Formats: Introduce structured debates on controversial topics, featuring opposing perspectives to spark engagement and critical thinking.
2. Establish Outcome-Oriented Structures
2.1 Thematic Task Forces: Form task forces for each theme to synthesize discussions and draft actionable outputs, such as recommendations or best practices.
2.2 Outcome-Focused Dialogues: Dedicate time for identifying specific actions or commitments from stakeholders at the end of each thematic track.
Introduce “Commitment Corners” where stakeholders can publicly pledge actions related to IGF themes.
3. Enhance Networking and Knowledge Sharing
3.1 Dedicated Networking Spaces: Create informal “networking lounges” where stakeholders can connect and collaborate in person and online.
Introduce thematic “matchmaking” tools to pair participants based on interests and expertise.
3.2 Knowledge Hubs: Establish online repositories of session content, policy briefs, and insights, ensuring IGF outcomes remain accessible post-event.
4. Leverage Technology for Enhanced Engagement
4.1 Interactive Tools: In the last IGF meeting in Saudi, technology was a big failure. This needs to improve to enable features such as: live polling, Q&A platforms, and gamification to make sessions more interactive and engaging. Additionally, Virtual Reality (VR) and Holographic Tools and AI-Driven Insights could be very helpful.
5. Foster Continuity Through Intersessional Work:
5.1 Year-Round Engagement: Strengthen Dynamic Coalitions (DCs), Best Practice Forums (BPFs), and Policy Networks (PNs) as ongoing platforms for collaboration. Publish periodic updates on intersessional work to maintain momentum between annual meetings.
5.2 Regional Integration: Deepen integration with regional and national IGFs, ensuring grassroots priorities consistently inform global discussions.
By adopting these ideas, the IGF can better reflect the diversity of its participants, adapt to the fast-evolving digital landscape, and ensure its work contributes meaningfully to global digital governance initiatives.
Technical Community
ID252
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
It was sensible from our point of view that subthemes were reduced from eight (2023) to four (2024). Due to the particular importance of the topic of AI, we propose to include AI in the overarching motto 2025.
The Global Digital Compact and the World Summit on the Information Society should be discussed in main sessions and high level sessions of this year’s IGF. In addition, Policy Networks and Best Practice should be motivated to contribute to both the GDC and the WSIS.
The hybrid character should be further expanded in order to offer onsite and online participants the same opportunities for participation and discussion, for example to take part in interactive surveys both onsite and online.
Private Sector
ID253
Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
The internet and its infrastructure are a rapidly growing factor in environmental sustainability as the use of (rare) materials and energy usage result in emissions and usage of clean drinking water. Digitalisation can be both a cause for concern and offer a path forward on complex topics that can be greatly improved or sped up by the advantages of digitalisation. There is a growing awareness of the role of the green IT movement in reducing the emissions that are caused by digitalisation and in the solutions digitalisation can have for a sustainable (better) environment.
Additionally, some keywords:
green IT (hardware, software and web hosting)
reduce emissions
stimulate energy efficiency
open ICT standards
Additionally, some keywords:
green IT (hardware, software and web hosting)
reduce emissions
stimulate energy efficiency
open ICT standards
Government
ID254
Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
SIDI Hub was launched in Paris at the end of 2023 to provide a platform for the exchange of ideas among the Policy and Technical standards Communities to promote the concept and introduction of Globally Interoperable Digital Identity. SIDI is fully transparent and does not seek to impose its views on anyone. Today SIDI Hub has garnered support from over 25 countries, UN agencies (including UNDP, UNHCR, and ITU), international organisations like the OECD, the EU, leading open standards bodies {I} and academia. This global multistakeholder coalition represents a balanced mix of stakeholders from all the UN's geographical regions. During 2024 we organised a global consultation seeking ideas/experience and to identify needs in 5 distinct regions, with meetings in Cape Town, Berlin, Washington and Tokyo. The process enabled us to identify a great deal of interest in Digital Identity, and to ground cross-border interoperability efforts in tangible requirements via the selection of champion use cases: opening a bank account, recognition of educational credentials, and around Immigration, Refugees, Disaster relief etc; together with a variety of Trust issues, all of which we shall take forward. We also identified the need for a broader Multi-Stakeholder input to the wider issues raised. The IGF would appear to offer an excellent opportunity to encourage a broader interest and above all to solicit the views of Civil Society on the fundamental issues raised by the introduction of digital interoperability and its adaptation to meet the needs of Developing Countries and the rights of the individual.
{I} such as SIA/OSIA, OIDF, FIDO, ToIP,
{I} such as SIA/OSIA, OIDF, FIDO, ToIP,
We believe that the pusuit of a truly interoperable system of Digital Identity fits well with the objectives of the Global Digital Compact.
We are keen to cooperate with the IGF organisersand the Multistakeholder Advisory Group to benefit from their experience, but would broadly see advantage in a keynote introductory statement from one of our leading personalities setting out the key elements which we have identified so far, followed by a panel discussion which would include the Norwegian Digitalisation Agency, our Norwegian partners, to benefit from the broad experience of those attending the IGF; particularly from Civil Society and Developing Countries.
Technical Community
ID255
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
The Global Conference on Cyber Capacity Building (GC3B), that will be hosted by Switzerland in Geneva in May 2025, will look into issues of high relevance to the IGF space, notably the intersection of digital development and cybersecurity.
In an increasingly connected world that relies heavily on technology, and where cyber threats continue to expand in both number and complexity, the need for robust cyber capacity that supports broader sustainable development goals has never been greater. International collaboration and collective investments in resources, knowledge and skills are key to building free, resilient and sustainable digital societies across the continents, where no country is left behind in their digital transition.
The GFCE would like to seek synergies of building on some relevant discussions at IGF2024 and preparing ground for IGF2025 to meaningfully feed into the discussions in Norway. IGF2025 will most likely deal with topics relevant to the GC3B, such as cybersecurity and development and the DSGs.
Notably, we would like to explore the topic of capacity building being more prominent on the IGF agenda.
In an increasingly connected world that relies heavily on technology, and where cyber threats continue to expand in both number and complexity, the need for robust cyber capacity that supports broader sustainable development goals has never been greater. International collaboration and collective investments in resources, knowledge and skills are key to building free, resilient and sustainable digital societies across the continents, where no country is left behind in their digital transition.
The GFCE would like to seek synergies of building on some relevant discussions at IGF2024 and preparing ground for IGF2025 to meaningfully feed into the discussions in Norway. IGF2025 will most likely deal with topics relevant to the GC3B, such as cybersecurity and development and the DSGs.
Notably, we would like to explore the topic of capacity building being more prominent on the IGF agenda.
Development agenda and links between cyber and development will certainly be a more and more important topic on the international agenda, especially in relation to the Global Digital Compact. The GFCE offers to provide reflections from the GC3B as an input.
Civil Society
ID256
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Media and Content
Artifical intelligence is going to be a major topic for years to come as we need to ensure the ehical, responsible and equitable use of it, as well as build capacity and ownership so that the benefits of the technology may be reaped by communities around the world.
Data governance is a related issue, in terms of how to have/create good quality data for the positive use of AI, as well as prevent the unauthorized use of data.
Media and content issues are exacerbated by use of AI and we need to look for regulation, technical means to identify and combat misinformation, as well as ensure broad media and digital literacy for everyone.
Data governance is a related issue, in terms of how to have/create good quality data for the positive use of AI, as well as prevent the unauthorized use of data.
Media and content issues are exacerbated by use of AI and we need to look for regulation, technical means to identify and combat misinformation, as well as ensure broad media and digital literacy for everyone.
Take stock in where we are on the committments made (in a structured way), identify the gaps and what needs to happen to close them.
Civil Society
ID257
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Intergovernmental Organization
ID258
Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, International cooperation on data
The persistent digital divide represents a significant global challenge, hindering equitable access to information and meaningful connectivity. Despite technological progress, nearly half of the world's schools remain offline, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities. This lack of access impedes youth education, limits participation in the digital economy, and slows progress towards Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including Quality Education (SDG 4), Gender Equality (SDG 5), Reduced Inequalities (SDG 10), and Partnerships for the Goals (SDG 17).
Addressing this digital inequity is central to key global initiatives such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),which prioritizes digital inclusion and equitable access to the benefits of digital transformation. Achieving universal connectivity requires strengthened digital cooperation and robust multistakeholder partnerships—cornerstones of these initiatives.
As highlighted in the Dubai Declaration, adopted at the 3rd UNESCO World OER Congress held in Dubai on 19-20 November 2024, where experts from 110 countries convened, harnessing the power of open solutions is critical to advancing the Global Digital Compact and strengthening digital public goods. The declaration underscores the transformative potential of open solutions in fostering content and digital cooperation, bridging persistent digital divides, and ensuring inclusive access to knowledge.
Open Educational Resources (OER) embody the principles of non-discrimination, accessibility, and inclusiveness enshrined in the 2019 UNESCO Recommendation on OER. By empowering users to utilize openly licensed content, OER directly contribute to digital inclusion and digital cooperation possibilities in support of SDG implementation. OER specifically reinforce Commitments 1 ("Leave no one behind") and 7 ("Improve digital cooperation") of Our Common Agenda by bolstering the Global Digital Compact and establishing digital commons as vital global public goods.
To effectively implement the 2019 UNESCO OER Recommendation, stakeholders must create enabling environments for digital inclusion. This involves providing policy advice, technical support, and capacity-building initiatives to strengthen collaboration and promote shared access to knowledge. Leveraging the IGF as a platform for dialogue, best practice sharing, and resource mobilization is crucial for fostering partnerships and networks that accelerate digital inclusion.
A thematic session on open solutions and digital public goods is vital to advancing these objectives. Such a session would highlight actionable strategies for addressing the digital divide, demonstrate the role of open solutions such as OER in achieving equitable access to knowledge, and showcase innovative partnerships that drive digital transformation. This focus aligns with the broader goals of the IGF, reinforcing the role of open solutions as a cornerstone of inclusive digital ecosystems.
Addressing this digital inequity is central to key global initiatives such as the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),which prioritizes digital inclusion and equitable access to the benefits of digital transformation. Achieving universal connectivity requires strengthened digital cooperation and robust multistakeholder partnerships—cornerstones of these initiatives.
As highlighted in the Dubai Declaration, adopted at the 3rd UNESCO World OER Congress held in Dubai on 19-20 November 2024, where experts from 110 countries convened, harnessing the power of open solutions is critical to advancing the Global Digital Compact and strengthening digital public goods. The declaration underscores the transformative potential of open solutions in fostering content and digital cooperation, bridging persistent digital divides, and ensuring inclusive access to knowledge.
Open Educational Resources (OER) embody the principles of non-discrimination, accessibility, and inclusiveness enshrined in the 2019 UNESCO Recommendation on OER. By empowering users to utilize openly licensed content, OER directly contribute to digital inclusion and digital cooperation possibilities in support of SDG implementation. OER specifically reinforce Commitments 1 ("Leave no one behind") and 7 ("Improve digital cooperation") of Our Common Agenda by bolstering the Global Digital Compact and establishing digital commons as vital global public goods.
To effectively implement the 2019 UNESCO OER Recommendation, stakeholders must create enabling environments for digital inclusion. This involves providing policy advice, technical support, and capacity-building initiatives to strengthen collaboration and promote shared access to knowledge. Leveraging the IGF as a platform for dialogue, best practice sharing, and resource mobilization is crucial for fostering partnerships and networks that accelerate digital inclusion.
A thematic session on open solutions and digital public goods is vital to advancing these objectives. Such a session would highlight actionable strategies for addressing the digital divide, demonstrate the role of open solutions such as OER in achieving equitable access to knowledge, and showcase innovative partnerships that drive digital transformation. This focus aligns with the broader goals of the IGF, reinforcing the role of open solutions as a cornerstone of inclusive digital ecosystems.
The IGF's multistakeholder approach, involving governments, the private sector, civil society, and the technical community, is essential for addressing the complex issues related to the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS process. It can provide a platform for all stakeholders to actively contribute to the implementation and review processes. This platform could also allow for insights on aligning digital governance with SDGs, while discussing key challenges and future directions. It is imperative that the perspectives of women, youth, indigenous communities, and other underrepresented groups are fully integrated into discussions on digital governance. Additionally, the focus on cross-cutting themes (e.g gender equality, youth engagement, inclusion of persons with disabilities, human rights, international collaboration, emerging technologies, sustainability and climate action, digital governance) will ensure a comprehensive, inclusive approach to tackling digital challenges on a global scale.
A thematic session on Open Solutions and digital public goods is essential for advancing key objectives related to digital inclusion and digital cooperation. This session would spotlight actionable strategies for addressing the digital divide, emphasizing the transformative role of Open Educational Resources (OER) in ensuring equitable access to knowledge. Additionally, it would showcase innovative partnerships and initiatives that drive digital transformation and foster collaboration across sectors.
To enhance the IGF's impact, particularly for the 2025 WSIS+20 Review and Global Digital Compact (GDC) support, the program could be structured around WSIS Action Lines, with clear mapping to GDC principles, using visual cues for easy navigation. Sessions should be outcome-oriented, generating concrete outputs for both reviews. Dynamic Coalitions should have increased visibility and structured engagement, contributing directly to thematic tracks. Inclusivity and accessibility must be prioritized through enhanced hybrid participation, universal accessibility features, and a robust diversity strategy.
To enhance the IGF's impact, particularly for the 2025 WSIS+20 Review and Global Digital Compact (GDC) support, the program could be structured around WSIS Action Lines, with clear mapping to GDC principles, using visual cues for easy navigation. Sessions should be outcome-oriented, generating concrete outputs for both reviews. Dynamic Coalitions should have increased visibility and structured engagement, contributing directly to thematic tracks. Inclusivity and accessibility must be prioritized through enhanced hybrid participation, universal accessibility features, and a robust diversity strategy.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID259
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Media and Content
-
-
-
Civil Society
ID260
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Internet governance, including:
- the evolution of the multistayholder model;
- internationalization of Internet governance;
- development of international regulatory framework related to the Internet governance, with special focus on the critical infrastructure of the public core.
- the evolution of the multistayholder model;
- internationalization of Internet governance;
- development of international regulatory framework related to the Internet governance, with special focus on the critical infrastructure of the public core.
Although the Geneva Declaration of Principles and the Tunis Agenda remain fully relevant, it is clear that much remains to be done in terms of their implementation and achieving the goals and objectives of the WSIS process based on them. There is still no international regulatory framework for Internet governance, despite the declaration in the Tunis agenda on the need to implement " principles, norms, rules, decision-making procedures, and programmes that shape the evolution and use of the Internet," there are not only developed and adopted such norms, rules and procedures, but the prospect of their development is not even visible. Work on the internationalization of the Internet governance system is not underway.
Within the framework of IGF 2025, proposals could be discussed and prepared with a special focus on practical actions for the internationalization of Internet governance. To develop proposals within the framework of IGF 2025 for international regulatory framework related to the Internet governance, with special focus on the critical infrastructure of the public core.
Within the framework of IGF 2025, proposals could be discussed and prepared with a special focus on practical actions for the internationalization of Internet governance. To develop proposals within the framework of IGF 2025 for international regulatory framework related to the Internet governance, with special focus on the critical infrastructure of the public core.
It seems appropriate to organize a separate government track, where it would be possible to organize the possibility of direct dialogue between the Internet community and representatives of government agencies and organizations directly implementing Internet regulation.
Government
ID261
Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
Digital services are an important part of children's lives. Social media applications are popular for peer interaction and entertainment. Children also have a right to participation that extends to the digital space. Given the risks of using social media, to what extent can this right be restricted, thereby limiting children's access to social media? Is a ban necessary or are there other options that take into account the risks while recognising the positive aspects and opportunities of the applications? Are mandatory structural precautionary measures functional alternatives to enable children to grow up well with media?
Government
ID262
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID263
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Children's rights online and youth participation should be a more integral part across IGF sessions
Civil Society
ID264
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Cybersecurity remains an important topic. How can organisations best a) protect themselves and b) be protected by their digital environment?
How does the world protect itself better against a) attacks on infrastructure and b) false content?
A new discussion ought to be about the way big tech questions legislation on privacy, services, etc. What is the role of government(s) in oversight of the Internet? Is it any different from oversight on food, transport, health, etc.?
How does the world protect itself better against a) attacks on infrastructure and b) false content?
A new discussion ought to be about the way big tech questions legislation on privacy, services, etc. What is the role of government(s) in oversight of the Internet? Is it any different from oversight on food, transport, health, etc.?
First, make an overview of what the intersessional activities for 2025 are and what are the expected outputs in Lillestrom? Second, how are these connected to the WSIS process, the GDC or other U.N. and beyond processes? Third, lead on connecting them and fourth, make sure the outcomes are known a) within the IGF community and b) the outside processes.
In general the current set up works well in my opinion.
What can be improved upon, is how intersessional work interacts with the IGF programme and individual sessions. The MAG has the overview of the whole programme and can connect individual sessions with the intersessional processes. Make the question on how a proposal relates to relevant intersessional work and how the organiser connects his/her proposal to this work mandatory to answer in the application process.
What can be a new track, is the presentation of output of intersessional processes, e.g. as part of the plenary meeting. This way more people are made aware of (the results of) intersessional work and will become more inclined to join it and/or fund it.
What can be improved upon, is how intersessional work interacts with the IGF programme and individual sessions. The MAG has the overview of the whole programme and can connect individual sessions with the intersessional processes. Make the question on how a proposal relates to relevant intersessional work and how the organiser connects his/her proposal to this work mandatory to answer in the application process.
What can be a new track, is the presentation of output of intersessional processes, e.g. as part of the plenary meeting. This way more people are made aware of (the results of) intersessional work and will become more inclined to join it and/or fund it.
Private Sector
ID265
Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Within the three themes selected above, we recommend including the following sub-focus areas:
Digital Cooperation: This thematic area can include a focus on multistakeholder approaches that build consensus on how the internet should be governed given that last year was a pivotal moment for policy conversations on internet governance (e.g., WSIS+20, GDC, NetMundial+10, the Summit of the Future, etc.). This topic could also examine how to ensure voices from underrepresented groups are fully represented in these important conversations, such as representatives from the local private sector and civil society throughout the Global Majority, as well as persons with disabilities, refugees, and other marginalized communities. Moreover, we recommend considering artificial intelligence and emerging technologies as two additional sub-themes (see final question).
Economic Issues and Development: We recommend including a focus area on how to ensure that policies and regulations impacting the online space foster an inclusive digital economy. This theme would benefit from additional engagement with private sector organizations including those representing small and medium-sized businesses, entrepreneurs, and those in the digital “gig” workforce. Additionally, more attention to the economic costs of implementing the GDC in Global Majority countries, especially for ICT infrastructure is recommended.
Rights and Freedoms: This thematic area can include an emphasis on supporting the development of coalitions that advance rights and freedoms to protect the survival of democracy in the digital age. Given the IGF Parliamentarian Track, this topic could also include a sub-theme on how stakeholders can better coordinate with parliamentarians and raise digital rights concerns at the national or regional levels, especially across the Global Majority.
Digital Cooperation: This thematic area can include a focus on multistakeholder approaches that build consensus on how the internet should be governed given that last year was a pivotal moment for policy conversations on internet governance (e.g., WSIS+20, GDC, NetMundial+10, the Summit of the Future, etc.). This topic could also examine how to ensure voices from underrepresented groups are fully represented in these important conversations, such as representatives from the local private sector and civil society throughout the Global Majority, as well as persons with disabilities, refugees, and other marginalized communities. Moreover, we recommend considering artificial intelligence and emerging technologies as two additional sub-themes (see final question).
Economic Issues and Development: We recommend including a focus area on how to ensure that policies and regulations impacting the online space foster an inclusive digital economy. This theme would benefit from additional engagement with private sector organizations including those representing small and medium-sized businesses, entrepreneurs, and those in the digital “gig” workforce. Additionally, more attention to the economic costs of implementing the GDC in Global Majority countries, especially for ICT infrastructure is recommended.
Rights and Freedoms: This thematic area can include an emphasis on supporting the development of coalitions that advance rights and freedoms to protect the survival of democracy in the digital age. Given the IGF Parliamentarian Track, this topic could also include a sub-theme on how stakeholders can better coordinate with parliamentarians and raise digital rights concerns at the national or regional levels, especially across the Global Majority.
The global IGF and regional IGFs could organize additional consultations to examine how diverse stakeholder groups such as civil society, the local private sector, and government can work together to uphold key digital rights mentioned in the Global Digital Compact (GDC). As outlined by the Open Internet for Democracy Initiative, “continuous coordination across diverse stakeholder groups is essential to build trust, exchange ideas, and reach consensus on a wide range of issues impacting the future of democracy online.” (See the full submission of the feedback on the GDC from the Open Internet for Democracy Initiative here: https://www.un.org/techenvoy/sites/www.un.org.techenvoy/files/GDC-submission_Open_Internet_for_Democracy.pdf )
We encourage the IGF to consider expanding the topic of Digital Cooperation to include artificial intelligence and emerging technologies as sub-themes. As part of this approach, the IGF could also explore the ongoing financing of emerging technologies, innovation, and implementation of the GDC especially as it relates to licensing, cybersecurity, and upkeep of digital public infrastructure (DPI).
Civil Society
ID266
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
IGF organization and role, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
N/A
As we approach the WSIS+20 review, it is critical to reinforce the valuable lessons and outcomes from the WSIS process. The IGF, a core achievement of the WSIS, has provided an exemplary platform for bottom-up discussions, enabling diverse stakeholders to contribute knowledge and expertise to collaboratively shape policy approaches that harness the Internet’s potential for global benefit. The IGF’s unique convening role is a central asset for advancing the WSIS vision.
In its nearly 20 years of operation, the IGF and its numerous national and regional initiatives (NRIs) and intersessional work have advanced cooperation, enhanced technical expertise, and produced intersessional output in the form of best practices and policy insights bringing together stakeholders at national, regional, and global levels to address policy issues inclusively.
Looking ahead to the IGF 2025, particularly considering the critical role it will play in the preparation for the WSIS+20 review, it is vital to ensure that the event's format and thematic design evolve to meet those specific needs. To enhance the IGF’s input to the WSIS+20 review, a dedicated track or theme should be introduced to focus specifically on the review process. This track would provide a platform for the IGF community to review and contribute to the available documents and information prior to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
This thematic track could be structured in a simplified manner, to include workshops, discussions, and/or focus groups focused on specific aspects of the WSIS+20 review. Additionally, it would provide an opportunity to explore how the IGF outcomes can be shaped in a way that are action oriented, and directly influence the preparatory process ahead of the high-level meeting.
The Host Country, IGF Secretariat, and UN DESA will play a crucial role in establishing a clear communication channel with the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review as we prepare for IGF 2025. It is equally important to ensure that the co-facilitators are present at the discussions in Norway, enabling meaningful dialogue with the community and allowing them to share their input on the process. By creating a focused, collaborative space, this track will provide participants with the opportunity to collectively shape the review process and ensure that the IGF's contributions are closely aligned with the WSIS+20 review.
The objectives outlined in the Global Digital Compact (GDC), adopted at the Summit of the Future, call for a bottom-up governance model that fosters a culture of cooperation. The GDC acknowledges and commits to the spirit of the WSIS outcomes, recognizing them as strong foundations for advancing global digital cooperation. To effectively support this, the follow-up and implementation of the GDC must be inclusive, bottom-up, and transparent, enabling all stakeholders to contribute meaningfully and offer their expertise. This approach not only ensures legitimacy and credibility but also provides the flexibility needed to quickly adapt to evolving technologies and issues, while minimizing unintended consequences.
In practical terms, the IGF should allocate time at its annual meeting to focus on discussing the implementation of the GDC’s five objectives, along with the challenges and best practices in advancing these commitments. The IGF should be leveraged as an opportunity to hear from all stakeholders on their efforts and progress in implementing the GDC. It is essential, however, that the GDC is not treated as a separate process from the WSIS+20 review but instead integrated into it. The IGF provides an appropriate platform to bridge these discussions, ensuring that the implementation of the GDC contributes directly to the WSIS+20 review process. Furthermore, it is crucial that the dialogue remains open to all stakeholders, including the private sector, so they can play an active role in realizing the commitments set forth by the GDC.
In its nearly 20 years of operation, the IGF and its numerous national and regional initiatives (NRIs) and intersessional work have advanced cooperation, enhanced technical expertise, and produced intersessional output in the form of best practices and policy insights bringing together stakeholders at national, regional, and global levels to address policy issues inclusively.
Looking ahead to the IGF 2025, particularly considering the critical role it will play in the preparation for the WSIS+20 review, it is vital to ensure that the event's format and thematic design evolve to meet those specific needs. To enhance the IGF’s input to the WSIS+20 review, a dedicated track or theme should be introduced to focus specifically on the review process. This track would provide a platform for the IGF community to review and contribute to the available documents and information prior to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
This thematic track could be structured in a simplified manner, to include workshops, discussions, and/or focus groups focused on specific aspects of the WSIS+20 review. Additionally, it would provide an opportunity to explore how the IGF outcomes can be shaped in a way that are action oriented, and directly influence the preparatory process ahead of the high-level meeting.
The Host Country, IGF Secretariat, and UN DESA will play a crucial role in establishing a clear communication channel with the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review as we prepare for IGF 2025. It is equally important to ensure that the co-facilitators are present at the discussions in Norway, enabling meaningful dialogue with the community and allowing them to share their input on the process. By creating a focused, collaborative space, this track will provide participants with the opportunity to collectively shape the review process and ensure that the IGF's contributions are closely aligned with the WSIS+20 review.
The objectives outlined in the Global Digital Compact (GDC), adopted at the Summit of the Future, call for a bottom-up governance model that fosters a culture of cooperation. The GDC acknowledges and commits to the spirit of the WSIS outcomes, recognizing them as strong foundations for advancing global digital cooperation. To effectively support this, the follow-up and implementation of the GDC must be inclusive, bottom-up, and transparent, enabling all stakeholders to contribute meaningfully and offer their expertise. This approach not only ensures legitimacy and credibility but also provides the flexibility needed to quickly adapt to evolving technologies and issues, while minimizing unintended consequences.
In practical terms, the IGF should allocate time at its annual meeting to focus on discussing the implementation of the GDC’s five objectives, along with the challenges and best practices in advancing these commitments. The IGF should be leveraged as an opportunity to hear from all stakeholders on their efforts and progress in implementing the GDC. It is essential, however, that the GDC is not treated as a separate process from the WSIS+20 review but instead integrated into it. The IGF provides an appropriate platform to bridge these discussions, ensuring that the implementation of the GDC contributes directly to the WSIS+20 review process. Furthermore, it is crucial that the dialogue remains open to all stakeholders, including the private sector, so they can play an active role in realizing the commitments set forth by the GDC.
Looking ahead to the IGF 2025, particularly considering the critical role it will play in the preparation for the WSIS+20 review, it is vital to ensure that the event's format and thematic design evolve to meet those specific needs. To enhance the IGF’s input to the WSIS+20 review, a dedicated track or theme should be introduced to focus specifically on the review process. This track would provide a platform for the IGF community to review and contribute to the available documents and information prior to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
This thematic track could be structured in a simplified manner, to include workshops, discussions, and/or focus groups focused on specific aspects of the WSIS+20 review. Additionally, it would provide an opportunity to explore how the IGF outcomes can be shaped in a way that are action oriented, and directly influence the preparatory process ahead of the high-level meeting.
The Host Country, IGF Secretariat, and UN DESA will play a crucial role in establishing a clear communication channel with the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review as we prepare for IGF 2025. It is equally important to ensure that the co-facilitators are present at the discussions in Norway, enabling meaningful dialogue with the community and allowing them to share their input on the process. By creating a focused, collaborative space, this track will provide participants with the opportunity to collectively shape the review process and ensure that the IGF's contributions are closely aligned with the WSIS+20 review.
The objectives outlined in the Global Digital Compact (GDC), adopted at the Summit of the Future, call for a bottom-up governance model that fosters a culture of cooperation. The GDC acknowledges and commits to the spirit of the WSIS outcomes, recognizing them as strong foundations for advancing global digital cooperation. To effectively support this, the follow-up and implementation of the GDC must be inclusive, bottom-up, and transparent, enabling all stakeholders to contribute meaningfully and offer their expertise. This approach not only ensures legitimacy and credibility but also provides the flexibility needed to quickly adapt to evolving technologies and issues, while minimizing unintended consequences.
In practical terms, the IGF should allocate time at its annual meeting to focus on discussing the implementation of the GDC’s five objectives, along with the challenges and best practices in advancing these commitments. The IGF should be leveraged as an opportunity to hear from all stakeholders on their efforts and progress in implementing the GDC. It is essential, however, that the GDC is not treated as a separate process from the WSIS+20 review but instead integrated into it. The IGF provides an appropriate platform to bridge these discussions, ensuring that the implementation of the GDC contributes directly to the WSIS+20 review process. Furthermore, it is crucial that the dialogue remains open to all stakeholders, including the private sector, so they can play an active role in realizing the commitments set forth by the GDC.
This thematic track could be structured in a simplified manner, to include workshops, discussions, and/or focus groups focused on specific aspects of the WSIS+20 review. Additionally, it would provide an opportunity to explore how the IGF outcomes can be shaped in a way that are action oriented, and directly influence the preparatory process ahead of the high-level meeting.
The Host Country, IGF Secretariat, and UN DESA will play a crucial role in establishing a clear communication channel with the co-facilitators of the WSIS+20 review as we prepare for IGF 2025. It is equally important to ensure that the co-facilitators are present at the discussions in Norway, enabling meaningful dialogue with the community and allowing them to share their input on the process. By creating a focused, collaborative space, this track will provide participants with the opportunity to collectively shape the review process and ensure that the IGF's contributions are closely aligned with the WSIS+20 review.
The objectives outlined in the Global Digital Compact (GDC), adopted at the Summit of the Future, call for a bottom-up governance model that fosters a culture of cooperation. The GDC acknowledges and commits to the spirit of the WSIS outcomes, recognizing them as strong foundations for advancing global digital cooperation. To effectively support this, the follow-up and implementation of the GDC must be inclusive, bottom-up, and transparent, enabling all stakeholders to contribute meaningfully and offer their expertise. This approach not only ensures legitimacy and credibility but also provides the flexibility needed to quickly adapt to evolving technologies and issues, while minimizing unintended consequences.
In practical terms, the IGF should allocate time at its annual meeting to focus on discussing the implementation of the GDC’s five objectives, along with the challenges and best practices in advancing these commitments. The IGF should be leveraged as an opportunity to hear from all stakeholders on their efforts and progress in implementing the GDC. It is essential, however, that the GDC is not treated as a separate process from the WSIS+20 review but instead integrated into it. The IGF provides an appropriate platform to bridge these discussions, ensuring that the implementation of the GDC contributes directly to the WSIS+20 review process. Furthermore, it is crucial that the dialogue remains open to all stakeholders, including the private sector, so they can play an active role in realizing the commitments set forth by the GDC.
Private Sector
ID267
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
I believe it is essential for IGF 2025 to identify specific actions and processes to be integrated into its agenda to demonstrate how the IGF supports processes like the GDC. This connection to the GDC should be emphasized not only in the agenda-setting process but also in the IGF's messages to ensure stronger alignment with the GDC’s objectives.
Government
ID268
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, International cooperation on data, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
The implementation of the GDC and the follow-up on the WSIS should be complementary and occupy a prominent place within the IGF agenda, as this is the most appropriate forum for such discussions. Having a "main/high-level session" dedicated to both processes, providing updates and addressing implementation challenges and goal fulfillment by stakeholders, is essential for advancing digital governance. These sessions should assess progress toward the WSIS action lines and the GDC objectives. Additionally, a greater alignment between the IGF annual themes with the GDC principles could foster the coordination between the processes.
In particular, government representatives (who can coordinate efforts with the Parliamentary Track) and international agencies—especially the facilitators of WSIS (who can organize within the Open Forums)—should report their achievements and gather feedback from other stakeholders. Both moments can also include the participation of a representative from the UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET), which is responsible for coordinating the GDC implementation efforts.
In particular, government representatives (who can coordinate efforts with the Parliamentary Track) and international agencies—especially the facilitators of WSIS (who can organize within the Open Forums)—should report their achievements and gather feedback from other stakeholders. Both moments can also include the participation of a representative from the UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET), which is responsible for coordinating the GDC implementation efforts.
As stated in the Netmundial+10 Declaration, the IGF should serve as a node to connect national and regional initiatives, fostering dialogue and enhancing coordination on global Internet Governance discussions. To this end, there could be a main session dedicated specifically to share best practices related to regional challenges. Taking place on the first day of the event, this session would present messages from the regional IGFs in order to provide input for the global discussions. This would also require better coordination within the regional initiatives in order to align its discussions with the global IGF and define the themes to be tackled each year.
Civil Society
ID269
Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Government
ID270
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
The World Benchmarking Alliance (WBA) assesses the world’s 200 most influential digital technology companies based on their contributions to advancing digital inclusion. This encompasses areas such as digital access, usage, skills, and innovation (i.e. responsible and ethical AI use). Our work accelerates tech accountability and, therefore, supports the implementation of Article 32(b) of the Global Digital Compact, which calls for "[...] industry accountability frameworks [...]." We seek to achieve this by providing insights & data and enhancing the transparency and accountability of technology companies regarding digital inclusion through benchmarking exercises, aligned with the objective of Action 55(c) of the Pact of the Future, while also contributing to policy discussions on the necessity of public standards that enable these companies to further enable digital inclusion for all. We seek to support GDC implementation to drive and uphold global norms on business responsibility.
The commitments from Member States outlined in the GDC, together with the call on technology companies to contribute to a sustainable digital future, should be upheld, expanded, and integrated with existing regulatory frameworks to strengthen global norms. This will help shape national frameworks and ensure that companies make meaningful progress. To achieve this, UN Member States need to ensure the implementation of the GDC includes a mechanism to develop global norms for technology companies, in collaboration with other stakeholders, and part of existing global processes such as the WSIS+20 review in 2025.
The commitments from Member States outlined in the GDC, together with the call on technology companies to contribute to a sustainable digital future, should be upheld, expanded, and integrated with existing regulatory frameworks to strengthen global norms. This will help shape national frameworks and ensure that companies make meaningful progress. To achieve this, UN Member States need to ensure the implementation of the GDC includes a mechanism to develop global norms for technology companies, in collaboration with other stakeholders, and part of existing global processes such as the WSIS+20 review in 2025.
Civil Society
ID271
Digital Cooperation, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
A key focus of IGF 2025 should be the future of internet governance. IGF 2025 should engage with these dialogues as a distinct thematic area or track (e.g., “future of internet governance,”; issues: “Global Digital Compact implementation”; “WSIS +20”), while also integrating and highlighting key aspects of these discussions across its other selected thematic areas as and where appropriate.
Wherever possible, the IGF’s annual meeting and intersessional work should directly contribute to dialogues and decisions related to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)+20 Review.
These contributions should be fostered and developed through thematic and programming choices (such as those suggested above) and subsequent outcome reports from the annual meeting and National Regional Initiatives (NRI), and the activities of the IGF Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions. They should showcase the IGF’s role as the premier example of multistakeholder dialogue and its impact on global, regional and national levels.
Drawing on the outcomes of this work, representatives of the IGF infrastructure (e.g., Secretariat, Leadership Panel, Multistakeholder Advisory Group) should routinely engage in multistakeholder inputs to the GDC implementation and WSIS+20 Review (e.g., written submissions, townhalls) and with national governments involved in state-to-state negotiations. We also encourage representatives of the IGF’s NRIs, Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions to make their own interventions and contributions to these dialogues.
The IGF should also work in close coordination with the newly formed UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET), which has, among other things, been tasked with the follow up and review of the GDC. Formerly the Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology (OSET), one of ODET’s key functions is to “strengthen system-wide coordination within and across the United Nations on digital and emerging technologies”.
Given this mandate and the well-documented funding challenges of the IGF, we call on ODET to lead on this engagement and ensure the IGF’s multistakeholder outcomes are integrated into the GDC’s implementation.
These contributions should be fostered and developed through thematic and programming choices (such as those suggested above) and subsequent outcome reports from the annual meeting and National Regional Initiatives (NRI), and the activities of the IGF Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions. They should showcase the IGF’s role as the premier example of multistakeholder dialogue and its impact on global, regional and national levels.
Drawing on the outcomes of this work, representatives of the IGF infrastructure (e.g., Secretariat, Leadership Panel, Multistakeholder Advisory Group) should routinely engage in multistakeholder inputs to the GDC implementation and WSIS+20 Review (e.g., written submissions, townhalls) and with national governments involved in state-to-state negotiations. We also encourage representatives of the IGF’s NRIs, Policy Networks and Dynamic Coalitions to make their own interventions and contributions to these dialogues.
The IGF should also work in close coordination with the newly formed UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET), which has, among other things, been tasked with the follow up and review of the GDC. Formerly the Office of the Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology (OSET), one of ODET’s key functions is to “strengthen system-wide coordination within and across the United Nations on digital and emerging technologies”.
Given this mandate and the well-documented funding challenges of the IGF, we call on ODET to lead on this engagement and ensure the IGF’s multistakeholder outcomes are integrated into the GDC’s implementation.
The IGF should further engage and incorporate NRI viewpoints into the design of the IGF. The NRI community is essential for diverse regional representation at—and bottom-up, grassroots input to—the IGF. Further NRI input to the IGF program and discussion design will support community-driven, multistakeholder dialogue that is reflective of local priorities across the globe. Also, the NRI Main Session should take place early in the IGF agenda to ensure that the associated dialogue and insights inform and permeate the week’s remaining sessions.
Technical Community
ID272
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and its inter-sessional work contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) by leveraging its multi-stakeholder model to convene diverse voices, including governments, civil society, private sector, and technical communities, ensuring balanced representation from all regions, particularly the Global South. To strengthen its impact, the IGF can establish dedicated working groups or forums specifically focused on GDC and WSIS reviews, creating a continuous dialogue around these frameworks. Additionally, the IGF can develop a repository of case studies and policy recommendations aligned with GDC priorities, serving as a knowledge-sharing platform for best practices and innovative approaches to digital governance.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can enhance its structure by adopting clearly defined thematic tracks aligned with global priorities and establishing continuous thematic working groups as part of its inter-sessional work. This approach would allow for ongoing collaboration on policy issues beyond the annual meeting, fostering sustained dialogue and progress. A relevant example can be drawn from the Data for Policy global community of interest, a diverse group of stakeholders exploring the possibilities and implications of data science, AI, and related technologies in governance and policymaking. The Data for Policy community operates under a comprehensive framework comprising six interdisciplinary and cross-sector focus areas, emphasising translational methodologies, tools, and practices that bridge the gap between data insights and policy decisions.
The six focus areas of the Data for Policy are:
Digital and Data-Driven Transformations in Governance
Policy and Literacy for Data
Ethics, Equity, and Trustworthiness
Algorithmic Governance
Global Challenges and Dynamic Threats
Each focus area has a dedicated committee of experts responsible for leading the peer review of conference and journal submissions, as well as engaging with the wider community to encourage new submissions and interdisciplinary thinking.
By adopting a similar structured framework, IGF could facilitate deeper, continuous engagement with key policy areas, encourage expert-driven policy discussions, and produce more actionable outcomes aligned with global digital governance priorities.
The six focus areas of the Data for Policy are:
Digital and Data-Driven Transformations in Governance
Policy and Literacy for Data
Ethics, Equity, and Trustworthiness
Algorithmic Governance
Global Challenges and Dynamic Threats
Each focus area has a dedicated committee of experts responsible for leading the peer review of conference and journal submissions, as well as engaging with the wider community to encourage new submissions and interdisciplinary thinking.
By adopting a similar structured framework, IGF could facilitate deeper, continuous engagement with key policy areas, encourage expert-driven policy discussions, and produce more actionable outcomes aligned with global digital governance priorities.
Civil Society
ID273
Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
To promote meaningful multilingual connectivity and internet access, online intermediaries and technology companies must invest in resources to develop and test their systems in languages beyond English. Currently, companies do not adequately train and test their systems due to a lack of high-quality non-English datasets and benchmarks because of limited availability, high development costs, and insufficient prioritization of multilingual capabilities. The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) provides a platform where technology companies, researchers, and civil society can collaborate on promoting multilingual technology access, securing systems against multilingual threats, and developing solutions. Through this platform, IGF can connect companies with existing multilingual resources and benchmarks developed by academics and civil society organizations that currently lack channels to share these resources directly with companies to assess and use.
The proliferation of spyware is threatening human rights on a global scale. Despite revelations related to the 2021 Pegasus Project, and the commencement of multilateral and multi stakeholder engagements such as the Pall Mall process, very little has actually been done to reign in the spread of commercial spyware, or to control governmental use of commercial or homegrown spyware. The Internet Governance Forum can provide a space in which the rare successful measures to combat spyware abuse can be highlighted as examples in one country that can be emulated in others. These measures include trade sanctions against spyware abusers and litigation under computer fraud laws brought by providers of communications services. The presence at IGF of stakeholders from industry, government and civil society makes it an ideal forum to explore approaches to the spyware problem that work, and that can work better if more widely adopted.
The proliferation of spyware is threatening human rights on a global scale. Despite revelations related to the 2021 Pegasus Project, and the commencement of multilateral and multi stakeholder engagements such as the Pall Mall process, very little has actually been done to reign in the spread of commercial spyware, or to control governmental use of commercial or homegrown spyware. The Internet Governance Forum can provide a space in which the rare successful measures to combat spyware abuse can be highlighted as examples in one country that can be emulated in others. These measures include trade sanctions against spyware abusers and litigation under computer fraud laws brought by providers of communications services. The presence at IGF of stakeholders from industry, government and civil society makes it an ideal forum to explore approaches to the spyware problem that work, and that can work better if more widely adopted.
N/A
N/A
Civil Society
ID274
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
The multistakeholder-developed, NETMundial+10 Sao Paulo declaration noted the importance of avoiding fragmentaiton and duplication of fora through better coordination around digital governance and pointed out the paritcularly important role that the IGF can and should play in this regard: "The Internet Governance Forum can deliver on this need, by strengthening its coordination and information-sharing roles. It should also serve as a venue for follow up of multilateral digital policy agreements (see Section 4), given its broad mandate. The IGF’s open nature, hybrid approach, intersessional processes, connections with local, national and regional initiatives, and inclusive design make it suitable for these responsibilities. To deliver on expectations for coordination and information-sharing, new working methods may need to be developed, and new financial and human resources would be essential.”
The Declaration also pointed out that “[f]or many reasons the IGF is the appropriate venue to follow up and monitor implementation of the GDC’s commitments. … The IGF with its multistakeholder structures and mechanisms should be used as a space to facilitate implementation, monitoring and follow up of the Global Digital Compact, … through the WSIS Action Lines, making use of the WSIS Forum and with the UN CSTD providing a platform for intergovernmental engagement in the monitoring and follow up process. The GDC should avoid eroding the relevance of the IGF and the multistakeholder approach in Internet governance and digital policy processes.”
The Declaration also pointed out that “[f]or many reasons the IGF is the appropriate venue to follow up and monitor implementation of the GDC’s commitments. … The IGF with its multistakeholder structures and mechanisms should be used as a space to facilitate implementation, monitoring and follow up of the Global Digital Compact, … through the WSIS Action Lines, making use of the WSIS Forum and with the UN CSTD providing a platform for intergovernmental engagement in the monitoring and follow up process. The GDC should avoid eroding the relevance of the IGF and the multistakeholder approach in Internet governance and digital policy processes.”
There would be real value in creating more spaces and opportunities for less structured, multistakeholder engagement on concrete topics. Panels, while informative, often do not feature or invite sufficient interactivity among participants.
Civil Society
ID275
Cybersecurity and Trust, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Private Sector
ID276
Data Governance, Media and Content, Rights and Freedoms
I consider it important to talk about inclusion and accessibility in a cross-cutting way on the subject of the Internet.
Organize short regional workshops or roundtables to identify challenges and areas for joint work and cooperate on common agendas.
Perhaps the events could be organized by tags, for example research, partnerships, workshops, networking, etc.
Civil Society
ID277
Digital Cooperation
Promoting and protecting digital public goods through a robust digital commons is crucial for addressing the Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) region’s unique challenges, including the digital divide, cultural preservation, and regional innovation. A digital commons fosters equity by providing free access to essential tools and knowledge, enabling local innovation, and safeguarding cultural diversity. It also helps resist digital colonialism by supporting digital sovereignty and aligns with global goals like the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. The LACIGF is an ideal forum for fostering multistakeholder collaboration to develop policies and strategies that ensure the sustainability of digital public goods, empowering the region to lead in building an inclusive, equitable, and resilient digital future.
Aligning Themes and Sessions with GDC and WSIS Priorities. Enhance the IGF outputs to include actionable recommendations linked explicitly to GDC and WSIS objectives
Civil Society
ID278
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Uso no ético de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa en elecciones
Civil Society
ID279
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
It would be important to think in activities more connected to the communities
Civil Society
ID280
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF serves as a worthy platform for the infusion of Multi-stakeholder and multi-lateral processes for the effective implementation of the Global Digitial Compact by all major actors. In the IGF process 2025, the programs and topics should reflect and be related increasingly to the most effective smooth ways of implementing the GDC for the benefit of humanity in the new world order of AI and contribute to the review of the World Summit on the Information Society in the lead up to the high-level meeting end of 2025.
The current format of the IGF seems okay; however, countries with small delegations are still missing out on major debates and discussions during the jamboree. I wish to propose that the Main Sessions be held without any parallel activities to enable all delegates to benefit from the discussions and sharing of regional experiences.
Technical Community
ID281
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance
IA regulations
Government
ID282
Digital Cooperation, Media and Content
Title: Media and Content Production in the Digital Era: Navigating the Global Digital Compact
In an age of rapid digital transformation, media and content production find themselves at the intersection of innovation, governance, and accountability. The Global Digital Compact (GDC) offers a framework designed to foster universal connectivity, uphold human rights, and promote equitable digital governance. This session will explore the intersection of the GDC’s principles with the evolving role of media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities in content production in the digital age.
The GDC aims to build an inclusive, accountable, and innovative shared digital future. This offers opportunities and challenges for media. Emerging technologies like AI, data analytics, and blockchain are transforming content creation, personalization, and distribution, potentially enhancing transparency and diverse voices. However, they also pose challenges, including combating misinformation, addressing algorithmic manipulation, and ensuring equitable digital access.
In an age of rapid digital transformation, media and content production find themselves at the intersection of innovation, governance, and accountability. The Global Digital Compact (GDC) offers a framework designed to foster universal connectivity, uphold human rights, and promote equitable digital governance. This session will explore the intersection of the GDC’s principles with the evolving role of media, focusing on the challenges and opportunities in content production in the digital age.
The GDC aims to build an inclusive, accountable, and innovative shared digital future. This offers opportunities and challenges for media. Emerging technologies like AI, data analytics, and blockchain are transforming content creation, personalization, and distribution, potentially enhancing transparency and diverse voices. However, they also pose challenges, including combating misinformation, addressing algorithmic manipulation, and ensuring equitable digital access.
Integrating media strategically into IGF processes, including the annual meeting and inter-sessional work, will enhance reflection on and contribution to the Global Digital Compact's implementation and the review of WSIS outcomes. By amplifying voices, bridging gaps, and holding stakeholders accountable, media will foster a more inclusive and effective path to the 2025 high-level meeting.
I attended the 2024 IGF in Riyadh and it was my first time. It was a great conference. The venue was great and spacious. For a first timer it was a bit overwhelming but it was very great and I learned a lot. But it was hard for Journalists to cover the event since it was a wireless session especially in the breakout rooms. I hope for the 2025 IGF this can be changed to accommodate recording for storytelling. It was hard to access the sessions one attended. Also the language interpretation was not catered for especially for non English speakers.
Civil Society
ID283
Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
We agree that the IGF should be the DGF, focusing towards the new GDC realities on technologies such as near future changes due to Brain Computer Interfaces, Quantum Computing, AI, Robotics, and Organoids.
We participated in the GDC from inception onwards, and would appreciate more recognition of our ground breaking work in that space. Nobody else at the IGF did what DTC did. We were the only people at the IGF actively participating making any effort to include IGF work both orally and with written submissions.
Youth need a large enough space to facilitate ongoing discussions onsite.
Civil Society
ID284
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID285
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development
Government
ID286
Artificial Intelligence
Intelligence Artificielle (IA)
1. Gouvernance éthique et réglementaire de l’IA :
o Créer des normes internationales sur l’éthique de l’IA.
o Mettre en place des régulateurs indépendants pour surveiller et évaluer les pratiques.
o Renforcer la transparence des décisions algorithmiques.
2. Transparence et responsabilité des systèmes d’IA :
o Imposer des audits réguliers et la publication des critères d’entraînement des modèles.
o Développer des labels d’IA responsable et certifier les systèmes conformes.
o Encourager des cadres de responsabilité juridique en cas de dommages causés par l’IA.
3. IA et inégalités numériques :
o Promouvoir l’accès équitable aux technologies et données nécessaires pour développer l’IA.
o Renforcer les formations en IA dans les pays en développement.
o Soutenir des initiatives d’IA inclusives axées sur la diversité culturelle et linguistique.
1. Gouvernance éthique et réglementaire de l’IA :
o Créer des normes internationales sur l’éthique de l’IA.
o Mettre en place des régulateurs indépendants pour surveiller et évaluer les pratiques.
o Renforcer la transparence des décisions algorithmiques.
2. Transparence et responsabilité des systèmes d’IA :
o Imposer des audits réguliers et la publication des critères d’entraînement des modèles.
o Développer des labels d’IA responsable et certifier les systèmes conformes.
o Encourager des cadres de responsabilité juridique en cas de dommages causés par l’IA.
3. IA et inégalités numériques :
o Promouvoir l’accès équitable aux technologies et données nécessaires pour développer l’IA.
o Renforcer les formations en IA dans les pays en développement.
o Soutenir des initiatives d’IA inclusives axées sur la diversité culturelle et linguistique.
L’IGF 2025 peut mieux refléter et contribuer à ces initiatives mondiales en :
1. Créer un espace de dialogue multipartite :
o Débattre des principes directeurs du Pacte numérique mondial en impliquant les gouvernements, la société civile, le secteur privé et les organisations internationales.
o Favoriser la transparence et la responsabilité dans la mise en œuvre des politiques numériques mondiales.
1. Créer un espace de dialogue multipartite :
o Débattre des principes directeurs du Pacte numérique mondial en impliquant les gouvernements, la société civile, le secteur privé et les organisations internationales.
o Favoriser la transparence et la responsabilité dans la mise en œuvre des politiques numériques mondiales.
Idées sur le format et la conception de l’IGF 2025 :
Approche thématique intégrée :
o Structurer le programme autour de pistes thématiques interconnectées, par exemple :
Gouvernance des données et IA
Innovation technologique et durabilité
Cybersécurité et coopération internationale
o Cela permettrait d’aborder les défis transversaux et de favoriser une approche holistique des discussions.
5. Rapports de suivi et évaluation d’impact :
o Publier des rapports annuels sur les résultats et recommandations de l’IGF, tout en assurant un suivi des progrès dans la mise en œuvre des décisions discutées.
o Utiliser des tableaux de bord interactifs pour suivre en temps réel les engagements pris par les participants et mesurer leur impact.
L’IGF 2025 peut renforcer son rôle en tant que plateforme inclusive pour discuter des défis mondiaux et des opportunités numériques. En mettant l’accent sur des thématiques prioritaires comme l’IA, la cybersécurité et la durabilité, il peut contribuer efficacement à la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et au suivi des objectifs du SMSI+20. Un format plus dynamique et interactif pourrait améliorer la participation et générer des solutions concrètes pour une gouvernance numérique équitable et durable.
Approche thématique intégrée :
o Structurer le programme autour de pistes thématiques interconnectées, par exemple :
Gouvernance des données et IA
Innovation technologique et durabilité
Cybersécurité et coopération internationale
o Cela permettrait d’aborder les défis transversaux et de favoriser une approche holistique des discussions.
5. Rapports de suivi et évaluation d’impact :
o Publier des rapports annuels sur les résultats et recommandations de l’IGF, tout en assurant un suivi des progrès dans la mise en œuvre des décisions discutées.
o Utiliser des tableaux de bord interactifs pour suivre en temps réel les engagements pris par les participants et mesurer leur impact.
L’IGF 2025 peut renforcer son rôle en tant que plateforme inclusive pour discuter des défis mondiaux et des opportunités numériques. En mettant l’accent sur des thématiques prioritaires comme l’IA, la cybersécurité et la durabilité, il peut contribuer efficacement à la mise en œuvre du Pacte numérique mondial et au suivi des objectifs du SMSI+20. Un format plus dynamique et interactif pourrait améliorer la participation et générer des solutions concrètes pour une gouvernance numérique équitable et durable.
Government
ID287
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The rapid development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionized industries and societies, offering immense potential to improve human lives. However, this progress also brings significant ethical challenges and risks, including bias, misinformation, privacy violations, job displacement, and the potential misuse of AI technologies. To address these concerns, it is critical to establish an international convention on AI ethics, anchored in the following principles: Establish a Global Ethical Framework, Mandate Risk Assessment and Mitigation, Strengthen International Collaboration, Establish Accountability and Regulatory Bodies, Promote Public Awareness and Education and Address High-Risk Applications. So, by adopting an international convention on AI ethics, we can create a safer, fairer, and more inclusive AI ecosystem that maximizes its benefits while mitigating its risks, such a convention will provide a unified approach to navigating the ethical dilemmas of AI and ensuring that its development aligns with global human values, this collaborative effort will empower societies to embrace AI responsibly, unlocking its potential to improve lives while safeguarding against its potential harms.
other suggestion, as digital transformation reshapes industries and economies, intellectual property (IP) rights must be embedded as a cornerstone of all related practices to protect innovation, promote creativity, and ensure fair use. This inclusion is critical to fostering a sustainable digital ecosystem where creators, businesses, and consumers can thrive.
This could be achieved by, Establish Clear IP Policies for Digital Innovations, Mandate IP Compliance in Digital Projects, Leverage Technology for IP Protection, Promote IP Awareness and Education, Foster International Collaboration, Incentivize IP-Centric Innovation, and Develop Dispute Resolution Mechanisms.
Integrating IP rights into all practices related to digital transformation is vital for protecting creativity, fostering innovation, and ensuring a balanced digital economy. By prioritizing IP protection, stakeholders can build a resilient digital landscape that rewards originality and safeguards the rights of creators and innovators in an era of rapid technological advancement.
other suggestion, as digital transformation reshapes industries and economies, intellectual property (IP) rights must be embedded as a cornerstone of all related practices to protect innovation, promote creativity, and ensure fair use. This inclusion is critical to fostering a sustainable digital ecosystem where creators, businesses, and consumers can thrive.
This could be achieved by, Establish Clear IP Policies for Digital Innovations, Mandate IP Compliance in Digital Projects, Leverage Technology for IP Protection, Promote IP Awareness and Education, Foster International Collaboration, Incentivize IP-Centric Innovation, and Develop Dispute Resolution Mechanisms.
Integrating IP rights into all practices related to digital transformation is vital for protecting creativity, fostering innovation, and ensuring a balanced digital economy. By prioritizing IP protection, stakeholders can build a resilient digital landscape that rewards originality and safeguards the rights of creators and innovators in an era of rapid technological advancement.
The Internet Governance Forum plays a critical role in addressing global digital challenges, convening stakeholders, and shaping policy dialogue. To ensure that its annual meetings and intersessional work contribute effectively to the outcomes of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS, the Internet Governance Forum could adopt the following strategies:
• Align the topics of the Internet Governance Forum with global agendas, by ensuring that the topics of the Forum explicitly address the priorities identified in the outcomes of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS, for example, focusing on and ensuring universal access to the Internet, fair use, data governance, and capacity building for developing countries.
• Include topics such as human rights, sustainability, and the ethics of artificial intelligence, which are critical to the goals of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS, by fostering effective community initiatives related to these topics.
• Promote multi-stakeholder collaboration, by establishing specific tracks or sessions during Internet Governance Forum meetings dedicated to discussing strategies for advancing and implementing the outcomes of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS.
• Promote the work of dynamic coalitions and the adoption of best practices, by mandating these groups to focus on actionable recommendations and standards to achieve the goals of the GDC and WSIS.
• Incubate policies and recommendations, by using intersessional work to produce targeted policy recommendations that can be submitted to the UN and other relevant bodies for adoption.
• Showcase successful regional and national initiatives that align with the outcomes of the GDC and WSIS, and build successful and effective models for replication.
• Produce concrete and actionable outcome documents from annual IGF meetings, directly linked to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS.
• Collaborate with relevant UN bodies to establish metrics to track progress towards the goals of the GDC and WSIS, with regular updates during IGF sessions.
• Launch initiatives to educate stakeholders on the outcomes of the GDC and WSIS and their relevance to Internet governance.
• Provide capacity building programs, by focusing on equipping stakeholders, especially from underrepresented regions, with the knowledge and tools to meaningfully engage in relevant GDC and WSIS activities.
• Integrating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain and digital transformation, and focusing on ensuring that discussions on emerging technologies address their implications for the World Telecommunication Forum and the World Summit on the Information Society, including ethical considerations and governance frameworks. Through these strategies, the Forum can strengthen its position as a key driver of progress towards the Global Digital Charter and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society, ensuring that its work directly supports global digital transformation and governance efforts leading up to the High-Level Meeting in 2025.
• Align the topics of the Internet Governance Forum with global agendas, by ensuring that the topics of the Forum explicitly address the priorities identified in the outcomes of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS, for example, focusing on and ensuring universal access to the Internet, fair use, data governance, and capacity building for developing countries.
• Include topics such as human rights, sustainability, and the ethics of artificial intelligence, which are critical to the goals of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS, by fostering effective community initiatives related to these topics.
• Promote multi-stakeholder collaboration, by establishing specific tracks or sessions during Internet Governance Forum meetings dedicated to discussing strategies for advancing and implementing the outcomes of the Global Digital Charter and WSIS.
• Promote the work of dynamic coalitions and the adoption of best practices, by mandating these groups to focus on actionable recommendations and standards to achieve the goals of the GDC and WSIS.
• Incubate policies and recommendations, by using intersessional work to produce targeted policy recommendations that can be submitted to the UN and other relevant bodies for adoption.
• Showcase successful regional and national initiatives that align with the outcomes of the GDC and WSIS, and build successful and effective models for replication.
• Produce concrete and actionable outcome documents from annual IGF meetings, directly linked to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS.
• Collaborate with relevant UN bodies to establish metrics to track progress towards the goals of the GDC and WSIS, with regular updates during IGF sessions.
• Launch initiatives to educate stakeholders on the outcomes of the GDC and WSIS and their relevance to Internet governance.
• Provide capacity building programs, by focusing on equipping stakeholders, especially from underrepresented regions, with the knowledge and tools to meaningfully engage in relevant GDC and WSIS activities.
• Integrating emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain and digital transformation, and focusing on ensuring that discussions on emerging technologies address their implications for the World Telecommunication Forum and the World Summit on the Information Society, including ethical considerations and governance frameworks. Through these strategies, the Forum can strengthen its position as a key driver of progress towards the Global Digital Charter and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society, ensuring that its work directly supports global digital transformation and governance efforts leading up to the High-Level Meeting in 2025.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) could benefit from an updated and dynamic format to enhance inclusivity, interactivity, and impact while addressing the complexities of internet governance. Several ideas are proposed to improve the overall format and design of the IGF, including thematic tracks and innovative approaches to addressing key topics.
Instead of broad overarching themes, we propose adopting specific and clear tracks that reflect evolving priorities, such as:
1. Core Tracks: Addressing fundamental issues like universal internet access, scheduled plans to ensure accessibility, and mechanisms that uphold privacy and cybersecurity, thereby ensuring continuity.
2. Emerging Tracks: Tackling areas like AI governance, blockchain, and digital inclusion to ensure safe internet usage and sustainability.
3. Focused Discussions: Encouraging smaller, more targeted discussions to foster collaboration and actionable outcomes, particularly for complex topics.
4. Youth-Led Panels: Incorporating sessions led by innovative young minds to shape future-focused discussions.
5. Outcome Summarization: Synthesizing the results of different tracks into effective, actionable recommendations.
To enhance accessibility and engagement, technology should play a central role:
• Live Polling Tools: Utilize real-time polling during sessions to gauge participant opinions and adjust discussions accordingly.
• Community Engagement: Expand space for civil society and academics to collaborate on drafting global agreements and principles, such as inputs for the Global Digital Compact.
It is equally essential to integrate regional and local concerns into the global agenda, focusing on underrepresented voices, while positioning the IGF as a bridge to other global initiatives. Additionally, creativity and innovation should be emphasized, along with the protection of intellectual property (IP) in global agreements and principles.
In line with this strategy, the Creators Union of Arab, a consultative member of the United Nations Economic and Social Council, which actively supports intellectual property rights, has launched a global platform for protecting IP in the digital environment. This initiative, presented at the IGF 2024 in Riyadh, leverages AI and blockchain technologies to emphasize the importance of creativity and innovation in the digital space.
Furthermore, the union launched the “Digital Safety and Cybersecurity Curriculum” initiative during the IGF 2023 in Kyoto, focusing on creating a safe online environment for children under the supervision of parents and educators.
These initiatives are led by a distinguished group of specialists, academics, and experts. We recommend their global endorsement and implementation to promote innovation, safeguard intellectual property, and ensure a secure digital environment worldwide.
Instead of broad overarching themes, we propose adopting specific and clear tracks that reflect evolving priorities, such as:
1. Core Tracks: Addressing fundamental issues like universal internet access, scheduled plans to ensure accessibility, and mechanisms that uphold privacy and cybersecurity, thereby ensuring continuity.
2. Emerging Tracks: Tackling areas like AI governance, blockchain, and digital inclusion to ensure safe internet usage and sustainability.
3. Focused Discussions: Encouraging smaller, more targeted discussions to foster collaboration and actionable outcomes, particularly for complex topics.
4. Youth-Led Panels: Incorporating sessions led by innovative young minds to shape future-focused discussions.
5. Outcome Summarization: Synthesizing the results of different tracks into effective, actionable recommendations.
To enhance accessibility and engagement, technology should play a central role:
• Live Polling Tools: Utilize real-time polling during sessions to gauge participant opinions and adjust discussions accordingly.
• Community Engagement: Expand space for civil society and academics to collaborate on drafting global agreements and principles, such as inputs for the Global Digital Compact.
It is equally essential to integrate regional and local concerns into the global agenda, focusing on underrepresented voices, while positioning the IGF as a bridge to other global initiatives. Additionally, creativity and innovation should be emphasized, along with the protection of intellectual property (IP) in global agreements and principles.
In line with this strategy, the Creators Union of Arab, a consultative member of the United Nations Economic and Social Council, which actively supports intellectual property rights, has launched a global platform for protecting IP in the digital environment. This initiative, presented at the IGF 2024 in Riyadh, leverages AI and blockchain technologies to emphasize the importance of creativity and innovation in the digital space.
Furthermore, the union launched the “Digital Safety and Cybersecurity Curriculum” initiative during the IGF 2023 in Kyoto, focusing on creating a safe online environment for children under the supervision of parents and educators.
These initiatives are led by a distinguished group of specialists, academics, and experts. We recommend their global endorsement and implementation to promote innovation, safeguard intellectual property, and ensure a secure digital environment worldwide.
Civil Society
ID288
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Rien
Faire participer les maximum des pays
Non
Government
ID289
Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics
The year 2025 shall be widely regarded as a pivotal point in the evolution of governmental and societal attitudes towards technology.as we older and younger generations of human beings are immerse in the XXIst Century.
The next questions or issues of interest IGF must take in account should focus on a new geopolitical and social scenario of a society, where leaders are assisted by technology that integrates machines and autonomous networks that have developed their own capacity for understanding and autonomous management, having been fed with data and having absorbed the first machine learning processes that have been applied in the last two decades.
Furthermore, their decisions both machine makers and leaders, impact on aspects as diverse as operations logistics, education, mass communication and commercial relations between territories and lands.
Aspects such as territorial integrity of The Nations , which affect to what we know as International Law were, until our present days, based on the lessons that our History up to the 20th century brought, Those will be challenged in the coming years. These aspects and referrals, which are part of human culture and civilisation, do not necessarily correspond to those of a machine or an autonomous organism. as a Cyborg may be. Life and interaction in Space, the new frontiers, et al; From a perspective that is not necessarily that conveyed by the mass media or do not necessary is presented de facto by the information media interests serve, to adapt and to respect both, the prominence of national and local interests in relation to the interests of common goods. How diplomacy will work in a future scenario when we are dealing not with humans but with autonomous and adult machines, shall be taken as well in consideration. Stakeholders and how its position should be addressed and endorsed as decision makers or as neutral makers shall it also be taken in consideration.
The next questions or issues of interest IGF must take in account should focus on a new geopolitical and social scenario of a society, where leaders are assisted by technology that integrates machines and autonomous networks that have developed their own capacity for understanding and autonomous management, having been fed with data and having absorbed the first machine learning processes that have been applied in the last two decades.
Furthermore, their decisions both machine makers and leaders, impact on aspects as diverse as operations logistics, education, mass communication and commercial relations between territories and lands.
Aspects such as territorial integrity of The Nations , which affect to what we know as International Law were, until our present days, based on the lessons that our History up to the 20th century brought, Those will be challenged in the coming years. These aspects and referrals, which are part of human culture and civilisation, do not necessarily correspond to those of a machine or an autonomous organism. as a Cyborg may be. Life and interaction in Space, the new frontiers, et al; From a perspective that is not necessarily that conveyed by the mass media or do not necessary is presented de facto by the information media interests serve, to adapt and to respect both, the prominence of national and local interests in relation to the interests of common goods. How diplomacy will work in a future scenario when we are dealing not with humans but with autonomous and adult machines, shall be taken as well in consideration. Stakeholders and how its position should be addressed and endorsed as decision makers or as neutral makers shall it also be taken in consideration.
Please, avoid the Drama Queen scenario
Not at precise his time.
Technical Community
ID290
Emerging Technologies and Innovation
-Implementing Virtual/Augmented Reality in Cultural Programs and Initiatives for creating immersive digital experiences. These technologies can enhance how cultural content is experienced and shared globally.
Certainly! Here's a refined version of your answer with clearer structure and language:
In my opinion, during the last IGF, I would suggest incorporating regional perspectives by hosting panels on digital inclusion specific to each regional group. This would help assess progress after Artificial intellengence wave and ensure that regional disparities are addressed. Additionally, I propose offering workshops on digital cultural preservation, where we can celebrate diversity in the digital space and explore how different regions can contribute to global digital culture.
It is essential to underline the importance of creating a safe digital space for creative individuals, where they can protect their work using digital tools. Governments need to recognize the value that the creative economy adds to their national economies and integrate this into their economic policies. By doing so, they can foster a more supportive environment for innovation and creativity.
It is important to highlight more local initiatives to inspire citizens to participate in the IGF and raise awareness. Hosting a public session to introduce "Ambassadors of Change" would provide a meaningful opportunity to engage more change-makers and foster a deeper connection with the event.
Civil Society
ID291
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Civil Society
ID292
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Surveillance and the use of spyware feel somewhat neglected in the agenda of many international fora and conferences.
Maybe have a more active monitoring and reflection role in monitoring global processes and initiatives, giving more space to human rights promoting items on the agenda, rather than techno-solutionism and presenting technology as the universal solution for every societal issue.
Make the format more dynamic and more inviting for participation for people who are not as active in the field. The IGF is a place for intersectionality and for marginalised voices to be heard. However, sometimes the content is quite high-level and hard to relate to for people who are new to the field.
Civil Society
ID293
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Surveillance, civil and political rights and liberties
Civil Society
ID294
Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Ethical AI Development: Address frameworks for ensuring AI is developed and deployed ethically, avoiding biases and promoting transparency.
Regulation and Governance: Explore regulatory approaches for AI, balancing innovation with accountability and harm mitigation.
AI and the Future of Work: Assess the impact of AI on jobs, skill development, and economic transformation.
Bridging the Digital Divide: Develop strategies to close gaps in connectivity, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
Affordability and Accessibility: Ensure internet access is affordable and inclusive for marginalized and low-income communities.
Digital Literacy and Capacity Building: Empower communities through digital skills training, ensuring meaningful engagement with digital technologies.
ICT’s Role in Climate Action: Discuss how technology can support climate adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable practices.
Green Technology and Innovation: Promote the development of energy-efficient and environmentally friendly technologies.
E-Waste Management: Explore solutions for managing electronic waste to minimize environmental harm.
Ethical AI Development: Address frameworks for ensuring AI is developed and deployed ethically, avoiding biases and promoting transparency.
Regulation and Governance: Explore regulatory approaches for AI, balancing innovation with accountability and harm mitigation.
AI and the Future of Work: Assess the impact of AI on jobs, skill development, and economic transformation.
Bridging the Digital Divide: Develop strategies to close gaps in connectivity, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
Affordability and Accessibility: Ensure internet access is affordable and inclusive for marginalized and low-income communities.
Digital Literacy and Capacity Building: Empower communities through digital skills training, ensuring meaningful engagement with digital technologies.
ICT’s Role in Climate Action: Discuss how technology can support climate adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable practices.
Green Technology and Innovation: Promote the development of energy-efficient and environmentally friendly technologies.
E-Waste Management: Explore solutions for managing electronic waste to minimize environmental harm.
The IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work can be strategically leveraged to contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS+20 Review by fostering multistakeholder dialogues, producing actionable outputs, and aligning its activities with the goals of these initiatives.
Strengthening the IGF’s Contribution to the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
The GDC emphasizes inclusivity, trust, and sustainable development in the digital sphere. The IGF can support its implementation through the following:
Key Actions
Focus on GDC Themes:
Prioritize GDC-aligned themes, such as universal connectivity, digital rights, data governance, and AI ethics, in IGF annual meetings and intersessional work.
Organize dedicated sessions to unpack specific GDC principles, ensuring broad input from all stakeholders.
Multistakeholder Engagement:
Leverage the IGF’s unique structure to gather perspectives from governments, civil society, private sector, and technical communities, creating consensus on how to operationalize the GDC.
Facilitate regional consultations during the intersessional period to ensure diverse voices inform the GDC’s implementation framework.
Action-Oriented Outputs:
Align IGF outputs with the GDC's actionable goals, offering concrete recommendations and policy guidelines.
Use intersessional Best Practice Forums (BPFs) and Dynamic Coalitions (DCs) to focus on issues like trust, digital inclusion, and sustainability, producing thematic reports that feed into the GDC process.
Monitoring and Accountability:
Establish mechanisms to track progress on GDC implementation, using IGF meetings as platforms for presenting updates, case studies, and challenges.
Contributing to the WSIS+20 Review
The WSIS+20 Review will evaluate the implementation of the WSIS outcomes, including progress on bridging the digital divide, ensuring access to information, and fostering sustainable development. The IGF can play a pivotal role in shaping this review.
Key Actions
Linking WSIS Action Lines to IGF Themes:
Map WSIS Action Lines (e.g., C1-C11) to IGF thematic areas, ensuring that discussions reflect the progress and challenges related to WSIS outcomes.
Host workshops that focus on specific WSIS outcomes, such as internet governance capacity building, ICT for development, and cybersecurity.
Regional Contributions:
Integrate insights from National, Regional, and Youth IGFs (NRIs) into WSIS+20 discussions to reflect localized perspectives and implementation challenges.
Encourage NRIs to host pre-WSIS+20 consultations, with findings shared during the IGF annual meeting.
Stakeholder Collaboration:
Convene multistakeholder panels to assess the successes and gaps in WSIS implementation, identifying lessons learned and areas for improvement.
Facilitate partnerships between governments, private sector actors, and civil society to collaboratively address WSIS challenges.
Highlighting Progress and Gaps:
Use the IGF annual meeting to present progress reports on WSIS outcomes, highlighting best practices and innovations.
Develop policy recommendations for submission to the high-level WSIS+20 Review meeting, informed by IGF discussions and outputs.
Leveraging IGF Intersessional Work for GDC and WSIS+20
Best Practice Forums (BPFs)
Focus BPFs on issues central to GDC and WSIS, such as digital inclusion, sustainable ICTs, and trust in digital technologies.
Use BPF findings to inform GDC and WSIS+20 discussions, ensuring evidence-based recommendations.
Dynamic Coalitions (DCs)
Encourage DCs to align their activities with GDC goals, exploring cross-cutting themes like AI, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
Integrate DC reports into the IGF’s contributions to the WSIS+20 Review.
Policy Networks
Establish policy networks that focus specifically on GDC implementation and WSIS outcomes, facilitating year-round collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Outputs and Outreach
Clear Documentation: Ensure that IGF session reports, outcome documents, and intersessional outputs explicitly connect to GDC and WSIS+20 priorities.
Global Advocacy: Use IGF platforms to raise awareness of the GDC and WSIS+20, encouraging broader stakeholder engagement and support.
Practical Tools: Develop toolkits, policy guidelines, and frameworks based on IGF outputs to assist stakeholders in implementing the GDC and WSIS recommendations.
Strengthening the IGF’s Contribution to the Global Digital Compact (GDC)
The GDC emphasizes inclusivity, trust, and sustainable development in the digital sphere. The IGF can support its implementation through the following:
Key Actions
Focus on GDC Themes:
Prioritize GDC-aligned themes, such as universal connectivity, digital rights, data governance, and AI ethics, in IGF annual meetings and intersessional work.
Organize dedicated sessions to unpack specific GDC principles, ensuring broad input from all stakeholders.
Multistakeholder Engagement:
Leverage the IGF’s unique structure to gather perspectives from governments, civil society, private sector, and technical communities, creating consensus on how to operationalize the GDC.
Facilitate regional consultations during the intersessional period to ensure diverse voices inform the GDC’s implementation framework.
Action-Oriented Outputs:
Align IGF outputs with the GDC's actionable goals, offering concrete recommendations and policy guidelines.
Use intersessional Best Practice Forums (BPFs) and Dynamic Coalitions (DCs) to focus on issues like trust, digital inclusion, and sustainability, producing thematic reports that feed into the GDC process.
Monitoring and Accountability:
Establish mechanisms to track progress on GDC implementation, using IGF meetings as platforms for presenting updates, case studies, and challenges.
Contributing to the WSIS+20 Review
The WSIS+20 Review will evaluate the implementation of the WSIS outcomes, including progress on bridging the digital divide, ensuring access to information, and fostering sustainable development. The IGF can play a pivotal role in shaping this review.
Key Actions
Linking WSIS Action Lines to IGF Themes:
Map WSIS Action Lines (e.g., C1-C11) to IGF thematic areas, ensuring that discussions reflect the progress and challenges related to WSIS outcomes.
Host workshops that focus on specific WSIS outcomes, such as internet governance capacity building, ICT for development, and cybersecurity.
Regional Contributions:
Integrate insights from National, Regional, and Youth IGFs (NRIs) into WSIS+20 discussions to reflect localized perspectives and implementation challenges.
Encourage NRIs to host pre-WSIS+20 consultations, with findings shared during the IGF annual meeting.
Stakeholder Collaboration:
Convene multistakeholder panels to assess the successes and gaps in WSIS implementation, identifying lessons learned and areas for improvement.
Facilitate partnerships between governments, private sector actors, and civil society to collaboratively address WSIS challenges.
Highlighting Progress and Gaps:
Use the IGF annual meeting to present progress reports on WSIS outcomes, highlighting best practices and innovations.
Develop policy recommendations for submission to the high-level WSIS+20 Review meeting, informed by IGF discussions and outputs.
Leveraging IGF Intersessional Work for GDC and WSIS+20
Best Practice Forums (BPFs)
Focus BPFs on issues central to GDC and WSIS, such as digital inclusion, sustainable ICTs, and trust in digital technologies.
Use BPF findings to inform GDC and WSIS+20 discussions, ensuring evidence-based recommendations.
Dynamic Coalitions (DCs)
Encourage DCs to align their activities with GDC goals, exploring cross-cutting themes like AI, human rights, and environmental sustainability.
Integrate DC reports into the IGF’s contributions to the WSIS+20 Review.
Policy Networks
Establish policy networks that focus specifically on GDC implementation and WSIS outcomes, facilitating year-round collaboration and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Outputs and Outreach
Clear Documentation: Ensure that IGF session reports, outcome documents, and intersessional outputs explicitly connect to GDC and WSIS+20 priorities.
Global Advocacy: Use IGF platforms to raise awareness of the GDC and WSIS+20, encouraging broader stakeholder engagement and support.
Practical Tools: Develop toolkits, policy guidelines, and frameworks based on IGF outputs to assist stakeholders in implementing the GDC and WSIS recommendations.
Majority of the ideas have already been implemented, what we can do is polishing on it and maybe reimagine.
Thematic Tracks with Integrated Flexibility
Thematic Track Organization
Fewer, Focused Tracks: Select a limited number of cross-cutting themes (e.g., 5–6) based on global priorities like AI, universal access, cybersecurity, and environmental sustainability.
Sub-Themes and Intersections: Break down main themes into sub-themes to explore nuanced aspects and intersections (e.g., AI and human rights, cybersecurity and economic stability).
Dynamic Session Types
Plenary Panels: High-level discussions on major themes involving key stakeholders.
Deep Dive Workshops: Smaller, interactive workshops for thematic deep dives and hands-on problem-solving.
Lightning Talks: Short, focused presentations highlighting innovative ideas or research.
Thematic Summits: Sessions that bring together insights from different tracks for cross-disciplinary collaboration and synthesis.
Rotating Regional Emphasis
Dedicate thematic tracks or sessions to address region-specific challenges or opportunities, informed by inputs from NRIs and intersessional activities.
Integration of Multistakeholder Contributions
Enhanced Co-Creation
Invite stakeholders (e.g., governments, civil society, youth groups, private sector) to co-design thematic tracks and sessions during the preparatory process.
Use participatory methods like surveys, town halls, and collaborative workshops to finalize the IGF program.
Community Showcases
Create space for NRIs, intersessional groups, and community-led initiatives to present their work and share insights within thematic tracks.
New Engagement Mechanisms
Hybrid Engagement
Interactive Platforms: Use robust hybrid platforms with features like live polls, Q&A, and breakout rooms to engage both in-person and virtual participants effectively.
Regional Hubs: Establish regional hubs that participate in IGF sessions virtually, increasing accessibility and localized discussion.
Youth Integration
Create a Youth Forum integrated within thematic tracks to ensure young voices contribute directly to mainstream discussions.
Organize reverse mentoring sessions where youth guide senior leaders on emerging trends.
Cross-Sector Networking
Use structured networking tools or events (e.g., speed networking, thematic networking lunches) to connect participants across sectors.
Outcome-Driven Structure
Synthesis Sessions
At the end of each thematic track, host synthesis sessions to summarize discussions, highlight key takeaways, and propose actionable recommendations.
Clear Output Formats
Ensure each thematic track produces actionable outputs, such as policy recommendations, roadmaps, or toolkits, which feed into broader frameworks like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
Follow-Up Mechanisms
Introduce mechanisms for revisiting previous IGF outcomes, tracking progress, and providing updates during future IGFs or intersessional periods.
Innovative Session Formats
Scenario Planning
Use scenario-based discussions to simulate responses to complex challenges (e.g., global AI governance crises or internet shutdown scenarios).
Debates and Contrarian Dialogues
Host structured debates on contentious topics, encouraging diverse perspectives and constructive disagreement.
Hackathons and Innovation Labs
Include hackathons or innovation labs where participants collaboratively design solutions for specific challenges related to the thematic tracks.
Accessibility and Inclusivity Enhancements
Simplified Access
Redesign the IGF website and mobile app for easier navigation and access to thematic tracks, schedules, and hybrid participation tools.
Ensure all session materials are available in multiple languages, with live interpretation for major sessions.
Financial Support for Underrepresented Groups
Expand funding programs for participants from underrepresented regions or communities to attend in-person and virtual sessions
Cross-Thematic Collaboration
Cross-Thematic Panels
Host panels that bridge themes (e.g., “AI and Data Governance for Climate Action”), encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue.
Thematic Linkages
Design tracks with overlapping sessions that highlight the interconnectedness of issues (e.g., universal access as a foundation for cybersecurity and trust).
Thematic Tracks with Integrated Flexibility
Thematic Track Organization
Fewer, Focused Tracks: Select a limited number of cross-cutting themes (e.g., 5–6) based on global priorities like AI, universal access, cybersecurity, and environmental sustainability.
Sub-Themes and Intersections: Break down main themes into sub-themes to explore nuanced aspects and intersections (e.g., AI and human rights, cybersecurity and economic stability).
Dynamic Session Types
Plenary Panels: High-level discussions on major themes involving key stakeholders.
Deep Dive Workshops: Smaller, interactive workshops for thematic deep dives and hands-on problem-solving.
Lightning Talks: Short, focused presentations highlighting innovative ideas or research.
Thematic Summits: Sessions that bring together insights from different tracks for cross-disciplinary collaboration and synthesis.
Rotating Regional Emphasis
Dedicate thematic tracks or sessions to address region-specific challenges or opportunities, informed by inputs from NRIs and intersessional activities.
Integration of Multistakeholder Contributions
Enhanced Co-Creation
Invite stakeholders (e.g., governments, civil society, youth groups, private sector) to co-design thematic tracks and sessions during the preparatory process.
Use participatory methods like surveys, town halls, and collaborative workshops to finalize the IGF program.
Community Showcases
Create space for NRIs, intersessional groups, and community-led initiatives to present their work and share insights within thematic tracks.
New Engagement Mechanisms
Hybrid Engagement
Interactive Platforms: Use robust hybrid platforms with features like live polls, Q&A, and breakout rooms to engage both in-person and virtual participants effectively.
Regional Hubs: Establish regional hubs that participate in IGF sessions virtually, increasing accessibility and localized discussion.
Youth Integration
Create a Youth Forum integrated within thematic tracks to ensure young voices contribute directly to mainstream discussions.
Organize reverse mentoring sessions where youth guide senior leaders on emerging trends.
Cross-Sector Networking
Use structured networking tools or events (e.g., speed networking, thematic networking lunches) to connect participants across sectors.
Outcome-Driven Structure
Synthesis Sessions
At the end of each thematic track, host synthesis sessions to summarize discussions, highlight key takeaways, and propose actionable recommendations.
Clear Output Formats
Ensure each thematic track produces actionable outputs, such as policy recommendations, roadmaps, or toolkits, which feed into broader frameworks like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
Follow-Up Mechanisms
Introduce mechanisms for revisiting previous IGF outcomes, tracking progress, and providing updates during future IGFs or intersessional periods.
Innovative Session Formats
Scenario Planning
Use scenario-based discussions to simulate responses to complex challenges (e.g., global AI governance crises or internet shutdown scenarios).
Debates and Contrarian Dialogues
Host structured debates on contentious topics, encouraging diverse perspectives and constructive disagreement.
Hackathons and Innovation Labs
Include hackathons or innovation labs where participants collaboratively design solutions for specific challenges related to the thematic tracks.
Accessibility and Inclusivity Enhancements
Simplified Access
Redesign the IGF website and mobile app for easier navigation and access to thematic tracks, schedules, and hybrid participation tools.
Ensure all session materials are available in multiple languages, with live interpretation for major sessions.
Financial Support for Underrepresented Groups
Expand funding programs for participants from underrepresented regions or communities to attend in-person and virtual sessions
Cross-Thematic Collaboration
Cross-Thematic Panels
Host panels that bridge themes (e.g., “AI and Data Governance for Climate Action”), encouraging interdisciplinary dialogue.
Thematic Linkages
Design tracks with overlapping sessions that highlight the interconnectedness of issues (e.g., universal access as a foundation for cybersecurity and trust).
Technical Community
ID295
Digital Cooperation, Technical and Operational Topics, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
- Under the “Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change” add a sub-theme of “Digital Inclusion for Climate Resilience” to explore how technology can empower communities to mitigate and adapt to climate change, especially in vulnerable regions like the ones with majority of off-line population and Asia-Pacific islands.
- Under the theme of “Economic issues and development” discuss topics of “Decentralized Digital Economies” to Investigate the role of blockchain, decentralized finance (DeFi), and Web3 in fostering inclusive economic growth.
- Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Digital Spaces: Promoting tools and policies to preserve cultural identities and languages in online platforms.
- Under the theme of “Economic issues and development” discuss topics of “Decentralized Digital Economies” to Investigate the role of blockchain, decentralized finance (DeFi), and Web3 in fostering inclusive economic growth.
- Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in Digital Spaces: Promoting tools and policies to preserve cultural identities and languages in online platforms.
The IGF annual meeting should contribute to the Global Digital Compact and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes review by:
- Aligning sessions with actionable milestones of these initiatives, such as measurable indicators for digital inclusion and sustainability.
- Hosting preparatory dialogues in Asia-Pacific to incorporate regional perspectives and challenges (Asia Pacific is home to the most natural disaster-prone economies (45% of natural disasters occur here), and the largest offline population (+60% of them live here), especially South Asia, which accounts for 57% of the world’s offline population).
- Publishing an annual synthesis report on how IGF outputs are driving progress on global digital governance goals.
- Aligning sessions with actionable milestones of these initiatives, such as measurable indicators for digital inclusion and sustainability.
- Hosting preparatory dialogues in Asia-Pacific to incorporate regional perspectives and challenges (Asia Pacific is home to the most natural disaster-prone economies (45% of natural disasters occur here), and the largest offline population (+60% of them live here), especially South Asia, which accounts for 57% of the world’s offline population).
- Publishing an annual synthesis report on how IGF outputs are driving progress on global digital governance goals.
- Regional Dialogues and Tracks: Introduce and strengthen regional thematic tracks (e.g., Asia-Pacific, Africa, Latin America) to spotlight local challenges and solutions.
- Youth and Community Engagement: Dedicate spaces for youth-led sessions and grassroots organizations (such as NOGs - network operator groups) to share perspectives on technology's societal impact.
- Interactive and Practical Sessions: Organize workshops, hackathons, and simulations for hands-on learning and tangible problem-solving.
- Sustainability in Format: Promote online participation and encourage more local hubs for satellite events (including remote hubs for IGF 2025) in various regions of the world to maximize impact.
- More engagement with and presence of policymakers so the Internet community can engage with policymakers at the IGF. This should include more participation of policymakers to speak to digital / Internet policies and how countries are thinking of regulatory environments.
Add a ‘collaboration’ track, which focuses on getting stakeholders together, i.e. creating the space to get various actors together like we did with the funders / donors networking session.
- Youth and Community Engagement: Dedicate spaces for youth-led sessions and grassroots organizations (such as NOGs - network operator groups) to share perspectives on technology's societal impact.
- Interactive and Practical Sessions: Organize workshops, hackathons, and simulations for hands-on learning and tangible problem-solving.
- Sustainability in Format: Promote online participation and encourage more local hubs for satellite events (including remote hubs for IGF 2025) in various regions of the world to maximize impact.
- More engagement with and presence of policymakers so the Internet community can engage with policymakers at the IGF. This should include more participation of policymakers to speak to digital / Internet policies and how countries are thinking of regulatory environments.
Add a ‘collaboration’ track, which focuses on getting stakeholders together, i.e. creating the space to get various actors together like we did with the funders / donors networking session.
Technical Community
ID296
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Policy and regulatory issues regarding innovation and tecnhology. How can these topics, its risks, and the protection of fundamental rights be addressed with policy makers.
It is crucial to take into account the different realities of countries and regions, that make it impossible to apply a single criteria and equal goals to all. So, a good idea would be to carry out work groups that serve as a preliminary diagnosis and start point, from which a blueprint can be draft.
The IGF is an important forum and, as it promotes digital inclusion and accessibility, the forum should meet this principles. As such, I propose to organize previous working groups, so more people can be part of the discussion. Also, I would propose an after work, such as a group of papers resulting from the knowledge exchange.
Civil Society
ID297
Cybersecurity and Trust
En el ámbito de la ciberseguridad, grupos como las mujeres - en especial las periodistas, comunicadoras y defensoras de derechos humanos- enfrentan niveles de violencia simbólica y digital que avanza en la instalación de discursos de odio. Según el informe "Violencia en línea contra las mujeres periodistas: Instantánea mundial de la incidencia y las repercusiones" realizado por UNESCO el año 2020, el 73% de las mujeres encuestadas dijo haber sufrido violencia en línea, las cuales, un 25% fueron amenazas de violencia física y 18% sexual, donde se ensañaron con las periodistas encuestadas.
Este tipo de agresiones han aumentado con los años junto al avance y masividad de las plataformas digitales, transformándose en un problema que está fuera de control. Tal como señala el informe de Unesco, en el año 2014, un estudio realizada por la Fundación Internacional de Mujeres en los Medios de Comunicación (IWMF) que encuestó a 1000 mujeres, concluyó que un 23% había sufrido “intimidación, amenazas o abusos” en línea en relación con su trabajo. Sin embargo, investigaciones realizadas el año 2017, develó que un 44% habían sufrido abusos en línea y en el año 2020, la cifra aumentó a un 73% de mujeres periodistas que señalaron de manera afirmativa frente a la consulta respecto a si habían vivido violencia digital.
Estas cifras demuestran que las agresiones digitales contra mujeres periodistas ha aumentado con los años y que sus máximas expresiones se traducen en agresiones con discursos de odio - 49%- , acoso por mensajes privados -48%- y amenazas contra su reputación en un 42%.
Este tipo de agresiones han aumentado con los años junto al avance y masividad de las plataformas digitales, transformándose en un problema que está fuera de control. Tal como señala el informe de Unesco, en el año 2014, un estudio realizada por la Fundación Internacional de Mujeres en los Medios de Comunicación (IWMF) que encuestó a 1000 mujeres, concluyó que un 23% había sufrido “intimidación, amenazas o abusos” en línea en relación con su trabajo. Sin embargo, investigaciones realizadas el año 2017, develó que un 44% habían sufrido abusos en línea y en el año 2020, la cifra aumentó a un 73% de mujeres periodistas que señalaron de manera afirmativa frente a la consulta respecto a si habían vivido violencia digital.
Estas cifras demuestran que las agresiones digitales contra mujeres periodistas ha aumentado con los años y que sus máximas expresiones se traducen en agresiones con discursos de odio - 49%- , acoso por mensajes privados -48%- y amenazas contra su reputación en un 42%.
En ese sentido, la reunión anual de FGI puede incidir en relevar que el problema de la ciberseguridad impacta en las mujeres periodistas comunicadores quienes son víctimas de violencias digitales y discursos de odio, conductas que buscan acallar sus voces, por tanto silenciar el trabajo periodístico vulnerando directamente la libertad de expresión y de prensa. Por eso, es importante que estas instancias logren destacar que este problema es una vulneración a derechos humanos fundamentales que debe ser abordado de manera concreta.
Estrategias amplias para enfrentar la violencia digital contra mujeres periodistas, comunicadores y defensoras de derechos humanos, que impacten en:
- el diseño de políticas pública desde el Estado y mecanismos de protección para mujeres periodistas víctimas de violencia en línea.
- marcos normativos que tenga por objetico proteger la labor de la prensa, prevenir la violencia y abordar los casos denunciados.
- acciones formativas para medios, universidades y periodistas para prevenir la violencia digital y saber cómo abordarlas.
- campañas de educación mediática para las audiencias, de modo de prevenir el aumento de discursos de odio contra mujeres periodistas y comunicadoras en entornos digitales.
- el diseño de políticas pública desde el Estado y mecanismos de protección para mujeres periodistas víctimas de violencia en línea.
- marcos normativos que tenga por objetico proteger la labor de la prensa, prevenir la violencia y abordar los casos denunciados.
- acciones formativas para medios, universidades y periodistas para prevenir la violencia digital y saber cómo abordarlas.
- campañas de educación mediática para las audiencias, de modo de prevenir el aumento de discursos de odio contra mujeres periodistas y comunicadoras en entornos digitales.
Civil Society
ID298
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
The IGF also relates to major global initiatives and agendas. How can the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and to the review of the overall implementation of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society in the lead up to the high-level meeting end of 2025?
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can enhance its contributions to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review by focusing on key areas:
- Intersessional Work: Strengthening ongoing dialogues and initiatives that align with GDC objectives, such as digital inclusion and governance solutions, ensures continuous stakeholder engagement .
- Policy Recommendations: Leveraging outcomes from IGF sessions to inform policy frameworks that support GDC commitments, particularly in areas like AI governance and human rights online
- Multistakeholder Collaboration: Promoting inclusive participation from diverse sectors fosters a unified approach to address digital divides and enhance global cooperation
These strategies will position the IGF as a pivotal platform leading up to the high-level meeting in 2025.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can enhance its contributions to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review by focusing on key areas:
- Intersessional Work: Strengthening ongoing dialogues and initiatives that align with GDC objectives, such as digital inclusion and governance solutions, ensures continuous stakeholder engagement .
- Policy Recommendations: Leveraging outcomes from IGF sessions to inform policy frameworks that support GDC commitments, particularly in areas like AI governance and human rights online
- Multistakeholder Collaboration: Promoting inclusive participation from diverse sectors fosters a unified approach to address digital divides and enhance global cooperation
These strategies will position the IGF as a pivotal platform leading up to the high-level meeting in 2025.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a significant role in addressing global digital policy issues and can enhance its contribution to major initiatives like the Global Digital Compact and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) review process. Here's how the IGF annual meetings and intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to these initiatives:
1. Aligning Themes and Priorities:
- The IGF can ensure its thematic priorities are closely aligned with the objectives of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes. This involves selecting discussion themes that resonate with issues like digital inclusion, human rights online, data governance, and digital cooperation.
2. Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues:
- By fostering inclusive and diverse multi-stakeholder dialogues, the IGF can bring together government, private sector, civil society, and technical community representatives to discuss and shape policies that support these global initiatives.
3. Outcome-Oriented Discussions:
- Encourage sessions to produce concrete outputs or recommendations that can feed into the Global Digital Compact and WSIS process, such as policy guidelines, best practices, or action plans.
4. Intersessional Work Enhancements:
- Strengthen intersessional activities like Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions, and national and regional IGF initiatives to ensure continuous engagement and input into the broader global digital governance discussions.
5.Monitoring and Reporting:
- Develop mechanisms to track and report on how discussions and recommendations from IGF contribute to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, thus highlighting the IGF's role in these processes.
6. Engaging with Relevant UN Processes:
- Work closely with relevant UN bodies and processes to ensure coherence and collaboration, including engaging with the United Nations Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology and related UN initiatives.
7. Raising Awareness and Capacity Building:
- Use the IGF platform to increase awareness and understanding of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS goals among stakeholders, and support capacity-building efforts to enable all stakeholders to contribute effectively.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF can significantly enhance its role in advancing key digital governance frameworks and agendas.
1. Aligning Themes and Priorities:
- The IGF can ensure its thematic priorities are closely aligned with the objectives of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes. This involves selecting discussion themes that resonate with issues like digital inclusion, human rights online, data governance, and digital cooperation.
2. Multi-Stakeholder Dialogues:
- By fostering inclusive and diverse multi-stakeholder dialogues, the IGF can bring together government, private sector, civil society, and technical community representatives to discuss and shape policies that support these global initiatives.
3. Outcome-Oriented Discussions:
- Encourage sessions to produce concrete outputs or recommendations that can feed into the Global Digital Compact and WSIS process, such as policy guidelines, best practices, or action plans.
4. Intersessional Work Enhancements:
- Strengthen intersessional activities like Best Practice Forums, Dynamic Coalitions, and national and regional IGF initiatives to ensure continuous engagement and input into the broader global digital governance discussions.
5.Monitoring and Reporting:
- Develop mechanisms to track and report on how discussions and recommendations from IGF contribute to the Global Digital Compact and WSIS review, thus highlighting the IGF's role in these processes.
6. Engaging with Relevant UN Processes:
- Work closely with relevant UN bodies and processes to ensure coherence and collaboration, including engaging with the United Nations Secretary-General’s Envoy on Technology and related UN initiatives.
7. Raising Awareness and Capacity Building:
- Use the IGF platform to increase awareness and understanding of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS goals among stakeholders, and support capacity-building efforts to enable all stakeholders to contribute effectively.
By implementing these strategies, the IGF can significantly enhance its role in advancing key digital governance frameworks and agendas.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) typically follows a format designed to foster open dialogue and inclusive discussions about internet governance issues. Here are some ideas that could enhance the overall format and design of the IGF, focusing on thematic tracks and treatment of themes:
1. Interactive Workshops: Incorporate more interactive workshops where participants can engage in hands-on activities and scenario-based discussions. This could lead to more practical insights and collaborative solutions.
2. Thematic Tracks Organization: Organize thematic tracks that align with current global challenges, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and climate change. Each track could have sub-themes to allow for deeper dives into specific areas.
3. Diverse Formats**: Introduce a variety of session formats, such as debates, fishbowl discussions, and PechaKucha presentations (20 slides for 20 seconds each) to keep discussions dynamic and engaging.
4. Youth and Community Engagement: Establish dedicated tracks for youth and community voices, ensuring their perspectives are front and center in discussions about the future of the internet.
5. Real-time Polling and Feedback: Utilize technology for real-time polling during sessions to gauge audience opinion on specific issues, which could guide discussions and decision-making.
6. Cross-cutting Themes: Instead of traditional separate tracks, consider cross-cutting themes where multiple facets of internet governance are discussed together, highlighting interconnections (e.g., privacy in the age of AI, or access in the context of digital economies).
7. Case Studies and Success Stories: Include sessions that focus on sharing successful case studies and stories from different regions about internet governance initiatives, showcasing what works and what doesn’t.
8. Focus on Action-Oriented Outcomes: Encourage sessions to focus on actionable outcomes, providing clear takeaways, recommendations, or commitments that participants can work towards after the event.
9. Network-building Opportunities: Create structured networking sessions to facilitate connections among participants, encouraging collaborations and partnerships beyond the forum.
10. Follow-up Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms to follow up on discussions from the IGF, such as creating task forces or working groups to continue addressing specific issues raised during the forum.
1. Interactive Workshops: Incorporate more interactive workshops where participants can engage in hands-on activities and scenario-based discussions. This could lead to more practical insights and collaborative solutions.
2. Thematic Tracks Organization: Organize thematic tracks that align with current global challenges, such as digital inclusion, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and climate change. Each track could have sub-themes to allow for deeper dives into specific areas.
3. Diverse Formats**: Introduce a variety of session formats, such as debates, fishbowl discussions, and PechaKucha presentations (20 slides for 20 seconds each) to keep discussions dynamic and engaging.
4. Youth and Community Engagement: Establish dedicated tracks for youth and community voices, ensuring their perspectives are front and center in discussions about the future of the internet.
5. Real-time Polling and Feedback: Utilize technology for real-time polling during sessions to gauge audience opinion on specific issues, which could guide discussions and decision-making.
6. Cross-cutting Themes: Instead of traditional separate tracks, consider cross-cutting themes where multiple facets of internet governance are discussed together, highlighting interconnections (e.g., privacy in the age of AI, or access in the context of digital economies).
7. Case Studies and Success Stories: Include sessions that focus on sharing successful case studies and stories from different regions about internet governance initiatives, showcasing what works and what doesn’t.
8. Focus on Action-Oriented Outcomes: Encourage sessions to focus on actionable outcomes, providing clear takeaways, recommendations, or commitments that participants can work towards after the event.
9. Network-building Opportunities: Create structured networking sessions to facilitate connections among participants, encouraging collaborations and partnerships beyond the forum.
10. Follow-up Mechanisms: Establish mechanisms to follow up on discussions from the IGF, such as creating task forces or working groups to continue addressing specific issues raised during the forum.
Civil Society
ID299
Artificial Intelligence, Economic Issues and Development, Media and Content
Civil Society
ID300
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
To address how the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and its intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), consider the following points:
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles
Integrate GDC Priorities: Ensure the IGF’s annual themes and discussions align with the core principles of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and trust in technology.
Promote Multistakeholder Dialogue: Use the IGF as a platform to convene governments, civil society, private sector, and technical community stakeholders to identify challenges and opportunities in implementing the GDC.
2. Serve as a Monitoring Platform for WSIS Implementation
Regular Updates on Progress: Dedicate sessions at the IGF to review and assess the implementation of WSIS action lines and targets.
Highlight Regional and Thematic Contributions: Encourage regional IGFs and national initiatives to report on progress and best practices in addressing WSIS goals, ensuring diverse representation.
3. Strengthen Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task IGF's intersessional groups to focus on topics directly linked to the GDC and WSIS, such as digital rights, capacity building, and infrastructure development.
Action-Oriented Recommendations: Ensure that the outputs of these groups offer practical, actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders.
4. Enhance IGF Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Develop tangible, consensus-driven policy recommendations from IGF discussions to inform the GDC's implementation and WSIS reviews.
Link to Global Agendas: Establish clear connections between IGF outputs and other global processes, including the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to maximize the IGF's relevance.
5. Foster Inclusion and Capacity Building
Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Ensure that underrepresented groups, including women, youth, and communities from the Global South, are actively involved in IGF discussions and contribute to the GDC and WSIS review.
Capacity Development Initiatives: Use IGF intersessional work to empower stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to participate meaningfully in digital governance discussions.
6. Preparation for the 2025 High-Level Meeting
Pre-Summit Consultations: Use upcoming IGFs to conduct consultations and preparatory dialogues for the 2025 high-level meeting.
Synergies with Other UN Processes: Collaborate with other UN bodies and initiatives, such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism, to ensure coherence in global digital governance efforts.
By strategically aligning its themes, outputs, and intersessional activities, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC's goals and contributing to the effective review and implementation of WSIS outcomes.
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles
Integrate GDC Priorities: Ensure the IGF’s annual themes and discussions align with the core principles of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and trust in technology.
Promote Multistakeholder Dialogue: Use the IGF as a platform to convene governments, civil society, private sector, and technical community stakeholders to identify challenges and opportunities in implementing the GDC.
2. Serve as a Monitoring Platform for WSIS Implementation
Regular Updates on Progress: Dedicate sessions at the IGF to review and assess the implementation of WSIS action lines and targets.
Highlight Regional and Thematic Contributions: Encourage regional IGFs and national initiatives to report on progress and best practices in addressing WSIS goals, ensuring diverse representation.
3. Strengthen Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task IGF's intersessional groups to focus on topics directly linked to the GDC and WSIS, such as digital rights, capacity building, and infrastructure development.
Action-Oriented Recommendations: Ensure that the outputs of these groups offer practical, actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders.
4. Enhance IGF Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Develop tangible, consensus-driven policy recommendations from IGF discussions to inform the GDC's implementation and WSIS reviews.
Link to Global Agendas: Establish clear connections between IGF outputs and other global processes, including the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to maximize the IGF's relevance.
5. Foster Inclusion and Capacity Building
Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Ensure that underrepresented groups, including women, youth, and communities from the Global South, are actively involved in IGF discussions and contribute to the GDC and WSIS review.
Capacity Development Initiatives: Use IGF intersessional work to empower stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to participate meaningfully in digital governance discussions.
6. Preparation for the 2025 High-Level Meeting
Pre-Summit Consultations: Use upcoming IGFs to conduct consultations and preparatory dialogues for the 2025 high-level meeting.
Synergies with Other UN Processes: Collaborate with other UN bodies and initiatives, such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism, to ensure coherence in global digital governance efforts.
By strategically aligning its themes, outputs, and intersessional activities, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC's goals and contributing to the effective review and implementation of WSIS outcomes.
Here are innovative ideas to enhance the format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to make it more impactful, inclusive, and action-oriented:
1. Thematic Tracks with Integrated Cross-Cutting Issues
Introduce Priority Tracks: Structure the IGF around 5-6 broad themes aligned with global priorities, such as:
Universal Digital Access and Connectivity
Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence
Digital Inclusion and Human Rights
Cybersecurity and Trust
Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Development
Climate Action and Digital Responsibility
Cross-Cutting Issues: Ensure each track integrates cross-cutting themes like gender, youth, and regional challenges to create a holistic approach.
Problem-Solution Focus: Dedicate thematic sessions to actionable outcomes, such as identifying bottlenecks and co-creating strategies for global digital challenges.
2. Multi-Tiered Sessions for Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder-Specific Tracks: Organize sessions based on stakeholder types (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector, academia) to allow targeted discussions.
Interactive Roundtables: Replace some panel discussions with smaller, interactive roundtables to promote meaningful dialogue and collaboration.
Action Labs: Introduce "Action Labs" where participants collaboratively brainstorm and propose innovative solutions to specific global or regional digital issues.
3. New Formats for Engagement
Living Sessions: Establish ongoing sessions where outcomes are updated throughout the year, enabling continuity between annual IGFs.
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, impactful talks by experts, innovators, and youth to share quick insights or new ideas in under 10 minutes.
Hackathons or Sprints: Organize hackathons or policy sprints to address specific challenges and present tangible outcomes at the IGF.
Debates and Simulations: Host debates on contentious issues or simulations to allow participants to explore policy scenarios interactively.
4. Regional and Community-Driven Input
Regional Voices Hub: Dedicate time slots to showcase key insights and recommendations from regional IGFs and grassroots initiatives.
Community Feedback Mechanism: Create open sessions where attendees can propose new topics for future IGFs or reflect on the forum’s ongoing work.
5. Strengthen Youth and Inclusion Dimensions
Youth-Led Tracks: Designate thematic sessions led by youth participants to integrate fresh perspectives and solutions.
Mentorship Program: Pair youth and first-time attendees with experienced IGF participants to facilitate networking and learning.
Inclusivity Challenges: Use challenges or competitions to encourage underrepresented groups to propose innovative ideas for IGF consideration.
6. Enhanced Digital and Hybrid Features
Interactive Online Platforms: Use advanced digital tools (e.g., collaborative whiteboards, virtual breakout rooms) to make hybrid participation more engaging.
Live Polling and Feedback: Integrate real-time polling and interactive Q&A during sessions to increase engagement from in-person and virtual audiences.
Accessibility Standards: Ensure multilingual live translations, captioning, and easy access for participants with disabilities.
7. Closing the Loop with Action-Oriented Outputs
Outcome Reports by Theme: Publish concise, actionable reports for each thematic track summarizing discussions, key recommendations, and follow-up actions.
Accountability Sessions: Dedicate a segment to review progress on previous IGF recommendations, ensuring continuity and accountability.
Policy Recommendations Platform: Create a dynamic online repository for IGF outcomes linked to relevant global agendas, like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
8. Collaborations with Other Global Initiatives
Cross-Forum Integration: Collaborate with UN processes (e.g., SDGs, WSIS, and UNFCCC) to align thematic tracks with broader global goals.
Inter-IGF Exchange: Foster knowledge exchange between regional IGFs and the global IGF to amplify grassroots solutions.
9. Simplified Schedule for Greater Engagement
Thematic Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to different themes for focused participation.
Pre-Forum Webinars: Host webinars before the IGF to introduce key topics and prepare participants.
Networking Breaks: Include structured networking breaks for participants to form meaningful connections.
10. Celebrating Innovation and Impact
Global Digital Awards: Introduce awards for innovative digital solutions aligned with IGF themes to encourage stakeholders to contribute actionable ideas.
Showcase Best Practices: Host an "Innovation Fair" where participants display successful initiatives or projects from their regions.
By adopting these changes, the IGF can become a more dynamic, inclusive, and solution-driven platform that effectively addresses global digital governance challenges and enhances its influence on international policy discussions.
1. Thematic Tracks with Integrated Cross-Cutting Issues
Introduce Priority Tracks: Structure the IGF around 5-6 broad themes aligned with global priorities, such as:
Universal Digital Access and Connectivity
Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence
Digital Inclusion and Human Rights
Cybersecurity and Trust
Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Development
Climate Action and Digital Responsibility
Cross-Cutting Issues: Ensure each track integrates cross-cutting themes like gender, youth, and regional challenges to create a holistic approach.
Problem-Solution Focus: Dedicate thematic sessions to actionable outcomes, such as identifying bottlenecks and co-creating strategies for global digital challenges.
2. Multi-Tiered Sessions for Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder-Specific Tracks: Organize sessions based on stakeholder types (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector, academia) to allow targeted discussions.
Interactive Roundtables: Replace some panel discussions with smaller, interactive roundtables to promote meaningful dialogue and collaboration.
Action Labs: Introduce "Action Labs" where participants collaboratively brainstorm and propose innovative solutions to specific global or regional digital issues.
3. New Formats for Engagement
Living Sessions: Establish ongoing sessions where outcomes are updated throughout the year, enabling continuity between annual IGFs.
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, impactful talks by experts, innovators, and youth to share quick insights or new ideas in under 10 minutes.
Hackathons or Sprints: Organize hackathons or policy sprints to address specific challenges and present tangible outcomes at the IGF.
Debates and Simulations: Host debates on contentious issues or simulations to allow participants to explore policy scenarios interactively.
4. Regional and Community-Driven Input
Regional Voices Hub: Dedicate time slots to showcase key insights and recommendations from regional IGFs and grassroots initiatives.
Community Feedback Mechanism: Create open sessions where attendees can propose new topics for future IGFs or reflect on the forum’s ongoing work.
5. Strengthen Youth and Inclusion Dimensions
Youth-Led Tracks: Designate thematic sessions led by youth participants to integrate fresh perspectives and solutions.
Mentorship Program: Pair youth and first-time attendees with experienced IGF participants to facilitate networking and learning.
Inclusivity Challenges: Use challenges or competitions to encourage underrepresented groups to propose innovative ideas for IGF consideration.
6. Enhanced Digital and Hybrid Features
Interactive Online Platforms: Use advanced digital tools (e.g., collaborative whiteboards, virtual breakout rooms) to make hybrid participation more engaging.
Live Polling and Feedback: Integrate real-time polling and interactive Q&A during sessions to increase engagement from in-person and virtual audiences.
Accessibility Standards: Ensure multilingual live translations, captioning, and easy access for participants with disabilities.
7. Closing the Loop with Action-Oriented Outputs
Outcome Reports by Theme: Publish concise, actionable reports for each thematic track summarizing discussions, key recommendations, and follow-up actions.
Accountability Sessions: Dedicate a segment to review progress on previous IGF recommendations, ensuring continuity and accountability.
Policy Recommendations Platform: Create a dynamic online repository for IGF outcomes linked to relevant global agendas, like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
8. Collaborations with Other Global Initiatives
Cross-Forum Integration: Collaborate with UN processes (e.g., SDGs, WSIS, and UNFCCC) to align thematic tracks with broader global goals.
Inter-IGF Exchange: Foster knowledge exchange between regional IGFs and the global IGF to amplify grassroots solutions.
9. Simplified Schedule for Greater Engagement
Thematic Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to different themes for focused participation.
Pre-Forum Webinars: Host webinars before the IGF to introduce key topics and prepare participants.
Networking Breaks: Include structured networking breaks for participants to form meaningful connections.
10. Celebrating Innovation and Impact
Global Digital Awards: Introduce awards for innovative digital solutions aligned with IGF themes to encourage stakeholders to contribute actionable ideas.
Showcase Best Practices: Host an "Innovation Fair" where participants display successful initiatives or projects from their regions.
By adopting these changes, the IGF can become a more dynamic, inclusive, and solution-driven platform that effectively addresses global digital governance challenges and enhances its influence on international policy discussions.
Civil Society
ID301
Cybersecurity and Trust, Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
To address how the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) annual meeting and its intersessional work can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), consider the following points:
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles
Integrate GDC Priorities: Ensure the IGF’s annual themes and discussions align with the core principles of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and trust in technology.
Promote Multistakeholder Dialogue: Use the IGF as a platform to convene governments, civil society, private sector, and technical community stakeholders to identify challenges and opportunities in implementing the GDC.
2. Serve as a Monitoring Platform for WSIS Implementation
Regular Updates on Progress: Dedicate sessions at the IGF to review and assess the implementation of WSIS action lines and targets.
Highlight Regional and Thematic Contributions: Encourage regional IGFs and national initiatives to report on progress and best practices in addressing WSIS goals, ensuring diverse representation.
3. Strengthen Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task IGF's intersessional groups to focus on topics directly linked to the GDC and WSIS, such as digital rights, capacity building, and infrastructure development.
Action-Oriented Recommendations: Ensure that the outputs of these groups offer practical, actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders.
4. Enhance IGF Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Develop tangible, consensus-driven policy recommendations from IGF discussions to inform the GDC's implementation and WSIS reviews.
Link to Global Agendas: Establish clear connections between IGF outputs and other global processes, including the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to maximize the IGF's relevance.
5. Foster Inclusion and Capacity Building
Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Ensure that underrepresented groups, including women, youth, and communities from the Global South, are actively involved in IGF discussions and contribute to the GDC and WSIS review.
Capacity Development Initiatives: Use IGF intersessional work to empower stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to participate meaningfully in digital governance discussions.
6. Preparation for the 2025 High-Level Meeting
Pre-Summit Consultations: Use upcoming IGFs to conduct consultations and preparatory dialogues for the 2025 high-level meeting.
Synergies with Other UN Processes: Collaborate with other UN bodies and initiatives, such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism, to ensure coherence in global digital governance efforts.
By strategically aligning its themes, outputs, and intersessional activities, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC's goals and contributing to the effective review and implementation of WSIS outcomes.
1. Align IGF Themes with Global Digital Compact Principles
Integrate GDC Priorities: Ensure the IGF’s annual themes and discussions align with the core principles of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, data governance, human rights, and trust in technology.
Promote Multistakeholder Dialogue: Use the IGF as a platform to convene governments, civil society, private sector, and technical community stakeholders to identify challenges and opportunities in implementing the GDC.
2. Serve as a Monitoring Platform for WSIS Implementation
Regular Updates on Progress: Dedicate sessions at the IGF to review and assess the implementation of WSIS action lines and targets.
Highlight Regional and Thematic Contributions: Encourage regional IGFs and national initiatives to report on progress and best practices in addressing WSIS goals, ensuring diverse representation.
3. Strengthen Intersessional Work
Dynamic Coalitions and Best Practice Forums (BPFs): Task IGF's intersessional groups to focus on topics directly linked to the GDC and WSIS, such as digital rights, capacity building, and infrastructure development.
Action-Oriented Recommendations: Ensure that the outputs of these groups offer practical, actionable insights for policymakers and stakeholders.
4. Enhance IGF Outputs
Policy Recommendations: Develop tangible, consensus-driven policy recommendations from IGF discussions to inform the GDC's implementation and WSIS reviews.
Link to Global Agendas: Establish clear connections between IGF outputs and other global processes, including the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to maximize the IGF's relevance.
5. Foster Inclusion and Capacity Building
Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Ensure that underrepresented groups, including women, youth, and communities from the Global South, are actively involved in IGF discussions and contribute to the GDC and WSIS review.
Capacity Development Initiatives: Use IGF intersessional work to empower stakeholders with the knowledge and skills needed to participate meaningfully in digital governance discussions.
6. Preparation for the 2025 High-Level Meeting
Pre-Summit Consultations: Use upcoming IGFs to conduct consultations and preparatory dialogues for the 2025 high-level meeting.
Synergies with Other UN Processes: Collaborate with other UN bodies and initiatives, such as the Technology Facilitation Mechanism, to ensure coherence in global digital governance efforts.
By strategically aligning its themes, outputs, and intersessional activities, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the GDC's goals and contributing to the effective review and implementation of WSIS outcomes.
Here are innovative ideas to enhance the format and design of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to make it more impactful, inclusive, and action-oriented:
1. Thematic Tracks with Integrated Cross-Cutting Issues
Introduce Priority Tracks: Structure the IGF around 5-6 broad themes aligned with global priorities, such as:
Universal Digital Access and Connectivity
Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence
Digital Inclusion and Human Rights
Cybersecurity and Trust
Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Development
Climate Action and Digital Responsibility
Cross-Cutting Issues: Ensure each track integrates cross-cutting themes like gender, youth, and regional challenges to create a holistic approach.
Problem-Solution Focus: Dedicate thematic sessions to actionable outcomes, such as identifying bottlenecks and co-creating strategies for global digital challenges.
2. Multi-Tiered Sessions for Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder-Specific Tracks: Organize sessions based on stakeholder types (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector, academia) to allow targeted discussions.
Interactive Roundtables: Replace some panel discussions with smaller, interactive roundtables to promote meaningful dialogue and collaboration.
Action Labs: Introduce "Action Labs" where participants collaboratively brainstorm and propose innovative solutions to specific global or regional digital issues.
3. New Formats for Engagement
Living Sessions: Establish ongoing sessions where outcomes are updated throughout the year, enabling continuity between annual IGFs.
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, impactful talks by experts, innovators, and youth to share quick insights or new ideas in under 10 minutes.
Hackathons or Sprints: Organize hackathons or policy sprints to address specific challenges and present tangible outcomes at the IGF.
Debates and Simulations: Host debates on contentious issues or simulations to allow participants to explore policy scenarios interactively.
4. Regional and Community-Driven Input
Regional Voices Hub: Dedicate time slots to showcase key insights and recommendations from regional IGFs and grassroots initiatives.
Community Feedback Mechanism: Create open sessions where attendees can propose new topics for future IGFs or reflect on the forum’s ongoing work.
5. Strengthen Youth and Inclusion Dimensions
Youth-Led Tracks: Designate thematic sessions led by youth participants to integrate fresh perspectives and solutions.
Mentorship Program: Pair youth and first-time attendees with experienced IGF participants to facilitate networking and learning.
Inclusivity Challenges: Use challenges or competitions to encourage underrepresented groups to propose innovative ideas for IGF consideration.
6. Enhanced Digital and Hybrid Features
Interactive Online Platforms: Use advanced digital tools (e.g., collaborative whiteboards, virtual breakout rooms) to make hybrid participation more engaging.
Live Polling and Feedback: Integrate real-time polling and interactive Q&A during sessions to increase engagement from in-person and virtual audiences.
Accessibility Standards: Ensure multilingual live translations, captioning, and easy access for participants with disabilities.
7. Closing the Loop with Action-Oriented Outputs
Outcome Reports by Theme: Publish concise, actionable reports for each thematic track summarizing discussions, key recommendations, and follow-up actions.
Accountability Sessions: Dedicate a segment to review progress on previous IGF recommendations, ensuring continuity and accountability.
Policy Recommendations Platform: Create a dynamic online repository for IGF outcomes linked to relevant global agendas, like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
8. Collaborations with Other Global Initiatives
Cross-Forum Integration: Collaborate with UN processes (e.g., SDGs, WSIS, and UNFCCC) to align thematic tracks with broader global goals.
Inter-IGF Exchange: Foster knowledge exchange between regional IGFs and the global IGF to amplify grassroots solutions.
9. Simplified Schedule for Greater Engagement
Thematic Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to different themes for focused participation.
Pre-Forum Webinars: Host webinars before the IGF to introduce key topics and prepare participants.
Networking Breaks: Include structured networking breaks for participants to form meaningful connections.
10. Celebrating Innovation and Impact
Global Digital Awards: Introduce awards for innovative digital solutions aligned with IGF themes to encourage stakeholders to contribute actionable ideas.
Showcase Best Practices: Host an "Innovation Fair" where participants display successful initiatives or projects from their regions.
By adopting these changes, the IGF can become a more dynamic, inclusive, and solution-driven platform that effectively addresses global digital governance challenges and enhances its influence on international policy discussions.
1. Thematic Tracks with Integrated Cross-Cutting Issues
Introduce Priority Tracks: Structure the IGF around 5-6 broad themes aligned with global priorities, such as:
Universal Digital Access and Connectivity
Data Governance and Artificial Intelligence
Digital Inclusion and Human Rights
Cybersecurity and Trust
Emerging Technologies and Sustainable Development
Climate Action and Digital Responsibility
Cross-Cutting Issues: Ensure each track integrates cross-cutting themes like gender, youth, and regional challenges to create a holistic approach.
Problem-Solution Focus: Dedicate thematic sessions to actionable outcomes, such as identifying bottlenecks and co-creating strategies for global digital challenges.
2. Multi-Tiered Sessions for Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder-Specific Tracks: Organize sessions based on stakeholder types (e.g., governments, civil society, private sector, academia) to allow targeted discussions.
Interactive Roundtables: Replace some panel discussions with smaller, interactive roundtables to promote meaningful dialogue and collaboration.
Action Labs: Introduce "Action Labs" where participants collaboratively brainstorm and propose innovative solutions to specific global or regional digital issues.
3. New Formats for Engagement
Living Sessions: Establish ongoing sessions where outcomes are updated throughout the year, enabling continuity between annual IGFs.
Lightning Talks: Introduce short, impactful talks by experts, innovators, and youth to share quick insights or new ideas in under 10 minutes.
Hackathons or Sprints: Organize hackathons or policy sprints to address specific challenges and present tangible outcomes at the IGF.
Debates and Simulations: Host debates on contentious issues or simulations to allow participants to explore policy scenarios interactively.
4. Regional and Community-Driven Input
Regional Voices Hub: Dedicate time slots to showcase key insights and recommendations from regional IGFs and grassroots initiatives.
Community Feedback Mechanism: Create open sessions where attendees can propose new topics for future IGFs or reflect on the forum’s ongoing work.
5. Strengthen Youth and Inclusion Dimensions
Youth-Led Tracks: Designate thematic sessions led by youth participants to integrate fresh perspectives and solutions.
Mentorship Program: Pair youth and first-time attendees with experienced IGF participants to facilitate networking and learning.
Inclusivity Challenges: Use challenges or competitions to encourage underrepresented groups to propose innovative ideas for IGF consideration.
6. Enhanced Digital and Hybrid Features
Interactive Online Platforms: Use advanced digital tools (e.g., collaborative whiteboards, virtual breakout rooms) to make hybrid participation more engaging.
Live Polling and Feedback: Integrate real-time polling and interactive Q&A during sessions to increase engagement from in-person and virtual audiences.
Accessibility Standards: Ensure multilingual live translations, captioning, and easy access for participants with disabilities.
7. Closing the Loop with Action-Oriented Outputs
Outcome Reports by Theme: Publish concise, actionable reports for each thematic track summarizing discussions, key recommendations, and follow-up actions.
Accountability Sessions: Dedicate a segment to review progress on previous IGF recommendations, ensuring continuity and accountability.
Policy Recommendations Platform: Create a dynamic online repository for IGF outcomes linked to relevant global agendas, like the Global Digital Compact or WSIS+20.
8. Collaborations with Other Global Initiatives
Cross-Forum Integration: Collaborate with UN processes (e.g., SDGs, WSIS, and UNFCCC) to align thematic tracks with broader global goals.
Inter-IGF Exchange: Foster knowledge exchange between regional IGFs and the global IGF to amplify grassroots solutions.
9. Simplified Schedule for Greater Engagement
Thematic Focus Days: Dedicate specific days to different themes for focused participation.
Pre-Forum Webinars: Host webinars before the IGF to introduce key topics and prepare participants.
Networking Breaks: Include structured networking breaks for participants to form meaningful connections.
10. Celebrating Innovation and Impact
Global Digital Awards: Introduce awards for innovative digital solutions aligned with IGF themes to encourage stakeholders to contribute actionable ideas.
Showcase Best Practices: Host an "Innovation Fair" where participants display successful initiatives or projects from their regions.
By adopting these changes, the IGF can become a more dynamic, inclusive, and solution-driven platform that effectively addresses global digital governance challenges and enhances its influence on international policy discussions.
Civil Society
ID302
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Topic : DIGITAL INCLUSION, DIGITAL FOR ALL
Target : Rural Areas
In Africa, 582 million people belong to the rural population, and in Asia, more than 2 billion. This represents approximately 60% of the population of these two continents which lives in the countryside.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (my country) contains more than 70% of the rural population.
Forums locaux du numérique (Local digital forums) in DRC are revolutionizing access to digital skills in rural areas to promote the massive inclusion of the entire population, particularly women and girls.
The initiative aims to fill the training gap in these regions in partnership with potential technical partners.
A digitalized village will reduce the number of rural exoduses, because rural populations will have the same possibilities as those in urban areas in the digital field. Which is the future of humanity.
Each training center created during these forums becomes a pilot center for each territory nationwide.
Recommendations:
- Initiate more of the rural population, particularly women and girls in Africa digital tools;
- develop applications that can enable connectivity between villages;
- install wifi hot spots and training centers in each region (community telecenters);
- Promote women's initiatives in innovation, digital and technology;
- Invest in the creation of digital solutions for education and health;
- Reduce the cost of internet in rural areas.
Done in Kinshasa (DemocraticRepublicofCongo), 12h january 2025.
Khibunda Ngongo Dab
Founder of Forums locaux du numérique
+243815754405
Target : Rural Areas
In Africa, 582 million people belong to the rural population, and in Asia, more than 2 billion. This represents approximately 60% of the population of these two continents which lives in the countryside.
The Democratic Republic of Congo (my country) contains more than 70% of the rural population.
Forums locaux du numérique (Local digital forums) in DRC are revolutionizing access to digital skills in rural areas to promote the massive inclusion of the entire population, particularly women and girls.
The initiative aims to fill the training gap in these regions in partnership with potential technical partners.
A digitalized village will reduce the number of rural exoduses, because rural populations will have the same possibilities as those in urban areas in the digital field. Which is the future of humanity.
Each training center created during these forums becomes a pilot center for each territory nationwide.
Recommendations:
- Initiate more of the rural population, particularly women and girls in Africa digital tools;
- develop applications that can enable connectivity between villages;
- install wifi hot spots and training centers in each region (community telecenters);
- Promote women's initiatives in innovation, digital and technology;
- Invest in the creation of digital solutions for education and health;
- Reduce the cost of internet in rural areas.
Done in Kinshasa (DemocraticRepublicofCongo), 12h january 2025.
Khibunda Ngongo Dab
Founder of Forums locaux du numérique
+243815754405
Digital inclusion is the best way to achieve. Through this annual meeting, we will speak loud about it again. The reduction of cost of internet.
Yes
But i can do it well in french. How can i be connected to french team to work about it?
We want to se 20th IGF Summit be broadcasting in our areas in Africa, in our languages and themes
But i can do it well in french. How can i be connected to french team to work about it?
We want to se 20th IGF Summit be broadcasting in our areas in Africa, in our languages and themes
Civil Society
ID303
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The form does not permit the choice of more than one issue per area from the dropdown box so I list our choices to prioritize here:
1. Cybersecurity and Trust Issues: Child online safety; Disinformation; and Internet Fragmentation.
2. Digital Cooperation Issues: Broadening stakeholder engagement in IG; IGF organisation & role; Multistakeholderism and Multidisciplinarity.
3. Emerging Technologies and Innovation Issues: Distributed ledger-blockchain; Metaverse; Virtual/Augmented reality.
1. Cybersecurity and Trust Issues: Child online safety; Disinformation; and Internet Fragmentation.
2. Digital Cooperation Issues: Broadening stakeholder engagement in IG; IGF organisation & role; Multistakeholderism and Multidisciplinarity.
3. Emerging Technologies and Innovation Issues: Distributed ledger-blockchain; Metaverse; Virtual/Augmented reality.
WSIS+20 is the opportunity to assess and strengthen the global open and free internet. Applying the KISS framework [Keep-Improve-Stop-Start], the review should Keep fostering inclusive multistakeholder dialogues - the backbone of the WSIS process. Engagement across governments, private sector actors, civil society, and international organisations should remain the mainstay for addressing digital divides and ensuring a truly global vision for the free and open internet.
It is essential to Improve the implementation of past commitments. Many initiatives launched under WSIS+10 have not achieved tangible results, particularly in regions with limited infrastructure. Strengthening accountability mechanisms, resource allocation, and integrating measurable outcomes into future action plans should help bridge this gap. Discussions should expand beyond access to include the quality of that access, and cover issues like digital skills, cybersecurity, and human rights.
WSIS+20 must also recognize what to Stop. Overemphasis on high-level declarations without actionable follow-through has been a recurring weakness.
WSIS+20 should Start prioritizing emerging challenges and their governance. The rapid development of technologies like generative AI, quantum computing, and Virtual worlds requires proactive governance frameworks. A forward-looking WSIS+20 must address that need.
It is essential to Improve the implementation of past commitments. Many initiatives launched under WSIS+10 have not achieved tangible results, particularly in regions with limited infrastructure. Strengthening accountability mechanisms, resource allocation, and integrating measurable outcomes into future action plans should help bridge this gap. Discussions should expand beyond access to include the quality of that access, and cover issues like digital skills, cybersecurity, and human rights.
WSIS+20 must also recognize what to Stop. Overemphasis on high-level declarations without actionable follow-through has been a recurring weakness.
WSIS+20 should Start prioritizing emerging challenges and their governance. The rapid development of technologies like generative AI, quantum computing, and Virtual worlds requires proactive governance frameworks. A forward-looking WSIS+20 must address that need.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID304
Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
I have five additional inputs and recommendations:
1. In an overarching strategic goal reflecting a priority underlined in several keynote speeches in Riyadh, the IGF should continue its important work in fostering collaborative proposals for connecting the remaining unconnected 2.6 billion people. If it is developed in coordination with the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, I believe that implementation of this strategy would make a significant contribution to getting the SDGs substantially back on track. I recommend that the aim in 2025 should be to develop with inputs from national and regional IGFs and the active support of the IGF's intersessional activities (DCs, PNs and BPFs), a multistakeholder strategy for substantially reducing this figure. This process should launch at IGF2025. I believe that realistic target setting by the IGF would help to drive achievement of this strategy's goals: e.g. targets to reduce the unconnected figure to 2 billion by 2030 across all regions of the Global South; and drawing on the experience of successful initiatives in that initial period, to 1.5 billion by 2035 and to 0.5 billion by 2040.
2. Given the increasing urgency of the humanitarian, economic and political impacts of climate change, it is vital now to upgrade and generally increase the profile of the IGF's deliberations on environmental issues with the development of specific policy recommendations and technical expert guidance. I suggest the current work of the IGF's Dynamic Coalition on the Environment (DCE - https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/dynamic-coalition-on-environment-dce ). If necessary in order to benefit from IGF Secretariat support and centralised resourcing, DCE should be invited to consider reinstatement as a Policy Network (as previously) with the mission to develop an action-orientated IGF workstream on environment and climate change.
3. Due to the reduced presence of civil society representation at IGF2024, there needs to be a reaffirmation in 2025 of the IGF's leading role in advancing freedom expression online, human rights and protection of journalists, bloggers and other online activists. I believe the programme for IGF2025 should reflect this.
4. The risks of global Internet fragmentation and the impacts of Internet shutdowns in the context of widening international conflicts, loom ever larger. The IGF (supported by the Internet Society) should not lose sight of the need to analyse and develop responses to these negative trends, and to champion the WSIS principles, values and benefits of the single, interoperable, safe and secure Internet that is facilitated and enhanced by cross-border data flows and technical protocols that support universal access in all regions and countries.
5. I think consideration should be given to scaling back IGF2025's coverage of AI issues following the large number of AI-related sessions at IGF 2024 (which demonstrated the value of the IGF's mandated scope including AI) until after ODET has set out its plans for a) initiating AI policy dialogues within the UN and b) implementing the GDC's commitments on AI on a multistakeholder basis. IGF 2025 could meanwhile usefully report to stakeholders on progress across the existing AI framework initiatives and their relevance to IGF 2024 Messages on AI. I believe that this would help stakeholders to navigate an increasingly complex array of international AI frameworks and specific ongoing initiatives in 2025-26. This would also benefit the IGF community in freeing up more space in the IGF 2025 programme for other fast evolving technology developments, notably quantum (including post-quantum cryptography), metaverses and Web 3.0 decentralised Internet based on blockchain (which had substantially dropped off the IGF 2024 schedule). Space in the programme for IGF 2025 should also be provided for ICANN to present its Applicant Guidebook for the upcoming new gTLD programme which is expected to be published for stakeholder review and feedback in June 2025. Assuming renewal of the IGF's mandate, IGF 2026 should be the key opportunity for the IGF to advance its contributions substantially on AI policy and best practice, and proceed to provide consensus-based messages and other inputs into the leading global AI policy arenas without the risk of IGF duplicating multistakeholder engagement in other global processes on AI. This would also help to reduce the burdens and costs for AI stakeholders facing a confusing array of multiple channels for engagement in 2025.
1. In an overarching strategic goal reflecting a priority underlined in several keynote speeches in Riyadh, the IGF should continue its important work in fostering collaborative proposals for connecting the remaining unconnected 2.6 billion people. If it is developed in coordination with the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development, I believe that implementation of this strategy would make a significant contribution to getting the SDGs substantially back on track. I recommend that the aim in 2025 should be to develop with inputs from national and regional IGFs and the active support of the IGF's intersessional activities (DCs, PNs and BPFs), a multistakeholder strategy for substantially reducing this figure. This process should launch at IGF2025. I believe that realistic target setting by the IGF would help to drive achievement of this strategy's goals: e.g. targets to reduce the unconnected figure to 2 billion by 2030 across all regions of the Global South; and drawing on the experience of successful initiatives in that initial period, to 1.5 billion by 2035 and to 0.5 billion by 2040.
2. Given the increasing urgency of the humanitarian, economic and political impacts of climate change, it is vital now to upgrade and generally increase the profile of the IGF's deliberations on environmental issues with the development of specific policy recommendations and technical expert guidance. I suggest the current work of the IGF's Dynamic Coalition on the Environment (DCE - https://www.intgovforum.org/en/content/dynamic-coalition-on-environment-dce ). If necessary in order to benefit from IGF Secretariat support and centralised resourcing, DCE should be invited to consider reinstatement as a Policy Network (as previously) with the mission to develop an action-orientated IGF workstream on environment and climate change.
3. Due to the reduced presence of civil society representation at IGF2024, there needs to be a reaffirmation in 2025 of the IGF's leading role in advancing freedom expression online, human rights and protection of journalists, bloggers and other online activists. I believe the programme for IGF2025 should reflect this.
4. The risks of global Internet fragmentation and the impacts of Internet shutdowns in the context of widening international conflicts, loom ever larger. The IGF (supported by the Internet Society) should not lose sight of the need to analyse and develop responses to these negative trends, and to champion the WSIS principles, values and benefits of the single, interoperable, safe and secure Internet that is facilitated and enhanced by cross-border data flows and technical protocols that support universal access in all regions and countries.
5. I think consideration should be given to scaling back IGF2025's coverage of AI issues following the large number of AI-related sessions at IGF 2024 (which demonstrated the value of the IGF's mandated scope including AI) until after ODET has set out its plans for a) initiating AI policy dialogues within the UN and b) implementing the GDC's commitments on AI on a multistakeholder basis. IGF 2025 could meanwhile usefully report to stakeholders on progress across the existing AI framework initiatives and their relevance to IGF 2024 Messages on AI. I believe that this would help stakeholders to navigate an increasingly complex array of international AI frameworks and specific ongoing initiatives in 2025-26. This would also benefit the IGF community in freeing up more space in the IGF 2025 programme for other fast evolving technology developments, notably quantum (including post-quantum cryptography), metaverses and Web 3.0 decentralised Internet based on blockchain (which had substantially dropped off the IGF 2024 schedule). Space in the programme for IGF 2025 should also be provided for ICANN to present its Applicant Guidebook for the upcoming new gTLD programme which is expected to be published for stakeholder review and feedback in June 2025. Assuming renewal of the IGF's mandate, IGF 2026 should be the key opportunity for the IGF to advance its contributions substantially on AI policy and best practice, and proceed to provide consensus-based messages and other inputs into the leading global AI policy arenas without the risk of IGF duplicating multistakeholder engagement in other global processes on AI. This would also help to reduce the burdens and costs for AI stakeholders facing a confusing array of multiple channels for engagement in 2025.
The IGF needs urgently to develop a coherent and fully integrated and inclusive strategy for undertaking a coordinating role for the IGF in the implementation of the GDC objectives and commitments. Having such a concrete and detailed strategy will assist in achieving recognition by the UN of this role for the IGF in the ongoing GDC process and also in the WSIS+20 process when I believe a permanent mandate for the IGF should be created by the UN (with periodic performance reviews by ECOSOC/CSTD). The Dynamic Coalitions showcased in their Main Session in Riyadh how 21 of the current 31 coalitions are focussing on specific GDC objectives and gearing up to contribute their expertise. A large number of DCs stand ready to contribute to the role of the IGF. The other intersessional workstreams. The PNs and BPFs should also contribute to the development of the IGF's strategy on GDC implementation for taking on this important role for the future evolution of global digital cooperation. The NRIs should also be consulted on the IGF's strategy for leading on the implementation because they provide the channel to regional, national and local multistakeholder communities for the necessary dissemination of GDC objectives and commitments to action. The NRIs also provide the means for monitoring and periodic reporting back to the UN ODET on progress of implementation, barriers and new opportunities at all geographical levels. The DCs, PNs, BPFs and NRIs should all develop mechanisms for submitting 6 monthly synthesis reports to ODET that cover a) their respective activities relating to implementation of GDC commitments; and b) reviews of progress generally in the implementation of GDC commitments, highlighting any barriers and emerging issues they have identified which were not anticipated in the GDC preparatory phase, and proposing recommended courses of collaborative action for addressing these.
I have the following three ideas I wish to share:
1) The IGF should establish an inclusive, consensus-based, multi-year process for developing IGF recommendations on emerging policy issues that have been extensively considered at an annual global IGF and prioritised in the output messages as requiring urgent global action through multistakeholder cooperation. This process should be overseen jointly by the Leadership Panel, the MAG and the Secretariat. It should be taken forward intersessionally through one or more of the existing DCs, BPFs and PNs, and/or through newly created intersessional mechanisms specificially established by the LP, MAG and Secretariat for this purpose.
2) The Day 0 programme could be reconfigured more structurally with a clearer demarcation from the main IGF programme of Days 1-4 than I think was the case at IGF2024. My recommendation is to allocate in its schedule sessions that prepare the ground for the plenary sessions and thematic tracks of the main programme. Accordingly, I suggest four main parts of this day's schedule. Part One (first half of morning): the customary host country presentation. Part Two (second half of morning): a Leadership Panel session with two main purposes: a) to present a report to the global IGF community on their outreach during the previous year to promote the previous IGF's outputs to government leaders and private sector decision-takers; and b) to present their proposals for the IGF's strategic priorities for the year ahead. Part Three (early-mid afternoon): a session for the IGF's intersessional activities - the DCs, the PNs and BPFs - to present i) synthesis reports on their previous year's activities (including those relating to GDC implementation), their individual outputs (e.g. guidelines, toolkits and recommended best practices); and ii) their contributions to global IGF outputs (including draft IGF policy recommendations which they have developed on emerging issues raised at the previous IGF as proposed in 1) above. Part Four (late afternoon): MAG presents an orientation of themian programme, signalling in particular the main thematic sessions, the workshop programme progression, the LP and MAG open sessions, the Village plan and the process for developing the session outputs, calls for action, the report production and the subsequent dissemination of IGF Messages.
1) The IGF should establish an inclusive, consensus-based, multi-year process for developing IGF recommendations on emerging policy issues that have been extensively considered at an annual global IGF and prioritised in the output messages as requiring urgent global action through multistakeholder cooperation. This process should be overseen jointly by the Leadership Panel, the MAG and the Secretariat. It should be taken forward intersessionally through one or more of the existing DCs, BPFs and PNs, and/or through newly created intersessional mechanisms specificially established by the LP, MAG and Secretariat for this purpose.
2) The Day 0 programme could be reconfigured more structurally with a clearer demarcation from the main IGF programme of Days 1-4 than I think was the case at IGF2024. My recommendation is to allocate in its schedule sessions that prepare the ground for the plenary sessions and thematic tracks of the main programme. Accordingly, I suggest four main parts of this day's schedule. Part One (first half of morning): the customary host country presentation. Part Two (second half of morning): a Leadership Panel session with two main purposes: a) to present a report to the global IGF community on their outreach during the previous year to promote the previous IGF's outputs to government leaders and private sector decision-takers; and b) to present their proposals for the IGF's strategic priorities for the year ahead. Part Three (early-mid afternoon): a session for the IGF's intersessional activities - the DCs, the PNs and BPFs - to present i) synthesis reports on their previous year's activities (including those relating to GDC implementation), their individual outputs (e.g. guidelines, toolkits and recommended best practices); and ii) their contributions to global IGF outputs (including draft IGF policy recommendations which they have developed on emerging issues raised at the previous IGF as proposed in 1) above. Part Four (late afternoon): MAG presents an orientation of themian programme, signalling in particular the main thematic sessions, the workshop programme progression, the LP and MAG open sessions, the Village plan and the process for developing the session outputs, calls for action, the report production and the subsequent dissemination of IGF Messages.
Private Sector
ID305
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content
Empowering Regional Voices in Global Digital Governance
On behalf of the Arab Media Union, we propose the inclusion of a dedicated thematic track at the 2025 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to address "Regional Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Transformation." This track should focus on the unique issues faced by the Arab region, including digital divide reduction, equitable access to internet infrastructure, and fostering local content creation in Arabic.
The Arab Media Union suggests forming regional multi-stakeholder panels involving governments, civil society, private sector representatives, and technical experts to discuss strategies tailored to regional needs. Specific topics could include:
Developing frameworks for localizing AI and emerging technologies to align with cultural and linguistic contexts.
Strengthening intellectual property (IP) rights in the digital domain to support content creators in the Arab region.
Expanding digital literacy programs to empower underrepresented groups, especially women and youth.
By addressing these issues, the IGF can ensure that the perspectives of the Arab region contribute meaningfully to global digital governance policies.
Suggestion 2: Establishing Ethical Standards for Digital Media and AI-Driven Content
The Arab Media Union emphasizes the urgent need to develop ethical standards for digital media, especially in the age of AI-driven content creation and dissemination. To this end, we propose a Global Code of Ethics for Digital Media and AI, to be discussed and drafted during the 2025 IGF.
Key elements of this initiative could include:
Guidelines for combating misinformation and fake news in digital media, leveraging AI responsibly to detect and mitigate false narratives.
Ethical principles for AI-generated content, ensuring transparency, accountability, and alignment with human rights.
Promoting partnerships between media organizations, AI developers, and policymakers to create a balanced regulatory framework that fosters innovation while protecting public interests.
The Arab Media Union offers to lead a session showcasing its regional initiatives on digital media ethics and AI content governance, including lessons learned and scalable models for global adoption.
These inputs aim to enhance the IGF’s impact in promoting inclusive, ethical, and regionally responsive internet governance.
On behalf of the Arab Media Union, we propose the inclusion of a dedicated thematic track at the 2025 Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to address "Regional Challenges and Opportunities in Digital Transformation." This track should focus on the unique issues faced by the Arab region, including digital divide reduction, equitable access to internet infrastructure, and fostering local content creation in Arabic.
The Arab Media Union suggests forming regional multi-stakeholder panels involving governments, civil society, private sector representatives, and technical experts to discuss strategies tailored to regional needs. Specific topics could include:
Developing frameworks for localizing AI and emerging technologies to align with cultural and linguistic contexts.
Strengthening intellectual property (IP) rights in the digital domain to support content creators in the Arab region.
Expanding digital literacy programs to empower underrepresented groups, especially women and youth.
By addressing these issues, the IGF can ensure that the perspectives of the Arab region contribute meaningfully to global digital governance policies.
Suggestion 2: Establishing Ethical Standards for Digital Media and AI-Driven Content
The Arab Media Union emphasizes the urgent need to develop ethical standards for digital media, especially in the age of AI-driven content creation and dissemination. To this end, we propose a Global Code of Ethics for Digital Media and AI, to be discussed and drafted during the 2025 IGF.
Key elements of this initiative could include:
Guidelines for combating misinformation and fake news in digital media, leveraging AI responsibly to detect and mitigate false narratives.
Ethical principles for AI-generated content, ensuring transparency, accountability, and alignment with human rights.
Promoting partnerships between media organizations, AI developers, and policymakers to create a balanced regulatory framework that fosters innovation while protecting public interests.
The Arab Media Union offers to lead a session showcasing its regional initiatives on digital media ethics and AI content governance, including lessons learned and scalable models for global adoption.
These inputs aim to enhance the IGF’s impact in promoting inclusive, ethical, and regionally responsive internet governance.
We believe that the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) is playing a pivotal role in aligning its annual meetings and intersessional work with the objectives of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). To this end, we propose several measures that could contribute to the Forum’s mission, including:
Focusing on universal internet access and bridging the digital divide, particularly in underrepresented regions.
Enhancing digital capacity-building initiatives to empower individuals and communities, with a special focus on women, youth, and marginalized groups.
Promoting the ethical governance of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, to ensure inclusivity, transparency, and respect for human rights.
The IGF could also establish dedicated tracks or sessions aimed at advancing and implementing the goals of the GDC and WSIS. These sessions should encourage participation from governments, civil society, the private sector, and regional organizations to foster actionable outcomes and scalable models.
Additionally, the IGF can focus on creating effective platforms to showcase regional success stories and best practices that align with the objectives of the GDC and WSIS. For instance, the Arab Media Union has launched numerous awareness and educational initiatives over the past years in partnership with various organizations to emphasize the importance of digital transformation, promote safe internet usage, and combat misinformation in the digital realm.
We also emphasize the importance of prioritizing capacity-building programs that equip stakeholders, particularly from developing regions, with the knowledge and tools to engage effectively in GDC and WSIS activities. These programs could include workshops, toolkits, and mentorship opportunities.
We, therefore, propose the adoption of these measures, which can serve as a cornerstone for global digital transformation and governance, contributing meaningfully to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes in the lead-up to the high-level meeting in 2025. The Arab Media Union remains committed to supporting these efforts through active participation and regional expertise.
Focusing on universal internet access and bridging the digital divide, particularly in underrepresented regions.
Enhancing digital capacity-building initiatives to empower individuals and communities, with a special focus on women, youth, and marginalized groups.
Promoting the ethical governance of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, to ensure inclusivity, transparency, and respect for human rights.
The IGF could also establish dedicated tracks or sessions aimed at advancing and implementing the goals of the GDC and WSIS. These sessions should encourage participation from governments, civil society, the private sector, and regional organizations to foster actionable outcomes and scalable models.
Additionally, the IGF can focus on creating effective platforms to showcase regional success stories and best practices that align with the objectives of the GDC and WSIS. For instance, the Arab Media Union has launched numerous awareness and educational initiatives over the past years in partnership with various organizations to emphasize the importance of digital transformation, promote safe internet usage, and combat misinformation in the digital realm.
We also emphasize the importance of prioritizing capacity-building programs that equip stakeholders, particularly from developing regions, with the knowledge and tools to engage effectively in GDC and WSIS activities. These programs could include workshops, toolkits, and mentorship opportunities.
We, therefore, propose the adoption of these measures, which can serve as a cornerstone for global digital transformation and governance, contributing meaningfully to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and WSIS outcomes in the lead-up to the high-level meeting in 2025. The Arab Media Union remains committed to supporting these efforts through active participation and regional expertise.
The Arab Media Union proposes adopting a more dynamic and inclusive format for the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) to better address the complexities of internet governance and ensure broader, more impactful participation. We recommend several key measures, including transitioning from broad, overarching themes to clearly defined and actionable thematic tracks aligned with global priorities, such as: Universal internet access and bridging the digital divide.
Ethical governance of emerging technologies.
Cybersecurity and online safety, particularly for vulnerable groups.
Implementing effective mechanisms to combat misinformation and promote digital literacy.
The focus should also include regional and local perspectives, integrating youth innovators and creative thinkers more widely to propose fresh, actionable ideas for internet governance. Interactive formats such as live polls, Q&A platforms, and brainstorming workshops should be utilized to foster real-time collaboration and feedback.
Building capacity and providing practical tools are also essential. Each track should conclude with concrete, actionable recommendations, including metrics for measuring progress and success.
To enhance inclusivity, technology can be leveraged to improve remote participation through AI-driven translation tools, ensuring accessibility for diverse linguistic groups, and digital collaboration platforms can be used to enable continuous intersessional dialogue.
By implementing these measures, the IGF can become a more inclusive, practical, and results-driven platform, fostering collaboration and ensuring its outcomes align directly with global digital governance goals. The Arab Media Union stands ready to support these efforts with its expertise and regional and global insights.
Ethical governance of emerging technologies.
Cybersecurity and online safety, particularly for vulnerable groups.
Implementing effective mechanisms to combat misinformation and promote digital literacy.
The focus should also include regional and local perspectives, integrating youth innovators and creative thinkers more widely to propose fresh, actionable ideas for internet governance. Interactive formats such as live polls, Q&A platforms, and brainstorming workshops should be utilized to foster real-time collaboration and feedback.
Building capacity and providing practical tools are also essential. Each track should conclude with concrete, actionable recommendations, including metrics for measuring progress and success.
To enhance inclusivity, technology can be leveraged to improve remote participation through AI-driven translation tools, ensuring accessibility for diverse linguistic groups, and digital collaboration platforms can be used to enable continuous intersessional dialogue.
By implementing these measures, the IGF can become a more inclusive, practical, and results-driven platform, fostering collaboration and ensuring its outcomes align directly with global digital governance goals. The Arab Media Union stands ready to support these efforts with its expertise and regional and global insights.
Civil Society
ID306
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
Crossborder AI policies
In the cybersecurity and AI thematic tracks, have model presentations to support the paper presentations.
Private Sector
ID307
Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Challenges of 5G implementation for transportation in KSA
Technical Community
ID308
Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
To better contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS+20 Review, the IGF must strategically align its annual meetings and intersessional work with the principles of these global frameworks. This involves curating program tracks that reflect key priorities, such as universal connectivity, digital trust and security, and human rights online, allowing stakeholders to present progress and address challenges. The IGF can also strengthen its role as a platform for multistakeholder engagement by organizing consultations at national and regional levels, ensuring that grassroots voices and regional priorities—particularly from the Global South—are incorporated into global discussions. Expanding youth and civil society engagement through dedicated tracks and producing actionable position papers would further enrich contributions to these global agendas.
The IGF can enhance its role as a reporting and accountability platform by introducing annual progress reports that compile case studies and national updates on the implementation of WSIS and GDC commitments. Creating "progress dialogues" during annual meetings, where stakeholders share lessons learned and identify policy gaps, would also foster greater transparency and inform global decision-making processes. Additionally, establishing policy incubators and partnership hubs during IGF meetings could foster collaboration and co-creation of digital solutions aligned with sustainable development goals.
Strengthening synergies with regional frameworks, such as the African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy, would ensure that national and regional digital policies feed into global efforts and reflect diverse stakeholder priorities. The IGF's intersessional work could also focus on capacity-building by delivering technical workshops and regional implementation labs tailored to the specific needs of underrepresented countries like The Gambia. This would help bridge digital governance knowledge gaps and empower stakeholders to meaningfully contribute to the WSIS+20 process.
To maximize its impact, the IGF must produce focused outputs and policy recommendations that are concise, actionable, and aligned with global review frameworks. Strengthening collaboration with the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) to ensure IGF discussions translate into practical policy briefs for high-level dialogues is crucial. By fostering inclusive engagement, enhancing accountability, and prioritizing solution-driven outcomes, the IGF can solidify its role as a key platform for shaping and implementing the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 outcomes.
The IGF can enhance its role as a reporting and accountability platform by introducing annual progress reports that compile case studies and national updates on the implementation of WSIS and GDC commitments. Creating "progress dialogues" during annual meetings, where stakeholders share lessons learned and identify policy gaps, would also foster greater transparency and inform global decision-making processes. Additionally, establishing policy incubators and partnership hubs during IGF meetings could foster collaboration and co-creation of digital solutions aligned with sustainable development goals.
Strengthening synergies with regional frameworks, such as the African Union’s Digital Transformation Strategy, would ensure that national and regional digital policies feed into global efforts and reflect diverse stakeholder priorities. The IGF's intersessional work could also focus on capacity-building by delivering technical workshops and regional implementation labs tailored to the specific needs of underrepresented countries like The Gambia. This would help bridge digital governance knowledge gaps and empower stakeholders to meaningfully contribute to the WSIS+20 process.
To maximize its impact, the IGF must produce focused outputs and policy recommendations that are concise, actionable, and aligned with global review frameworks. Strengthening collaboration with the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) to ensure IGF discussions translate into practical policy briefs for high-level dialogues is crucial. By fostering inclusive engagement, enhancing accountability, and prioritizing solution-driven outcomes, the IGF can solidify its role as a key platform for shaping and implementing the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS+20 outcomes.
Civil Society
ID309
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Specially utilizing full potential of ionizer booster and static electricity to uplift it's meaningful innovation in weapon and human health
1.Blockchain
2.internet computing
3.Data sharing and privacy
4.AI in government sectors
5.Innovation and startup for emerging leaders.
2.internet computing
3.Data sharing and privacy
4.AI in government sectors
5.Innovation and startup for emerging leaders.
Intergovernmental Organization
ID310
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Government
ID311
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Media and Content
The use of generative AI, platform governance, disinformation
- Ensure that the IGF's annual themes and sessions reflect the key priorities of the Global Digital Compact (GDC).
- Encourage multi-stakeholder partnerships through networking sessions, collaborative activities, or by prioritizing sessions hosted by multiple organizations in collaboration.
- Ensure balanced representation of stakeholders across various sectors and regions, with particular attention to amplifying voices from developing countries.
- Use IGF sessions and campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).
- Encourage multi-stakeholder partnerships through networking sessions, collaborative activities, or by prioritizing sessions hosted by multiple organizations in collaboration.
- Ensure balanced representation of stakeholders across various sectors and regions, with particular attention to amplifying voices from developing countries.
- Use IGF sessions and campaigns to raise awareness about the GDC and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS).
I believe the IGF could be enhanced by incorporating more interactive formats, such as:
- Roundtable Discussions: Facilitated dialogues involving all participants, moderated by designated facilitators to ensure balanced contributions and dynamic exchanges.
- Workshops: Hands-on sessions that include small breakout groups for activities such as role-playing or scenario-based discussions.
- Panel Discussions: Structured presentations or sharing of viewpoints by up to four speakers on a specific topic. Limiting the number of panelists allows sufficient time for interaction with attendees.
- Roundtable Discussions: Facilitated dialogues involving all participants, moderated by designated facilitators to ensure balanced contributions and dynamic exchanges.
- Workshops: Hands-on sessions that include small breakout groups for activities such as role-playing or scenario-based discussions.
- Panel Discussions: Structured presentations or sharing of viewpoints by up to four speakers on a specific topic. Limiting the number of panelists allows sufficient time for interaction with attendees.
Civil Society
ID312
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
South Asia has distinct governance meaning, shaped by our unique history, culture, and indigenous heritage. Despite gaining sovereignty, our region remains influenced by external powers, perpetuating colonial legacies.
South Asian Region has been facing various forms of exploitation, from colonialism to post-colonial policy capture. Now, this region is struggling to cope with the digital age and the powerful wave of intelligent tech, dominated by big tech players and multinational corporations.
As an ICT policy and governance practitioner and academic, I urge the Internet Governance Forum to provide guidance and support. We need help developing inclusive governance policies and frameworks, free from colonial mindsets.
South Asian Region has been facing various forms of exploitation, from colonialism to post-colonial policy capture. Now, this region is struggling to cope with the digital age and the powerful wave of intelligent tech, dominated by big tech players and multinational corporations.
As an ICT policy and governance practitioner and academic, I urge the Internet Governance Forum to provide guidance and support. We need help developing inclusive governance policies and frameworks, free from colonial mindsets.
There is an urgent need to design global covenants that provide a guiding framework for future technologies, ensuring they align with the principles of inclusivity, accountability, and sustainability. The IGF annual meetings and intersessional work can play a pivotal role in advancing the Global Digital Compact by fostering multistakeholder dialogues to develop model laws and governance frameworks tailored to the unique socio-economic and cultural contexts of different regions. The IGF can further contribute by identifying best practices, promoting capacity-building initiatives, and facilitating cross-border collaborations in preparation for the high-level review meeting in 2025.
The IGF 2025 should embrace a thematic design that prioritizes "digital constitutionalism" and the evolving frameworks for internet governance in the era of intelligent technologies. Building on two decades of debates and research surrounding an Internet Bill of Rights and universal declarations on digital freedoms, the IGF can center its thematic tracks on the constitutionalization of internet governance as a foundational focus.
Technical Community
ID313
Artificial Intelligence, Media and Content
Information and Information literacy
Maneuver the information landscape
Healt information
Maneuver the information landscape
Healt information
By creating cooperation across sectors, institutions and themes.
Avoid pannels and focus on "lightnings speeches".
Another possible way of engage the audience is arrange talkshows where the presenters talk togheter.
Another possible way of engage the audience is arrange talkshows where the presenters talk togheter.
Private Sector
ID314
Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Rights and freedom issues are also very important more especially children's digital Rights, freedom and responsibilities, gender inclusion, civil, political, economic, cultural, and social rights of citizens.
The IGF and it's role in supporting major global initiatives I.e the global digital compact and WSIS+20 review.
IGF serves as a crucial multistakehoder platform for fostering discussions on internet governance and digital policies, aligning its objectives with major global initiatives such as the proposed Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the ongoing review of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS+20). To maximize it's contributions to these efforts, the IGF's annual meetings and intersessional work can strategically support these global frameworks, ensuring an inclusive, collaborative, and action oriented approach to addressing pressing digital challenges.
Strategic Enhancements for the IGF Engagement:
To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS+20 review, the IGF should consider the following strategic approaches:
1. Enhance Policy Outputs: The IGF's annual meetings should produce more actionable and concise recommendations to inform the GDC framework and WSIS +20 discussions
2. Expand Regional Engagement: Strengthening national and regional IGF'S (NRIs) can provide localized insights and ensure that global initiatives are inclusive and contextually relevant.
3. Collaboration with UN Bodies: Closer alignment with the initiatives like the UN High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation and the office of the Secretary-General's Envoy on Technology can amplify the IGF's impact on GDC and WSIS+20 process.
4. Measuring Impact: Establishing metrics to evaluate the IGF's contributions to digital inclusion, trust, and cooperation can help demonstrate its relevance to the broader global digital agenda.
IGF serves as a crucial multistakehoder platform for fostering discussions on internet governance and digital policies, aligning its objectives with major global initiatives such as the proposed Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the ongoing review of the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS+20). To maximize it's contributions to these efforts, the IGF's annual meetings and intersessional work can strategically support these global frameworks, ensuring an inclusive, collaborative, and action oriented approach to addressing pressing digital challenges.
Strategic Enhancements for the IGF Engagement:
To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the GDC and WSIS+20 review, the IGF should consider the following strategic approaches:
1. Enhance Policy Outputs: The IGF's annual meetings should produce more actionable and concise recommendations to inform the GDC framework and WSIS +20 discussions
2. Expand Regional Engagement: Strengthening national and regional IGF'S (NRIs) can provide localized insights and ensure that global initiatives are inclusive and contextually relevant.
3. Collaboration with UN Bodies: Closer alignment with the initiatives like the UN High-Level Panel on Digital Cooperation and the office of the Secretary-General's Envoy on Technology can amplify the IGF's impact on GDC and WSIS+20 process.
4. Measuring Impact: Establishing metrics to evaluate the IGF's contributions to digital inclusion, trust, and cooperation can help demonstrate its relevance to the broader global digital agenda.
Thematic Tracks with Regional Relevance means to organize the IGF around core global themes, like digital inclusion, cybersecurity, AI ethics or data governance. Within each theme, include sessions or panels that highlight Regional challenges and solutions (e.g digital inclusion in in Africa, cybersecurity in Europe). Partner with national and regional IGF'S (NRIs) to bring local insights to global discussions.
Organize sessions that explore overlaps between themes (e.g AI and digital rights or cybersecurity in IT systems. Use interdisciplinary panels with experts from multiple fields to provide diverse perspectives. Encourage breakthrough groups to discuss specific cross-thematic challenges.
This will promote a more integrated approach to solving complex digital issues. It will encourage participants to think outside their areas of expertise. And it will address challenges that span multiple areas, such as AIs impact on global security.
Organize sessions that explore overlaps between themes (e.g AI and digital rights or cybersecurity in IT systems. Use interdisciplinary panels with experts from multiple fields to provide diverse perspectives. Encourage breakthrough groups to discuss specific cross-thematic challenges.
This will promote a more integrated approach to solving complex digital issues. It will encourage participants to think outside their areas of expertise. And it will address challenges that span multiple areas, such as AIs impact on global security.
Government
ID315
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
In the rapidly evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Emerging Technologies, it is crucial to address the digital divide and the emerging AI divide, which threaten to exacerbate social and economic inequalities. The lack of access to AI tools and knowledge disproportionately impacts marginalized communities, leading to reduced job opportunities and a growing skills gap. For IGF 2025, I propose the following key considerations:
1. Bridging the Digital and AI Divide through Tailored AI Applications: AI applications must be designed to address the specific challenges faced by underserved populations. For example:
- Job-readiness programs powered by AI can upskill individuals who lack access to formal education or training. This could include free or low-cost platforms tailored to teach practical AI usage, coding, and digital literacy.
- AI-enabled vocational training modules can help individuals, especially those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, acquire skills relevant to emerging industries.
By prioritizing accessibility and affordability, AI solutions can become enablers rather than barriers to employment.
2. Empowering Senior Citizens with AI: Senior citizens often face difficulties in navigating modern digital ecosystems. AI can play a transformative role in:
- Simplifying interactions with technology through AI-driven voice assistants and personalized interfaces designed with accessibility in mind.
- Providing AI-powered tutorials and guides that help them understand and engage with services such as healthcare, banking, and communication.
- Enabling lifelong learning opportunities by integrating senior-focused curricula into AI-driven learning platforms, allowing them to adapt to and benefit from a technology-driven society.
3. Championing Open Access through AI and Emerging Technologies: "Open access for all" should be a guiding principle in the AI ecosystem to ensure equitable participation. This can be achieved by:
- Leveraging open-source AI tools and frameworks to provide free access to cutting-edge technologies, enabling individuals and organizations to innovate without prohibitive costs.
- Creating platforms where communities can contribute to open-source projects, fostering a culture of collaboration and inclusivity. For instance, initiatives could encourage youth, seniors, and marginalized groups to engage in projects that address local issues, thereby building technical skills while solving societal challenges.
4. Role of the Metaverse and Emerging Technologies: The Metaverse and Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR) offer unparalleled opportunities to bridge gaps in education, training, and connectivity:
- Virtual training centers in the Metaverse could bring AI education to remote areas, providing immersive learning experiences to individuals with limited access to traditional infrastructure.
- Collaborative spaces in the Metaverse can also foster global participation in open-source projects, making the development and use of AI a truly inclusive effort.
5. Encouraging Community-Driven Contributions: To make open-source ecosystems thrive, society must also play an active role in their growth. IGF 2025 could prioritize:
- Initiatives to educate communities about contributing to open-source projects, such as creating easy-to-understand guidelines and tools for first-time contributors.
- Showcasing successful community-driven open-source projects that solve real-world problems, inspiring others to follow suit.
By focusing on these areas, IGF 2025 can pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable digital future, ensuring that AI and emerging technologies are harnessed to bridge divides and empower communities worldwide.
1. Bridging the Digital and AI Divide through Tailored AI Applications: AI applications must be designed to address the specific challenges faced by underserved populations. For example:
- Job-readiness programs powered by AI can upskill individuals who lack access to formal education or training. This could include free or low-cost platforms tailored to teach practical AI usage, coding, and digital literacy.
- AI-enabled vocational training modules can help individuals, especially those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, acquire skills relevant to emerging industries.
By prioritizing accessibility and affordability, AI solutions can become enablers rather than barriers to employment.
2. Empowering Senior Citizens with AI: Senior citizens often face difficulties in navigating modern digital ecosystems. AI can play a transformative role in:
- Simplifying interactions with technology through AI-driven voice assistants and personalized interfaces designed with accessibility in mind.
- Providing AI-powered tutorials and guides that help them understand and engage with services such as healthcare, banking, and communication.
- Enabling lifelong learning opportunities by integrating senior-focused curricula into AI-driven learning platforms, allowing them to adapt to and benefit from a technology-driven society.
3. Championing Open Access through AI and Emerging Technologies: "Open access for all" should be a guiding principle in the AI ecosystem to ensure equitable participation. This can be achieved by:
- Leveraging open-source AI tools and frameworks to provide free access to cutting-edge technologies, enabling individuals and organizations to innovate without prohibitive costs.
- Creating platforms where communities can contribute to open-source projects, fostering a culture of collaboration and inclusivity. For instance, initiatives could encourage youth, seniors, and marginalized groups to engage in projects that address local issues, thereby building technical skills while solving societal challenges.
4. Role of the Metaverse and Emerging Technologies: The Metaverse and Virtual/Augmented Reality (VR/AR) offer unparalleled opportunities to bridge gaps in education, training, and connectivity:
- Virtual training centers in the Metaverse could bring AI education to remote areas, providing immersive learning experiences to individuals with limited access to traditional infrastructure.
- Collaborative spaces in the Metaverse can also foster global participation in open-source projects, making the development and use of AI a truly inclusive effort.
5. Encouraging Community-Driven Contributions: To make open-source ecosystems thrive, society must also play an active role in their growth. IGF 2025 could prioritize:
- Initiatives to educate communities about contributing to open-source projects, such as creating easy-to-understand guidelines and tools for first-time contributors.
- Showcasing successful community-driven open-source projects that solve real-world problems, inspiring others to follow suit.
By focusing on these areas, IGF 2025 can pave the way for a more inclusive and equitable digital future, ensuring that AI and emerging technologies are harnessed to bridge divides and empower communities worldwide.
To better align the IGF annual meeting and its intersessional work with the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, I propose integrating gamification strategies to enhance stakeholder engagement and participation, along with leveraging thematic inputs for tangible action plans.
1. Gamifying IGF Engagement
Gamification can transform IGF participation into a more dynamic and inclusive experience, encouraging attendees to actively engage with the forum and its agenda. Here are some actionable suggestions:
- IGF Points System: Introduce a points-based system in the official IGF app where participants earn points for attending sessions, engaging in discussions, submitting feedback, or networking with other attendees.
- Achievement Badges: Gamify milestones with digital badges or certifications, such as "AI Advocate" (attending AI-focused sessions), "Metaverse Explorer" (participating in emerging tech discussions), or "Open Access Champion" (contributing ideas on connectivity and inclusivity).
- Leaderboards and Rewards: Display global or regional leaderboards for IGF participants, recognizing active contributors with rewards like early access to session recordings, exclusive networking opportunities, or IGF merchandise.
- Interactive Challenges: Host IGF-wide challenges, such as crowdsourcing ideas for addressing digital divides or proposing innovative AI applications, with top contributors recognized during plenary sessions.
- Virtual Scavenger Hunts: Leverage gamification in the Metaverse or IGF’s digital platforms to create scavenger hunts that lead participants to key discussions or resources related to the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
2. Leveraging Thematic Inputs for GDC and WSIS Goals
The inputs related to AI applications, open access, and emerging technologies directly contribute to advancing both GDC and WSIS objectives by fostering inclusivity, innovation, and digital empowerment:
- AI for Open Access: By promoting open-source AI tools and frameworks, IGF can align with the GDC's aim to ensure equitable access to digital tools while addressing WSIS goals around bridging the digital divide.
- Inclusive Participation in the Metaverse: The Metaverse can become a platform for global dialogue, enabling underrepresented communities to engage in policymaking and knowledge-sharing. These efforts directly support the GDC’s commitment to inclusivity and WSIS objectives on universal access and meaningful connectivity.
- Youth and Senior Engagement: Focused initiatives on youth and senior citizens, as highlighted in the thematic inputs, empower these groups to actively participate in the digital economy, furthering the GDC’s aim for inclusivity and equitable digital opportunities.
3. Creating Synergies Between IGF, GDC, and WSIS
- Action-Oriented Sessions: Dedicate IGF workshops or sessions to brainstorming actionable steps for implementing GDC principles and reviewing WSIS outcomes, incorporating feedback loops that feed directly into global policymaking.
- Interactive Reporting Tools: Use gamification to encourage participants to provide input during IGF sessions on how policies and initiatives are advancing GDC and WSIS objectives.
- Open-Source Collaboration: Promote collaborative projects during IGF, where participants can contribute to open-source platforms aligned with WSIS action lines, such as creating digital tools for education, healthcare, and sustainability.
4. Long-Term Vision and Commitment
Gamifying the IGF experience, coupled with thematic inputs focusing on AI, open access, and innovation, can create a sustainable and inclusive ecosystem for advancing the GDC and WSIS goals. By making IGF sessions more interactive and action-driven, the forum can become a hub for tangible outcomes, fostering a collaborative environment for addressing global challenges in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
1. Gamifying IGF Engagement
Gamification can transform IGF participation into a more dynamic and inclusive experience, encouraging attendees to actively engage with the forum and its agenda. Here are some actionable suggestions:
- IGF Points System: Introduce a points-based system in the official IGF app where participants earn points for attending sessions, engaging in discussions, submitting feedback, or networking with other attendees.
- Achievement Badges: Gamify milestones with digital badges or certifications, such as "AI Advocate" (attending AI-focused sessions), "Metaverse Explorer" (participating in emerging tech discussions), or "Open Access Champion" (contributing ideas on connectivity and inclusivity).
- Leaderboards and Rewards: Display global or regional leaderboards for IGF participants, recognizing active contributors with rewards like early access to session recordings, exclusive networking opportunities, or IGF merchandise.
- Interactive Challenges: Host IGF-wide challenges, such as crowdsourcing ideas for addressing digital divides or proposing innovative AI applications, with top contributors recognized during plenary sessions.
- Virtual Scavenger Hunts: Leverage gamification in the Metaverse or IGF’s digital platforms to create scavenger hunts that lead participants to key discussions or resources related to the GDC and WSIS outcomes.
2. Leveraging Thematic Inputs for GDC and WSIS Goals
The inputs related to AI applications, open access, and emerging technologies directly contribute to advancing both GDC and WSIS objectives by fostering inclusivity, innovation, and digital empowerment:
- AI for Open Access: By promoting open-source AI tools and frameworks, IGF can align with the GDC's aim to ensure equitable access to digital tools while addressing WSIS goals around bridging the digital divide.
- Inclusive Participation in the Metaverse: The Metaverse can become a platform for global dialogue, enabling underrepresented communities to engage in policymaking and knowledge-sharing. These efforts directly support the GDC’s commitment to inclusivity and WSIS objectives on universal access and meaningful connectivity.
- Youth and Senior Engagement: Focused initiatives on youth and senior citizens, as highlighted in the thematic inputs, empower these groups to actively participate in the digital economy, furthering the GDC’s aim for inclusivity and equitable digital opportunities.
3. Creating Synergies Between IGF, GDC, and WSIS
- Action-Oriented Sessions: Dedicate IGF workshops or sessions to brainstorming actionable steps for implementing GDC principles and reviewing WSIS outcomes, incorporating feedback loops that feed directly into global policymaking.
- Interactive Reporting Tools: Use gamification to encourage participants to provide input during IGF sessions on how policies and initiatives are advancing GDC and WSIS objectives.
- Open-Source Collaboration: Promote collaborative projects during IGF, where participants can contribute to open-source platforms aligned with WSIS action lines, such as creating digital tools for education, healthcare, and sustainability.
4. Long-Term Vision and Commitment
Gamifying the IGF experience, coupled with thematic inputs focusing on AI, open access, and innovation, can create a sustainable and inclusive ecosystem for advancing the GDC and WSIS goals. By making IGF sessions more interactive and action-driven, the forum can become a hub for tangible outcomes, fostering a collaborative environment for addressing global challenges in the lead-up to the high-level meeting at the end of 2025.
Gamification of Themes and Engagement:
a) Theme-Specific Challenges
Design challenges for each track (e.g., an AI-themed challenge could be crowdsourcing innovative solutions to bridge the AI divide). Participants can join challenges and submit ideas through the IGF app or platform, earning points and recognition.
b) Participation Tiers
Encourage participation in sessions across tracks by creating tiers like:
"Theme Explorer" (attend 2 sessions in a track)
"Theme Advocate" (contribute to discussions in at least 1 session)
"Theme Leader" (present actionable outcomes in wrap-up sessions)
c) Leaderboard by Tracks
Create live leaderboards for engagement within thematic tracks to encourage active participation. This could include points for asking questions, providing feedback, or sharing takeaways on social media.
a) Theme-Specific Challenges
Design challenges for each track (e.g., an AI-themed challenge could be crowdsourcing innovative solutions to bridge the AI divide). Participants can join challenges and submit ideas through the IGF app or platform, earning points and recognition.
b) Participation Tiers
Encourage participation in sessions across tracks by creating tiers like:
"Theme Explorer" (attend 2 sessions in a track)
"Theme Advocate" (contribute to discussions in at least 1 session)
"Theme Leader" (present actionable outcomes in wrap-up sessions)
c) Leaderboard by Tracks
Create live leaderboards for engagement within thematic tracks to encourage active participation. This could include points for asking questions, providing feedback, or sharing takeaways on social media.
Civil Society
ID316
Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity, Peacetech
This is an opportunity to invite high representatives of the GDC and WSIS to meet the intersessional work, NRIs and other key groups and identify key topics to be addresed in those space, defining a common agenda for the next 6 months and next year in order to go deep inside on what is happening in different contexts and regions and present results on the WSIS and GDC spaces. It could be begin with a high level panel and then a workshop with representatives of the different groups, including all the stakeholders, topics and regions.
I think some of the workshops could present a kind of poster/gallery exhibition, with the key points of the panel then people can know what is it about and decide to assits one o another, or even if is not possible to assist know the basic information to share with their group.
Some expressions of art , comics, poetry, installations or others could be a different way to understand, not onlly trhough discussiones, but also since fellings and emotions, important topics that are been discussing, it could be also help for include new people in the conversations and to share with people who is not present and create interest in what is happening.
Some expressions of art , comics, poetry, installations or others could be a different way to understand, not onlly trhough discussiones, but also since fellings and emotions, important topics that are been discussing, it could be also help for include new people in the conversations and to share with people who is not present and create interest in what is happening.
Civil Society
ID317
Economic Issues and Development, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Technical and Operational Topics
Theme: "Digital Financial Inclusion"
The IGF can advance digital financial freedom and foster equitable access to the digital economy's opportunities. At its core, the Internet is a space for connection and creativity and a global marketplace. Open tools and standards promoting interoperable payment protocols enable more people, regardless of background or location, to access that marketplace, share their creativity, and earn from their intellectual property. Suppressing this marketplace undermines innovation, stifles freedom of expression, and creates barriers to economic participation. The IGF can be a critical venue for advocating for policies and systems that uphold financial freedom, empower producers, and ensure everyone can benefit from the digital world's opportunities.
The IGF can advance digital financial freedom and foster equitable access to the digital economy's opportunities. At its core, the Internet is a space for connection and creativity and a global marketplace. Open tools and standards promoting interoperable payment protocols enable more people, regardless of background or location, to access that marketplace, share their creativity, and earn from their intellectual property. Suppressing this marketplace undermines innovation, stifles freedom of expression, and creates barriers to economic participation. The IGF can be a critical venue for advocating for policies and systems that uphold financial freedom, empower producers, and ensure everyone can benefit from the digital world's opportunities.
Civil Society
ID318
Data Governance, Economic Issues and Development, Media and Content
On Data governance: The IGF needs to explore and critically evaluate the growing claim by states that digital services run by "foreign adversaries" are national security threats and encourage debates on whether territorializing data and ownership of data resources and data-driven services improves security.
On media and content: The IGF needs to put more emphasis on the clash between national security claims and online freedom of expression. We need to investigate and debate attempts by governments to wage information operations against each other and to encroach on the freedoms of business and civil society in order to counteract the propaganda and influence of other states.
On Economic Development: the iGF needs to address the growing trade barriers in the digital economy and how to avoid the reduced competition and lower efficiency caused by economic fragmentation, sanctions and export controls in digital technologies. We also need to better appreciate the relationship between free e-commerce, economic growth and universal access.
On media and content: The IGF needs to put more emphasis on the clash between national security claims and online freedom of expression. We need to investigate and debate attempts by governments to wage information operations against each other and to encroach on the freedoms of business and civil society in order to counteract the propaganda and influence of other states.
On Economic Development: the iGF needs to address the growing trade barriers in the digital economy and how to avoid the reduced competition and lower efficiency caused by economic fragmentation, sanctions and export controls in digital technologies. We also need to better appreciate the relationship between free e-commerce, economic growth and universal access.
I do not believe that the IGF annual meeting should be dominated or controlled by the agenda set by the Global Digital Compact. We view IGF and GDC as separate initiatives. We favor IGF as a priority because it is a more open, multistakeholder process. It reflects the ideas and initiatives of civil society and business as well as governments, whereas GDC as a multilateral initiative reflects a negotiation among governments.
Regarding the WSIS outcomes, an IGF main session or workshop on that topic would be welcome. This session(s) should review the outcomes of WSIS and pose the question whether we should continue our close it. The session(s) should have representatives from both sides of that question and should not be cheerleading for WSIS or the UN but an objective assessment leading to a consensus.
Regarding the WSIS outcomes, an IGF main session or workshop on that topic would be welcome. This session(s) should review the outcomes of WSIS and pose the question whether we should continue our close it. The session(s) should have representatives from both sides of that question and should not be cheerleading for WSIS or the UN but an objective assessment leading to a consensus.
Most main sessions at IGF 2024 were very boring and not well attended. The problem is that the speaker selections are meant to be "safe" and there is no diversity of viewpoint or debate about the hot issues. Speakers seem to be chosen because they "represent" a certain stakeholder, geographic region, or gender rather than because they have something interesting to say. The MAG should show a better awareness of the points of debate, discussion and conflict on digital policy issues and not be afraid to air them.
Civil Society
ID319
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
To better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes, the IGF annual meeting and intersessional work should focus on the following actionable strategies:
1. Aligning Themes with Global Agendas
Annual and Intersessional Themes: The IGF must ensure its discussions focus on priority areas of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, human rights online, and trust in the digital ecosystem.
Innovation Mapping for WSIS: Identify and highlight innovations in ICTs and governance models that align with WSIS action lines, such as ICT applications for e-governance, e-learning, and e-health.
2. Encouraging Innovation and Collaboration
Create a dedicated track or working group to explore innovative solutions to digital transformation challenges, including AI, blockchain, and cybersecurity.
1. Aligning Themes with Global Agendas
Annual and Intersessional Themes: The IGF must ensure its discussions focus on priority areas of the GDC, such as universal connectivity, digital inclusion, human rights online, and trust in the digital ecosystem.
Innovation Mapping for WSIS: Identify and highlight innovations in ICTs and governance models that align with WSIS action lines, such as ICT applications for e-governance, e-learning, and e-health.
2. Encouraging Innovation and Collaboration
Create a dedicated track or working group to explore innovative solutions to digital transformation challenges, including AI, blockchain, and cybersecurity.
Raising the age limit for the Youth IGF beyond 30 years could make the initiative more inclusive and reflective of diverse perspectives. Here’s why and how it can be integrated with other innovative formats:
---
1. Why Increase the Age Limit?
1. Evolving Career Trajectories
Many individuals shift to technology or digital governance roles later in life, especially in regions where access to education or digital skills is delayed. Limiting participation to age 30 excludes valuable contributions from these voices.
2. Youth Isn’t Just Biological
Youthfulness in participation is often linked to fresh ideas and enthusiasm, not necessarily biological age. People in their mid-30s or early 40s could bring equally innovative ideas, coupled with practical work experience.
3. Widening the Representation Gap
Excluding individuals aged 31–40 risks missing out on the perspectives of those transitioning between early and mid-career stages—groups that often serve as a bridge between young talent and seasoned experts.
4. Global Standards of "Youth"
Some organizations (e.g., African Union’s Youth Charter) define youth as up to 35 years old. Expanding the IGF’s youth age range could align it with such global benchmarks and create consistency.
---
2. Integration with VR, Gamification, and Regional vs. Global Formats
VR-Based Youth IGF Spaces:
Create VR environments for intergenerational collaboration, where younger (up to 35 or 40) participants virtually interact with experienced professionals.
Example: A VR session could feature younger participants presenting bold solutions while seasoned experts provide feedback in real-time.
Gamified Youth IGF:
Introduce a gamified competition for participants aged up to 40, where ideas are rewarded with mentorship opportunities, project funding, or leadership roles at subsequent IGFs.
Regional vs. Global Youth IGFs:
Organize regional Youth IGFs that include older participants (up to 40) to reflect diverse local challenges. Winners or representatives from these regional sessions can be invited to present at the global Youth IGF.
Youth-Led Hackathons:
Expand the age limit for youth hackathons, ensuring people with varied skill levels and experiences—especially those transitioning careers—can participate. These hackathons could focus on real-world solutions for internet governance challenges.
---
3. Why Stop at Youth? Emphasize "Emerging Voices"
Instead of framing participation solely as "youth," consider creating an Emerging Voices IGF with no strict age limit, allowing anyone who is new to internet governance or digital policymaking to join.
This approach recognizes that innovation can come from individuals of any age or background, ensuring broader inclusivity.
---
By broadening the age limit and integrating innovative formats like VR, gamification, and regional approaches, the Youth IGF can evolve into a more dynamic, inclusive, and impactful platform that bridges generational divides while amplifying fresh perspectives.
---
1. Why Increase the Age Limit?
1. Evolving Career Trajectories
Many individuals shift to technology or digital governance roles later in life, especially in regions where access to education or digital skills is delayed. Limiting participation to age 30 excludes valuable contributions from these voices.
2. Youth Isn’t Just Biological
Youthfulness in participation is often linked to fresh ideas and enthusiasm, not necessarily biological age. People in their mid-30s or early 40s could bring equally innovative ideas, coupled with practical work experience.
3. Widening the Representation Gap
Excluding individuals aged 31–40 risks missing out on the perspectives of those transitioning between early and mid-career stages—groups that often serve as a bridge between young talent and seasoned experts.
4. Global Standards of "Youth"
Some organizations (e.g., African Union’s Youth Charter) define youth as up to 35 years old. Expanding the IGF’s youth age range could align it with such global benchmarks and create consistency.
---
2. Integration with VR, Gamification, and Regional vs. Global Formats
VR-Based Youth IGF Spaces:
Create VR environments for intergenerational collaboration, where younger (up to 35 or 40) participants virtually interact with experienced professionals.
Example: A VR session could feature younger participants presenting bold solutions while seasoned experts provide feedback in real-time.
Gamified Youth IGF:
Introduce a gamified competition for participants aged up to 40, where ideas are rewarded with mentorship opportunities, project funding, or leadership roles at subsequent IGFs.
Regional vs. Global Youth IGFs:
Organize regional Youth IGFs that include older participants (up to 40) to reflect diverse local challenges. Winners or representatives from these regional sessions can be invited to present at the global Youth IGF.
Youth-Led Hackathons:
Expand the age limit for youth hackathons, ensuring people with varied skill levels and experiences—especially those transitioning careers—can participate. These hackathons could focus on real-world solutions for internet governance challenges.
---
3. Why Stop at Youth? Emphasize "Emerging Voices"
Instead of framing participation solely as "youth," consider creating an Emerging Voices IGF with no strict age limit, allowing anyone who is new to internet governance or digital policymaking to join.
This approach recognizes that innovation can come from individuals of any age or background, ensuring broader inclusivity.
---
By broadening the age limit and integrating innovative formats like VR, gamification, and regional approaches, the Youth IGF can evolve into a more dynamic, inclusive, and impactful platform that bridges generational divides while amplifying fresh perspectives.
Government
ID320
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
Frameworks for multilateral organizations and harmonization among frameworks is crucial for open, global and interoperable internet ecosystem.
Enhancing international cooperation especially more synergy among different agencies under UN. IGF sessions and workshops should link Action lines of WSIS process as well as SDG targets. Highlight cross cutting technologies with in WSIS outcomes and GDC aspirations. Capacity building and inclusion through specialized tracks of different strata of society including youth, elderly, women, disabled and other vulnerable groups. Addressing Digital North-South gap. By partnership between governments, private sector, and civil society for joint projects aligned with GDC and WSIS outcomes.
Human elements of technology should be prioritized.
Government
ID321
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Under Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity Issues: The IGF should include discussions on a way to enforce the implementation of the Universal Access Fund.
The topic includes counterfeit products and policies in place for the mitigation of cyber security particularly in developing countries.
The topic includes counterfeit products and policies in place for the mitigation of cyber security particularly in developing countries.
The IGF activities play a vital role in contributing to key issues of the WSIS action points, therefore the same efforts could be improved whereby IGF through its annual meeting aligns key thematic areas in the IGF session highlighting the GDC prioritized areas. The IGF should now redirect in focus or connect its outputs and agenda with the focus of the GDC and WSIS outcome. IGF should have a clear roadmap leading to the WSIS action points and progress and GDC should foster active stakeholder engagement in discussion and activities related to the GDC and WSIS process in a holistic and inclusive manner.
the current format promotes the participation of everyone with the format of the onsite and virtual, but there should be an improvement to be more inclusive to all people with differently able and marginalized communities to participate more.
Civil Society
ID322
Artificial Intelligence, Data Governance, Rights and Freedoms
On AI governance, AI risks and AI and data:
In the past many years, there has been rapid advances in the use of AI, most recently with the use of generative AI by end users and citizens. While questions of ethical use of AI, need for fairness, accountability and transparency are not new, the very rapid scale deployment of AI across different fields and also the easy use of AI across different users, have raised questions of exacerbated harms, infringement of copyright among others and a lot of focus currently is on developing governance for AI. Somewhere, there has been an acceptance of inevitability and almost omnipresence of AI across different contexts which has furthered deliberations around harnessing AI for good. We ask that while “AI for good” as an issue is being mainstreamed, it is most critical that there are avenues to discuss and understand areas where AI should not be used (because of the outsized harms as compared to its benefits) or can be used through limited use of resources (given the wide ranging environmental impacts associated with AI and the resource intensive areas of computational power and data centers) and mechanisms to actualize that. This means that not only do we discuss AI governance in the context of where it is already deployed but also discuss conditions in which it should not be deployed.
There also needs to be greater and more specific regional conversations around data use for AI, especially for developing predictive AI systems, in sensitive settings such as healthcare and financial services. The challenges of using different data for different geographical settings have been well documented (consider for example training data from global north to develop and deploy AI diagnostics for a country in global south). There needs to be more specific conversations and transparency around data sources that are being used and how they can be both ethically sourced but also made contextually relevant. IGF can support these conversations by inviting specific inputs from the multi-stakeholder community on these specific issues.
On digital identity:
There is growing interest in digital public infrastructure and its use for public service delivery and has potential to offer benefits and meaningful governance, if done well, as certain examples may suggest. However, the implementation of digital ID systems for example, particularly when they are the sole means of identification, raises critical questions. Such systems must have robust legislative backing, including privacy and data protection frameworks, if not regulations, along with sufficient legislative and judicial oversight to ensure accountability. Concerns about mission creep—where systems initially introduced for specific purposes gradually expand to other uses without adequate scrutiny—highlight the need for clearly defined objectives and legal safeguards. These systems should proactively assess and mitigate risks and harms before implementation. Furthermore, given that many of these systems rely heavily on private companies with limited oversight, it is crucial to ensure meaningful community participation and accountability throughout the entire process to prioritize public interest over private gains. As we think about DPIs, we urge that its applicability, necessary infrastructural availability, assessment of risks are adequately considered and detailed through the themes and sessions at IGF.
On data governance and youth engagement:
Personal data is being captured by different actors in an unprecedented manner, and at times without any legislative backing or grievance redressal mechanism. With the advent of generative AI- there are also concerns regarding the extent to which data which is publicly available is being used and for what purposes. These concerns are exacerbated when children’s data is being used for generative AI purposes; in most cases without the knowledge or consent of the children. In an increasingly digitised world, how should children navigate the digital world; what is the appropriate age for children to access the internet and should there be age-gating, and if yes, how should that be implemented? What are the mechanisms to determine parental verification? As we have more and more young people online, it will be essential to define and develop frameworks for children’s use and experience of the internet, including having young people participate in these discussions.
In the past many years, there has been rapid advances in the use of AI, most recently with the use of generative AI by end users and citizens. While questions of ethical use of AI, need for fairness, accountability and transparency are not new, the very rapid scale deployment of AI across different fields and also the easy use of AI across different users, have raised questions of exacerbated harms, infringement of copyright among others and a lot of focus currently is on developing governance for AI. Somewhere, there has been an acceptance of inevitability and almost omnipresence of AI across different contexts which has furthered deliberations around harnessing AI for good. We ask that while “AI for good” as an issue is being mainstreamed, it is most critical that there are avenues to discuss and understand areas where AI should not be used (because of the outsized harms as compared to its benefits) or can be used through limited use of resources (given the wide ranging environmental impacts associated with AI and the resource intensive areas of computational power and data centers) and mechanisms to actualize that. This means that not only do we discuss AI governance in the context of where it is already deployed but also discuss conditions in which it should not be deployed.
There also needs to be greater and more specific regional conversations around data use for AI, especially for developing predictive AI systems, in sensitive settings such as healthcare and financial services. The challenges of using different data for different geographical settings have been well documented (consider for example training data from global north to develop and deploy AI diagnostics for a country in global south). There needs to be more specific conversations and transparency around data sources that are being used and how they can be both ethically sourced but also made contextually relevant. IGF can support these conversations by inviting specific inputs from the multi-stakeholder community on these specific issues.
On digital identity:
There is growing interest in digital public infrastructure and its use for public service delivery and has potential to offer benefits and meaningful governance, if done well, as certain examples may suggest. However, the implementation of digital ID systems for example, particularly when they are the sole means of identification, raises critical questions. Such systems must have robust legislative backing, including privacy and data protection frameworks, if not regulations, along with sufficient legislative and judicial oversight to ensure accountability. Concerns about mission creep—where systems initially introduced for specific purposes gradually expand to other uses without adequate scrutiny—highlight the need for clearly defined objectives and legal safeguards. These systems should proactively assess and mitigate risks and harms before implementation. Furthermore, given that many of these systems rely heavily on private companies with limited oversight, it is crucial to ensure meaningful community participation and accountability throughout the entire process to prioritize public interest over private gains. As we think about DPIs, we urge that its applicability, necessary infrastructural availability, assessment of risks are adequately considered and detailed through the themes and sessions at IGF.
On data governance and youth engagement:
Personal data is being captured by different actors in an unprecedented manner, and at times without any legislative backing or grievance redressal mechanism. With the advent of generative AI- there are also concerns regarding the extent to which data which is publicly available is being used and for what purposes. These concerns are exacerbated when children’s data is being used for generative AI purposes; in most cases without the knowledge or consent of the children. In an increasingly digitised world, how should children navigate the digital world; what is the appropriate age for children to access the internet and should there be age-gating, and if yes, how should that be implemented? What are the mechanisms to determine parental verification? As we have more and more young people online, it will be essential to define and develop frameworks for children’s use and experience of the internet, including having young people participate in these discussions.
We request some steps to be taken at the IGF annual meeting and during its intersessional work:
-Reduce duplication of processes and efforts when it comes to implementation of GDC and continue to look at existing arenas like the WSIS+20 and IGF. Greater coordination and collaboration among various UN bodies.
-Robust support for civil society participation at the IGF and other internet governance processes, especially so from Global South.
-Creation of well resourced working groups that look through the GDC implementation work where relevant.
-Reduce duplication of processes and efforts when it comes to implementation of GDC and continue to look at existing arenas like the WSIS+20 and IGF. Greater coordination and collaboration among various UN bodies.
-Robust support for civil society participation at the IGF and other internet governance processes, especially so from Global South.
-Creation of well resourced working groups that look through the GDC implementation work where relevant.
Given the diverse set of stakeholders and the wide ranging nature topics discussed, it is understandable that the IGF covers a lot of ground. It would be beneficial if there might be deeper reflections on fewer issues if possible, so that there is greater depth in conversations as opposed to a much wider coverage. We understand that this might be difficult given what IGF sets out to do, but a more focused approach might help stakeholders have a better understanding of priorities and areas of focus. It will also be very helpful if all sessions have space for Q&A, even if it is for 10 minutes. It allows for listeners to reflect and also ask questions, where possible.
Civil Society
ID323
Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies and Innovation, Media and Content
Algorithmic divide in media
The digital disruption in the media industry has seen publishers work on inventing new ways to reach and engage audiences. In the Global South newspaper sales, TV viewership and radio listenership are slowly dwindling, as players in the media sector mull going to where the audiences are – digital platforms.
In transitioning to digital platforms, media organisations stare at dependence on search engines and social media platforms for news dissemination and building audience communities. Here, the news media has to exist amidst several creators and influencers, who are getting away with a bigger share of advertising revenue that the media depended on to sustain operations and generate profits.
As a result, have come up with strategies to tailor their business models based on the media metamorphosis.
One of these initiatives has been the use of Artificial Intelligence in content distribution. Media organisations, just like social media platforms use algorithms to serve audiences with personalised content.
This dissemination of targeted content has been through the use of AI, where user behaviours are analysed, their data collected to feed algorithms that prioritise engagement. Through this strategy, a number of news publishers aim at maximising potential revenue from advertisers through targeted advertising.
In its Global Principles for Information Integrity, the United Nations highlights the use of algorithms to polarize the information ecosystem, with a target of generating engagement through media content, and in the process, amplifying and rewarding harmful content.
As the intelligence era becomes more recognised in the media, newsrooms now focus on using algorithms to provide personalised media content, with a target of audience retention.
Through personalised content, an algorithmic divide emerges, where there is a disparity in knowledge of how user data is collected to train algorithmic models. This disparity is also witnessed in establishing how the recommendation systems work.
The Global Principles for Information integrity advocate for public empowerment in the information ecosystem, where individuals (users/news consumers) have control over their online experience and can make informed decisions on what they consume.
However, the algorithmic divide as a result of news personalisation leads to users being treated differently based on their demographic background, socioeconomic status, and even political affiliations.
This algorithmic divide can perpetuate bias in news dissemination, where users access information based on biased characteristics – as assumed by data used to train the algorithms.
Through personalisation, the news industry also risks hampering consistent access to diverse sources of information. This could hinder inclusive access to information by marginalised communities, certain genders or races.
During the IGF 2024, participants found existing algorithmic divide which has limited digital access or perpetuated bias among certain populations.
The IGF 2025 could consider putting in place measures that guide use of algorithms in media distribution. This is in an effort to ensure a transparent internet for all persons, and addressed divisions based on demographic backgrounds and individual preferences.
The digital disruption in the media industry has seen publishers work on inventing new ways to reach and engage audiences. In the Global South newspaper sales, TV viewership and radio listenership are slowly dwindling, as players in the media sector mull going to where the audiences are – digital platforms.
In transitioning to digital platforms, media organisations stare at dependence on search engines and social media platforms for news dissemination and building audience communities. Here, the news media has to exist amidst several creators and influencers, who are getting away with a bigger share of advertising revenue that the media depended on to sustain operations and generate profits.
As a result, have come up with strategies to tailor their business models based on the media metamorphosis.
One of these initiatives has been the use of Artificial Intelligence in content distribution. Media organisations, just like social media platforms use algorithms to serve audiences with personalised content.
This dissemination of targeted content has been through the use of AI, where user behaviours are analysed, their data collected to feed algorithms that prioritise engagement. Through this strategy, a number of news publishers aim at maximising potential revenue from advertisers through targeted advertising.
In its Global Principles for Information Integrity, the United Nations highlights the use of algorithms to polarize the information ecosystem, with a target of generating engagement through media content, and in the process, amplifying and rewarding harmful content.
As the intelligence era becomes more recognised in the media, newsrooms now focus on using algorithms to provide personalised media content, with a target of audience retention.
Through personalised content, an algorithmic divide emerges, where there is a disparity in knowledge of how user data is collected to train algorithmic models. This disparity is also witnessed in establishing how the recommendation systems work.
The Global Principles for Information integrity advocate for public empowerment in the information ecosystem, where individuals (users/news consumers) have control over their online experience and can make informed decisions on what they consume.
However, the algorithmic divide as a result of news personalisation leads to users being treated differently based on their demographic background, socioeconomic status, and even political affiliations.
This algorithmic divide can perpetuate bias in news dissemination, where users access information based on biased characteristics – as assumed by data used to train the algorithms.
Through personalisation, the news industry also risks hampering consistent access to diverse sources of information. This could hinder inclusive access to information by marginalised communities, certain genders or races.
During the IGF 2024, participants found existing algorithmic divide which has limited digital access or perpetuated bias among certain populations.
The IGF 2025 could consider putting in place measures that guide use of algorithms in media distribution. This is in an effort to ensure a transparent internet for all persons, and addressed divisions based on demographic backgrounds and individual preferences.
The IGF can seek further dialogue with the private sector and big tech companies to reach agreements on developing a safe and secure internet for all. By onboarding these players, IGF will achieve internet governance guardrails right from the development of digital products.
The IGF can consider onboarding players in Information Ecosystem to its themes.
Private Sector
ID324
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Hate speech in new social networks era
I believe it´s necessary to expand the messagei of the IGF’s work and its initiatives through media outlets as a new strategic stakeholder, and to include more members from the international fact-checking network (IFCN)
Civil Society
ID325
Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Disinformation, Hate speech, including against women and vulnerable groups, Legal and regulatory issues
Under "Emerging Technologies and Innovative Issues", Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity Issues", or even as its own thematic area, we expected to find "Digital Public Infrastructure".
As a leading media development organization, IMS has long advocated for journalism as a public good. We seek to promote a digital environment with access to reliable, inclusive information and critical journalism for the support of free, democratic and peaceful societies. Especially in the face of Meta's recent decision to end their third-party fact-checking programme in the US, IMS sees the need for alternative discussion platforms that serve the public interest, not profits and public figures.
We would therefore be keen to see “Digital Public Infrastructure” as a topic for discussion at IGF 2025 and the opportunity to expand on media’s role in the digital ecosystem. IMS insight would be based off our research, https://www.mediasupport.org/publication/public-interest-infrastructure/, which centers around the ambition rebuild our digital infrastructure with the public interest at the core.
As a leading media development organization, IMS has long advocated for journalism as a public good. We seek to promote a digital environment with access to reliable, inclusive information and critical journalism for the support of free, democratic and peaceful societies. Especially in the face of Meta's recent decision to end their third-party fact-checking programme in the US, IMS sees the need for alternative discussion platforms that serve the public interest, not profits and public figures.
We would therefore be keen to see “Digital Public Infrastructure” as a topic for discussion at IGF 2025 and the opportunity to expand on media’s role in the digital ecosystem. IMS insight would be based off our research, https://www.mediasupport.org/publication/public-interest-infrastructure/, which centers around the ambition rebuild our digital infrastructure with the public interest at the core.
The inclusion of “Digital Public Infrastructure” as a theme at the 2025 IGF would contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact because it is a key action area under Objective 1: Close all digital divides and accelerate progress across the Sustainable Development Goals.
Furthermore, as the WSIS vision is to establish a “people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society,” supporting innovation for the creation of alternative discussion platforms based on the needs of local communities and societies falls directly in line with this notion.
Furthermore, as the WSIS vision is to establish a “people-centered, inclusive and development-oriented information society,” supporting innovation for the creation of alternative discussion platforms based on the needs of local communities and societies falls directly in line with this notion.
N/A
Civil Society
ID326
Digital Cooperation, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
2025 is a pivotal year, as it will feature two significant milestones: the Compact Implementation Map and Endorsements, as well as the Implementation and WSIS+20 Review.
To ensure everyone is well-informed, it would be valuable to create materials that are both accessible and comprehensive. An easy-to-read guide and a detailed timeline would help stakeholders understand where we stand and the steps leading to these critical events.
It is essential to provide an executive summary of these materials, as well as easy-to-read versions in all official UN languages. This approach will ensure inclusivity, foster understanding, and encourage diverse ideas and contributions.
To ensure everyone is well-informed, it would be valuable to create materials that are both accessible and comprehensive. An easy-to-read guide and a detailed timeline would help stakeholders understand where we stand and the steps leading to these critical events.
It is essential to provide an executive summary of these materials, as well as easy-to-read versions in all official UN languages. This approach will ensure inclusivity, foster understanding, and encourage diverse ideas and contributions.
The IGF 2025 was my first IGF participation, and I found the organization impressive, particularly how the themes and thematic tracks were presented. The IGF 2024 application and the main display showcasing upcoming panels were also very effective.
It would be beneficial to maintain this format in the future.
It would be beneficial to maintain this format in the future.
Civil Society
ID327
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Weaponization of Internet
Digital rights, Internet governance and multistakeholderism in time of war
Digital rights, Internet governance and multistakeholderism in time of war
To understand (and enhance) the role of the IGF in the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and in the WSIS+20 review it would be great to create simple info-graphic which reflects major overlappings and major divergencies between these three developments, and add to the description of at least plenary sessions specific place of the discussed theme within this info-graphic.
To ensure greater audience engagement in some experimental session it is possible to prepare two boards, stickers and pencils. Before the session participants can write their expectations from the outcomes of the session (answered questions, for example) on yellow papers and stick their notes on the first board. Moderator can use these stickers during the session. After the session participants can rewrite their expectations on the green papers, if their expectations have been met, and on red papers - if not, and stick them on the second board. Moderator of the remote participation can do the same for remote participants.
Civil Society
ID328
Cybersecurity and Trust
Cybercrimen and organized crime, Non traditional manifestations of cyber organized crime, cybersecurity threats, Use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes.
Navigating the new International order, embracing the Cybersecurity Realities in the Age of Emerging Powers.
Yes, with following thematics as a presentation:
"Rethinking the Cybersecurity in the Digital connection, Interrelated threat that target to the security of the countries"
Various criminals, including those involved in human trafficking, are using information and communications technologies to carry out criminal activities, "Trafficking of women and girls extends to cyberspace through social networks".
In many countries, the access to new technologies has increased, global figures show that after 60 years of the birth of the Internet, "almost two thirds of the inhabitants of planet Earn are connected to the network, access to the Internet which already exceeas ou%, in the same way tne risks and cybercrime scenarlos continue to increase, since tasks that develop critical Intrastructures such in ports, nealn services, mass transporation and enerav. nave been interrupted, nothina escapes Tor tnis ioe or new risks Hospitals and basic services such as health are now in the crosshairs and are not sate trom software developers who are hired bv the cibercrime.
We need to speak about the "The new iT adversaries". Therefore, national security in the diferent countries must be rethought. Where to focus efforts? What laws and legislation we need to protect us? ¿What skills and competencies we need to teach in the schools? ¿How should we protect the population in the world? All is neccesary to knowing the challenges, good practices and advances are very important, the cybersecurity is global policy.
"Rethinking the Cybersecurity in the Digital connection, Interrelated threat that target to the security of the countries"
Various criminals, including those involved in human trafficking, are using information and communications technologies to carry out criminal activities, "Trafficking of women and girls extends to cyberspace through social networks".
In many countries, the access to new technologies has increased, global figures show that after 60 years of the birth of the Internet, "almost two thirds of the inhabitants of planet Earn are connected to the network, access to the Internet which already exceeas ou%, in the same way tne risks and cybercrime scenarlos continue to increase, since tasks that develop critical Intrastructures such in ports, nealn services, mass transporation and enerav. nave been interrupted, nothina escapes Tor tnis ioe or new risks Hospitals and basic services such as health are now in the crosshairs and are not sate trom software developers who are hired bv the cibercrime.
We need to speak about the "The new iT adversaries". Therefore, national security in the diferent countries must be rethought. Where to focus efforts? What laws and legislation we need to protect us? ¿What skills and competencies we need to teach in the schools? ¿How should we protect the population in the world? All is neccesary to knowing the challenges, good practices and advances are very important, the cybersecurity is global policy.
Civil Society
ID329
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, Multistakeholderism and multidisciplinarity
Internet Society France would like to thank the IGF Secretariat for the consultation and the opportunity to submit ideas and proposals as part of the preparation of the 2025 session
Stakeholder engagement must be inclusive and sufficiently diverse to include Internet users.
Supplying financial support to enable participation of under represented communities in the multistakeholder processes is also essential to improve participation.
Multilingualism on the Internet is also essential to enable diverse participation from as many people as possible.
Stakeholder engagement must be inclusive and sufficiently diverse to include Internet users.
Supplying financial support to enable participation of under represented communities in the multistakeholder processes is also essential to improve participation.
Multilingualism on the Internet is also essential to enable diverse participation from as many people as possible.
The annual meeting of the IGF and its intersessional work should be greatly strengthened. The quality of the work led by the BPFs and the dynamic coalitions, for example the excellent work carried out by the Internet Standards, Security and Safety Coalition (IS3C) and DC Core Internet Values showcase the value of the IGF and its multi stakeholder approach.
In light of the WSIS+20 and implementation of the Global DIgital Compact, the IGF should further engage regional and national initiatives. The broad success and recognition of the IGF’s unique role as a platform is largely the result of both a successful annual meeting and of successful national and regional IGFs.
In light of the WSIS+20 and implementation of the Global DIgital Compact, the IGF should further engage regional and national initiatives. The broad success and recognition of the IGF’s unique role as a platform is largely the result of both a successful annual meeting and of successful national and regional IGFs.
As mentioned above cultural and linguistic diversity are of paramount importance to improve diversity and reach out to a broader audience.
Ensuring a wide participation of stakeholders with different backgrounds - hence the need of linguistic diversity - should also be a focus of the IGF as the bottom-up and inclusive platform.
Promoting Internet Multilingualism could go a long way to ensuring the success of the IGF. The overall format and design of the IGF should include sessions in any of the 6 UN official languages and enable participants to meaningfully participate.
Contact : for additional information, please contact the chair of the board : Nicolas CHAGNY : [email protected]
Ensuring a wide participation of stakeholders with different backgrounds - hence the need of linguistic diversity - should also be a focus of the IGF as the bottom-up and inclusive platform.
Promoting Internet Multilingualism could go a long way to ensuring the success of the IGF. The overall format and design of the IGF should include sessions in any of the 6 UN official languages and enable participants to meaningfully participate.
Contact : for additional information, please contact the chair of the board : Nicolas CHAGNY : [email protected]
Civil Society
ID330
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Technical and Operational Topics
Stakeholder engagement
multilingualism and cultural diversity
multilingualism and cultural diversity
The IGF annual meeting and its inter-sessional work can better contribute to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and to the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes by Strengthening Intersessional work and promote multilingualism as well as cross-sectoral and multi-stakeholder collaboration.
Cultural and linguistic diversity online as reflected in a number of United Nations documents need further commitment and work to allow for the emergence of a multilingual dialogue and to facilitate the meaningful participation of all stakeholders and the widest audience.
Cultural and linguistic diversity online as reflected in a number of United Nations documents need further commitment and work to allow for the emergence of a multilingual dialogue and to facilitate the meaningful participation of all stakeholders and the widest audience.
AFNIC would like to emphasise the importance of:
1. promoting multilingualism through sessions in any of the 6 UN languages (with or without interpretation) ;
2. developing Innovative formats to foster engagement such as moots or hackathons.
Further collaboration with stakeholders and NRIs are also needed to build the annual program and foster a community driven dialogue.
1. promoting multilingualism through sessions in any of the 6 UN languages (with or without interpretation) ;
2. developing Innovative formats to foster engagement such as moots or hackathons.
Further collaboration with stakeholders and NRIs are also needed to build the annual program and foster a community driven dialogue.
Technical Community
ID331
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Eclairement would like to thank the IGF Secretariat for the consultation.
Such a great event should be widely open to expert and newcomers, regarding the importance of Internet and its governance on the day-to-day life.
Therefore sessions could be tagged depending of the level of expertise or could be chosen with all the range of publics in mind. Citizens should widely be represented in such event.
Stakeholder engagement must be inclusive and sufficiently diverse to include Internet users.
Supplying financial support to enable participation of under represented communities in the multistakeholder processes is also essential to improve participation.
Multilingualism on the Internet is also essential to enable diverse participation from as many people as possible.
Such a great event should be widely open to expert and newcomers, regarding the importance of Internet and its governance on the day-to-day life.
Therefore sessions could be tagged depending of the level of expertise or could be chosen with all the range of publics in mind. Citizens should widely be represented in such event.
Stakeholder engagement must be inclusive and sufficiently diverse to include Internet users.
Supplying financial support to enable participation of under represented communities in the multistakeholder processes is also essential to improve participation.
Multilingualism on the Internet is also essential to enable diverse participation from as many people as possible.
the iGF should further recognize the role and implication of national and regional initiatives to strengthen the global IGF community.
One of the tool which should permit to include all people and to authorize a true reasoning amongst them is the promotion and the implementation of multilinguism.
As per the importance of cultural diversity and stakeholder engagement: the global IGF, in the UN system, should allow for session in any of the six UN languages not only in English. The linguistic and cultural diversity in the mag should also be central.
As per the importance of cultural diversity and stakeholder engagement: the global IGF, in the UN system, should allow for session in any of the six UN languages not only in English. The linguistic and cultural diversity in the mag should also be central.
Civil Society
ID332
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Broadening stakeholder engagement in Internet governance, IGF organization and role, International cooperation on data
Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
The IGF 2025 can enhance the WSIS+20 Review by facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogues that assess progress on WSIS outcomes and identify gaps. By integrating sessions focused on the Global Digital Compact, the IGF can drive collaborative efforts to promote digital inclusion, security, and sustainability. Engaging diverse voices will ensure that the review process is comprehensive and reflective of global needs, ultimately fostering a more inclusive digital future aligned with the commitments of both WSIS and the Global Digital Compact.
To enhance the IGF format, consider implementing thematic tracks that incorporate interactive elements like workshops and roundtable discussions. Each track could focus on key issues such as Digital Cooperation, AI Ethics and Cybersecurity, with sub-streams for deeper exploration. Introduce 'Policy Labs' where stakeholders collaboratively draft actionable proposals, fostering real-world solutions. Incorporate storytelling sessions to share personal experiences related to Internet Governance, making discussions more relatable. Additionally, utilize digital tools for live polling and QA to engage both in-person and remote participants effectively. Finally, create dedicated spaces for youth and community voices to ensure diverse perspectives are represented, promoting a more inclusive dialogue on Internet Governance challenges.
Government
ID333
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change
Insider threats detection. As most organisations focus more on external threats , insiders also pose a threat as they have some certain level of access to the systems we are protecting.
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) can enhance its contribution to the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the WSIS+20 review by aligning its annual meetings and intersessional work with these initiatives. This can be achieved by creating dedicated tracks on GDC priorities like universal connectivity and cybersecurity, fostering multi-stakeholder contributions, and leveraging Best Practice Forums (BPFs) and Dynamic Coalitions (DCs) to provide actionable recommendations. The IGF should integrate WSIS action line reviews, address emerging digital challenges, and align regional and national IGFs with global goals. Strengthening collaborations with UN bodies, ensuring inclusive participation, documenting measurable outcomes, and promoting capacity-building programs will further position the IGF as a pivotal platform in shaping digital governance and advancing sustainable development.
To enhance the IGF's format and design, thematic tracks can be grouped into broader clusters, like "Digital Inclusion" or "Trust and Security," with flexibility for emerging topics and multi-year priorities. Interactive formats such as scenario-based sessions, debates, hackathons, and unconference-style discussions can foster dynamic participation. Inclusivity can be improved by dedicating tracks for youth and marginalized groups, using hybrid tools for virtual engagement, and ensuring accessibility for people with disabilities. Regional IGF integration, cross-sector dialogues, and technology-driven innovations like AI tools for real-time notes and digital exhibitions can enrich collaboration and knowledge sharing. Delivering action-oriented outcomes, such as roadmaps and voluntary commitments, alongside follow-up mechanisms, will ensure the IGF's discussions translate into tangible global impact.
Government
ID334
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
The annual IGF meeting and its intersessional work can support the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and the WSIS outcomes by promoting the digital inclusion of less-resourced languages. This would help reduce the digital divide, ensure equitable access to information, and preserve cultural diversity online. The IGF could establish thematic coalitions, propose concrete recommendations for digital language policies, and organize dedicated panels on these issues. These actions would strengthen its role in building inclusive digital governance aligned with global objectives.
The IGF could adopt a more interactive and inclusive format by incorporating more participatory workshops, thematic hackathons, and collaborative sessions focused on delivering practical solutions. For instance, thematic tracks could include linguistic innovation labs to develop technological tools for under-resourced languages. Plenary sessions could be complemented by regional working groups to tailor discussions to local contexts. Additionally, leveraging digital tools to gather real-time input would enable broader participation, including marginalized communities, thereby enhancing the relevance and impact of the discussions.
Civil Society
ID335
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Media and Content
Increased Security and Tension with Civil Liberties
Implications of Digital Surveillance on Individual Freedoms
Implications of Digital Surveillance on Individual Freedoms
The Internet Governance Forum (IGF) plays a vital role in shaping global discussions on internet governance and related issues, making it well-positioned to contribute to major global initiatives like the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes.
Here are several ways in which the IGF can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and review the outcomes of WSIS:
- Linking IGF Outcomes to WSIS Targets and Review
- Facilitating Regional and Thematic Dialogues
- Building more Partnerships for Implementation
- Harnessing Data for Development and Monitoring
- Building Capacity for Future Digital Challenges
Here are several ways in which the IGF can better reflect or contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact and review the outcomes of WSIS:
- Linking IGF Outcomes to WSIS Targets and Review
- Facilitating Regional and Thematic Dialogues
- Building more Partnerships for Implementation
- Harnessing Data for Development and Monitoring
- Building Capacity for Future Digital Challenges
By incorporating these elements into its overall format and design, the IGF can better respond to the evolving nature of digital challenges, drive actionable outcomes, and foster more inclusive, global collaboration:
- Inclusive and Accessible Language
- Clearer Follow-Up Mechanisms and Accountability
- New Stakeholder Models and Co-Creation Spaces
- Incorporating Interactive, Digital-First Format
- Inclusive, Diverse, and Global Representation
- Inclusive and Accessible Language
- Clearer Follow-Up Mechanisms and Accountability
- New Stakeholder Models and Co-Creation Spaces
- Incorporating Interactive, Digital-First Format
- Inclusive, Diverse, and Global Representation
Civil Society
ID336
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
Civil Society
ID337
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation
We propose that "Space Internet Governance" be added as a thematic topic for IGF 2025, recognizing the need for a governance framework for the emerging space network that extends beyond Earth. As humanity ventures to establish networks on and around the Moon, ensuring their connectivity, accessibility, and inclusivity will be essential for our collective future in space.
The foundational principles and lessons that have led to the Internet's success and sustainability—its "DNA"—must be carried forward to the emerging space network. In particular, the multistakeholder policy-making process, which lies at the core of Internet governance, will be crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of the Space Internet.
The IGF serves as a multistakeholder venue in itself, becoming an indispensable platform to inform and be informed by various stakeholders on these emerging challenges. Engaging with these subjects from their nascent stages is critical to shaping humanity’s trajectory in space.
The foundational principles and lessons that have led to the Internet's success and sustainability—its "DNA"—must be carried forward to the emerging space network. In particular, the multistakeholder policy-making process, which lies at the core of Internet governance, will be crucial for ensuring the long-term sustainability of the Space Internet.
The IGF serves as a multistakeholder venue in itself, becoming an indispensable platform to inform and be informed by various stakeholders on these emerging challenges. Engaging with these subjects from their nascent stages is critical to shaping humanity’s trajectory in space.
To better reflect and contribute to the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC), the IGF can set forth concrete goals and outcomes as a collective forum. While the IGF has traditionally served as a platform for dialogue, it can strengthen its impact by facilitating action that drives measurable progress in key digital governance areas.
The IGF should focus on addressing emerging issues before they become irreversible problems—such as the proposed 'Space Internet Governance' topic. As technological advancements continue to shape the digital and space landscapes, addressing nascent issues early is crucial for avoiding larger, potentially unmanageable challenges in the future. Currently, the IGF’s focus tends to be on digital governance issues that have already surfaced, but we believe it is equally important to proactively address emerging issues that will significantly impact the future of global digital governance.
Additionally, the process for selecting thematic topics, including its timeline and criteria, should be communicated more transparently to all proposers. This will allow for a more inclusive approach, ensuring that timely and critical issues are given due consideration as early as possible.
Additionally, the process for selecting thematic topics, including its timeline and criteria, should be communicated more transparently to all proposers. This will allow for a more inclusive approach, ensuring that timely and critical issues are given due consideration as early as possible.
Civil Society
ID338
Data Governance, Digital Cooperation, Economic Issues and Development
Civil Society
ID339
Economic Issues and Development, Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change, Media and Content
Technical Community
ID340
Data Governance, Media and Content, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Utilizing the São Paulo Multistakeholder Guidelines (NetMundial+10 Outcome Document) will be key to ensuring inclusivity particularly in strengthening civil society and Global South participation. By ensuring the active engagement of all stakeholders and addressing the most pressing issues, IGF 2025 can further strengthen its relevance and impact in the global digital governance landscape, showcasing its value to the current WSIS+20 process.
Finally, we would like to endorse the vision and proposals contained in the document “A Vision of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Beyond 2025”, available under https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/213/28513.
Finally, we would like to endorse the vision and proposals contained in the document “A Vision of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) Beyond 2025”, available under https://www.intgovforum.org/en/filedepot_download/213/28513.
We need to build before and during the IGF XX a strong connection and link with the WSIS follow-up process lead by ITU, because the WSIS+20 renewal is a common endeavor. Would be a lot stronger if IGF and WSIS follow up would come to the UNGA in September with common positions and proposal about their mandate's renewals and also about the improvements of their mandate, including some structural synergies for the future.
Yes. we need to use 2025 IGF to showcase what could be done by the IGF (as the only true multistakeholder arena of the whole IG processes) in order to solve common problems related to Internet Governance.
identify one or two problems where the solution can clearly only be found and implemented with the contribution of all the stakeholders, and structure one or two IGF tracks around the scope to bring possible solutions to the given problem.
On such base, propose the implementation of the Tunis' mandate, in order to make the IGF the place where UNGA could discuss and test possible solutions to problems related to digital transition, BEFORE that any resolution or Treaty based solution would be discussed in a multilateral environment.
identify one or two problems where the solution can clearly only be found and implemented with the contribution of all the stakeholders, and structure one or two IGF tracks around the scope to bring possible solutions to the given problem.
On such base, propose the implementation of the Tunis' mandate, in order to make the IGF the place where UNGA could discuss and test possible solutions to problems related to digital transition, BEFORE that any resolution or Treaty based solution would be discussed in a multilateral environment.
Civil Society
ID341
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
The GDC should be reviewed annually at the IGF. The IGF has various organizations which allow youth to attend in person. These opportunities can therefore be leveraged to ensure youth are part of the annual GDC review and that technology is evolving in a beneficial way to future generations.
Emphasize that panels should include youth as stakeholders/stakeholder group to be included. It is important not to just have youth as a track, but incorporated as stakeholders throughout all panels.
Civil Society
ID342
Data Governance, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The convergence of emerging technologies, especially generative AI and quantum science and technology, will have increasingly important synergistic impacts on the internet as a whole. The dual use nature of these technologies militates toward a greater need for collaboration between academia, civil society, corporations and state and other non-state actors at the regional, international and even supranational level. This need is especially acute with regard to regulatory arbitrage as the use of these technologies proliferates.
The challenges of implementing the Global Digital Compact are actually opportunities to align multi-stakeholder efforts, such as the IGF, with multilateral efforts to address the risks associated with emerging technologies. One prominent example is the need for standardization of protocols for the application of post-quantum encryption to enhance data governance that will be crucial for enhancing cybersecurity.
The challenges of implementing the Global Digital Compact are actually opportunities to align multi-stakeholder efforts, such as the IGF, with multilateral efforts to address the risks associated with emerging technologies. One prominent example is the need for standardization of protocols for the application of post-quantum encryption to enhance data governance that will be crucial for enhancing cybersecurity.
Perhaps include a thematic track on the applications of quantum science and technology that aligns with the UN sponsored international year of Quantum Science and technology. Specifically, a track on how multi-stakeholder processes such as IGF an be a forum to address the emerging "quantum divide".
Perhaps include a track addressing risks associated with the increasing proliferation of adversarial uses of emerging technologies, especially with regard to data governance and cybersecurity.
Perhaps include a track addressing risks associated with the increasing proliferation of adversarial uses of emerging technologies, especially with regard to data governance and cybersecurity.
Government
ID343
Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Civil Society
ID344
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Rights and Freedoms
The IGF can play a crucial role in advancing the Global Digital Compact and contributing to the review of WSIS outcomes by fostering inclusive and multistakeholder discussions on key digital governance issues. The IGF and its intersessional work could include dedicated sessions focused on tracking progress and assessing outcomes, which could highlight challenges and offer recommendations for accelerating progress.
For IGF 2025, the overall format and design could benefit from more dynamic and flexible session formats to foster greater interaction and collaboration. Thematic tracks could focus more on emerging and high-priority issues, while also ensuring dedicated spaces for regional and sector-specific discussions. Additionally, integrating key topics like the GDC and the WSIS+20 review into the core programme would keep these important themes central to the discussions.
Expanding the diversity of speakers, with a particular emphasis on experts from underrepresented regions and sectors, would enrich the conversations and bring a broader range of perspectives. Creating more informal networking opportunities and spaces for collaboration could make IGF 2025 a more inclusive and action-driven event.
Expanding the diversity of speakers, with a particular emphasis on experts from underrepresented regions and sectors, would enrich the conversations and bring a broader range of perspectives. Creating more informal networking opportunities and spaces for collaboration could make IGF 2025 a more inclusive and action-driven event.
Civil Society
ID345
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Intergovernmental Organization
ID346
Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
The IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can significantly contribute to the Global Digital Compact and the review of WSIS outcomes by focusing on Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance, and Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity. Through fostering secure, transparent, and resilient digital ecosystems, the IGF can prioritize global cybersecurity frameworks, data protection, and online safety while promoting trust in digital technologies. Discussions on data governance can drive equitable data-sharing frameworks, address issues like data sovereignty and ethical AI, and facilitate regional collaboration to bridge disparities in infrastructure and governance. Additionally, the IGF can champion universal access by sharing best practices for expanding meaningful connectivity to underserved communities, addressing affordability and infrastructure gaps, and promoting digital literacy. By aligning its work within these thematic areas, the IGF can play a pivotal role in advancing the Global Digital Compact and supporting the WSIS+20 review in 2025.
To boost knowledge sharing and engage participants with diverse interests, the IGF can incorporate research poster presentations, policy hackathons, and documentary viewings into its programming. Research poster presentations would provide a platform for academics, practitioners, and youth to showcase innovative ideas and findings in an interactive format, sparking conversations and collaborations. Policy hackathons can bring together multidisciplinary teams to develop actionable solutions to pressing digital policy challenges, encouraging hands-on engagement and fostering creativity. Documentary viewings, followed by moderated discussions, can serve as a powerful tool to highlight real-world digital issues, such as cybersecurity, data governance, and universal access, offering participants a more immersive and reflective experience. By integrating these elements alongside traditional panels and thematic tracks, the IGF can enrich its programming and appeal to a broader audience while enhancing the impact of knowledge exchange.
Technical Community
ID347
Cybersecurity and Trust, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
The IGF annual meeting and intersessional work can advance the implementation of the Global Digital Compact (GDC) and the review of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) outcomes by fostering inclusive dialogue, amplifying civil society voices, and promoting actionable commitments.
Building on ProBoxVE.org’s experience in Venezuela, the IGF could:
1. Address Disinformation and Digital Repression: Highlight the misuse of digital platforms in restricting civic space and share best practices, such as our monitoring of disinformation during elections and advocacy for transparent governance.
2. Collaborate on Regional Challenges: Integrate grassroots perspectives from regions like Venezuela, where digital rights are under threat, showcasing how monitoring, reporting, and international collaboration can protect online freedoms.
3. Promote Civic Space and Inclusion: Use our insights to emphasize strategies for defending civic participation online, ensuring marginalized voices are heard.
4. Foster Action-Oriented Outputs: Leverage case studies like ours to move from dialogue to measurable commitments, ensuring IGF discussions align with GDC and WSIS goals.
ProBoxVE.org stands ready to contribute to these efforts by sharing expertise, partnering on capacity-building initiatives, and providing evidence-based recommendations from our work countering digital repression and advancing accountability. This collaboration would enhance the IGF’s role in shaping a safer, more inclusive digital future.
Building on ProBoxVE.org’s experience in Venezuela, the IGF could:
1. Address Disinformation and Digital Repression: Highlight the misuse of digital platforms in restricting civic space and share best practices, such as our monitoring of disinformation during elections and advocacy for transparent governance.
2. Collaborate on Regional Challenges: Integrate grassroots perspectives from regions like Venezuela, where digital rights are under threat, showcasing how monitoring, reporting, and international collaboration can protect online freedoms.
3. Promote Civic Space and Inclusion: Use our insights to emphasize strategies for defending civic participation online, ensuring marginalized voices are heard.
4. Foster Action-Oriented Outputs: Leverage case studies like ours to move from dialogue to measurable commitments, ensuring IGF discussions align with GDC and WSIS goals.
ProBoxVE.org stands ready to contribute to these efforts by sharing expertise, partnering on capacity-building initiatives, and providing evidence-based recommendations from our work countering digital repression and advancing accountability. This collaboration would enhance the IGF’s role in shaping a safer, more inclusive digital future.
We suggest discussing the use of technology to identify and target dissent, such as the systematic harassment and criminalization of opposition voices on social media platforms. Key findings from our research highlight how these tactics include disinformation campaigns, digital intimidation, and manipulation of the online information to silence critics. Another critical topic is authoritarian cooperation, where regimes share tools and strategies to enhance repression, censorship, and the manipulation of online information. These issues could be explored under thematic tracks focused on digital rights and governance or treated as cross-cutting themes to highlight their pervasive impact.
Civil Society
ID348
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms
Human Rights, Children's Rights and Gender Balance are cross-cutting issues that need to be addressed throughout the whole programme. Virtual reality and Artificial Intelligence gain even more impact and therefore need to be given more attention in policy making and regulatory processes.
The early date of IGF provides the opportunity to feed timely into the implementation process of the GDC and the WSIS review process. Both should therefore feature prominently in IGF 2025 thus making the event a platform for acceleration of these processes.
Human rights and democracy are globally under pressure, their protection should therefore form the red thread of the programme of IGF 2025.
Civil Society
ID349
Digital Cooperation, Rights and Freedoms, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
- Digital inclusion for Seniors 0r Third Age focused on Education.
- Digital Rights for Seniors or Third Age with ITC
- Cybersecurity towards the Elderly today
- Digital Rights for Seniors or Third Age with ITC
- Cybersecurity towards the Elderly today
We have created regional programs based on Digital Education and Training for Seniors or Older Adults to create spaces and fulfill the UN learning promoted by UNESCO and related to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that is associated with the decade of healthy aging that it is related to WHO World Health Organization. For all this we have managed to create a Digital Transformation University for Older Adults that has a very dynamic study curriculum and within learning we associate the UN Agenda 2030 and the ITU Connect 2030 Agenda to create an awareness of sustainability and sustainability in older people with great results and in this way, we founded a Project called Senior Mission and U3A REIDTIC to create agents of change.
Creating a work table with high relevance in Seniors and with inputs from experiences or good practices from other regions led by organizations that are dedicated to continuously working with the Elderly.
Civil Society
ID350
Artificial Intelligence, Digital Cooperation, Emerging Technologies and Innovation
The IGF annual meeting can contribute to the Global Digital Compact by promoting inclusive, cross-border collaboration on issues like digital ethics, universal access, and AI governance. It should focus on engaging underserved communities to ensure their voices are heard in global discussions. The IGF's multi-stakeholder approach can facilitate dialogues on the challenges of emerging technologies such as AI, blockchain, and smart cities, aligning with the Compact's principles of cooperation and trust. Additionally, IGF should create thematic sessions centered on the impact of Internet governance on sustainable development, ensuring alignment with the WSIS agenda, particularly in digital inclusion, data governance, and cybersecurity.
To enhance the IGF’s format and design, it should embrace dynamic thematic tracks that evolve with the digital landscape, focusing on emerging technologies like the metaverse and quantum computing. Strengthening regional representation, especially from developing countries, is crucial for inclusivity and can be achieved through targeted regional events. Cross-cutting themes, such as AI and human rights or cybersecurity and digital cooperation, would help identify synergies and foster holistic solutions. Lastly, incorporating interactive formats like hackathons or live debates on pressing issues could encourage deeper engagement and collaboration among stakeholders.
Civil Society
ID351
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Universal Access and Meaningful Connectivity
Internet Shutdown is human rights violations
The implementation of global digital compact needs mutli-stakeholder collaboration and Interoperability policies adaptation by all governements.
Technical Research Sappers presentation has to be given due attention especially on the application of AI in development sectors. Lighting talks are essential;l to imprint issues related to youth engagement in Internet governance landscape.
Civil Society
ID352
Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity and Trust, Data Governance
We want to bring the necessary attention to how emerging technologies like generative exacerbate existing privacy and trust issues with the use of social media. Also to prospect data governance solutions that mitigate the risk of unethical use of individual data (particularly children) to train AI models and cause information disorders. All these are in line with the objectives of the global digital compact.
One major way this can be done is to promote programs that fund the necessary work to close the digital divide. The discussions at the IGF must be interpreted in action by the leading organisations represented and global internet governance stakeholders present. To achieve responsible data use and equity in the digital economy, it is important to ensure Digital rights and digital security programs are funded to support research and remediation of gaps found in data security and privacy.
The regional-focused sessions should prioritise themes relevant to specific regions and be interactive. For instance, some of the major challenges in internet governance in Africa are Surveillance, information disorders and widespread internet shutdowns during elections.
These issues should not only be discussed in panel/classroom formats, there should be room for demonstrative sessions, lightning talks, Q & A sessions with the technical actors that drive our advocacy forward.
These issues should not only be discussed in panel/classroom formats, there should be room for demonstrative sessions, lightning talks, Q & A sessions with the technical actors that drive our advocacy forward.
Technical Community