Session
Human Rights & Freedoms
Rights to Access and Information
Organizer 1: Chantal Joris, ARTICLE 19
Organizer 2: Tetiana Avdieieva, Digital Security Lab Ukraine
Organizer 3: Brigitte Andersen, ARTICLE 19
Speaker 1: irene khan, Intergovernmental Organization, Intergovernmental Organization
Speaker 2: Tetiana Avdieieva, Civil Society, Eastern European Group
Speaker 3: Khattab Hamad, Civil Society, African Group
Speaker 4: Rizk Joelle, Intergovernmental Organization, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Speaker 5: Jason Pielemeier, Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Elonnai Hickok: Global Network Initiative (hickok.elonnai _56369)
Online moderator: Suay Boulougouris: ARTICLE 19 (suay_54871)
Chantal Joris, Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Brigitte Andersen, Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Chantal Joris, Civil Society, Western European and Others Group (WEOG)
Round Table - 90 Min
1. What are the main digital risks and threats to the free flow of information in recent armed conflicts? 2. What obligations do States have during armed conflicts - under international human rights and humanitarian law - to respect the free flow of information and freedom of expression and where can gaps be identified? 3. How do these responsibilities apply to ICT companies? What considerations should guide their decision making during conflicts? Where can gaps be identified?
What will participants gain from attending this session? First, participants will have the opportunity to hear from experts from countries affected by recent international armed conflicts (Ukraine) and non-international armed conflicts (Sudan), as well as a representative from the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). These experts will discuss the contemporary threats to freedom of expression during conflicts. Participants will be encouraged to share their perspectives on the key threats to freedom of expression in these and other conflicts and engage in interactive discussions that aim to determine the extent to which existing rules cover the threats to freedom of expression and where States and companies need to do better. The discussion will feature contributions from experts representing various sectors, including the private sector, freedom of expression advocates, and humanitarian actors.
Description:
Protecting freedom of expression and access to information are crucial during armed conflicts. Civilians need unhindered access to information to receive potentially life-saving information on the security situation, to access safe passage or humanitarian assistance, and to contact their loved ones. Freedom of expression also allows journalists to disseminate accurate information about the conflict to the public and report on crimes committed by the warring parties - key to counter a culture of impunity. While internet shutdowns, censorship requests and and disinformation campaigns - amplified by digitalisation - have taken on an increasingly central role in both international and non-international armed conflicts, there is still a lack of understanding as to what legal standards under international humanitarian law and international human rights law apply to these and related issues. The role of businesses, such as internet service providers or social media companies, and the extent of their responsibilities during armed conflicts, is also underexplored. The panel discussion will address the following topics: (i) threats to freedom of expression and the free flow of information during armed conflicts, (ii) the extent to which protective principles and recommendations can be derived from international humanitarian law and international human rights law, and (iii) identifying gaps requiring further guidance and elaboration.
The session aims to identifying existing priorities in better understanding threats to freedom of expression and access to information in conflicts and which protections under international human rights law and international humanitarian law that should guide actions by States and ICT companies, while also highlighting potential gaps. These insights will inform ARTICLE 19's upcoming report, providing policy recommendations on freedom of expression in armed conflicts and shaping ARTICLE 19’s future work in this area. Additionally, the session and subsequent efforts by ARTICLE 19, the ICRC, and other stakeholders in the field of freedom of expression, digital rights, and armed conflicts might eventually contribute to the development of a set of principles on freedom of expression in armed conflicts.
Hybrid Format: During the session, the on-site moderator will closely collaborate with the online moderator to gather input from online participants via the chat function and facilitate oral contributions. The session will be divided into two parts. In the first part, on-site and online participants will engage in an interactive discussion, featuring case studies of international and non-international armed conflicts. These case studies will highlight the primary threats to freedom of expression during conflicts and their impact on civilians. The second part will identify the key rules that apply to States and ICT companies in conflict situations, while also pinpointing any existing gaps that need developing.
Report
International law, and in particular international humanitarian law, does need to be clarified as it does not always provide detailed answers on how to deal with the new trends in how armed conflicts are fought. For example, digital companies would benefit from greater guidance what it means for them to respect international humanitarian law.
There is a need for a multi-stakeholder approach, including international organisations, humanitarian actors, digital companies, and human rights organisations, to fill these gaps and issue guidance on how these challenges can be addressed.